| Literature DB >> 34608826 |
Xiaobin Chi1, Yi Jiang1, Yongbiao Chen1, Lizhi Lv1, Jianwei Chen1, Fang Yang1, Xiaojin Zhang1, Fan Pan1, Qiucheng Cai1.
Abstract
As powerful regulatory factors, microRNAs (miRNAs) are involved in tumor progression. The current research aimed to excavate the prognostic significance and potential regulatory mechanisms of miR-652-3p in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Expression of miR-652-3p in HCC tissues and cells was exposed by Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay, and we found that miR-652-3p was elevated in HCC tissues and cells than in the control group (P < 0.05). Then, the relationship between miR-652-3p levels and clinical characteristics was obtained from the Chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model to explore the outcome of miR-652-3p on the prognosis of HCC. The results investigated that overexpression of miR-652-3p was related to clinical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (P = 0.020) and differentiation (P = 0.031). HCC patients with elevated miR-652-3p levels were correlated with poor overall survival (log-rank, P = 0.007), and maybe a possible prognostic marker for HCC. Finally, CCK-8, colony formation, wound healing and Transwell assay was detected after transfection of HCC cells with miR-652-3p mimic or inhibitor. And the results confirmed that elevation miR-652-3p promoted the proliferation, migration, and invasion of tumor cells (P < 0.05). All data indicated that elevated miR-652-3p is a prognostic marker and would be able to participate in tumor progression of HCC by regulating cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.Entities:
Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma; miR-652-3p; prognosis; progression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34608826 PMCID: PMC8806865 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1979861
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Correlation between miR-652-3p expression levels and clinical features in HCC patients
| Parameters | Cases No. | miR-625-3p expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (n = 57) | High (n = 69) | |||
| Age (years) | 0.858 | |||
| <60 | 62 | 29 | 33 | |
| ≥60 | 64 | 28 | 36 | |
| Gender | 0.595 | |||
| Male | 65 | 31 | 34 | |
| Female | 61 | 26 | 35 | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.721 | |||
| <5 | 69 | 30 | 39 | |
| ≥5 | 57 | 27 | 30 | |
| Smoking status | ||||
| No | 71 | 35 | 36 | 0.367 |
| Yes | 55 | 22 | 33 | |
| Alcohol intake | ||||
| No | 70 | 34 | 36 | 0.472 |
| Yes | 56 | 23 | 33 | |
| AFP (ng/ml) | 0.477 | |||
| <400 | 66 | 32 | 34 | |
| ≥400 | 60 | 25 | 35 | |
| Cirrhosis | ||||
| Yes | 64 | 30 | 34 | 0.724 |
| No | 62 | 27 | 35 | |
| Clinical TNM stage | 0.020 | |||
| I–II | 58 | 33 | 25 | |
| III–IV | 68 | 24 | 44 | |
| Differentiation | ||||
| Well and moderate | 61 | 34 | 27 | 0.031 |
| Poor and others | 65 | 23 | 42 | |
AFP, alpha-fetoprotein.
Figure 1.RT-qPCR assay discovered the levels of miR-652-3p in HCC tissues and cells. a. The levels of miR-652-3p were significantly increased in HCC tissues (***P < 0.001). b. Expression of miR-652-3p in HCC and human normal hepatocytes. Compared with normal cells, miR-652-3p was elevated in HCC cells (**P < 0.01)
Figure 2.Compared with HCC patients with low miR-652-3p expression, the prognosis of patients with high miR-652-3p expression was not ideal (log-rank P = 0.007)
Multivariate Cox analysis of miR-652-3p and clinical parameters with overall survival
| Characteristics | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | ||
| miR-1183 | 3.249 | 1.323–7.979 | 0.010 |
| Age | 0.442 | 0.308–1.673 | 0.443 |
| Gender | 1.086 | 0.445–2.595 | 0.853 |
| Tumor size | 0.775 | 0.333–1.803 | 0.554 |
| Smoking status | 0.647 | 0.299–1.399 | 0.268 |
| Alcohol intake | 0.697 | 0.317–1.533 | 0.370 |
| AFP | 0.560 | 0.238–1.317 | 0.184 |
| Cirrhosis | 0.406 | 0.168–0.981 | 0.045 |
| Clinical stage | 2.708 | 1.050–6.982 | 0.039 |
| Differentiation | 2.288 | 0.997–5.253 | 0.051 |
Figure 3.The level of miR-652-3p regulates cell proliferation of HCC cells. a. Expression level of miR-652-3p was detected after transfection of miR-652-3p mimics and inhibitors. (**P < 0.01). b. CCK-8 assay to detect the regulation of miR-652-3p on proliferation (*P < 0.05). c. Colony formation assay was performed to accessed the regulation of miR-652-3p on colony forming ability (***P < 0.001, compared to mimic NC; ### P < 0.001, compared to inhibitor NC)
Figure 4.Wound healing and Transwell assay was used to detect cell migration and invasion. a. Wound healing assay was performed to explore the migration of Hep3B. b. Wound healing assay was performed to explore the migration of Huh-7. c. Representative images of miR-652-3p affecting cell migration and statistical results on the number of cell migration. d. Representative images of miR-652-3p affecting cell invasion and statistical results on the number of cell migration (***P < 0.001, compared to mimic NC; ### P < 0.001, compared to inhibitor NC)