Kayla Esser1, Clara Moore1, Kara Grace Hounsell1, Adrienne Davis2, Alia Sunderji2, Rayzel Shulman3, Bryan Maguire4, Eyal Cohen5, Julia Orkin6. 1. Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children (K Esser, C Moore, KG Hounsell, R Shulman, E Cohen, and J Orkin), Toronto, Canada. 2. Division of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children (A Davis and A Sunderji), Toronto, Canada. 3. Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children (K Esser, C Moore, KG Hounsell, R Shulman, E Cohen, and J Orkin), Toronto, Canada; Division of Endocrinology, The Hospital for Sick Children (R Shulman), Toronto, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto (R Shulman), Toronto, Canada. 4. Biostatistics, Design and Analysis, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children (B Maguire), Toronto, Canada. 5. Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children (K Esser, C Moore, KG Hounsell, R Shulman, E Cohen, and J Orkin), Toronto, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto (R Shulman), Toronto, Canada; Division of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children (E Cohen and J Orkin), Toronto, Canada; Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto (E Cohen), Toronto, Canada. 6. Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children (K Esser, C Moore, KG Hounsell, R Shulman, E Cohen, and J Orkin), Toronto, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto (R Shulman), Toronto, Canada; Division of Paediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children (E Cohen and J Orkin), Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: julia.orkin@sickkids.ca.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Children with medical complexity (CMC) are hypothesized to have unique housing and accessibility needs due to their medical fragility and medical technology dependency; however, research on prevalence and types of housing need in CMC is limited. The objective was to describe housing need in families of CMC, and to compare housing need across CMC, children with one chronic condition (Type 1 diabetes; CT1D) and healthy children (HC). METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive study assessed housing suitability, adequacy, affordability, stress, stability, and accessibility using survey methodology. Participants were caregivers of CMC, CT1D and HC at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. The association of housing need outcomes across groups was analyzed using logistic and ordinal logistic regression models, adjusting for income, educational attainment, employment status, community type, immigration status, child age, and number of people in household. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety caregivers participated. Caregivers of CMC reported increased risk of housing-related safety concerns (aOR 3.1 [1.3-7.5]), using a common area as a sleeping area (5.6 [2.0-16.8]), reducing spending (4.6 [2.3-9.5]) or borrowing money to afford rent (2.9 [1.2-6.7]), experiencing housing stress (3.3 [1.8-6.0]), and moving or considering moving to access health/community services (15.0 [6.4-37.6]) compared to HC. CONCLUSIONS: CMC were more likely to experience multiple indicators of housing need compared to CT1D and HC even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors, suggesting an association between complexity of child health conditions and housing need. Further research and practise should consider screening for and supporting housing need in CMC.
OBJECTIVE: Children with medical complexity (CMC) are hypothesized to have unique housing and accessibility needs due to their medical fragility and medical technology dependency; however, research on prevalence and types of housing need in CMC is limited. The objective was to describe housing need in families of CMC, and to compare housing need across CMC, children with one chronic condition (Type 1 diabetes; CT1D) and healthy children (HC). METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive study assessed housing suitability, adequacy, affordability, stress, stability, and accessibility using survey methodology. Participants were caregivers of CMC, CT1D and HC at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. The association of housing need outcomes across groups was analyzed using logistic and ordinal logistic regression models, adjusting for income, educational attainment, employment status, community type, immigration status, child age, and number of people in household. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety caregivers participated. Caregivers of CMC reported increased risk of housing-related safety concerns (aOR 3.1 [1.3-7.5]), using a common area as a sleeping area (5.6 [2.0-16.8]), reducing spending (4.6 [2.3-9.5]) or borrowing money to afford rent (2.9 [1.2-6.7]), experiencing housing stress (3.3 [1.8-6.0]), and moving or considering moving to access health/community services (15.0 [6.4-37.6]) compared to HC. CONCLUSIONS: CMC were more likely to experience multiple indicators of housing need compared to CT1D and HC even after adjusting for sociodemographic factors, suggesting an association between complexity of child health conditions and housing need. Further research and practise should consider screening for and supporting housing need in CMC.
Authors: Colin Macarthur; Eyal Cohen; Sherri Adams; Francine Buchanan; Natasha R Saunders; Jeremy N Friedman Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-03-11