Literature DB >> 34608530

Confessed versus denied inflicted head injuries in infants: similarities and differences.

Matthieu Vinchon1, Mélodie-Anne Karnoub2, Nathalie Noulé3, Marie-Emilie Lampin4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Abusive head injuries (AHI), and in particular shaken baby syndrome (SBS), are common causes of mortality and morbidity in infants. Although SBS is a well-established entity, based on clinical experience and experimental data, and confirmed by the perpetrators' confessions, a growing number of publications challenge the diagnostic criteria, and even the validity of the perpetrators' confession. We decided to study AHI in infants and compare cases with and without confession.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We collected prospectively all cases of infantile traumatic head injuries hospitalized in our institution between 2001 and 2021. From this database, we selected victims of AHI, comparing cases for which the perpetrator confessed during police inquiry ("confession" group) versus cases without confession ("denial" group).
RESULTS: We studied 350 cases of AHI in infants; 137 of these (39.1%) were confessed. We found no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the child's previous history, as well as the personality and previous history of the caretakers. However, the "confession" group showed significantly more severe clinical presentation, cerebral lesions, retinal hemorrhages, and a more pejorative outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the diagnosis of AHI was confirmed by the confession in a large number of cases, indicating that the diagnostic criteria of AHI are robust. We also found that denial, although possibly sincere, was likely ill-founded, and that the perpetrators' decision to confess or deny was markedly influenced by the severity of the inflicted lesions.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child abuse; Infantile subdural hematoma; Medicolegal inquiry

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34608530     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-021-05381-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  11 in total

Review 1.  Insufficient evidence for 'shaken baby syndrome' - a systematic review.

Authors:  Niels Lynøe; Göran Elinder; Boubou Hallberg; Måns Rosén; Pia Sundgren; Anders Eriksson
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.299

2.  Neuropathological changes in a lamb model of non-accidental head injury (the shaken baby syndrome).

Authors:  J W Finnie; P C Blumbergs; J Manavis; R J Turner; S Helps; R Vink; R W Byard; G Chidlow; B Sandoz; J Dutschke; R W G Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Accidental and nonaccidental head injuries in infants: a prospective study.

Authors:  Matthieu Vinchon; Sabine Defoort-Dhellemmes; Marie Desurmont; Patrick Dhellemmes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Dural haemorrhage in non-traumatic infant deaths: does it explain the bleeding in 'shaken baby syndrome'?

Authors:  J F Geddes; R C Tasker; A K Hackshaw; C D Nickols; G G W Adams; H L Whitwell; I Scheimberg
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.090

5.  Abusive head trauma: judicial admissions highlight violent and repetitive shaking.

Authors:  Catherine Adamsbaum; Sophie Grabar; Nathalie Mejean; Caroline Rey-Salmon
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Confessed abuse versus witnessed accidents in infants: comparison of clinical, radiological, and ophthalmological data in corroborated cases.

Authors:  Matthieu Vinchon; Sabine de Foort-Dhellemmes; Marie Desurmont; Isabelle Delestret
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  'Munchausen's syndrome by proxy' or a 'miscarriage of justice'? An initial application of functional neuroimaging to the question of guilt versus innocence.

Authors:  Sean A Spence; Catherine J Kaylor-Hughes; Martin L Brook; Sudheer T Lankappa; Iain D Wilkinson
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 5.361

8.  Shaken baby syndrome: does it exist?

Authors:  D G Talbert
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 1.538

9.  Finite element analysis of impact and shaking inflicted to a child.

Authors:  Sébastien Roth; Jean-Sébastien Raul; Bertrand Ludes; Rémy Willinger
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.791

10.  Denial and Empathy: Partners in Employee Trust Repair?

Authors:  Zhanna Bagdasarov; Shane Connelly; James F Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-22
View more
  3 in total

1.  Answer to Lynøe: Interesting data about confessions and abusive head trauma, but suboptimal analysis.

Authors:  Matthieu Vinchon; Mélodie-Anne Karnoub; Nathalie Noulé; Marie-Emilie Lampin
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Agreements and disagreements regarding "shaken baby syndrome".

Authors:  Niels Lynøe; Anders Eriksson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 1.532

3.  Abusive head injuries in infants corroborated versus non-corroborated cases: more answers to more questions.

Authors:  Matthieu Vinchon
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 1.532

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.