Tocilizumab and remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Trials of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia have demonstrated mixed results, and the role of tocilizumab in combination with other treatments is uncertain. Here we evaluated whether tocilizumab plus remdesivir provides greater benefit than remdesivir alone in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial included patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring > 6 L/min supplemental oxygen. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg or placebo intravenously plus ≤ 10 days of remdesivir. The primary outcome was time from randomization to hospital discharge or "ready for discharge" (defined as category 1, assessed by the investigator on a 7-category ordinal scale of clinical status) to day 28. Patients were followed for 60 days.
RESULTS: Among 649 enrolled patients, 434 were randomly assigned to tocilizumab plus remdesivir and 215 to placebo plus remdesivir. 566 patients (88.2%) received corticosteroids during the trial to day 28. Median time from randomization to hospital discharge or "ready for discharge" was 14 (95% CI 12-15) days with tocilizumab plus remdesivir and 14 (95% CI 11-16) days with placebo plus remdesivir [log-rank P = 0.74; Cox proportional hazards ratio 0.97 (95% CI 0.78-1.19)]. Serious adverse events occurred in 128 (29.8%) tocilizumab plus remdesivir and 72 (33.8%) placebo plus remdesivir patients; 78 (18.2%) and 42 (19.7%) patients, respectively, died by day 28.
CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab plus remdesivir did not shorten time to hospital discharge or "ready for discharge" to day 28 compared with placebo plus remdesivir in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Take home message

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly developed into a global health threat since emerging in China in late 2019 [1]. Most patients experience mild disease and recover with symptomatic treatment and supportive care. However, a subset experience more severe illness necessitating hospitalization [2]. Among patients who seek medical care, approximately 20% experience complications that may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiorgan failure, and death [3].

Tocilizumab is a humanized monoclonal anti–interleukin-6 receptor-alpha antibody. Interleukin-6 levels are often increased in patients with acute lung injury and ARDS, including those with severe COVID-19 pneumonia [4, 5]. Tocilizumab improved survival, reduced the need for mechanical ventilation, and shortened the length of hospital stay compared with standard care in 2 large open-label platform trials (REMAP-CAP and RECOVERY) [6, 7]. EMPACTA, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia but not receiving ventilatory support, showed reduced likelihood of progression to mechanical ventilation or death with tocilizumab but no survival benefit [8]. Other randomized controlled trials have not shown survival benefit with tocilizumab [9-12], although potential clinical benefits in reduced need for mechanical ventilation, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and length of hospital stay were observed in COVACTA and CORIMUNO-TOCI 1 [9, 11]. A prospective meta-analysis of 27 randomized trials involving more than 10,000 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 demonstrated that interleukin-6 antagonists were associated with lower 28-day all-cause mortality [13]. Rapidly evolving standards of care during the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in further uncertainty about the use of tocilizumab in combination with other treatments, including corticosteroids and remdesivir [14].

Remdesivir is a selective inhibitor of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase that delays RNA chain termination during replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) [15] and decreases the efficiency of viral nucleotide incorporation [16]. A 10-day course of remdesivir was superior to standard care alone in reducing time to recovery in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 [17], and a 5-day course demonstrated clinical benefit in moderate COVID-19 [18]. We hypothesized that combining remdesivir and tocilizumab could be more effective than adding remdesivir alone to standard care, which could include corticosteroids.

Methods

Trial design and patients

REMDACTA, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trial, evaluated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab plus remdesivir versus placebo plus remdesivir in patients aged 12 years and older hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia between June 2020 and March 2021. Patients were required to have a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test result within 7 days of randomization, pneumonia confirmed by chest x-ray or computed tomography, and hypoxemia requiring > 6 L/min supplemental oxygen. The protocol was amended in September 2020 to allow enrollment of patients who received ≤ 2 doses of remdesivir before randomization. Patients were excluded if the estimated glomerular filtration rate was < 30 mL/min (including patients undergoing hemodialysis or hemofiltration) or alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase levels were > 5 × the upper limit of normal within 24 h of screening. Patients with suspected active bacterial, fungal, viral, or other infection except COVID-19 were excluded. Systemic corticosteroids for treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia were permitted. Treatment with convalescent plasma, chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, antivirals, biologics, and Janus kinase inhibitors during the trial was prohibited.

Informed consent was obtained from the patient or legally authorized representative. The trial was conducted in accordance with the ICH E6 guidance for Good Clinical Practice and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki or local laws and regulations, whichever afforded greater protection. The trial was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each site. The sponsor, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., designed the trial and performed analyses; a contract research organization paid by the sponsor monitored the trial under the direction and supervision of the sponsor.

Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio using an interactive web-based response system and a permuted block method to receive blinded treatment with tocilizumab plus remdesivir or placebo plus remdesivir. Randomization was stratified by geographic region (North America, Europe, other) and by a 2-level factor based on clinical status at screening (ordinal scale categories 4–5, category 6) on a 7-category ordinal scale (additional details are in the Online Resource). Remdesivir was administered intravenously, followed by a single intravenous dose of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (maximum, 800 mg) or placebo on day 1. Patients with sustained fever or clinically significant worsening of signs and symptoms of COVID-19 (e.g., increased supplemental oxygen requirement) could receive a second infusion of blinded tocilizumab or placebo within 8 to 24 h of the first infusion. Patients were monitored through day 60, and the primary end point was assessed at day 28. Additional details and the complete trial protocol are in the Online Resource. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04409262).

Outcomes

The primary outcome was time from randomization to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge,” defined as category 1, assessed by the investigator on the 7-category ordinal scale to day 28. Patients achieved the outcome at the time of discharge or when they achieved category 1 on the 7-category ordinal scale, whichever occurred first, provided they had no further ordinal scale assessments greater than category 1 on or before day 28, they were not readmitted to the hospital on or before day 28, and they did not die on or before day 28.

The primary outcome was initially defined as clinical status assessed by the investigator using a 7-category ordinal scale of clinical status on day 28, but this was changed to time from randomization to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” to day 28 in response to evolving external data, including results from COVACTA and EMPACTA, which suggested that time to discharge was a more sensitive outcome for trials in this patient population [8, 9]. The amendment was finalized in September 2020, and the original primary outcome was retained as a secondary outcome. Ordinal scale categories are as follows: 1, discharged or “ready for discharge” (as evidenced by normal body temperature and respiratory rate, and stable oxygen saturation on ambient air or ≤ 2 L/min supplemental oxygen); 2, non–ICU hospital ward, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 3, non–ICU hospital ward, requiring supplemental oxygen; 4, ICU or non–ICU hospital ward, requiring noninvasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen; 5, ICU, requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation; 6, ICU, requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or mechanical ventilation and additional organ support; 7, death. Key secondary efficacy outcomes assessed to day 28 were time from randomization to mechanical ventilation or death, clinical status on the ordinal scale at day 14, and time to death. Mortality was assessed at day 28 and day 60. Adverse events were recorded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 23.1.

Statistical analysis

Assuming a median time to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” of 11 days in the placebo plus remdesivir arm [17], a sample size of 650 patients accruing approximately 520 events was calculated to provide 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 1.3 or an approximate 2.5-day reduction in median time to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” for tocilizumab plus remdesivir.

Efficacy was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned patients who received any amount of tocilizumab or placebo grouped according to randomly assigned treatment arm. Safety was assessed in the safety-evaluable population, defined as all patients who received any amount of study medication (remdesivir, tocilizumab/placebo) according to treatment received.

The primary outcome was compared between the treatment arms using a log-rank test stratified by region (North America, Europe, other) and baseline ordinal scale category (4–5, 6). Treatment arms were compared using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for stratification factors. Patients who died on or before day 28 were censored at day 28, and patients who withdrew or were lost to follow-up before achieving the primary outcome (not followed by death) were censored at their last recorded ordinal scale assessment. The primary end point was tested at a 2-sided 5% significance level. Kaplan–Meier plots, medians, 95% CIs, and P values from the stratified log-rank test were calculated for time-to-event primary and secondary efficacy outcomes, and distributions were compared using the Cox model. Ordinal data were analyzed using a proportional odds model comparing treatment arms and accounting for stratification factors at randomization. Effect sizes, P values, and 95% CIs were calculated based on odds ratios for treatment effect from the proportional odds model. The Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test adjusted by the stratification factors at randomization was used to analyze mortality at day 28 and day 60. Additional details are in the Online Resource.

Results

Patients

Overall, 709 patients were screened and 649 were enrolled from Brazil [n = 154 (23.7%)], Russia [n = 49 (7.6%)], Spain [n = 14 (2.2%)], and the United States [n = 432 (66.6%)] between June 2020 and January 2021 at 53 trial sites; 434 were randomly assigned to the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 215 to the placebo plus remdesivir arm (Fig. 1). Four patients in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and five patients in the placebo plus remdesivir arm did not receive tocilizumab or placebo and were excluded from the modified intention-to-treat population (additional details on the analysis populations are in the Online Resource). Approximately three-quarters of patients completed the trial to day 28: 336 (77.4%) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 160 (74.4%) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm. Death was the most common reason for not completing the trial; 78 patients (18%) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 42 (19.5%) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm died on or before day 28. Among the remaining patients, in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm, 9 (2.1%) were lost to follow-up, 7 (1.6%) withdrew consent, 2 (0.5%) discontinued because of adverse events, 1 (0.2%) discontinued following a protocol deviation, and 1 (0.2%) discontinued for other reasons that were not specified; in the placebo plus remdesivir arm, 7 patients (3.3%) were lost to follow-up, 3 (1.4%) withdrew consent, and 3 (1.4%) discontinued following protocol deviations (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

The safety population was defined as all patients who received any amount of study medication (remdesivir, tocilizumab/placebo) with patients grouped according to treatment received. aIncludes 1 patient who was randomly assigned to the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm but received placebo plus remdesivir. bDoes not include 1 patient who was randomly assigned to the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm but received placebo plus remdesivir; this patient was included in the placebo plus remdesivir arm of the safety population. cIncludes the patient who was randomly assigned to the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm but received placebo plus remdesivir and 2 patients (1 from each treatment arm) who received remdesivir but not tocilizumab or placebo. ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, PCR, polymerase chain reaction, ULN upper limit of normal

A second dose of tocilizumab or placebo was administered to 85 patients (19.8%) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 48 (22.7%) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm (safety population) 8 to 24 h after the first tocilizumab/placebo dose for sustained fever or clinically significant worsening of signs or symptoms. Among all randomly assigned patients, 266 (41%) discontinued remdesivir early, 171 (39.4%) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm, and 95 (44.2%) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm. The most common reason for discontinuing remdesivir was discharge from the study hospital before completing 10 days of treatment [tocilizumab plus remdesivir, 99 patients (22.8%); placebo plus remdesivir, 55 patients (25.6%)].

Demographics and disease characteristics at baseline were generally well balanced between treatment arms (Table 1). Most patients were at ordinal scale category 4 at baseline [tocilizumab plus remdesivir, 336 (78.1%); placebo plus remdesivir, 175 (83.3%)]. Similar proportions of patients received remdesivir before randomization (tocilizumab plus remdesivir, 19.3%; placebo plus remdesivir, 19%). Most patients received systemic corticosteroids at baseline [tocilizumab plus remdesivir, 357/429 (83.2%); placebo plus remdesivir 184/213 (86.4%); safety population] or during the trial to day 28 [tocilizumab plus remdesivir, 378/429 (88.1%); placebo plus remdesivir 188/213 (88.3%); safety population].

Table 1

Baseline demographics and disease characteristics (modified intention-to-treat population)

Characteristic	Tocilizumab + remdesivir N = 430	Placebo + remdesivir N = 210
Sex
Male	266 (61.9)	139 (66.2)
Female	164 (38.1)	71 (33.8)
Age, years
Mean ± SD	60.1 ± 13.3	58.2 ± 13.3
18–64	257 (59.8)	138 (65.7)
65–84	165 (38.4)	70 (33.3)
≥ 85	8 (1.9)	2 (1)
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino	208 (48.4)	122 (58.1)
Not Hispanic or Latino	207 (48.1)	86 (41)
Unknown/not stated	15 (3.5)	2 (1)
Race
White	279 (64.9)	150 (71.4)
Black or African American	51 (11.9)	19 (9)
Asian	17 (4)	5 (2.4)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander	7 (1.6)	3 (1.4)
American Indian or Alaska Native	4 (0.9)	4 (1.9)
Multiple	9 (2.1)	2 (1)
Unknown	63 (14.7)	27 (12.9)
Weight, kg, mean ± SD	94.4 ± 26.5	96.4 ± 25.3
NEWS2,a mean ± SD	6.5 ± 2.3	6.4 ± 2.4
Ordinal scale for clinical statusb
3	29 (6.7)	13 (6.2)
4	336 (78.1)	175 (83.3)
5	39 (9.1)	9 (4.3)
6	26 (6)	13 (6.2)
Mechanical ventilationc	59 (13.7)	22 (10.5)
Corticosteroid use (safety population), n/N (%)
Baselined	357/429 (83.2)	184/213 (86.4)
During the trial to day 28e	378/429 (88.1)	188/213 (88.3)
Remdesivir use before randomization	83 (19.3)	40 (19)
Days, mean ± SD	1.3 ± 0.7	1.5 ± 0.6
Coexisting conditions
Diabetes	172 (40)	81 (38.6)
Heart disease	105 (24.4)	45 (21.4)
Hypertension	267 (62.1)	128 (61)
Time since first COVID-19 symptom, days, mean ± SD	8.8 ± 4.8	8.9 ± 4.7
Symptoms at time of COVID-19 diagnosis
Fever	279 (64.9)	142 (67.6)
Cough	313 (72.8)	158 (75.2)
Shortness of breath	348 (80.9)	174 (82.9)
Gastrointestinal symptoms	139 (32.3)	62 (29.5)
Headache	84 (19.5)	34 (16.2)
Fatigue	178 (41.4)	79 (37.6)
Anosmia	62 (14.4)	26 (12.4)
Other	159 (37)	77 (36.7)

ICU intensive care unit, NEWS2 National Early Warning Score 2

Data are shown as number (%) unless noted otherwise

aNEWS2 was not calculated if ≥ 1 of the components was missing

b1, Discharged (or “ready for discharge”). 2, Non-ICU hospital ward (or “ready for hospital ward”) not requiring supplemental oxygen. 3, Non-ICU hospital ward (or “ready for hospital ward”) requiring supplemental oxygen. 4, ICU or non-ICU hospital ward, requiring noninvasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen. 5, ICU, requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation. 6, ICU, requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or mechanical ventilation and additional organ support. 7, Death

cThe baseline mechanical ventilation record was missing for 1 patient, so the baseline ordinal scale category (category 3: non-ICU hospital ward or “ready for hospital ward” requiring supplemental oxygen) was used to impute baseline mechanical ventilation status as not on mechanical ventilation

dMedications received between day –7 and day 1. Includes only systemic treatments

eMedications started before or after day 1 and ending on or after day 1 up to day 28. Includes only systemic treatments

Primary outcome

Median time from randomization to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” to day 28 was 14 (95% CI 12–15) days in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 14 (95% CI 11–16) days in the placebo plus remdesivir arm [log-rank P = 0.74; Cox proportional hazards ratio 0.97 (95% CI 0.78–1.19)] (Fig. 2a, Table 2). The proportion of patients discharged or “ready for discharge” to day 28 was 66% in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 67.1% in the placebo plus remdesivir arm. There were no significant differences in time to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” between treatment arms among subgroups of patients according to demographics, corticosteroid use at baseline, remdesivir use before randomization, or mechanical ventilation at baseline. Time to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” did not differ according to baseline ordinal scale category except among patients in ordinal category 5 at baseline (39 in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir group, 9 in the placebo plus remdesivir group) for whom tocilizumab was associated with longer time to discharge [hazard ratio 0.36 (95% CI 0.14–0.91)]; however, the small number of patients in this subgroup limits interpretability (Online Resource Fig. S1). No difference was observed between treatment arms for the original primary outcome: clinical status at day 28 on the 7-category ordinal scale (Online Resource Fig. S2).

Fig. 2

Time to (a) hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” (primary outcome), (b) mechanical ventilation or death, (c) death. Data are shown as (a) 1 minus the Kaplan–Meier curve, (b) Kaplan–Meier curve for time to mechanical ventilation or death, and (c) Kaplan–Meier curve for time to death (modified intention-to-treat population). Panel a shows time to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” defined as days from randomization to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” not followed by ordinal scale category > 1, hospital readmission, or death. Patients who discontinued or were lost to follow-up for any reason before hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” criteria were met were censored at their last recorded ordinal scale assessment. Panel b shows time to mechanical ventilation or death defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of death or mechanical ventilation. For patients already receiving mechanical ventilation at baseline, only death was counted as an event. One patient had a missing baseline mechanical ventilation record; therefore, the baseline ordinal scale category (category 3: non-ICU hospital ward or “ready for hospital ward” requiring supplemental oxygen) was used to impute baseline mechanical ventilation status as not receiving mechanical ventilation. Patients who withdrew or were lost to follow-up before discharge (not followed by death) were censored at their last assessment of vital signs. Patients who withdrew or who were lost to follow-up on or after the day of discharge (not followed by death or hospital readmission) were censored at day 28. Panel c shows time to death defined as the time from randomization to death. Patients who withdrew or were lost to follow-up before discharge (not followed by death) were censored at the last known date they were alive. Patients who withdrew or were lost to follow-up on or after the day of discharge (not followed by death or hospital readmission) were censored at day 28. ICU intensive care unit

Table 2

Primary and key secondary efficacy outcomes

	Tocilizumab + remdesivir N = 430	Placebo + remdesivir N = 210
Primary outcome
Time to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” to day 28, days, median (95% CI)a	14 (12–15)	14 (11–16)
P value	P = 0.74
Hazard ratio (95% CI)b	0.97 (0.78–1.19)
Secondary outcomesc
Time to mechanical ventilation or death to day 28, days, median (95% CI)a	NE	NE
P value	P = 0.9
Hazard ratio (95% CI)d	0.98 (0.72–1.34)
Clinical status at day 14 assessed on the 7-category ordinal scale, n (%)e
1	231 (54)	110 (52.4)
2	11 (2.6)	4 (1.9)
3	38 (8.9)	24 (11.4)
4	41 (9.6)	14 (6.7)
5	21 (4.9)	14 (6.7)
6	43 (10)	24 (11.4)
7	43 (10)	20 (9.5)
Clinical status at day 14 assessed on the 7-category ordinal scale, mean (95% CI)e,f	2.8 (2.6–3)	2.9 (2.6–3.2)
	Difference = –0.065 (–0.42 to 0.29)
	P = 0.72
Time to death to day 28, days, median (95% CI)a	NE	NE
P value	P = 0.79
Hazard ratio (95% CI)d	0.95 (0.65–1.39)
Mortality at day 28, n (%) [95% CI]g	78 (18.1) [14.5–21.8]	41 (19.5) [14.2–24.9]
	Weighted difference = –1.3 [–7.8 to 5.2]
	P = 0.69
Mortality at day 60, n (%) [95% CI]g	97 (22.6) [18.6–26.5]	54 (25.7) [19.8–31.6]
	Weighted difference = –3 [–10.1 to 4]
	P = 0.39

Time to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” was defined as days from randomization to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” not followed by ordinal scale category > 1, hospital readmission, or death. Patients who discontinued or were lost to follow-up for any reason before hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” criteria were met were censored at their last recorded ordinal scale assessment. Patients who died were censored at day 28

Time to mechanical ventilation or death was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of death or mechanical ventilation. For patients already receiving mechanical ventilation at baseline, only death was counted as an event. One patient had a missing baseline mechanical ventilation record; therefore, the baseline ordinal scale category (category 3: non-ICU hospital ward or “ready for hospital ward” requiring supplemental oxygen) was used to impute baseline mechanical ventilation status as not receiving mechanical ventilation. Patients who withdrew or were lost to follow-up before discharge (not followed by death) were censored at their last assessment of vital signs. Patients who withdrew or were lost to follow-up on or after the day of discharge (not followed by death or hospital readmission) were censored at day 28. Time to death was defined as the time from randomization to death. Patients who withdrew or were lost to follow-up before discharge (not followed by death) were censored at the last known date they were alive. Patients who withdrew or were lost to follow-up on or after the day of discharge (not followed by death or hospital readmission) were censored at day 28

aP value from log-rank test and hazard ratio from Cox proportional hazards model, both stratified by baseline ordinal score (4–5, 6) and region (North America, Europe, other)

bHazard ratio > 1 favors tocilizumab plus remdesivir over placebo plus remdesivir

cAdditional outcomes were specified in the protocol (Online Resource Table S3); to facilitate rapid publication of study results, only the primary and key secondary outcomes are reported here

dHazard ratio < 1 favors tocilizumab plus remdesivir over placebo plus remdesivir

eMissing data were imputed using last postbaseline observation carried forward. Two patients in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm did not have ordinal scale data after baseline to day 14

fDifference between mean and P value was calculated using a linear regression approach with Huber–White sandwich estimates for standard errors, including both stratification factors at randomization, baseline ordinal score (4–5, 6) and region (North America, Europe, other)

gWeighted difference between percentage and P value was calculated using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test adjusted by stratification factors at randomization

ICU intensive care unit, NE nonevaluable

Secondary outcomes

Mechanical ventilation or death to day 28 occurred in 123 patients (28.6%) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 61 patients (29%) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm. Median time to mechanical ventilation or death to day 28 was nonevaluable in both treatment arms because it occurred in less than half the patients [log-rank P = 0.90; hazard ratio 0.98 (95% CI 0.72–1.34)] (Fig. 2b, Table 2). Mean clinical status on the 7-category ordinal scale at day 14 was 2.8 (95% CI 2.6–3) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 2.9 (95% CI 2.6–3.2) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm [difference –0.07 (–0.4, 0.3); P = 0.72] (Table 2) [because the assumption of proportional odds was not met (Online Resource Table S1), the prespecified difference in means analysis is presented]. Proportions of patients in each ordinal scale category at day 14 were similar between treatment arms (Table 2, Online Resource Fig. S3). Seventy-eight patients (18.1%) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 41 (19.5%) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm died by day 28 [weighted difference –1.3% (95% CI –7.8%, 5.2%); P = 0.69]. Median time to death was nonevaluable in both arms [log-rank P = 0.79; hazard ratio 0.95 (95% CI, 0.65–1.39)] (Fig. 2c, Table 2). No significant difference was observed in time to death to day 28 between treatment arms among subgroups of patients based on demographics, corticosteroid use at baseline, remdesivir use before randomization, or mechanical ventilation at baseline (Online Resource Fig. S1). By day 60, 97 patients (22.6%) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 54 (25.7%) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm had died [weighted difference –3% (95% CI –10.1%, 4%); P = 0.39].

Safety to day 28

In the safety population, the number of patients who experienced ≥ 1 adverse event was 320 of 429 (74.6%) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 147 of 213 (69%) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm. Serious adverse events were reported in 128 patients (29.8%) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 72 (33.8%) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm (Table 3, Online Resource Table S2). Forty-six patients (10.7%) in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm and 28 (13.1%) in the placebo plus remdesivir arm discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. Adverse events of special interest were balanced between both treatment arms, including serious infections [86 (20%) and 53 (24.9%)] and serious bleeding events [11 (2.6%) and 7 (3.3%)]. The most common serious infections (reported in > 1% of patients in each treatment arm) were progression of underlying COVID-19 pneumonia (required to be reported as a serious adverse event if COVID-19 resulted in death), septic shock, pneumonia, sepsis, and bacterial pneumonia.

Table 3

Safety to day 28

	Tocilizumab + remdesivirN = 429	Placebo + remdesivirN = 213
Adverse events
Events, n	1094	530
Patients with ≥ 1 event	320 (74.6)	147 (69)
Patients with ≥ 1 serious adverse event	128 (29.8)	72 (33.8)
Deaths	78 (18.2)	42 (19.7)
Patients who discontinued the trial because of an adverse eventa	2 (0.5)	0
Patients who discontinued study treatment because of an adverse eventb	46 (10.7)	28 (13.1)
Adverse events of special interest
Events, n	268	149
Patients with ≥ 1 event	160 (37.3)	83 (39)
Infections	131 (30.5)	71 (33.3)
Serious infections	86 (20)	53 (24.9)
Opportunistic infections	3 (0.7)	5 (2.3)
Bleeding events	55 (12.8)	22 (10.3)
Serious bleeding events	11 (2.6)	7 (3.3)
Stroke	10 (2.3)	8 (3.8)
Hepatic events	6 (1.4)	3 (1.4)
Anaphylactic reactionc	2 (0.5)	0
Hypersensitivity eventd	1 (0.2)	0
Gastrointestinal perforations	1 (0.2)	1 (0.5)
Myocardial infarction	1 (0.2)	0
Demyelinating events	0	0
Potential Hy’s law casese	2 (0.5)	3 (1.4)

Data are shown as number (%) of patients unless stated otherwise and percentages are calculated based on the total number of patients in each treatment arm (N)

aExcluding patients who died

bIncludes discontinuation from tocilizumab/placebo and remdesivir

cAnaphylactic reaction adverse events were identified using the narrow Standardized MedDRA Query of “Anaphylactic Reaction” that occurred during or within 24 h of the end of an infusion (tocilizumab/placebo or remdesivir). The adverse event term for both events was “Shock,” and both events occurred within 24 h of a remdesivir infusion

dNot included in the overall number of patients with or the total count of adverse events of special interest. Hypersensitivity adverse events were identified by the narrow Standardized MedDRA Query of “Hypersensitivity” occurring during or within 24 h of the end of an infusion that were not deemed unrelated to study treatment (tocilizumab/placebo or remdesivir). The adverse event term was “Injection site urticaria” and occurred during a remdesivir infusion

eAlanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase level > 3×upper limit of normal and either bilirubin level > 2×upper limit of normal or clinical jaundice, as reported by the investigator

MedDRA Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities

Discussion

In this trial, there was no difference between tocilizumab plus remdesivir and placebo plus remdesivir in time from randomization to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” to day 28. There were also no differences between treatment arms in the key secondary outcomes of time to mechanical ventilation or death to day 28, clinical status at day 14 assessed by the investigator on the 7-category ordinal scale, and time to death to day 28. No new safety signals were identified in this trial, and the safety profile was consistent with the known safety profiles of tocilizumab and remdesivir. Adverse events of special interest, including the incidence and types of serious infections, were balanced between the treatment arms and consistent with the known disease course of severe COVID-19.

Compared with other randomized placebo-controlled trials of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19, REMDACTA differed with respect to target patient population and background treatments, in part because of the continuing evolution of standard care. In EMPACTA, which demonstrated a treatment benefit on time to mechanical ventilation or death for tocilizumab versus placebo, 64.2% of patients were receiving low-flow oxygen at enrollment, 54.6% received remdesivir, and > 80% received systemic corticosteroids. COVACTA recruited patients with a broader range of disease severity, and fewer patients received effective background therapy (< 10% of patients received remdesivir, < 50% received corticosteroids). These differences in patient selection and treatments may account for the different outcomes between the studies.

Based on results of the REMAP-CAP [6] and RECOVERY [7] open-label platform trials, tocilizumab in combination with dexamethasone is recommended by the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel in certain patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who exhibit rapid respiratory decompensation and, at a minimum, need for high-flow oxygen supplementation [19]. In RECOVERY, patients considered for random allocation to the tocilizumab arm were required to have clinical evidence of progressive COVID-19 after their first random allocation in the trial. In REMAP-CAP, patients were enrolled within 24 h of initiation of organ support in the ICU, defined as invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation (including high-flow nasal cannula with flow rate > 30 L/min of and fraction of inspired oxygen > 0.4) or intravenous infusion of any vasopressor or inotrope. REMDACTA enrolled patients who required > 6 L/min of supplemental oxygen irrespective of time since symptom onset time since or since diagnosis of COVID-19 and evidence of recent or rapid deterioration was not required. Together, these findings suggest that patients with declining respiratory status may be more likely to benefit from treatment with tocilizumab. Additional studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

The endorsement of interleukin-6 receptor blockade in patients with severe and critical COVID-19 by the World Health Organization and others will likely increase the adoption of tocilizumab as standard of care in these patients [14]. Although trials of remdesivir have not demonstrated a clear mortality benefit [20], remdesivir remains standard of care in many parts of the world based on trials that demonstrated shortened time to recovery and other clinical benefits [17, 18]. Only 27% of patients in RECOVERY and 33% of patients in REMAP-CAP received remdesivir. Thus, it is important to better understand the role of tocilizumab in combination with remdesivir and other treatments, including newer antivirals, neutralizing antibodies, and other immunomodulators. Additional studies or patient-level meta-analyses may be required to achieve this [21].

Strengths and weaknesses

To our knowledge, REMDACTA is the first multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the inhibition of interleukin-6 signaling in patients with COVID-19, all of whom received remdesivir and most of whom also received systemic corticosteroids. However, REMDACTA was not powered to detect the relatively small but clinically meaningful mortality benefit demonstrated in larger platform studies. REMDACTA was designed and initiated relatively early in the pandemic, before results from other randomized controlled trials of tocilizumab were available. Thus, the primary outcome of the trial was changed from clinical status on the ordinal scale to time to discharge or “ready for discharge” when enrollment was approximately half-completed based on the results from other trials, which suggested that time to discharge or “ready for discharge” is a more sensitive and clinically meaningful outcome in patients with severe COVID-19 [8, 9]. REMDACTA eligibility criteria were also modified to allow enrollment of patients who had received up to 2 doses of remdesivir before randomization because remdesivir was increasingly administered as standard of care. These changes were implemented while patients were still enrolling in the trial, and the protocol and statistical analysis plan were finalized on February 22, 2021, before unblinding on March 1, 2021.

Despite randomization, there were some slight imbalances in baseline characteristics between the treatment arms (e.g., more patients aged 65 and older, more patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, and fewer patients receiving corticosteroids in the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm). These imbalances were unlikely to have been important individually but could have created a cumulative bias in favor of placebo plus remdesivir. A slightly higher proportion of patients in the placebo plus remdesivir arm than the tocilizumab plus remdesivir arm discontinued remdesivir before completing 10 days of treatment (44.2% vs 39.4%); however, most of these early discontinuations were the result of hospital discharge, consistent with remdesivir use in other trials [17] and in clinical practice.

Conclusion

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, tocilizumab plus remdesivir did not shorten time to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” to day 28 compared with placebo plus remdesivir in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, most of whom received systemic corticosteroids. Serious infections were not more frequent with tocilizumab treatment, and no new safety signals were identified.

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1869 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 1300 kb)

Supplementary file3 (DOCX 1214 kb)

In this randomized controlled trial of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia, the median time from randomization to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” was 14 days with tocilizumab plus remdesivir and 14 days with placebo plus remdesivir. Although large platform trials showed a survival benefit of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 and declining respiratory status, this trial did not confirm treatment benefit of tocilizumab in combination with remdesivir.