Literature DB >> 34608811

Baseline MRI and Its Predictive Usefulness in Chronic Backpain Thirteen Years Later.

N K Mazarakis1, Andreas K Demetriades2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34608811      PMCID: PMC9344516          DOI: 10.1177/21925682211049365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Global Spine J        ISSN: 2192-5682


× No keyword cloud information.
Udby and colleagues are to be congratulated for their interesting study titled The Association of MRI Findings and Long-Term Disability in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain published in Global Spine J. 2021;11 (5):633-639, reaching a decent number of participants (170/204) from an older trial (2004-5) and trying to provide a 13-year follow-up in the predictive use of a baseline MRI in backpain. Admittedly their title, at first glance, gives the impression that what is to be discussed is a follow-up study to assess the correlation of spinal MRI findings and chronic low back pain. Instead, the authors tried to look back at those patients who now suffer with low back pain and searched for any correlations with their original spinal MRI 13 years ago. The methodology may be pragmatic in that it aimed to provide an assessment of the prognostic usefulness of a baseline (low field, 0.2T) MRI for backpain 13 years later. It included information – both at baseline and at 13 years – from questionnaires; demographics; antibiotic usage; history of surgery. Other than cost or logistics, was there any disadvantage in pursuing an MRI assessment of the radiological findings as they may have evolved after 13 years? Are we assuming that the structural findings could not have changed, worsened or perhaps improved? Or that other findings may not have emerged? Accepting that this study limited itself to looking at the potential physical correlates of backpain, we can only draw attention – and possibly suggest a future follow up study – to the facts that: - Only 3 radiological parameters were selected for assessment/correlation: disc degeneration; facet degeneration; and Modic changes. - There was no assessment of paraspinal musculature, its atrophy or fat infiltration. - There was no assessment of the sagittal spino-pelvic alignment, the lumbar lordotic curvature or the sacro-iliac joints, and any other concepts which may have evolved over the last 13 years. - MRI findings exist in many asymptomatic patients, and this study has not clarified its control population, or whether the subjects had continuous, non-continuous or recurrent pain, or indeed other pain.[3,4] [again Goubert et al 2017] The main outcome of the study is that severe disc degeneration and facet joint degeneration were not associated with long-term low back pain. An interesting, and unexpected, observation of the present study was that Modic changes were associated with less long-term disability. It is worth noting that no participant was on long-term antibiotics. Others have reported a strong association between Modic changes and low back pain. Overall, this thought-provoking and challenging study design has been successful in lending further support to the fact that a physical model of back pain is no longer the predominant one. The modern belief is a biopsychosocial model.[6-8] A better understanding – and accepting – that long-term back pain seems to be a biopsychosocial phenomenon rather than just purely a physical problem is important as it will dictate the nature of any attempted management planning.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Are the size and composition of the paraspinal muscles associated with low back pain? A systematic review.

Authors:  Tom A Ranger; Flavia M Cicuttini; Tue S Jensen; Waruna L Peiris; Sultana Monira Hussain; Jessica Fairley; Donna M Urquhart
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee; Todd F Alamin; Jonothan L Miller; John M Carragee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging and low back pain in adults: a diagnostic imaging study of 40-year-old men and women.

Authors:  Per Kjaer; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Lars Korsholm; Joan Solgaard Sorensen; Tom Bendix
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lumbar muscle structure and function in chronic versus recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Dorien Goubert; Robby De Pauw; Mira Meeus; Tine Willems; Barbara Cagnie; Stijn Schouppe; Jessica Van Oosterwijck; Evy Dhondt; Lieven Danneels
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 5.  Low back pain.

Authors:  Nebojsa Nick Knezevic; Kenneth D Candido; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Jan Van Zundert; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  An educational approach based on a non-injury model compared with individual symptom-based physical training in chronic LBP. A pragmatic, randomised trial with a one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Pia H Sorensen; Tom Bendix; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Dorte Lemvigh; Aage Indahl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The Association of MRI Findings and Long-Term Disability in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Peter Muhareb Udby; Søren Ohrt-Nissen; Tom Bendix; Stig Brorson; Leah Y Carreon; Mikkel Østerheden Andersen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-12

8.  Longitudinal associations between incident lumbar spine MRI findings and chronic low back pain or radicular symptoms: retrospective analysis of data from the longitudinal assessment of imaging and disability of the back (LAIDBACK).

Authors:  Pradeep Suri; Edward J Boyko; Jack Goldberg; Christopher W Forsberg; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.