| Literature DB >> 34609725 |
Rudi W Hendriks1, Odilia B J Corneth2, Stefan F H Neys3, Jasper Rip3,4.
Abstract
Systemic autoimmune disorders are complex heterogeneous chronic diseases involving many different immune cells. A significant proportion of patients respond poorly to therapy. In addition, the high burden of adverse effects caused by "classical" anti-rheumatic or immune modulatory drugs provides a need to develop more specific therapies that are better tolerated. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a crucial signaling protein that directly links B-cell receptor (BCR) signals to B-cell activation, proliferation, and survival. BTK is not only expressed in B cells but also in myeloid cells, and is involved in many different signaling pathways that drive autoimmunity. This makes BTK an interesting therapeutic target in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. The past decade has seen the emergence of first-line BTK small-molecule inhibitors with great efficacy in the treatment of B-cell malignancies, but with unfavorable safety profiles for use in autoimmunity due to off-target effects. The development of second-generation BTK inhibitors with superior BTK specificity has facilitated the investigation of their efficacy in clinical trials with autoimmune patients. In this review, we discuss the role of BTK in key signaling pathways involved in autoimmunity and provide an overview of the different inhibitors that are currently being investigated in clinical trials of systemic autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, as well as available results from completed trials.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34609725 PMCID: PMC8491186 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-021-01592-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drugs ISSN: 0012-6667 Impact factor: 9.546
Fig. 1Role of BTK in B-cell signaling. Overview of BCR signaling and other important signaling modules for B cells. Upon BCR engagement, LYN will activate and phosphorylate Ig-α and Ig-β, subsequently activating SYK. Together with CD19-mediated activation of PI3K, this leads to the activation of SLP65, BTK, and PLCγ2. This in turn activates downstream signaling pathways crucial for proliferation and survival, including engagement of ERK, NF-κB, and downstream mediators of AKT like S6, and anti-apoptotic proteins like BCL-2. Signaling downstream of TLRs and BAFFR also involves BTK phosphorylation, leading to activation of these same proliferation and survival factors. Other receptor signaling pathways like chemokine receptor signaling also contribute to migration, proliferation, and survival of B cells. BTK Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, BCR B-cell receptor, Ig immunoglobulin, PTPN22 protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22, SYK spleen tyrosine kinase, PI3K phosphoinositide 3-kinase, SLP65 Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte adaptor protein of 65 kDa, CIN85 Cbl-interacting protein of 85 kDa, PLCγ2 phospholipase Cγ2, DAG diacylglycerol, IP inositol triphosphate, PKC-β protein kinase C β, TRAF3 TNF receptor-associated factor 3, NIK NF-κB-inducing kinase, IKKα inhibitor of NF-κB kinase, MyD88 myeloid differentiation factor 88, MAL MyD88 adaptor-like, IRAK2 interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 2, ERK extracellular signal-related kinase, NFAT nuclear factor of activated T cells, BCAP B-cell adaptor for PI3K, PTEN phosphatase and tensin homolog, SHIP1 SH-2 containing inositol 5' polyphosphatase 1, BCL-2 B-cell lymphoma-2
Fig. 2The four main pathogenic roles of B cells in the context of systemic autoimmune disease. (I) Initiation or enhancement of autoimmune responses by presenting auto-antigens to T cells and concomitantly providing co-stimulatory signals. (II) B cells can differentiate into autoantibody-producing plasma cells. (III) B cells can produce pro-inflammatory cytokines. (IV) B cells are involved in stimulating the development and maintenance of these tertiary lymphoid structures
Characteristics of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors first to be developed and in autoimmune disease clinical trials
| Inhibitor (other names) | Interaction type | Interaction site | Other targets | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ibrutinib (Imbruvica/PCI-32765) | Irreversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 = 0.5 nM | BMX IC50 = 0.8 nM | [ |
| EGFR IC50 = 5.6 nM | ||||
| ITK IC50 = 11 nM | ||||
| TEC IC50 = 78 nM | ||||
| LYN IC50 = 200 nM | ||||
| Acalabrutinib (Calquence/ACP-196) | Irreversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 = 3 nM | ERBB4 IC50 = 16 nM | [ |
| BMX IC50 = 46 nM | ||||
| TEC IC50 = 126 nM | ||||
| TXK IC50 = 368 nM | ||||
| BMS-986142 | Reversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 < 0.5 nM | TEC IC50 = 10 nM | [ |
| ITK IC50 = 15 nM | ||||
| BLK IC50 = 23 nM | ||||
| TXK IC50 = 28 nM | ||||
| BMX IC50 = 32 nM | ||||
| Branebrutinib (BMS-986195) | Irreversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 = 0.1 nM | TEC IC50 = 0.9 nM | [ |
| BMX IC50 = 1.5 nM | ||||
| TXK IC50 = 5.0 nM | ||||
| ITK IC50 = 100 nM | ||||
| Elsubrutinib (ABBV-105) | Irreversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 = 180 nM | BLK IC50 = 5940 nM | [ |
| JAK-3 IC50 = 8640 nM | ||||
| TXK IC50 = 9180 nM | ||||
| EGFR IC50 = 14400 nM | ||||
| Evobrutinib (M2951) | Irreversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 = 9 nM | BMX IC50 = 20 nM | [ |
| TEC IC50 = 7300 nM | ||||
| Fenebrutinib (G DC-0853/RG7845) | Reversible, non-covalent | K430, M477, and D539 IC50 = 2.3 nM | SRC IC50 = 302 nM | [ |
| BMX IC50 = 351 nM | ||||
| FGR IC50 = 387 nM | ||||
| Orelabrutinib (ICP-022) | Irreversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 = 1.6 nM | * | [ |
| Poseltinib (HM71224/LY-3337641) | Irreversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 = 1.95 nM | BMX IC50 = 0.64 nM | [ |
| TEC IC50 = 4.57 nM | ||||
| TXK IC50 = 4.62 nM | ||||
| EGFR IC50 = 4.96 nM | ||||
| BLK IC50 = 13.5 nM | ||||
| Remibrutinib (LOU064) | Irreversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 = 1.3 nM | * | [ |
| Rilzabrutinib (PRN1008) | Reversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 = 1.3 nM | TEC IC50 = 0.8 nM | [ |
| BMX IC50 = 1.0 nM | ||||
| RLK IC50 = 1.2 nM | ||||
| BLK IC50 = 6.3 nM | ||||
| Spebrutinib (CC-292/AVL292) | Irreversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 < 0.5 nM | BMX IC50 = 0.7 nM | [ |
| TEC IC50 = 6.2 nM | ||||
| TXK IC50 = 8.9 nM | ||||
| ITK IC50 = 36 nM | ||||
| TAS5315 | Covalent* | Cys481 IC50 < 0.15 nM | * | [ |
| Tirabrutinib (ONO/GS-4059) | Irreversible, covalent | Cys481 IC50 = 2 nM | BMX IC50 = 6 nM | [ |
| TEC IC50 = 48 nM | ||||
| TXK IC50 = 92 nM | ||||
| BLK IC50 = 300 nM |
BLK B lymphocyte kinase, BMX bone-marrow expressed kinase, Cys481 cysteine 481, EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, ERBB4 Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4, FGR Gardner-Rasheed feline sarcoma viral (v-fgr) oncogene homolog, IC half maximal inhibitory concentration, ITK interleukin-2 inducible T-cell kinase, JAK-3 Janus kinase-3, LYN Lck/yes novel tyrosine kinase, RLK resting lymphocyte kinase, SRC proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src, TEC tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma, TXK TXK tyrosine kinase
*No data available
Preclinical data for Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors evaluated in clinical trials for autoimmune disorders
| Animal models | Human in vitro studies | References |
|---|---|---|
| – | B cells: Inhibition of B-cell activation (CD69 expression) | [ |
CAIA: Treatment from the start, dose-dependent reduction of clinical scores CIA (mice): Treatment prior to disease onset, dose-dependent reduction of disease severity; treatment start at time of boost (day 21), dose-dependent reduction of disease severity and joint destruction. Enhances efficacy of standard-of-care agents | GPA: Reduced cytokine expression, but not memory cell/ plasma cell formation and antibody production in B cells from active patients. In B cells from patients in remission, these effector functions were inhibited by BMS-986142 | [ |
CIA (mice): Treatment at immunization, dose-dependent reduction of clinical scores, reduced joint destruction, almost complete protection at highest dose NZB/W: Reduced mortality, dose-dependent reduction of proteinuria, anti-dsDNA, reduced glomerulonephritis (comparable to prednisolone) | Healthy B cells/PBMC: Inhibits BCR-mediated proliferation and activation of B cells, FcR-mediated TNFα production by PBMC | [ |
NP-immunizations: NP-LPS: no significant effect on antibody development; NP-Ficoll: reduced IgM and IgG3; NP-KLH: reduced IgM after boost, high dose reduced IgG1 Vaccine response (pneumococcal, Prevnar): no significant effect on antibody levels CIA (rats): Treatment at onset disease, dose-dependent reduction in clinical score, bone loss IFN-α-accelerated NZB/W F1: Treatment prior to onset proteinuria, dose-dependent reduction in mortality, proteinuria, and anti-dsDNA (only high doses) | Healthy B cells/PBMC/eosinophils: Inhibits BCR-mediated B-cell activation, IgE-mediated histamine release by eosinophils and FcR- and TLR-mediated cytokine production by PBMC | [ |
CIA (mice): Treatment before onset of disease, dose-dependent reduction of incidence and severity of arthritis, and histopathological scores of joint inflammation/destruction CIA (rats): treatment at onset of disease, dose-dependent reduction of clinical and histopathological score IFN-α-accelerated NZB/W F1: Dose-dependent reduction of proteinuria and kidney damage, reduced plasma cell numbers and B- and T-cell activation EAE: Before onset: Dose-dependent reduction of disease severity, cytokine expression, reduced B- and T-cell infiltration in CNS, reduced Ag-dependent B-cell differentiation, antigen presentation | Healthy B cells: Inhibition of BCR-induced B-cell activation (comparable to MS B cells), inhibition of BCR- and TLR9-induced cytokine production MS B cells: BTK protein levels increased in memory CD27+ B cells, no differences in BTK phosphorylation with healthy B cells. | [ |
| CIA (rats): Treatment started after onset of arthritis, dose-dependent reduction of ankle thickness, inflammation in the joints and joint destruction | Healthy B cells: Inhibits anti-IgM-induced BCR signaling, anti-IgM- and CD40L-induced proliferation Healthy CD14+ monocytes: prevents FcR-mediated TNFα production | [ |
CIA (rats): Dose-dependent reduction in disease score, proinflammatory cytokine production, and histopathological score MRL/lpr: Increased survival of treated mice, reduction in anti-dsDNA antibodies and IFNα levels in serum, urine protein levels | * | ¥ |
CIA (mice): Treatment started 10 days after boost, reduced weight loss and severity of arthritis, reduced IL-6 and IgG serum levels and reduced bone erosion/bone loss MRL/ NZB/W F1: Treatment started at 18 weeks of age, reduced GC B-cell/plasma cell formation, improved renal function, increased survival at higher doses | Healthy B-cells: Inhibits signaling and activation Healthy CD14+ Monocytes: dose-dependent inhibition of cytokine production upon FcR and TLR stimulation. Induction of osteoclast formation inhibited. | [ |
SRBC Immunization (rats): treatment at time of immunization, dose-dependent reduction in Ag-specific IgM antibodies CIA (rats): Treatment after onset of disease, reduction of clinical score and joint inflammation and destruction | Blood B cells: Reduced BCR-mediated CD69 expression Blood basophils: Reduced FcεR-mediated CD63 expression Human monocyte cell line: Reduced FcγR-mediated IL-8 production | [ |
Passive arthus reaction (rats): Dose-dependent reduction of intradermal dye extravasation Anti-GBM nephritis: Dose-dependent reduction of kidney inflammation and improvement of kidney function Anti-CD41-mediated ITP: Pretreatment dose dependently reduced platelet loss CIA (rats): Treatment at disease onset, dose-dependent reduction of clinical and histopathological scores; treatment after disease onset, reversal of disease Canine pemphigus: Immediate and rapid clinical improvement | B cells: Reduced BCR-mediated activation and proliferation, reduced CD40/IL-21R- or TLR9-mediated antibody production Monocytes: Reduced FcγR-mediated TNFα production Basophils/mast cells: Reduced FcεR-mediated degranulation and CD63 expression | [ |
| CIA (mice): Treatment started after onset of arthritis, dose-dependent reduction of disease severity, weight loss, and inflammatory cytokines in serum, reduced inflammation and bone destruction in joints | B cells: Reduced BCR/TLR-mediated activation, proliferation, cytokine production, plasma cell differentiation, and antibody production Macrophages: Reduced FcγR-mediated TNFα production Monocyte-derived DC: Reduced TLR9 mediated CD86 expression Basophils: Reduced FcεR-induced degranulation Osteoclast: Reduced osteoclastogenesis | [ |
CIA (mice): Treatment started after onset, dose-dependent reduction in arthritis scores, inflammation, pannus formation, cartilage and bone damage, induction of bone repair MRL/lpr: Reduced glomerulonephritis, serum BUN, and anti-dsDNA antibody levels | Monocytes: Dose-dependent reduction of TNFα and IL-6 production Osteoclasts: Reduced osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption | [ |
CIA (mice): Start treatment at time of boost, dose-dependent reduction in disease score and joint damage, reduction of MIP-1α, IL-1β, KC, IL-6, RANKL, and MMP-3 production in joints of arthritic mice NZW/B F1: Start treatment at 12 weeks (before onset), reduced proteinuria, reduced GC B cells and plasma cells, reduced anti-dsDNA antibodies in serum | Monocytes: Reduced FcγR- and TLR9-mediated TNFα and IL-6 production Osteoclast (precursors): Reduced M-CSF- and RANK-L-mediated osteoclast differentiation, reduced MIP-1α and RANTES production in bone marrow cultures | [ |
anti-dsDNA anti-double strand DNA, anti-GBM anti-glomerular basal membrane, BCR B-cell receptor, BUN blood urea nitrogen, CAIA collagen antibody-induced arthritis, CIA collagen-induced arthritis, CNS central nervous system, EAE experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, FcR Fc receptor, GC germinal center, GPA granulomatosis with polyangiitis, IFNα interferon α, ITP immune thrombocytopenia, KC keratinocyte-derived chemokine, M-CSF macrophage-colony-stimulating factor, MIP-1α macrophage inflammatory protein α, MRL/lpr Murphy Roths Large lymphoproliferative, MS multiple sclerosis, NP-KLH 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl-keyhole limpet, NP-LPS 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl-lipopolysacharide, PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cell, RANKL receptor-activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand, RANTES Regulated upon Activation Normal T Cell Expressed and Presumably Secreted, SRBC sheep red blood cell, TLR toll-like receptor, TNFα tumor necrosis factor α, NZB/W New Zealand black × New Zealand white
*No data available
¥Unpublished data from company presentation (https://www.innocarepharma.com/media/1419/innocare-pharma-investor-presentation-2019.pdf)
Ongoing and completed clinical trials (phase II or III) with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in systemic autoimmune diseases
| Trial no. and type | Disease | Treatment arms | Treatment duration | Primary outcome | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCT02387762 phase IIa, R, DB, PC | Active RA background MTX | • Placebo daily + stable MTX (7.5–25 mg) weekly | 4 weeks | DAS28-CRP at 4 weeks | No results reported |
| • ACA 15mg daily + stable MTX (7.5–25 mg) weekly | |||||
NCT02638948 phase II, R, DB, PC | Active RA with inadequate response to MTX | • Placebo daily + MTX | 12 weeks | % ACR20/ACR70 response at 12 weeks | No significant difference in % ACR20 or ACR70 response at 12 weeks in both treatment arms compared to placebo# |
| • BMS 100 mg daily + MTX | |||||
| • BMS 200 mg daily + MTX | |||||
NCT02843659 phase II, R, DB, PC | Moderate to severe primary SjS | • Placebo daily | 12 weeks | Mean change ESSDAI from baseline at 12 weeks | Terminated due to inability to meet protocol objectives |
| • BMS 350 mg daily | |||||
NCT04186871 phase II, R, DB, PC | Active SLE, primary SjS or RA | SLE/SjS: | * | SLE: % ≥ 50% reduction mCLASI from baseline at 24 weeks SjS: % changes in composite score from baseline at 24 weeks RA: % ACR50 response at 12 weeks | Currently recruiting |
| • Placebo daily¥ | |||||
| • BRA daily | |||||
| RA: | |||||
| • Placebo daily, followed by abatacept | |||||
| • BRA daily followed by abatacept | |||||
NCT03682705 phase II, R, DB, PC | Active RA with inadequate response/ intolerance to DMARD | • Placebo + placebo daily | 12 weeks | Change in DAS28-CRP from baseline At 12 weeks | Significant effect of combined ELS + UPA treatment compared to placebo, but no difference compared to UPA monotherapy# |
| • ELS 60mg + upadacitinib 15 mg daily | |||||
| • ELS 60 mg + placebo daily | |||||
| • ELS 20 mg + placebo daily | |||||
| • ELS 5 mg + placebo daily | |||||
| • Placebo + 15 mg upadacitinib daily | |||||
NCT03978520 phase II, R, DB, PC | Moderate to severely active SLE | • Placebo + placebo daily¥ | * | Achievement of SRI-4 and steroid dose ≥ 10 mg prednisone equivalent at 24 weeks | Currently recruiting |
| • ELS + upadacitinib daily | |||||
| • ELS + placebo daily | |||||
| • Placebo + upadacitinib daily | |||||
NCT04451772 LTE of | Moderate to severely active SLE | • Placebo + placebo daily¥ | Up to 56 weeks | Number of participants with adverse events through week 104 | Currently recruiting |
| • ELS + upadacitinib A daily | |||||
| • ELS + upadacitinib B daily | |||||
| • ELS + placebo daily | |||||
NCT02784106 phase IIa, R, DB, PC | RA with stable MTX treatment | • Placebo daily + MTX | 12 weeks (extension through 26 weeks) | % ACR20 response at 12 weeks | No significant difference in ACR20 % between placebo and treatment# |
| • EVO 2 × 50 mg daily + MTX | |||||
| Extension period from 12–26 weeks both arms with EVO 2 × 50 mg daily | |||||
NCT03233230 phase IIb, R, DB, PC | RA with inadequate response to MTX | • Placebo daily | 12 weeks | % ACR20 response using hsCRP at 12 weeks | No significant difference in ACR20 % between placebo and treatment arms# |
| • EVO 25 mg daily | |||||
| • EVO 75 mg daily | |||||
| • EVO 2 × 50 mg | |||||
NCT02975336 phase II, R, DB, PC | Active SLE | • Placebo daily | 52 weeks (extension through 104 weeks) | SRI-4 response at 52 weeks | No significant difference in SRI-4 response between placebo and treatment arms# |
| • EVO 25 mg | |||||
| • EVO 75 mg daily | |||||
| • EVO 2 × 50 mg daily | |||||
| Extension period from 52–104 weeks both arms with EVO 2 × 50 mg daily | |||||
NCT02833350 phase II, R, DB, PC | Active RA with inadequate response to MTX (cohort 1) or TNF inhibition (cohort 2) | Cohort 1: | 12 weeks | % ACR50 response at 12 weeks | Cohort 1: ACR50 response rate was significantly higher in 150 mg (28%), 2 × 200 mg (35%) and ADA (36%)-treated patients compared to placebo (15%). [ Cohort 2: ACR50 response rate was increased in 2 × 200 mg treated patients (25%) compared to placebo (15%), although not significantly ( |
| • Placebo daily | |||||
| • FEN 50 mg daily | |||||
| • FEN 150 mg daily | |||||
| • FEN 2 × 200 mg daily | |||||
| • Adalimumab 40 mg/2 weeks all arms + MTX and folic acid | |||||
| Cohort 2: | |||||
| • Placebo daily | |||||
| • FEN 2 × 200 mg daily | |||||
| Both arms: + MTX and folic acid | |||||
NCT02983227 LTE of | RA with inadequate response to MTX (cohort 1) or TNF inhibitors (cohort 2) | • 2 × 200 mg FEN daily | 52 weeks | % adverse events by week 60 % ACR50 response at 52 weeks | Cohort 1: 60.2% reported AE, 57.1% ACR50 response# Cohort 2: 57% reported AE, 50% ACR50 response |
NCT02908100 phase II, R, DB, PC | Moderate to severe SLE | • Placebo daily | 48 weeks | SRI-4 response at week 48 | No significant difference in SRI-4 response between placebo and treatment arms# |
| • FEN 150 mg daily | |||||
| • FEN 2 × 200 mg daily | |||||
| All arms + standard care | |||||
NCT03407482 LTE of | SLE | • FEN 2 × 200 mg daily | * | % adverse events by week 8 | Terminated due to lack of efficacy in parent study |
NCT02628028 phase II, R, DB, PC | RA with mildly active (part A) or moderately to severely (part B) disease | Part A: | Part A: 4 weeks Part B: 12 weeks + 52 weeks extension | Part A: Number of treatment emergent/serious adverse events or adverse event of special interest Part B: % patients with ACR20 response at 12 weeks | Part A: No safety signals precluded start of part B. [ Part B: Interim analysis indicated no statistical difference in ACR20 rate, trial was discontinued [ |
| • Placebo daily | |||||
| • POS 5 mg daily | |||||
| • POS 10 mg daily | |||||
| • POS 30 mg daily | |||||
| Part B: | |||||
| • Placebo daily | |||||
| • POS 5 mg daily | |||||
| • POS 10 mg daily | |||||
| • POS 30 mg daily | |||||
NCT04305197 phase Ib/IIa, R, DB, PC | Mild to moderate SLE | • Placebo daily | 12 weeks | % patients with (serious) adverse events | Currently recruiting |
| • ORE 50 mg daily | |||||
| • ORE 80 mg daily | |||||
| • ORE 100 mg daily | |||||
NCT04035668 phase II, R, DB, PC | Active primary SjS | • Placebo¥ | * | Changes in ESSDAI from baseline at 24 weeks | Currently recruiting |
| • REM low dose | |||||
| • REM intermediate dose | |||||
| • REM high dose | |||||
| • REM high dose 2 | |||||
NCT02704429 phase II, open label | Newly diagnosed or relapsed pemphigus vulgaris with moderate-severe disease | Part A: | Part A: 12 weeks + 12 weeks follow-up Part B: 24 weeks + 4 weeks follow-up | Part A: Incidence of adverse events at 4 weeks; % control of disease activity (CDA) at week 4 | Part A: 74% treatment emergence adverse events 52% CDA at 4 weeks [ |
| • RIL 2 × 400–600 mg daily | |||||
| Part B: | |||||
| • 24 weeks RIL + 4 weeks follow-up | |||||
NCT03762265 phase III, R, DB, PC | Newly diagnosed or relapsing moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris or foliaceus | • Placebo + ≤ 5 mg prednisone daily | 68 weeks + 48 weeks extension | % complete remission at week 37 | |
| • RIL + ≤ 5 mg prednisone daily | |||||
NCT01975610 phase IIa, R, DB, PC | RA (female) with stable MTX treatment | • Placebo daily | 4 weeks | % ACR20 response at 4 weeks | 10/24 treated patients reached ACR20 by 4 weeks, compared to 5/23 placebo-treated patients ( |
| • SPE 375 mg daily | |||||
NCT03605251 phase II, R, DB, PC | RA with inadequate response to MTX | • Placebo¥ | 12 or 36 weeks | % ACR20 response at 12 weeks | Completed, no data reported |
| • TAS low dose | |||||
| • TAS high dose | |||||
| All arms + MTX; after 12 weeks, placebo group is randomized into low or high dose | |||||
NCT03100942 phase II, R, DB, PC | Active SjS | • Placebo daily | TIR: 49.4 weeks LAN: 50.4 weeks FIL: 50.3 weeks | % patients fulfilling protocol-specified response at 12 weeks | No significant difference in improvement of clinical symptoms at 12 weeks was found for any treatment arm compared to placebo# |
| • TIR 40 mg daily | |||||
| • Lanraplenib 30 mg daily | |||||
| • Filgotinib 200 mg daily | |||||
| After 24 weeks, placebo group is randomized into other groups through 48 weeks | |||||
NCT02626026 # phase I, R, DB, PC | Healthy individuals (cohort 1) and active RA (cohort 2) | Cohort 1, part A: | Part A: 1 week Part B: 4 weeks | % treatment-emergent adverse events and % treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities at 7 days (part A) or 59 days (part B) | Part A: No apparent differences in adverse events or laboratory abnormalities# Part B: No apparent differences in adverse events, but more laboratory abnormalities in treated patients |
| • Placebo daily | |||||
| • TIR 2 × 10 mg TIR daily | |||||
| Cohort 1, part B: | |||||
| • Placebo daily | |||||
| • TIR 20 mg daily | |||||
| Cohort 2, part B: | |||||
| • Placebo daily | |||||
| • TIR 20 mg daily | |||||
ACA acalabrutinib, ACR20 American College of Rheumatology 20, BMS BMS-986142, BRA branebrutinib, CDA control of disease activity, DAS28-CRP disease activity score 28-C-reactive protein, DB double blind, DMARD disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, ELS elsubrutinib, ESSDAI EULAR Sjögren’s syndrome disease activity index, EVO evobrutinib FEN fenebrutinib, FIL filgotinib, hsCRP high sensitive CRP, LAN lanraplenib, mCLASI modified Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index, MTX methotrexate, ORE orelabrutinib, PC placebo-controlled, POS poseltinib, R randomized, RA rheumatoid arthritis, REM remibrutinib, RIL rilzabrutinib, SjS Sjögren’s syndrome, SLE systemic lupus erythematosus, SPE spebrutinib, SRI-4 SLE responder index-4, TAS TAS5315, TIR tirabrutinib, TNF tumor necrosis factor, UPA upadacitinib
#Unpublished data obtained from clinicaltrials.gov
*Information on treatment duration not available
¥Information on dose not available
| Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a crucial signaling protein that links signals from the B-cell antigen receptor to the activation, proliferation, and survival of B cells. |
| Together with the emergence of very specific small-molecule BTK inhibitors, this makes BTK an interesting therapeutic target in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. |
| Here, we discuss the role of BTK in autoimmunity and the current status of BTK inhibition in clinical trials of systemic autoimmune diseases. |