Literature DB >> 34609725

Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition as an Emerging Therapy in Systemic Autoimmune Disease.

Rudi W Hendriks1, Odilia B J Corneth2, Stefan F H Neys3, Jasper Rip3,4.   

Abstract

Systemic autoimmune disorders are complex heterogeneous chronic diseases involving many different immune cells. A significant proportion of patients respond poorly to therapy. In addition, the high burden of adverse effects caused by "classical" anti-rheumatic or immune modulatory drugs provides a need to develop more specific therapies that are better tolerated. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a crucial signaling protein that directly links B-cell receptor (BCR) signals to B-cell activation, proliferation, and survival. BTK is not only expressed in B cells but also in myeloid cells, and is involved in many different signaling pathways that drive autoimmunity. This makes BTK an interesting therapeutic target in the treatment of autoimmune diseases. The past decade has seen the emergence of first-line BTK small-molecule inhibitors with great efficacy in the treatment of B-cell malignancies, but with unfavorable safety profiles for use in autoimmunity due to off-target effects. The development of second-generation BTK inhibitors with superior BTK specificity has facilitated the investigation of their efficacy in clinical trials with autoimmune patients. In this review, we discuss the role of BTK in key signaling pathways involved in autoimmunity and provide an overview of the different inhibitors that are currently being investigated in clinical trials of systemic autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, as well as available results from completed trials.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34609725      PMCID: PMC8491186          DOI: 10.1007/s40265-021-01592-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


Key Points

Introduction

Autoimmune disorders are driven by a loss of self-tolerance, often involving aberrant selection and activation of autoreactive B cells and subsequent auto-antibody production [1]. Each B cell harbors a unique antigen receptor, the B-cell receptor (BCR), that can recognize a specific antigen, thereby activating the B cell. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a crucial signaling protein that directly links BCR signals to B-cell proliferation and survival [2] (Fig. 1). The gene encoding BTK was discovered as the gene affected in X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) patients [3, 4]. Because of the lack of functional BTK protein, mature B cells and antibodies are almost completely absent in these patients. The importance of BCR signaling in autoimmunity is underlined by studies in animal models showing that single-gene defects and changes in expression of BCR signaling molecules or inhibitory co-receptors can lead to autoimmunity [5, 6]. Furthermore, in human autoimmune diseases, genetic susceptibility loci include genes encoding BCR signaling molecules, for example LYN, BLK, BANK1, PTPN22, and PXK [7-12]. The efficacy of B-cell-depleting therapy in autoimmune patients has prompted the search for more specific B-cell-targeting therapies, leading to the development of small-molecule inhibitors of BCR signaling molecules including BTK.
Fig. 1

Role of BTK in B-cell signaling. Overview of BCR signaling and other important signaling modules for B cells. Upon BCR engagement, LYN will activate and phosphorylate Ig-α and Ig-β, subsequently activating SYK. Together with CD19-mediated activation of PI3K, this leads to the activation of SLP65, BTK, and PLCγ2. This in turn activates downstream signaling pathways crucial for proliferation and survival, including engagement of ERK, NF-κB, and downstream mediators of AKT like S6, and anti-apoptotic proteins like BCL-2. Signaling downstream of TLRs and BAFFR also involves BTK phosphorylation, leading to activation of these same proliferation and survival factors. Other receptor signaling pathways like chemokine receptor signaling also contribute to migration, proliferation, and survival of B cells. BTK Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, BCR B-cell receptor, Ig immunoglobulin, PTPN22 protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22, SYK spleen tyrosine kinase, PI3K phosphoinositide 3-kinase, SLP65 Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte adaptor protein of 65 kDa, CIN85 Cbl-interacting protein of 85 kDa, PLCγ2 phospholipase Cγ2, DAG diacylglycerol, IP inositol triphosphate, PKC-β protein kinase C β, TRAF3 TNF receptor-associated factor 3, NIK NF-κB-inducing kinase, IKKα inhibitor of NF-κB kinase, MyD88 myeloid differentiation factor 88, MAL MyD88 adaptor-like, IRAK2 interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 2, ERK extracellular signal-related kinase, NFAT nuclear factor of activated T cells, BCAP B-cell adaptor for PI3K, PTEN phosphatase and tensin homolog, SHIP1 SH-2 containing inositol 5' polyphosphatase 1, BCL-2 B-cell lymphoma-2

Role of BTK in B-cell signaling. Overview of BCR signaling and other important signaling modules for B cells. Upon BCR engagement, LYN will activate and phosphorylate Ig-α and Ig-β, subsequently activating SYK. Together with CD19-mediated activation of PI3K, this leads to the activation of SLP65, BTK, and PLCγ2. This in turn activates downstream signaling pathways crucial for proliferation and survival, including engagement of ERK, NF-κB, and downstream mediators of AKT like S6, and anti-apoptotic proteins like BCL-2. Signaling downstream of TLRs and BAFFR also involves BTK phosphorylation, leading to activation of these same proliferation and survival factors. Other receptor signaling pathways like chemokine receptor signaling also contribute to migration, proliferation, and survival of B cells. BTK Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, BCR B-cell receptor, Ig immunoglobulin, PTPN22 protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22, SYK spleen tyrosine kinase, PI3K phosphoinositide 3-kinase, SLP65 Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte adaptor protein of 65 kDa, CIN85 Cbl-interacting protein of 85 kDa, PLCγ2 phospholipase Cγ2, DAG diacylglycerol, IP inositol triphosphate, PKC-β protein kinase C β, TRAF3 TNF receptor-associated factor 3, NIK NF-κB-inducing kinase, IKKα inhibitor of NF-κB kinase, MyD88 myeloid differentiation factor 88, MAL MyD88 adaptor-like, IRAK2 interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 2, ERK extracellular signal-related kinase, NFAT nuclear factor of activated T cells, BCAP B-cell adaptor for PI3K, PTEN phosphatase and tensin homolog, SHIP1 SH-2 containing inositol 5' polyphosphatase 1, BCL-2 B-cell lymphoma-2 In addition to B cells, BTK is expressed by most hematopoietic cells, including the monocyte/macrophage/dendritic cell lineage, granulocytes, mast cells, platelets, osteoclasts, and erythroid cells [3, 4, 13–20]. Although rarely BTK expression has been reported in mouse T and natural killer (NK) cells [21, 22], it is generally accepted that these cells do not express BTK protein (search BTK at http://rstats.immgen.org/Skyline/skyline.html) [2–4, 20]. BTK also plays a role in many other key immune signaling pathways, including B-cell-activating factor receptor (BAFFR), Toll-like receptor (TLR), chemokine receptor, and Fc receptor (FcR) signaling (Fig. 1) [20]. The first-in-kind inhibitor of BTK kinase activity to reach the clinic was ibrutinib (Imbruvica, PCI-32765), which obtained US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2013 for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients, and subsequently for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients upon successful phase II trials [23, 24]. The efficacy of ibrutinib in CLL may not only be attributed to inhibition of BTK, affecting survival and homing of CLL cells, as changes in the tumor microenvironment through off-target effects, such as reducing T-cell exhaustion and promoting an anti-tumor Th1 phenotype, might contribute to its efficacy [25]. Off-target kinase inhibition may not be beneficial in autoimmunity and may be associated with significant side effects, making ibrutinib less suitable for treatment of chronic autoimmune diseases. These findings prompted the development of more specific BTK inhibitors with a favorable safety profile for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. The first BTK inhibitor reported for the treatment of a chronic inflammatory disorder was evobrutinib (M2951), in a clinical trial with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients [26]. At a dose of 75 mg once daily, this BTK inhibitor significantly reduced the number of enhancing lesions from 12 through 24 weeks of treatment compared to placebo. Efficacy was maintained for 2 years with a reduction in annual relapse rate and increased time until first relapse [27]. A large number of experimental models support the efficacy of BTK inhibition in MS. In experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) mouse models of MS, evobrutinib prophylactically reduced disease severity [28], and evobrutinib treatment in mice with established symptoms resulted in reduced leptomeningeal inflammation [29]. Hereby, the numbers of meningeal B cells were reduced, but myeloid cell infiltrates appeared to persist. BTK is expressed in microglia and astrocytes, and treatment with evobrutinib resulted in a significant reduction in astrocytosis in the cortex surrounding the areas of meningeal inflammation [29]. Likewise, ibrutinib treatment decreased the proliferative response of microglia cells upon injection of anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein monoclonal antibodies in mice [30]. BTK inhibition resulted in improved remyelination in vitro in demyelinated cerebellar slices, as well as in vivo in a transgenic Xenopus laevis model [31]. Furthermore, evobrutinib was shown to inhibit activation of B cells, reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine RNA expression, and limiting expression of proteins involved in antigen presentation [28]. However, T cells were also indirectly affected, and evobrutinib reduced disease severity in a B-cell independent MS mouse model [32]. In addition, GM-CSF-induced M1 macrophage differentiation and cytokine expression were reduced in vitro [33]. Taken together, these findings suggest that the therapeutic efficacy of BTK inhibition in MS patients may partly be due a substantial impact on the myeloid compartment, and thus beyond effects on B-cell activity. The positive results of BTK inhibition obtained in MS patients, together with the promising efficacy in pre-clinical animal models of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [34, 35], make BTK inhibition an interesting therapeutic option in systemic autoimmune disorders. This notion is further supported by various human in vitro studies. In this review, we discuss the role of BTK in key signaling pathways involved in autoimmunity, as well as the various inhibitors that are currently being investigated in clinical trials in patients with systemic autoimmune disease.

Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) in Signaling Pathways

BTK in B-Cell Receptor Signaling

In the context of autoimmune disease, B cells can have various pathogenic characteristics (Fig. 2). Autoreactive B cells can initiate and/or enhance the autoimmune response by presenting auto-antigens on major histocompatibility complex II (MHC-II) molecules, and by providing activating signals through co-stimulatory factors, such as CD80 and CD86, to autoreactive T cells. In turn, B cells can differentiate, in a T-dependent or -independent manner, into plasma cells that produce autoreactive antibodies. B cells can be the source of large quantities of cytokines, including the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6. These support an inflammatory and autoimmune environment by activating surrounding cells and stimulating proliferation and survival. Finally, B cells are involved in stimulating the development and maintenance of tertiary lymphoid structures by producing soluble factors, such as lymphotoxin α1β2 [36, 37]. These structures may contain germinal centers and are often found in the affected organs of autoimmune disease patients.
Fig. 2

The four main pathogenic roles of B cells in the context of systemic autoimmune disease. (I) Initiation or enhancement of autoimmune responses by presenting auto-antigens to T cells and concomitantly providing co-stimulatory signals. (II) B cells can differentiate into autoantibody-producing plasma cells. (III) B cells can produce pro-inflammatory cytokines. (IV) B cells are involved in stimulating the development and maintenance of these tertiary lymphoid structures

The four main pathogenic roles of B cells in the context of systemic autoimmune disease. (I) Initiation or enhancement of autoimmune responses by presenting auto-antigens to T cells and concomitantly providing co-stimulatory signals. (II) B cells can differentiate into autoantibody-producing plasma cells. (III) B cells can produce pro-inflammatory cytokines. (IV) B cells are involved in stimulating the development and maintenance of these tertiary lymphoid structures B cells are generated in the bone marrow, where gene rearrangement of immunoglobulin V, D, and J elements in developing B cells leads to the expression of a unique BCR. Only those B cells expressing a functional BCR survive and subsequently undergo negative selection as they are checked for autoreactivity. This selection mainly takes place during development in the bone marrow and during the transitional stage in the circulation and is dependent on BCR signaling strength [38]. The BCR converts extracellular activation by cognate antigen into intracellular signals, mostly dominated by phosphorylation of protein kinases (Fig. 1). Following antigen binding to the BCR, the recruitment of the Src-family tyrosine protein kinase Lck/yes novel tyrosine kinase (LYN) and phosphorylation of the IgM-associated heterodimers Igα and Igβ are early events in this cascade, leading to the phosphorylation of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) [39]. BTK is then recruited to the cell membrane by phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) through the formation of phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3) [40]. This recruitment enables SYK to phosphorylate BTK at tyrosine Y551 in its kinase domain [41-45]. SYK concomitantly phosphorylates the B-cell linker (BLNK) protein, also known as SLP65, which serves as a scaffolding protein by interacting with various signaling molecules including BTK and PLCγ2 [46]. Upon BCR engagement, multiple SLP65 molecules are recruited to CIN85 trimers, resulting in the assembly of large CIN85-SLP65 macromolecular signaling complexes [47]. As a result, BTK is fully activated and autophosphorylation at Y223 follows, although this event does not appear to be crucial for BTK function in mouse B cells [48]. Active BTK in turn phosphorylates phospholipase Cγ2 (PLCγ2) [49], leading to cytoplasmic calcium influx and the activation of several downstream signaling pathways and transcription factors, important for survival, proliferation, and differentiation, including nuclear factor (NF)-κB [50, 51]. The rapid and stronger response of IgG-expressing memory B cells is thought to be, at least partially, dependent on the presence of the immunoglobulin tail tyrosine (ITT) motif in the cytoplasmic tail of membrane IgG [52]. The ITT motif can be phosphorylated by SYK, resulting in the recruitment of BTK via the adaptor protein Grb2. The dual activation pathway of BTK is thought to result in an amplification of IgG-induced calcium mobilization in memory B cells.

BTK and B-Cell-Activating Factor Receptor (BAFFR) Signaling

Survival and homeostatic proliferation of mature B cells are dependent on tonic BCR signaling and B-cell activating factor (BAFF), which is a cytokine that belongs to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) ligand family [53, 54]. BAFF can bind three receptors: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), transmembrane activator and CAML interactor (TACI), and BAFF receptor (BAFFR). In addition to activating the non-canonical NFκB pathway, the latter transduces survival signals via the canonical NF-κB pathway by co-opting the BCR signaling pathway through SYK and BTK (Fig. 1) [55-57]. Activation of these downstream signaling pathways fuels B-cell survival in a direct and indirect fashion: directly by enhancing the expression of pro-survival factors and dampening the expression of pro-apoptotic factors [58, 59], and indirectly by driving the expression of the receptors for BAFF and their downstream signaling substrates [60-62]. In addition, during B-cell activation BAFF supports class switching and differentiation into plasma cells [63]. Murine studies have shown that a disbalance in either of these signals can cause an altered B-cell selection and can thereby result in an autoimmune phenotype. For example, overexpression of BAFF in mice leads to the development of a Sjögren/SLE-like phenotype [64]. Similarly, B-cell-specific overexpression of BTK leads to a systemic autoimmune phenotype in mice [6]. In human systemic autoimmune disease, increased BAFF levels in serum and enhanced BCR signaling in circulating B cells are also observed [63, 65], possibly allowing the escape of autoreactive B cells from negative selection. Increased levels of BAFF may rescue autoreactive B cells from anergy and promote the formation of a mature follicular dendritic cell network, allowing subsequent affinity maturation and differentiation in germinal centers (GC) [66, 67].

BTK in Other Signaling Pathways

Next to its well described role in BCR signaling, BTK is also involved in signaling downstream of TLRs (Fig. 1), specifically TLR3, 4, 7, 8, and 9 both in B cells and in other hematopoietic cell types [68]. Although evidence exists for the involvement of BTK kinase activity in downstream TLR signaling [69], BTK is mainly thought to function as a linker protein for the recruitment of myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) and MyD88 adaptor-like (MAL) to the receptor [70]. TLR stimulation leads to the activation of interferon-regulatory factors and/or the NF-κB pathway, resulting in expression of co-stimulatory receptors and adhesion molecules, the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and antigen presentation. In B cells, TLR activation leads to B-cell survival by similar mechanisms as previously described for BCR and BAFF signaling [71]. Therefore, TLR signaling can lead to synergistic effects when B cells are simultaneously stimulated by the BCR [72]. BTK is also involved in FcR signaling [73, 74]. The activation of the FcεR promotes histamine release in mast cells and FcγR activation leads to pro-inflammatory cytokine production and enhances antigen presentation by myeloid cells [75]. BTK links RANK (receptor activator of NF-κΒ) activation together with co-stimulation, for example by FcRs, to drive osteoclast differentiation [76]. This can play a pathogenic role in systemic autoimmune diseases such as RA [76, 77]. BTK is involved in downstream signaling of several chemokine receptors, including CXCR4 [78], and in the intracellular signal transduction required for integrin activation and upregulation [79-81]. Therefore, in leukocytes it is important for the attraction towards and infiltration into the site of inflammation. BTK may also play an antibody-independent role in autoimmunity through its interaction with transcription factor Bright/ARID3a, which is implicated in Ig heavy chain transcription [82]. Mice overexpressing Arid3a display autoimmunity, and SLE patients show increased ARID3a expression in B cells, although this did not correlate with autoantibody production [83-85]. In this context, it is of note that both ARID3a and interferon (IFN)α were induced in B cells upon TLR9 stimulation [86]. Taken together, the wide expression and functional profile of BTK implies that modulating BTK activity could be of benefit by restraining these inflammatory and autoimmune processes by targeting multiple pathways in multiple cell types simultaneously.

BTK Structure and Inhibitor Target Sites

BTK is a member of the highly conserved family of cytoplasmic TEC kinases, which also includes tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (TEC), interleukin-2 inducible T-cell kinase (ITK), bone marrow-expressed kinase (BMX), and resting lymphocyte kinase (RLK) [19]. BTK consists of 659 amino acids and contains five domains with two phosphorylation sites. It is transiently recruited to the cell membrane upon BCR activation through the activity of PI3K, which results in the generation of PIP3, which interacts with the N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of BTK. In addition, it contains a Tec homology (TH), a SRC homology 3 (SH3), and an SH2 domain, as well as a C-terminal kinase domain. The proline-rich TH domain is important for optimal activity and stability of the protein, but also has the capacity to bind other kinases including LYN. The SH3 domain contains the Y223 autophosphorylation site and interacts with various signaling molecules via binding to proline-rich regions. The SH2 domain has the capacity to bind to phosphorylated tyrosine residues of signaling molecules, in particular SLP65. Because many human diseases, particularly malignancies, involve dysregulation of one of the 518 identified protein kinases [87], these enzymes have become important drug targets. Nearly all currently FDA-approved small-molecule kinase inhibitors have a competitive mechanism of action. Such reversible inhibitors are classified as type I-V, based on their interaction with the ATP-binding pocket of an active or inactive kinase conformation or binding to a site distinct from the active site [88]. In contrast, many BTK inhibitors, including the prototypic irreversible inhibitor ibrutinib [34, 35], are classified as type VI, and form a covalent bond with Cys-481 within the ATP-binding site of the kinase domain. They generally have a high specificity, because the Cys-481 amino acid residue is poorly conserved among kinases (Table 1). More recently developed inhibitors, such as acalabrutinib, poseltinib, spebrutinib, and tirabrutinib, also interact irreversibly with Cys-481 [89] (Table 1). Although rilzabrutinib (PRN-1008) forms a covalent bond with Cys-481, inhibition is reversible [90].
Table 1

Characteristics of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors first to be developed and in autoimmune disease clinical trials

Inhibitor (other names)Interaction typeInteraction siteOther targetsReferences
Ibrutinib (Imbruvica/PCI-32765)Irreversible, covalentCys481 IC50 = 0.5 nMBMX IC50 = 0.8 nM[35]
EGFR IC50 = 5.6 nM
ITK IC50 = 11 nM
TEC IC50 = 78 nM
LYN IC50 = 200 nM
Acalabrutinib (Calquence/ACP-196)Irreversible, covalentCys481 IC50 = 3 nMERBB4 IC50 = 16 nM[160]
BMX IC50 = 46 nM
TEC IC50 = 126 nM
TXK IC50 = 368 nM
BMS-986142Reversible, covalentCys481 IC50 < 0.5 nMTEC IC50 = 10 nM[105]
ITK IC50 = 15 nM
BLK IC50 = 23 nM
TXK IC50 = 28 nM
BMX IC50 = 32 nM
Branebrutinib (BMS-986195)Irreversible, covalentCys481 IC50 = 0.1 nMTEC IC50 = 0.9 nM[139]
BMX IC50 = 1.5 nM
TXK IC50 = 5.0 nM
ITK IC50 = 100 nM
Elsubrutinib (ABBV-105)Irreversible, covalentCys481 IC50 = 180 nMBLK IC50 = 5940 nM[125]
JAK-3 IC50 = 8640 nM
TXK IC50 = 9180 nM
EGFR IC50 = 14400 nM
Evobrutinib (M2951)Irreversible, covalentCys481 IC50 = 9 nMBMX IC50 = 20 nM[126]
TEC IC50 = 7300 nM
Fenebrutinib (G DC-0853/RG7845)Reversible, non-covalentK430, M477, and D539 IC50 = 2.3 nMSRC IC50 = 302 nM[92]
BMX IC50 = 351 nM
FGR IC50 = 387 nM
Orelabrutinib (ICP-022)Irreversible, covalentCys481 IC50 = 1.6 nM*[161]
Poseltinib (HM71224/LY-3337641)Irreversible, covalentCys481 IC50 = 1.95 nMBMX IC50 = 0.64 nM[103]
TEC IC50 = 4.57 nM
TXK IC50 = 4.62 nM
EGFR IC50 = 4.96 nM
BLK IC50 = 13.5 nM
Remibrutinib (LOU064)Irreversible, covalentCys481 IC50 = 1.3 nM*[95]
Rilzabrutinib (PRN1008)Reversible, covalentCys481 IC50 = 1.3 nMTEC IC50 = 0.8 nM[132]
BMX IC50 = 1.0 nM
RLK IC50 = 1.2 nM
BLK IC50 = 6.3 nM
Spebrutinib (CC-292/AVL292)Irreversible, covalentCys481 IC50 < 0.5 nMBMX IC50 = 0.7 nM[104]
TEC IC50 = 6.2 nM
TXK IC50 = 8.9 nM
ITK IC50 = 36 nM
TAS5315Covalent*Cys481 IC50 < 0.15 nM*[141, 142]
Tirabrutinib (ONO/GS-4059)Irreversible, covalentCys481 IC50 = 2 nMBMX IC50 = 6 nM[162]
TEC IC50 = 48 nM
TXK IC50 = 92 nM
BLK IC50 = 300 nM

BLK B lymphocyte kinase, BMX bone-marrow expressed kinase, Cys481 cysteine 481, EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, ERBB4 Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4, FGR Gardner-Rasheed feline sarcoma viral (v-fgr) oncogene homolog, IC half maximal inhibitory concentration, ITK interleukin-2 inducible T-cell kinase, JAK-3 Janus kinase-3, LYN Lck/yes novel tyrosine kinase, RLK resting lymphocyte kinase, SRC proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src, TEC tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma, TXK TXK tyrosine kinase

*No data available

Characteristics of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors first to be developed and in autoimmune disease clinical trials BLK B lymphocyte kinase, BMX bone-marrow expressed kinase, Cys481 cysteine 481, EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, ERBB4 Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4, FGR Gardner-Rasheed feline sarcoma viral (v-fgr) oncogene homolog, IC half maximal inhibitory concentration, ITK interleukin-2 inducible T-cell kinase, JAK-3 Janus kinase-3, LYN Lck/yes novel tyrosine kinase, RLK resting lymphocyte kinase, SRC proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src, TEC tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma, TXK TXK tyrosine kinase *No data available Other reversible BTK inhibitors, including RN486, CGI1746, and fenebrutinib [75, 91, 92], are classified as type II inhibitors, because they stabilize an inactive non-phosphorylated form of BTK [93]. These inhibitors target the H3 pocket (a network of three hydrogen bonds involving the residues K430, G414, and T474), which is immediately adjacent to the region occupied by ATP. Thereby, these inhibitors sequester the Y551 residue and prevent its phosphorylation [94]. Interestingly, the ability to sequester Y551 was shown to determine the potency for inhibition of FcγR and FcεR signaling, but not of BCR signaling, perhaps providing an added benefit in autoimmune and allergic indications, respectively [94]. Very recently, another BTK inhibitor was developed, remibrutinib (LOU064), which also stabilizes an inactive BTK conformation by selectively targeting the H3 pocket by forming a covalent bond [95]. An obvious important benefit of covalent inhibitors is their ability to reach higher and more sustained BTK occupancy, compared with reversible inhibitors that need to be present in the circulation at high levels to allow for effective inhibition. It has been well documented that many CLL patients treated with ibrutinib develop drug resistance due to a C481S mutation that disrupts the binding of this BTK inhibitor to the cysteine residue [96]. Several BTK inhibitors can effectively counteract ibrutinib-resistant C481S-BTK. These include the type II inhibitors CGI-1746 and fenebrutinib, as well as XMU‐MP‐3, which has a unique binding mode and interacts with the M477, E445, and S538 residues of BTK. Likewise, the irreversible inhibitor ZYBT1 inhibits both wild-type and C481S-BTK but binds to the same site as ibrutinib [75, 92, 97, 98]. Altogether, the current number of BTK inhibitors and the obtained knowledge on their biological activity is overwhelming, given that already by the end of February 2017 almost 1,500 small-molecule inhibitors had been developed, involving over 300 BTK-inhibitor-related patents [89].

Evidence For a Critical Role of BTK in Autoimmunity

Animal Models

Many animal studies have indicated a critical role of BTK in autoimmunity, in both B cells and myeloid cells. Btk-deficient Xid mice are protected against the development of (full blown) autoimmunity in several disease models, including collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) for RA and the NZBxNZW model for SLE [20, 99, 100]. Vice versa, overexpression of BTK specifically in murine B cells is sufficient to induce a spontaneous autoimmune phenotype resembling human SLE and Sjögren’s syndrome (SjS), featuring spontaneous GC and plasma cell formation, autoantibody production and immune infiltration in lungs, kidneys, and salivary glands [6]. This phenotype depends on B–T cell interaction and TLR signaling, and can be ameliorated by in vivo Btk inhibition [6, 101, 102]. In murine CIA, Btk inhibition in vivo reduces disease severity in a dose-dependent fashion, even after onset of arthritis, comparable to standard-of-care therapeutics such as dexamethasone (Table 2) [35, 92, 103, 104]. Furthermore, Btk inhibition enhances the effects of standard-of-care therapeutics when administered together [105]. Inhibitors may target multiple cell types involved in the pathogenesis of disease, including B cells, myeloid cells, and osteoclasts, thereby reducing autoantibody formation, pro-inflammatory cytokine production and bone destruction. Similar to CIA, Btk inhibition also protects against severe progressive disease in a number of murine lupus models, including mice with a mutation in Fas (MRL/lpr) [2]. The efficacy depends on inhibition of both B cells and myeloid cells. Interestingly, lupus nephritis or kidney damage is often reduced, despite persistence of autoantibodies in the serum, particularly anti-RNA antibodies [106].
Table 2

Preclinical data for Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors evaluated in clinical trials for autoimmune disorders

Animal modelsHuman in vitro studiesReferences
Acalabrutinib
B cells: Inhibition of B-cell activation (CD69 expression)[160]
BMS-986142

CAIA: Treatment from the start, dose-dependent reduction of clinical scores

CIA (mice): Treatment prior to disease onset, dose-dependent reduction of disease severity; treatment start at time of boost (day 21), dose-dependent reduction of disease severity and joint destruction. Enhances efficacy of standard-of-care agents

GPA: Reduced cytokine expression, but not memory cell/ plasma cell formation and antibody production in B cells from active patients. In B cells from patients in remission, these effector functions were inhibited by BMS-986142[65, 105]
Branebrutinib

CIA (mice): Treatment at immunization, dose-dependent reduction of clinical scores, reduced joint destruction, almost complete protection at highest dose

NZB/W: Reduced mortality, dose-dependent reduction of proteinuria, anti-dsDNA, reduced glomerulonephritis (comparable to prednisolone)

Healthy B cells/PBMC: Inhibits BCR-mediated proliferation and activation of B cells, FcR-mediated TNFα production by PBMC[139]
Elsubrutinib

NP-immunizations: NP-LPS: no significant effect on antibody development; NP-Ficoll: reduced IgM and IgG3; NP-KLH: reduced IgM after boost, high dose reduced IgG1

Vaccine response (pneumococcal, Prevnar): no significant effect on antibody levels

CIA (rats): Treatment at onset disease, dose-dependent reduction in clinical score, bone loss

IFN-α-accelerated NZB/W F1: Treatment prior to onset proteinuria, dose-dependent reduction in mortality, proteinuria, and anti-dsDNA (only high doses)

Healthy B cells/PBMC/eosinophils: Inhibits BCR-mediated B-cell activation, IgE-mediated histamine release by eosinophils and FcR- and TLR-mediated cytokine production by PBMC[125]
Evobrutinib

CIA (mice): Treatment before onset of disease, dose-dependent reduction of incidence and severity of arthritis, and histopathological scores of joint inflammation/destruction

CIA (rats): treatment at onset of disease, dose-dependent reduction of clinical and histopathological score

IFN-α-accelerated NZB/W F1: Dose-dependent reduction of proteinuria and kidney damage, reduced plasma cell numbers and B- and T-cell activation

EAE: Before onset: Dose-dependent reduction of disease severity, cytokine expression, reduced B- and T-cell infiltration in CNS, reduced Ag-dependent B-cell differentiation, antigen presentation

Healthy B cells: Inhibition of BCR-induced B-cell activation (comparable to MS B cells), inhibition of BCR- and TLR9-induced cytokine production

MS B cells: BTK protein levels increased in memory CD27+ B cells, no differences in BTK phosphorylation with healthy B cells.

[28, 126, 163]
Fenebrutinib
CIA (rats): Treatment started after onset of arthritis, dose-dependent reduction of ankle thickness, inflammation in the joints and joint destruction

Healthy B cells: Inhibits anti-IgM-induced BCR signaling, anti-IgM- and CD40L-induced proliferation

Healthy CD14+ monocytes: prevents FcR-mediated TNFα production

[92]
Orelabrutinib

CIA (rats): Dose-dependent reduction in disease score, proinflammatory cytokine production, and histopathological score

MRL/lpr: Increased survival of treated mice, reduction in anti-dsDNA antibodies and IFNα levels in serum, urine protein levels

*¥
Poseltinib

CIA (mice): Treatment started 10 days after boost, reduced weight loss and severity of arthritis, reduced IL-6 and IgG serum levels and reduced bone erosion/bone loss

MRL/lpr: Treatment started at 8 weeks of age, reduced B-cell activation, reduced anti-DNA IgG, reduced skin lesions, improved renal function

NZB/W F1: Treatment started at 18 weeks of age, reduced GC B-cell/plasma cell formation, improved renal function, increased survival at higher doses

Healthy B-cells: Inhibits signaling and activation

Healthy CD14+ Monocytes: dose-dependent inhibition of cytokine production upon FcR and TLR stimulation. Induction of osteoclast formation inhibited.

[103, 130]
Remibrutinib

SRBC Immunization (rats): treatment at time of immunization, dose-dependent reduction in Ag-specific IgM antibodies

CIA (rats): Treatment after onset of disease, reduction of clinical score and joint inflammation and destruction

Blood B cells: Reduced BCR-mediated CD69 expression

Blood basophils: Reduced FcεR-mediated CD63 expression

Human monocyte cell line: Reduced FcγR-mediated IL-8 production

[95]
Rilzabrutinib

Passive arthus reaction (rats): Dose-dependent reduction of intradermal dye extravasation

Anti-GBM nephritis: Dose-dependent reduction of kidney inflammation and improvement of kidney function

Anti-CD41-mediated ITP: Pretreatment dose dependently reduced platelet loss

CIA (rats): Treatment at disease onset, dose-dependent reduction of clinical and histopathological scores; treatment after disease onset, reversal of disease

Canine pemphigus: Immediate and rapid clinical improvement

B cells: Reduced BCR-mediated activation and proliferation, reduced CD40/IL-21R- or TLR9-mediated antibody production

Monocytes: Reduced FcγR-mediated TNFα production

Basophils/mast cells: Reduced FcεR-mediated degranulation and CD63 expression

[132, 164]
Spebrutinib
CIA (mice): Treatment started after onset of arthritis, dose-dependent reduction of disease severity, weight loss, and inflammatory cytokines in serum, reduced inflammation and bone destruction in joints

B cells: Reduced BCR/TLR-mediated activation, proliferation, cytokine production, plasma cell differentiation, and antibody production

Macrophages: Reduced FcγR-mediated TNFα production

Monocyte-derived DC: Reduced TLR9 mediated CD86 expression

Basophils: Reduced FcεR-induced degranulation

Osteoclast: Reduced osteoclastogenesis

[104, 134]
TAS5315

CIA (mice): Treatment started after onset, dose-dependent reduction in arthritis scores, inflammation, pannus formation, cartilage and bone damage, induction of bone repair

MRL/lpr: Reduced glomerulonephritis, serum BUN, and anti-dsDNA antibody levels

Monocytes: Dose-dependent reduction of TNFα and IL-6 production

Osteoclasts: Reduced osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption

[141, 143, 144]
Tirabrutinib

CIA (mice): Start treatment at time of boost, dose-dependent reduction in disease score and joint damage, reduction of MIP-1α, IL-1β, KC, IL-6, RANKL, and MMP-3 production in joints of arthritic mice

NZW/B F1: Start treatment at 12 weeks (before onset), reduced proteinuria, reduced GC B cells and plasma cells, reduced anti-dsDNA antibodies in serum

Monocytes: Reduced FcγR- and TLR9-mediated TNFα and IL-6 production

Osteoclast (precursors): Reduced M-CSF- and RANK-L-mediated osteoclast differentiation, reduced MIP-1α and RANTES production in bone marrow cultures

[135138]

anti-dsDNA anti-double strand DNA, anti-GBM anti-glomerular basal membrane, BCR B-cell receptor, BUN blood urea nitrogen, CAIA collagen antibody-induced arthritis, CIA collagen-induced arthritis, CNS central nervous system, EAE experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, FcR Fc receptor, GC germinal center, GPA granulomatosis with polyangiitis, IFNα interferon α, ITP immune thrombocytopenia, KC keratinocyte-derived chemokine, M-CSF macrophage-colony-stimulating factor, MIP-1α macrophage inflammatory protein α, MRL/lpr Murphy Roths Large lymphoproliferative, MS multiple sclerosis, NP-KLH 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl-keyhole limpet, NP-LPS 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl-lipopolysacharide, PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cell, RANKL receptor-activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand, RANTES Regulated upon Activation Normal T Cell Expressed and Presumably Secreted, SRBC sheep red blood cell, TLR toll-like receptor, TNFα tumor necrosis factor α, NZB/W New Zealand black × New Zealand white

*No data available

¥Unpublished data from company presentation (https://www.innocarepharma.com/media/1419/innocare-pharma-investor-presentation-2019.pdf)

Preclinical data for Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors evaluated in clinical trials for autoimmune disorders CAIA: Treatment from the start, dose-dependent reduction of clinical scores CIA (mice): Treatment prior to disease onset, dose-dependent reduction of disease severity; treatment start at time of boost (day 21), dose-dependent reduction of disease severity and joint destruction. Enhances efficacy of standard-of-care agents CIA (mice): Treatment at immunization, dose-dependent reduction of clinical scores, reduced joint destruction, almost complete protection at highest dose NZB/W: Reduced mortality, dose-dependent reduction of proteinuria, anti-dsDNA, reduced glomerulonephritis (comparable to prednisolone) NP-immunizations: NP-LPS: no significant effect on antibody development; NP-Ficoll: reduced IgM and IgG3; NP-KLH: reduced IgM after boost, high dose reduced IgG1 Vaccine response (pneumococcal, Prevnar): no significant effect on antibody levels CIA (rats): Treatment at onset disease, dose-dependent reduction in clinical score, bone loss IFN-α-accelerated NZB/W F1: Treatment prior to onset proteinuria, dose-dependent reduction in mortality, proteinuria, and anti-dsDNA (only high doses) CIA (mice): Treatment before onset of disease, dose-dependent reduction of incidence and severity of arthritis, and histopathological scores of joint inflammation/destruction CIA (rats): treatment at onset of disease, dose-dependent reduction of clinical and histopathological score IFN-α-accelerated NZB/W F1: Dose-dependent reduction of proteinuria and kidney damage, reduced plasma cell numbers and B- and T-cell activation EAE: Before onset: Dose-dependent reduction of disease severity, cytokine expression, reduced B- and T-cell infiltration in CNS, reduced Ag-dependent B-cell differentiation, antigen presentation Healthy B cells: Inhibition of BCR-induced B-cell activation (comparable to MS B cells), inhibition of BCR- and TLR9-induced cytokine production MS B cells: BTK protein levels increased in memory CD27+ B cells, no differences in BTK phosphorylation with healthy B cells. Healthy B cells: Inhibits anti-IgM-induced BCR signaling, anti-IgM- and CD40L-induced proliferation Healthy CD14+ monocytes: prevents FcR-mediated TNFα production CIA (rats): Dose-dependent reduction in disease score, proinflammatory cytokine production, and histopathological score MRL/lpr: Increased survival of treated mice, reduction in anti-dsDNA antibodies and IFNα levels in serum, urine protein levels CIA (mice): Treatment started 10 days after boost, reduced weight loss and severity of arthritis, reduced IL-6 and IgG serum levels and reduced bone erosion/bone loss MRL/lpr: Treatment started at 8 weeks of age, reduced B-cell activation, reduced anti-DNA IgG, reduced skin lesions, improved renal function NZB/W F1: Treatment started at 18 weeks of age, reduced GC B-cell/plasma cell formation, improved renal function, increased survival at higher doses Healthy B-cells: Inhibits signaling and activation Healthy CD14+ Monocytes: dose-dependent inhibition of cytokine production upon FcR and TLR stimulation. Induction of osteoclast formation inhibited. SRBC Immunization (rats): treatment at time of immunization, dose-dependent reduction in Ag-specific IgM antibodies CIA (rats): Treatment after onset of disease, reduction of clinical score and joint inflammation and destruction Blood B cells: Reduced BCR-mediated CD69 expression Blood basophils: Reduced FcεR-mediated CD63 expression Human monocyte cell line: Reduced FcγR-mediated IL-8 production Passive arthus reaction (rats): Dose-dependent reduction of intradermal dye extravasation Anti-GBM nephritis: Dose-dependent reduction of kidney inflammation and improvement of kidney function Anti-CD41-mediated ITP: Pretreatment dose dependently reduced platelet loss CIA (rats): Treatment at disease onset, dose-dependent reduction of clinical and histopathological scores; treatment after disease onset, reversal of disease Canine pemphigus: Immediate and rapid clinical improvement B cells: Reduced BCR-mediated activation and proliferation, reduced CD40/IL-21R- or TLR9-mediated antibody production Monocytes: Reduced FcγR-mediated TNFα production Basophils/mast cells: Reduced FcεR-mediated degranulation and CD63 expression B cells: Reduced BCR/TLR-mediated activation, proliferation, cytokine production, plasma cell differentiation, and antibody production Macrophages: Reduced FcγR-mediated TNFα production Monocyte-derived DC: Reduced TLR9 mediated CD86 expression Basophils: Reduced FcεR-induced degranulation Osteoclast: Reduced osteoclastogenesis CIA (mice): Treatment started after onset, dose-dependent reduction in arthritis scores, inflammation, pannus formation, cartilage and bone damage, induction of bone repair MRL/lpr: Reduced glomerulonephritis, serum BUN, and anti-dsDNA antibody levels Monocytes: Dose-dependent reduction of TNFα and IL-6 production Osteoclasts: Reduced osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption CIA (mice): Start treatment at time of boost, dose-dependent reduction in disease score and joint damage, reduction of MIP-1α, IL-1β, KC, IL-6, RANKL, and MMP-3 production in joints of arthritic mice NZW/B F1: Start treatment at 12 weeks (before onset), reduced proteinuria, reduced GC B cells and plasma cells, reduced anti-dsDNA antibodies in serum Monocytes: Reduced FcγR- and TLR9-mediated TNFα and IL-6 production Osteoclast (precursors): Reduced M-CSF- and RANK-L-mediated osteoclast differentiation, reduced MIP-1α and RANTES production in bone marrow cultures anti-dsDNA anti-double strand DNA, anti-GBM anti-glomerular basal membrane, BCR B-cell receptor, BUN blood urea nitrogen, CAIA collagen antibody-induced arthritis, CIA collagen-induced arthritis, CNS central nervous system, EAE experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, FcR Fc receptor, GC germinal center, GPA granulomatosis with polyangiitis, IFNα interferon α, ITP immune thrombocytopenia, KC keratinocyte-derived chemokine, M-CSF macrophage-colony-stimulating factor, MIP-1α macrophage inflammatory protein α, MRL/lpr Murphy Roths Large lymphoproliferative, MS multiple sclerosis, NP-KLH 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl-keyhole limpet, NP-LPS 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl-lipopolysacharide, PBMC peripheral blood mononuclear cell, RANKL receptor-activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand, RANTES Regulated upon Activation Normal T Cell Expressed and Presumably Secreted, SRBC sheep red blood cell, TLR toll-like receptor, TNFα tumor necrosis factor α, NZB/W New Zealand black × New Zealand white *No data available ¥Unpublished data from company presentation (https://www.innocarepharma.com/media/1419/innocare-pharma-investor-presentation-2019.pdf) Other non-autoimmune disease models provide evidence of a role for BTK in cell types and pathogenic mechanisms that may be relevant in autoimmune diseases. For example, Btk is essential in the crosstalk between TLR4 and FcγRIIa signaling leading to activation of alveolar neutrophils in an LPS/immune complex-mediated model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [107]. Furthermore, Btk inhibition inhibited neutrophil extracellular trap release into the lungs upon influenza infection in mice [108]. BTK may also be protective in some diseases. In bone marrow-derived macrophages in mice (and monocytes in humans), Btk deficiency or Btk inhibition leads to increased NLR family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) activation, increasing susceptibility for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [109]. Together these studies emphasize the therapeutic potential of BTK inhibition in autoimmunity and may explain side effects observed in patients treated with BTK inhibitors.

Human Studies

BTK protein and phosphorylated BTK levels are increased in circulating B cells of RA, SjS, and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) patients [65, 110]. This increase was already evident in new emerging B cells, i.e., transitional and naïve B cells, and was associated with active disease. BTK protein and phosphorylation levels correlated with autoantibodies and with numbers of pathogenic T cells in the circulation, as well as with immune infiltrates in the salivary glands of SjS patients [110, 111]. In vitro treatment of macrophages in synovial explants of RA and psoriatic arthritis patients with RN486, a highly selective, reversible inhibitor of BTK, showed that BTK is required for cytokine production in macrophages upon FcR or CD40 stimulation [112]. Enhanced BTK expression, through BTK-encoding adenovirus transduction of macrophages, increased IL-6 production upon CD40 or FcγR stimulation [112]. In a co-culture system of activated platelets with primary human fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS), cytokine production was inhibited by RN486 in a dose-dependent manner [113]. Similarly, pro-inflammatory cytokine production by effector B cells of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients is inhibited by ibrutinib treatment in vitro, as is anti-topoisomerase autoantibody production [114]. In B cells from GPA patients, in vitro BTK inhibition with BMS-986142 also reduced BCR-mediated cytokine production, but appeared to be less effective in B cells from patients with active GPA, compared to B cells from patients in remission and healthy controls [65]. Furthermore, in vitro memory B cell and plasma cell formation and antibody production were inhibited in patients in remission, but not in patients with active GPA. These findings indicate that although BTK inhibition can inhibit effector functions of B cells in autoimmune patients, B cells from patients with active disease may be less susceptible to BTK inhibition. Based on the observation that BTK inhibition protects against fatal lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome mouse models [107, 108], as well as the rather mild course of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in XLA patients and BTK inhibitor-treated leukemia patients [115-119], acalabrutinib was administered in a prospective study in COVID-19 patients. Clinical recovery of COVID-19 was seen and inflammatory markers normalized, indicating that BTK inhibition has the capacity to correct the dysregulated and damaging inflammatory response by macrophages [120]. Although a randomized phase II clinical trial of acalabrutinib in hospitalized patients (NCT04346199, available at clinicaltrials.gov) failed to meet the primary endpoint according to an Astra Zeneca press release on 12 November 2020, other BTK inhibitors, including abivertinib (NCT04528667; NCT04440007) and ibrutinib (NCT04439006), are currently under investigation in clinical trials. Interestingly, very recently, evidence was provided that during severe COVID-19, the SYK inhibitor fostamatinib can counteract the critical pro-inflammatory role of aberrantly glycosylated anti-spike IgG that activates macrophages via FcγRs [121]. Blocking signaling of the FcγRIIa-SYK axis in platelets using fostamatinib may additionally prevent platelet aggregation and vascular complications in COVID-19 patients [122]. These findings may have implications for the treatment of autoimmune disorders, since changes in antibody glycosylation are also observed during active autoimmune disease [123] and BTK inhibition abolishes FcγRIII-induced TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6 production in macrophages in the context of myeloid cell-mediated RA [75].

BTK Inhibitors in Clinical Trials of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases

Although several trials with BTK inhibitors in autoimmune diseases have been completed, few have been published in research articles. When no publications were available, the data in this review were largely obtained from clinicaltrials.gov (search for stated NTC number) or from published abstracts of scientific meetings.

Acalabrutinib

Acalabrutinib, an irreversible, covalent inhibitor of BTK, was the second BTK inhibitor to reach the clinic for B-cell malignancies [124]. This inhibitor has a much higher specificity for BTK than the first-in-kind inhibitor ibrutinib, making it more suitable for autoimmune patients. A clinical trial was conducted with RA patients with stable methotrexate (MTX) treatment, but to date results have not been published (NCT02387762).

BMS-986142

This reversible, covalent BTK inhibitor reduced FcR-mediated cytokine production by healthy human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and BCR-induced cytokine production by healthy human B cells in vitro (Table 2) [105]. As described above, in GPA, BMS-986142 inhibited plasma cell differentiation and antibody production in vitro, although B cells from patients with active disease appeared less susceptible to treatment than B cells from remission patients or healthy individuals. In animal models of RA, this inhibitor has shown promising efficacy by dose dependently reducing joint inflammation and destruction, synergistically with standard-of-care treatment [105]. However, in a clinical trial with active RA patients, no significant improvement of symptoms was observed after 12 weeks of combined treatment with BMS-986142 and MTX compared to placebo and MTX (NCT02638948) (Table 3). A monotherapy study with primary SjS patients was terminated due to inability to reach protocol objectives (NCT02843659).
Table 3

Ongoing and completed clinical trials (phase II or III) with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in systemic autoimmune diseases

Trial no. and typeDiseaseTreatment armsTreatment durationPrimary outcomeResults
Acalabrutinib

NCT02387762

phase IIa, R, DB, PC

Active RA background MTX• Placebo daily + stable MTX (7.5–25 mg) weekly4 weeksDAS28-CRP at 4 weeksNo results reported
• ACA 15mg daily + stable MTX (7.5–25 mg) weekly
BMS-986142

NCT02638948

phase II, R, DB, PC

Active RA with inadequate response to MTX• Placebo daily + MTX12 weeks% ACR20/ACR70 response at 12 weeksNo significant difference in % ACR20 or ACR70 response at 12 weeks in both treatment arms compared to placebo#
• BMS 100 mg daily + MTX
• BMS 200 mg daily + MTX

NCT02843659

phase II, R, DB, PC

Moderate to severe primary SjS• Placebo daily12 weeksMean change ESSDAI from baseline at 12 weeksTerminated due to inability to meet protocol objectives
• BMS 350 mg daily
Branebrutinib

NCT04186871

phase II, R, DB, PC

Active SLE, primary SjS or RASLE/SjS:*

SLE: % ≥ 50% reduction mCLASI from baseline at 24 weeks

SjS: % changes in composite score from baseline at 24 weeks

RA: % ACR50 response

at 12 weeks

Currently recruiting
• Placebo daily¥
• BRA daily
RA:
• Placebo daily, followed by abatacept
• BRA daily followed by abatacept
Elsubrutinib

NCT03682705

phase II, R, DB, PC

Active RA with inadequate response/ intolerance to DMARD• Placebo + placebo daily12 weeks

Change in DAS28-CRP from baseline

At 12 weeks

Significant effect of combined ELS + UPA treatment compared to placebo, but no difference compared to UPA monotherapy#
• ELS 60mg + upadacitinib 15 mg daily
• ELS 60 mg + placebo daily
• ELS 20 mg + placebo daily
• ELS 5 mg + placebo daily
• Placebo + 15 mg upadacitinib daily

NCT03978520

phase II, R, DB, PC

Moderate to severely active SLE• Placebo + placebo daily¥*Achievement of SRI-4 and steroid dose ≥ 10 mg prednisone equivalent at 24 weeksCurrently recruiting
• ELS + upadacitinib daily
• ELS + placebo daily
• Placebo + upadacitinib daily

NCT04451772

LTE of NCT03978520

Moderate to severely active SLE• Placebo + placebo daily¥Up to 56 weeksNumber of participants with adverse events through week 104Currently recruiting
• ELS + upadacitinib A daily
• ELS + upadacitinib B daily
• ELS + placebo daily
Evobrutinib

NCT02784106

phase IIa, R, DB, PC

RA with stable MTX treatment• Placebo daily + MTX12 weeks (extension through 26 weeks)% ACR20 response at 12 weeksNo significant difference in ACR20 % between placebo and treatment#
• EVO 2 × 50 mg daily + MTX
Extension period from 12–26 weeks both arms with EVO 2 × 50 mg daily

NCT03233230

phase IIb, R, DB, PC

RA with inadequate response to MTX• Placebo daily12 weeks% ACR20 response using hsCRP at 12 weeksNo significant difference in ACR20 % between placebo and treatment arms#
• EVO 25 mg daily
• EVO 75 mg daily
• EVO 2 × 50 mg

NCT02975336

phase II, R, DB, PC

Active SLE• Placebo daily52 weeks (extension through 104 weeks)SRI-4 response at 52 weeksNo significant difference in SRI-4 response between placebo and treatment arms#
• EVO 25 mg
• EVO 75 mg daily
• EVO 2 × 50 mg daily
Extension period from 52–104 weeks both arms with EVO 2 × 50 mg daily
Fenebrutinib

NCT02833350

phase II, R, DB, PC

Active RA with inadequate response to MTX (cohort 1) or TNF inhibition (cohort 2)Cohort 1:12 weeks% ACR50 response at 12 weeks

Cohort 1: ACR50 response rate was significantly higher in 150 mg (28%), 2 × 200 mg (35%) and ADA (36%)-treated patients compared to placebo (15%). [128]

Cohort 2: ACR50 response rate was increased in 2 × 200 mg treated patients (25%) compared to placebo (15%), although not significantly (p = 0.07) [128]

• Placebo daily
• FEN 50 mg daily
• FEN 150 mg daily
• FEN 2 × 200 mg daily
• Adalimumab 40 mg/2 weeks all arms + MTX and folic acid
Cohort 2:
• Placebo daily
• FEN 2 × 200 mg daily
Both arms: + MTX and folic acid

NCT02983227

LTE of NCT02833350

RA with inadequate response to MTX (cohort 1) or TNF inhibitors (cohort 2)• 2 × 200 mg FEN daily52 weeks

% adverse events by week 60

% ACR50 response at 52 weeks

Cohort 1: 60.2% reported AE, 57.1% ACR50 response#

Cohort 2: 57% reported AE, 50% ACR50 response

NCT02908100

phase II, R, DB, PC

Moderate to severe SLE• Placebo daily48 weeksSRI-4 response at week 48No significant difference in SRI-4 response between placebo and treatment arms#
• FEN 150 mg daily
• FEN 2 × 200 mg daily
All arms + standard care

NCT03407482

LTE of NCT02908100

SLE• FEN 2 × 200 mg daily*% adverse events by week 8Terminated due to lack of efficacy in parent study
Poseltinib

NCT02628028

phase II, R, DB, PC

RA with mildly active (part A) or moderately to severely (part B) diseasePart A:

Part A:

4 weeks

Part B:

12 weeks

+ 52 weeks extension

Part A: Number of treatment emergent/serious adverse events or adverse event of special interest

Part B: % patients with ACR20 response at 12 weeks

Part A: No safety signals precluded start of part B. [131]

Part B: Interim analysis indicated no statistical difference in ACR20 rate, trial was discontinued [131]

• Placebo daily
• POS 5 mg daily
• POS 10 mg daily
• POS 30 mg daily
Part B:
• Placebo daily
• POS 5 mg daily
• POS 10 mg daily
• POS 30 mg daily
Orelabrutinib

NCT04305197

phase Ib/IIa, R, DB, PC

Mild to moderate SLE• Placebo daily12 weeks% patients with (serious) adverse eventsCurrently recruiting
• ORE 50 mg daily
• ORE 80 mg daily
• ORE 100 mg daily
Remibrutinib

NCT04035668

phase II, R, DB, PC

Active primary SjS• Placebo¥*Changes in ESSDAI from baseline at 24 weeksCurrently recruiting
• REM low dose
• REM intermediate dose
• REM high dose
• REM high dose 2
Rilzabrutinib

NCT02704429

phase II, open label

Newly diagnosed or relapsed pemphigus vulgaris with moderate-severe diseasePart A:

Part A: 12 weeks + 12 weeks follow-up

Part B: 24 weeks + 4 weeks follow-up

Part A: Incidence of adverse events at 4 weeks; % control of disease activity (CDA) at week 4

Part A: 74% treatment emergence adverse events

52% CDA at 4 weeks [133]

• RIL 2 × 400–600 mg daily
Part B:
• 24 weeks RIL + 4 weeks follow-up

NCT03762265

phase III, R, DB, PC

Newly diagnosed or relapsing moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris or foliaceus• Placebo + ≤ 5 mg prednisone daily68 weeks + 48 weeks extension% complete remission at week 37Active, not recruiting
• RIL + ≤ 5 mg prednisone daily
Spebrutinib

NCT01975610

phase IIa, R, DB, PC

RA (female) with stable MTX treatment• Placebo daily4 weeks% ACR20 response at 4 weeks10/24 treated patients reached ACR20 by 4 weeks, compared to 5/23 placebo-treated patients (p = 0.25) [134]
• SPE 375 mg daily
TAS5315

NCT03605251

phase II, R, DB, PC

RA with inadequate response to MTX• Placebo¥12 or 36 weeks% ACR20 response at 12 weeksCompleted, no data reported
• TAS low dose
• TAS high dose
All arms + MTX; after 12 weeks, placebo group is randomized into low or high dose
Tirabrutinib

NCT03100942

phase II, R, DB, PC

Active SjS• Placebo daily

TIR: 49.4 weeks

LAN: 50.4 weeks

FIL: 50.3 weeks

% patients fulfilling protocol-specified response at 12 weeksNo significant difference in improvement of clinical symptoms at 12 weeks was found for any treatment arm compared to placebo#
• TIR 40 mg daily
• Lanraplenib 30 mg daily
• Filgotinib 200 mg daily
After 24 weeks, placebo group is randomized into other groups through 48 weeks

NCT02626026 #

phase I, R, DB, PC

Healthy individuals (cohort 1) and active RA (cohort 2)Cohort 1, part A:

Part A: 1 week

Part B: 4 weeks

% treatment-emergent adverse events and % treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities at 7 days (part A) or 59 days (part B)

Part A: No apparent differences in adverse events or laboratory abnormalities#

Part B: No apparent differences in adverse events, but more laboratory abnormalities in treated patients

• Placebo daily
• TIR 2 × 10 mg TIR daily
Cohort 1, part B:
• Placebo daily
• TIR 20 mg daily
Cohort 2, part B:
• Placebo daily
• TIR 20 mg daily

ACA acalabrutinib, ACR20 American College of Rheumatology 20, BMS BMS-986142, BRA branebrutinib, CDA control of disease activity, DAS28-CRP disease activity score 28-C-reactive protein, DB double blind, DMARD disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, ELS elsubrutinib, ESSDAI EULAR Sjögren’s syndrome disease activity index, EVO evobrutinib FEN fenebrutinib, FIL filgotinib, hsCRP high sensitive CRP, LAN lanraplenib, mCLASI modified Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index, MTX methotrexate, ORE orelabrutinib, PC placebo-controlled, POS poseltinib, R randomized, RA rheumatoid arthritis, REM remibrutinib, RIL rilzabrutinib, SjS Sjögren’s syndrome, SLE systemic lupus erythematosus, SPE spebrutinib, SRI-4 SLE responder index-4, TAS TAS5315, TIR tirabrutinib, TNF tumor necrosis factor, UPA upadacitinib

#Unpublished data obtained from clinicaltrials.gov

*Information on treatment duration not available

¥Information on dose not available

Ongoing and completed clinical trials (phase II or III) with Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in systemic autoimmune diseases NCT02387762 phase IIa, R, DB, PC NCT02638948 phase II, R, DB, PC NCT02843659 phase II, R, DB, PC NCT04186871 phase II, R, DB, PC SLE: % ≥ 50% reduction mCLASI from baseline at 24 weeks SjS: % changes in composite score from baseline at 24 weeks RA: % ACR50 response at 12 weeks NCT03682705 phase II, R, DB, PC Change in DAS28-CRP from baseline At 12 weeks NCT03978520 phase II, R, DB, PC NCT04451772 LTE of NCT03978520 NCT02784106 phase IIa, R, DB, PC NCT03233230 phase IIb, R, DB, PC NCT02975336 phase II, R, DB, PC NCT02833350 phase II, R, DB, PC Cohort 1: ACR50 response rate was significantly higher in 150 mg (28%), 2 × 200 mg (35%) and ADA (36%)-treated patients compared to placebo (15%). [128] Cohort 2: ACR50 response rate was increased in 2 × 200 mg treated patients (25%) compared to placebo (15%), although not significantly (p = 0.07) [128] NCT02983227 LTE of NCT02833350 % adverse events by week 60 % ACR50 response at 52 weeks Cohort 1: 60.2% reported AE, 57.1% ACR50 response# Cohort 2: 57% reported AE, 50% ACR50 response NCT02908100 phase II, R, DB, PC NCT03407482 LTE of NCT02908100 NCT02628028 phase II, R, DB, PC Part A: 4 weeks Part B: 12 weeks + 52 weeks extension Part A: Number of treatment emergent/serious adverse events or adverse event of special interest Part B: % patients with ACR20 response at 12 weeks Part A: No safety signals precluded start of part B. [131] Part B: Interim analysis indicated no statistical difference in ACR20 rate, trial was discontinued [131] NCT04305197 phase Ib/IIa, R, DB, PC NCT04035668 phase II, R, DB, PC NCT02704429 phase II, open label Part A: 12 weeks + 12 weeks follow-up Part B: 24 weeks + 4 weeks follow-up Part A: 74% treatment emergence adverse events 52% CDA at 4 weeks [133] NCT03762265 phase III, R, DB, PC NCT01975610 phase IIa, R, DB, PC NCT03605251 phase II, R, DB, PC NCT03100942 phase II, R, DB, PC TIR: 49.4 weeks LAN: 50.4 weeks FIL: 50.3 weeks NCT02626026 # phase I, R, DB, PC Part A: 1 week Part B: 4 weeks Part A: No apparent differences in adverse events or laboratory abnormalities# Part B: No apparent differences in adverse events, but more laboratory abnormalities in treated patients ACA acalabrutinib, ACR20 American College of Rheumatology 20, BMS BMS-986142, BRA branebrutinib, CDA control of disease activity, DAS28-CRP disease activity score 28-C-reactive protein, DB double blind, DMARD disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, ELS elsubrutinib, ESSDAI EULAR Sjögren’s syndrome disease activity index, EVO evobrutinib FEN fenebrutinib, FIL filgotinib, hsCRP high sensitive CRP, LAN lanraplenib, mCLASI modified Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index, MTX methotrexate, ORE orelabrutinib, PC placebo-controlled, POS poseltinib, R randomized, RA rheumatoid arthritis, REM remibrutinib, RIL rilzabrutinib, SjS Sjögren’s syndrome, SLE systemic lupus erythematosus, SPE spebrutinib, SRI-4 SLE responder index-4, TAS TAS5315, TIR tirabrutinib, TNF tumor necrosis factor, UPA upadacitinib #Unpublished data obtained from clinicaltrials.gov *Information on treatment duration not available ¥Information on dose not available

Elsubrutinib

In animal models of autoimmunity, this irreversible, non-covalent BTK inhibitor showed dose-dependent improvement in disease severity, organ damage, and mortality [125]. Importantly, antibody formation following model antigen immunization or vaccination was not hampered in mice, suggesting that normal antibody responses can be mounted upon infection [125]. In vitro, elsubrutinib inhibited activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production by B cells and PBMCs. However, in a clinical trial with RA patients, elsubrutinib did not enhance the efficacy of the JAK-1 inhibitor upadacitinib, and appeared to have limited efficacy as monotherapy (NCT03682705). A phase II clinical trial with SLE patients is currently recruiting patients (NCT03978520; long-term extension study NCT04451772).

Evobrutinib

This irreversible covalent BTK inhibitor showed promising results in animal models for RA, SLE, and MS [28, 126]. In addition, it showed clinical efficacy in MS patients, as described above [26]. Nevertheless, evobrutinib did not appear to improve symptoms in RA patients on stable MTX or with inadequate response to MTX and SLE patients (NCT02784106, NCT03233230, and NCT02975336).

Fenebrutinib

Fenebrutinib is a highly specific, reversible, non-covalent inhibitor of BTK. It was effective in CIA in mice and inhibits BCR and CD40L-mediated signaling and activation of B cells [92]. In a cohort of RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX, fenebrutinib increased the proportion of patients with an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response (50% improvement of disease symptoms defined by the ACR [127]) after 12 weeks of treatment with a dose of 150 mg daily compared to placebo, and reached an effectiveness comparable to adalimumab treatment with a high dose of 200 mg twice daily [128]. In addition, at this high dose, it increased the ACR50 response rate in another patient cohort, characterized by an inadequate response to TNFα inhibition, although not significantly. However, ACR20 response and changes in disease activity score 28-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP; a disease activity score including 28 swollen joint counts and CRP levels [129]) at 12 weeks compared to baseline were significant in these patients [128]. All doses were well tolerated, with (serious) adverse events occurring in fenebrutinib-treated patients at similar rates as in adalimumab-treated patients. Fenebrutinib moderately reduced total IgM, IgG, and rheumatoid factor-IgM in the serum of patients in a dose-dependent fashion, and in the second cohort it also reduced serum anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-IgG. Despite the high efficacy in RA patients, a similar study in moderate to severe SLE patients did not improve symptoms (NCT02908100; long-term extension study NCT03407482).

Poseltinib

Poseltinib, an irreversible, non-covalent BTK inhibitor, reduced disease severity in several animal models of autoimmunity after onset of disease [103, 130]. Safety assessment in RA patients with mildly active disease showed favorable results [131]. However, the second part of this trial, with moderately to severely active RA patients, was discontinued when interim analysis showed no significant improvement of symptoms after 12 weeks of treatment with any of the three doses tested [131].

Rilzabrutinib

Rilzabrutinib is a reversible, covalent BTK inhibitor that potently inhibits B-cell activation and proliferation upon BCR stimulation, and antibody production upon CD40/IL-21R or TLR9 stimulation in vitro [132]. In addition, it showed efficacy in a wide range of (auto)immune animal models [132]. Of note, in contrast to first-line BTK inhibitors, rilzabrutinib does not interfere with normal platelet aggregation. An open-label study with pemphigus vulgaris patients yielded promising results, with 52% and 70% of patients showing control of disease activity at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, respectively, which further increased and was maintained after treatment was stopped [133]. A phase III, placebo-controlled trial is currently ongoing (NCT03762265).

Spebrutinib

Spebrutinib can effectively inhibit the activation of several immune cells through various receptors and signaling pathways in vitro and reduces disease severity in CIA in mice [104]. In a clinical trial with female RA patients on stable MTX, naïve B cells increased in the circulation of treated patients, and transitional B cells decreased. In addition, levels of CTX-1, a collagen-degradation product, were decreased, suggesting reduced osteoclastogenesis, as were CXCL13 levels [134]. However, the ACR20 response rate was not significantly increased in treated patients versus placebo-treated controls at 4 weeks.

Tirabrutinib

This irreversible, covalent inhibitor of BTK showed significant effectiveness in the inhibition of human osteoclasts in vitro and in CIA in vivo [135-138]. Nevertheless, in a clinical trial with SjS patients, no clinical improvement was observed (NCT03100942).

BTK Inhibitors in Clinical Trials of Autoimmune Diseases with Results Pending

Branebrutinib is an irreversible, covalent inhibitor of BTK that has shown efficacy in RA and SLE mouse models, reducing clinical signs of disease dose dependently [139]. This inhibitor was well tolerated in a phase I study with healthy individuals [140], and these promising results have led to a clinical trial with active SLE, primary SjS, and RA patients, which is currently recruiting patients (NCT04186871). Orelabrutinib is an irreversible, covalent inhibitor of BTK that was reported to be effective in animal models of RA and SLE, and is currently in a clinical trial with SLE patients (NCT04305197). Remibrutinib is a highly specific, irreversible, non-covalent BTK inhibitor that reduced antigen-specific IgM formation in rats upon sheep red blood-cell immunization and reduced arthritis development and joint destruction in CIA in rats [95]. A clinical trial with primary SjS patients is currently recruiting (NCT04035668). TAS5315 is a covalent inhibitor of BTK that showed high selectivity and promising efficacy in animal models of RA and SLE [141-144]. A clinical trial with RA patients with inadequate response to MTX has been completed, but no data have been reported yet (NCT03605251).

Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives

The last decade has seen the emergence of a large number of small-molecule inhibitors targeting BTK, many of which demonstrated promising efficacy in preclinical studies with autoimmune animal models. However, in contrast to the convincing clinical efficacy of BTK inhibitors in patients with B-cell malignancies, many clinical trials conducted in autoimmune patients to date have reported negative results, indicating that BTK inhibition as monotherapy may not be sufficient in (many of) these patients. However, the observed reduction of enhancing lesions in evobrutinib-treated patients with multiple sclerosis is an important and very promising exception. Differences in the pathogenic mechanisms of disease and cell types involved may underlie the differences in efficacy. For example, it is of note that BTK is expressed in astrocytes and microglia cells and that animal models for MS have demonstrated that BTK inhibition affects the numbers of astrocytes and microglia cells in the brain and supports remyelination [30, 31]. The reasons for a limited efficacy of BTK inhibition in systemic autoimmunity remain largely unknown, but several mechanisms may contribute to this phenomenon. First, BTK inhibitor treatment in humans may be associated with low BTK occupancy. Effects of BTK inhibition in affected organs in humans are mostly studied in vitro, and BTK occupancy is often not measured in vivo, even in preclinical models. For example, in vitro experiments have shown an effect of BTK inhibition on synovial macrophages and the platelet–fibroblast-like synoviocyte interaction in RA [112, 113], but whether these effects also occur in vivo remains unclear. For MS, in vivo data in humans are limited, but in EAE mice high BTK occupancy following evobrutinib treatment was observed in the brain [145]. Limited BTK occupancy might also be supported by the observation that there is no profound loss of circulating B cells even after prolonged inhibitor treatment, in contrast to the severe B-cell deficiency found in patients with XLA [146]. Secondly, it is conceivable that BTK inhibition affects critical immunosuppressive capacities of B cells. For example, BTK inhibition in vitro inhibited the differentiation of B cells with a regulatory function and their production of IL-10 and IL-35, which are essential mediators of immunosuppressive B cells [147]. However, small doses of ibrutinib were shown to preserve IL-10 production, while reducing the profibrotic cytokines TNFα and IL-6 in B cells of patients with SSc [114]. Thirdly, BTK inhibitor efficacy may be related to differential involvement of BTK in other signaling pathways in various immune cells. As mentioned above, BTK inhibition can be particularly effective in specific cells types, for example strongly limiting the activity of astrocytes and microglia cells. BTK is required for TLR-induced IL-10 production in macrophage and DC populations [148, 149]. In this context, it was shown that BTK-deficient DCs or inhibitor-treated DCs gain a more mature phenotype with a stronger T-cell-stimulatory ability than wild-type cells [149, 150]. Furthermore, the absence of BTK in XLA patients is associated with impaired TLR9-induced production of IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α, and IL-10, whereby it is of note that TLR9 is protective in autoimmune diseases such as SLE [151, 152]. Finally, in particular signaling pathways BTK functions as a linker molecule, as was shown for interaction with Myd88 and MAL [70], which would render kinase inhibition ineffective. Efficacy may also be hampered by the induction of rewiring of signaling pathways by BTK inhibition in B cells. In this context, we recently showed that upon BTK inhibition in mice, phosphorylation of several proximal BCR signaling molecules, such as CD79a, Syk, and PI3K, as well as the key Btk-effector PLCγ2 and the more downstream kinase extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk) were significantly increased [153]. Taken together, these findings suggest that the suppressive activity of BTK inhibition in autoreactive B cells might partly be counteracted by inhibitor-induced activation of autoreactive T cells or proinflammatory myeloid cells. On the other hand, it is possible that the high specificity of second-generation BTK inhibitors, while greatly improving their safety profile, is accompanied by a loss of beneficial off-target effects that may well be essential in complex autoimmune diseases. To improve the effectiveness of BTK inhibitors, therapeutic strategies should be explored that combine BTK inhibition with other highly specific inhibitors, thereby retaining the favorable safety profile. Selection or outgrowth of resistant clones is a major problem in clinical management of tumors. As most small-molecule inhibitors have fewer side effects than chemotherapy, treatment with multiple small-molecule inhibitors combined with B-cell-depleting agents is gaining broad interest [154]. Combinations explored in this field may also be of use in autoimmunity. Some strategies aim to target several signaling proteins in order to breach the microenvironmental niche involved in CLL disease. Treatment with the dual SYK/JAK inhibitor cerdulatinib showed induction of apoptosis in CLL cells and reduced capacity to produce CCL3 and CCL4 [155, 156], two chemokines that are induced upon interaction with nurse-like cells, which are supporting tumor-associated macrophages in CLL. It is also attractive to explore combination therapies of BTK inhibitors with histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis), as they have demonstrated potential in autoimmune animal models, and use of isoform selective HDACis may overcome adverse effects [157]. Combination therapy with ibrutinib and HDACis affected the survival of CLL cells in the EμTCL-1 CLL mouse model and induced synergistic cytotoxicity in primary cells from CLL patients [158]. Treatment with CUDC-907, which is a dual inhibitor of both PI3K and HDAC activity, resulted in increased apoptosis of MCL cells [159]. BTK inhibition may also enhance the effect of standard-of-care anti-rheumatic drugs, as shown with BMS-986142 in CIA [105]. However, this synergistic effect was not observed in a trial with combined treatment with the BTK inhibitor elsubrutinib and JAK-1 inhibitor upadacitinib in RA patients (NCT03682705). A similar study in SLE patients is currently ongoing (NCT03978520). Future studies investigating combination strategies with different BTK inhibitors and other specific therapeutics may lead to combination therapies that induce long-term remission of disease and facilitate personalized medicine.
Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a crucial signaling protein that links signals from the B-cell antigen receptor to the activation, proliferation, and survival of B cells.
Together with the emergence of very specific small-molecule BTK inhibitors, this makes BTK an interesting therapeutic target in the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
Here, we discuss the role of BTK in autoimmunity and the current status of BTK inhibition in clinical trials of systemic autoimmune diseases.
  150 in total

Review 1.  The protein kinase complement of the human genome.

Authors:  G Manning; D B Whyte; R Martinez; T Hunter; S Sudarsanam
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The transcription factor Bright plays a role in marginal zone B lymphocyte development and autoantibody production.

Authors:  Athenia L Oldham; Cathrine A Miner; Hong-Cheng Wang; Carol F Webb
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 4.407

3.  Enhanced Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Activity in Peripheral Blood B Lymphocytes From Patients With Autoimmune Disease.

Authors:  Odilia B J Corneth; Gwenny M P Verstappen; Sandra M J Paulissen; Marjolein J W de Bruijn; Jasper Rip; Melanie Lukkes; Jan Piet van Hamburg; Erik Lubberts; Hendrika Bootsma; Frans G M Kroese; Rudi W Hendriks
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 10.995

4.  The Neutrophil Btk Signalosome Regulates Integrin Activation during Sterile Inflammation.

Authors:  Stephanie Volmering; Helena Block; Mark Boras; Clifford A Lowell; Alexander Zarbock
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 31.745

5.  American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D T Felson; J J Anderson; M Boers; C Bombardier; D Furst; C Goldsmith; L M Katz; R Lightfoot; H Paulus; V Strand
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1995-06

6.  Dual inhibition of PI3K signaling and histone deacetylation halts proliferation and induces lethality in mantle cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Hui Guo; Dongfeng Zeng; Hui Zhang; Taylor Bell; Jun Yao; Yang Liu; Shengjian Huang; Carrie J Li; Elizabeth Lorence; Shouhao Zhou; Tiejun Gong; Changying Jiang; Makhdum Ahmed; Yixin Yao; Krystle J Nomie; Liang Zhang; Michael Wang
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Safety and Efficacy of Poseltinib, Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 2-part Phase II Study.

Authors:  Mark C Genovese; Alberto Spindler; Akira Sagawa; Won Park; Anna Dudek; Alan Kivitz; Jeannie Chao; Lai Shan Melanie Chan; Jennifer Witcher; William Barchuk; Ajay Nirula
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  High titers and low fucosylation of early human anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG promote inflammation by alveolar macrophages.

Authors:  Willianne Hoepel; Hung-Jen Chen; Chiara E Geyer; Sona Allahverdiyeva; Xue D Manz; Steven W de Taeye; Jurjan Aman; Lynn Mes; Maurice Steenhuis; Guillermo R Griffith; Peter I Bonta; Philip J M Brouwer; Tom G Caniels; Karlijn van der Straten; Korneliusz Golebski; René E Jonkers; Mads D Larsen; Federica Linty; Jan Nouta; Cindy P A A van Roomen; Frank E H P van Baarle; Cornelis M van Drunen; Gertjan Wolbink; Alexander P J Vlaar; Godelieve J de Bree; Rogier W Sanders; Lisa Willemsen; Annette E Neele; Diederik van de Beek; Theo Rispens; Manfred Wuhrer; Harm Jan Bogaard; Marit J van Gils; Gestur Vidarsson; Menno de Winther; Jeroen den Dunnen
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  The immunoglobulin tail tyrosine motif upgrades memory-type BCRs by incorporating a Grb2-Btk signalling module.

Authors:  Niklas Engels; Lars M König; Wiebke Schulze; Daniel Radtke; Kanika Vanshylla; Johannes Lutz; Thomas H Winkler; Lars Nitschke; Jürgen Wienands
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition Promotes Myelin Repair.

Authors:  Elodie Martin; Marie-Stéphane Aigrot; Roland Grenningloh; Bruno Stankoff; Catherine Lubetzki; Ursula Boschert; Bernard Zalc
Journal:  Brain Plast       Date:  2020-10-01
View more
  6 in total

1.  Decreased BAFF Receptor Expression and Unaltered B Cell Receptor Signaling in Circulating B Cells from Primary Sjögren's Syndrome Patients at Diagnosis.

Authors:  Stefan F H Neys; Gwenny M Verstappen; Hendrika Bootsma; Frans G M Kroese; Rudi W Hendriks; Odilia B J Corneth
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  Bruton's Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Immunological Diseases: Current Status and Perspectives.

Authors:  Ewa Robak; Tadeusz Robak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Lymphocyte Counts and Multiple Sclerosis Therapeutics: Between Mechanisms of Action and Treatment-Limiting Side Effects.

Authors:  Stefanie Fischer; Undine Proschmann; Katja Akgün; Tjalf Ziemssen
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 4.  A Narrative Review on Axonal Neuroprotection in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Laurent Monassier; Ayikoé Guy Mensah-Nyagan; Nicolas Collongues; Guillaume Becker; Valérie Jolivel; Estelle Ayme-Dietrich; Jérôme de Seze; Fabien Binamé; Christine Patte-Mensah
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2022-05-24

5.  Systematic simulation of the interactions of pleckstrin homology domains with membranes.

Authors:  Kyle I P Le Huray; He Wang; Frank Sobott; Antreas C Kalli
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 14.957

Review 6.  Current Perspectives: Evidence to Date on BTK Inhibitors in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Edgar Carnero Contentti; Jorge Correale
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.319

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.