Literature DB >> 34608972

GLABRA2-based selection efficiently enriches Cas9-generated nonchimeric mutants in the T1 generation.

Xiangjiu Kong1, Wenbo Pan2, Nengxu Sun1, Tingyu Zhang1, Lijing Liu1, Huawei Zhang2.   

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a widely used tool for genome editing in plants. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), egg cell-specific promoters driving Cas9 expression have been applied to reduce the proportion of T1 transformants that are chimeras; however, this approach generally leads to relatively low mutagenesis rates. In this study, a GLABRA2 mutation-based visible selection (GBVS) system was established to enrich nonchimeric mutants among T1 plants generated by an egg cell-specific CRISPR/Cas9 system. GBVS generally enhanced mutation screening, increasing the frequency by 2.58- to 7.50-fold, and 25%-48.15% of T1 plants selected through the GBVS system were homozygous or biallelic mutants, which was 1.71- to 7.86-fold higher than the percentage selected using the original system. The mutant phenotypes of T2 plants were not obviously affected by the glabrous background for all four target genes used in this study. Additionally, the nonchimeric pyrabactin resistance 1 (PYR1)/PYR1-like 1 (PYL1) and PYL2 triple mutant pyr1/pyl1/pyl2 could be obtained in the T1 generation with a ratio of 26.67% when GBVS was applied. Collectively, our results show that compared with the known CRISPR/Cas9 systems, the GBVS system described here saves more time and labor when used for the obtainment of homozygous or biallelic monogenic mutants and nonchimeric polygenic mutants in Arabidopsis. © American Society of Plant Biologists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34608972      PMCID: PMC8491020          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.005


  39 in total

1.  Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Zhengyan Feng; Yanfei Mao; Nanfei Xu; Botao Zhang; Pengliang Wei; Dong-Lei Yang; Zhen Wang; Zhengjing Zhang; Rui Zheng; Lan Yang; Liang Zeng; Xiaodong Liu; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Discriminated sgRNAs-Based SurroGate System Greatly Enhances the Screening Efficiency of Plant Base-Edited Cells.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Yongxing Yang; Ya Liu; Guiting Kang; Feipeng Wang; Lu Li; Xinxin Lv; Si Zhao; Shuang Yuan; Jinling Song; Ying Wu; Feng Feng; Xiaoqing He; Chengwei Zhang; Wei Song; Jiuran Zhao; Jinxiao Yang
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 13.164

3.  A Multipurpose Toolkit to Enable Advanced Genome Engineering in Plants.

Authors:  Tomáš Čermák; Shaun J Curtin; Javier Gil-Humanes; Radim Čegan; Thomas J Y Kono; Eva Konečná; Joseph J Belanto; Colby G Starker; Jade W Mathre; Rebecca L Greenstein; Daniel F Voytas
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  An Arabidopsis mutant that requires increased calcium for potassium nutrition and salt tolerance.

Authors:  J Liu; J K Zhu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Generation of herbicide tolerance traits and a new selectable marker in wheat using base editing.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jinxing Liu; Zhuangzhuang Chai; Sha Chen; Yang Bai; Yuan Zong; Kunling Chen; Jiayang Li; Linjian Jiang; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 15.793

6.  Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  S J Clough; A F Bent
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  An Efficient Visual Screen for CRISPR/Cas9 Activity in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Florian Hahn; Otho Mantegazza; André Greiner; Peter Hegemann; Marion Eisenhut; Andreas P M Weber
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  High-efficiency genome editing in plants mediated by a Cas9 gene containing multiple introns.

Authors:  Ramona Grützner; Patrick Martin; Claudia Horn; Samuel Mortensen; Erin J Cram; Carolyn W T Lee-Parsons; Johannes Stuttmann; Sylvestre Marillonnet
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2020-11-23

9.  The Arabidopsis GAI gene defines a signaling pathway that negatively regulates gibberellin responses.

Authors:  J Peng; P Carol; D E Richards; K E King; R J Cowling; G P Murphy; N P Harberd
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  GmNAP1 is essential for trichome and leaf epidermal cell development in soybean.

Authors:  Kuanqiang Tang; Suxin Yang; Xingxing Feng; Tao Wu; Jiantian Leng; Huangkai Zhou; Yaohua Zhang; Hui Yu; Jinshan Gao; Jingjing Ma; Xianzhong Feng
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.076

View more
  5 in total

1.  Updates on gene editing and its applications.

Authors:  Holger Puchta; Jiming Jiang; Kan Wang; Yunde Zhao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Establishment of an Efficient Genome Editing System in Lettuce Without Sacrificing Specificity.

Authors:  Wenbo Pan; Xue Liu; Dayong Li; Huawei Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Application of CRISPR/CasΦ2 System for Genome Editing in Plants.

Authors:  Qinan Cai; Dongmei Guo; Yujun Cao; Yuan Li; Rui Ma; Wenping Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 4.  Mini-Review: Transgenerational CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Plants.

Authors:  Lennert Impens; Thomas B Jacobs; Hilde Nelissen; Dirk Inzé; Laurens Pauwels
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2022-02-04

Review 5.  Transgene-free Genome Editing in Plants.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Gu; Lijing Liu; Huawei Zhang
Journal:  Front Genome Ed       Date:  2021-12-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.