OBJECTIVE: Patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) demonstrate altered immune responses to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), but the presence and roles of EBV have not been fully explored during the pre-clinical disease period. This study was undertaken to determine if EBV infection, as evidenced by an altered anti-EBV antibody response, either plays an important role in driving the development of RA or is a result of expanded RA-related autoimmunity. METHODS: A total of 83 subjects with RA according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and 83 age-, sex-, and race-matched control subjects without RA were included in our study. We collected sera from RA subjects and matched controls during the pre-RA and post-RA diagnosis periods and tested the sera for the presence of 5 anti-EBV antibodies (anti-EBV nuclear antigen 1 IgG isotype, anti-viral capsid antigen [anti-VCA] isotypes IgG and IgA, and anti-early antigen [EA] isotypes IgG and IgA), 7 RA-related autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor measured by nephelometry [RF-Neph] as well as isotype-specific IgA-RF, IgM-RF, and IgG-RF, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide [anti-CCP] antibodies, including anti-CCP2, anti-CCP3, and anti-CCP3.1), 22 cytokines/chemokines, 36 individual anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, and IgG-cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibodies. Random forest classification, mixed modeling, and joint mixed modeling were used to determine differences in anti-EBV antibody levels between RA subjects and controls. RESULTS: Random forest analysis identified the presence of preclinical EBV antibodies in the serum that differentiated RA subjects from controls without RA. Specifically, IgG-EA antibody levels were higher in RA subjects (mean ± SD 0.82 ± 0.72 international standardized ratio [ISR]) compared to controls (mean ± SD 0.49 ± 0.28 ISR). In subjects with RA, elevated serum IgG-EA levels in the preclinical period before seroconversion were significantly correlated with increased serum IgM-RF levels (P = 0.007), whereas this correlation was not seen in control subjects without RA (P = 0.15). IgG-CMV antibody levels did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Subjects whose serum IgG-EA antibody levels are elevated in the preclinical period will eventually develop RA, which suggests that EBV reactivation cycles are increased during the preclinical period of RA. A combination of RF and EBV reactivation may play an important role in the development of RA.
OBJECTIVE: Patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) demonstrate altered immune responses to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), but the presence and roles of EBV have not been fully explored during the pre-clinical disease period. This study was undertaken to determine if EBV infection, as evidenced by an altered anti-EBV antibody response, either plays an important role in driving the development of RA or is a result of expanded RA-related autoimmunity. METHODS: A total of 83 subjects with RA according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and 83 age-, sex-, and race-matched control subjects without RA were included in our study. We collected sera from RA subjects and matched controls during the pre-RA and post-RA diagnosis periods and tested the sera for the presence of 5 anti-EBV antibodies (anti-EBV nuclear antigen 1 IgG isotype, anti-viral capsid antigen [anti-VCA] isotypes IgG and IgA, and anti-early antigen [EA] isotypes IgG and IgA), 7 RA-related autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor measured by nephelometry [RF-Neph] as well as isotype-specific IgA-RF, IgM-RF, and IgG-RF, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide [anti-CCP] antibodies, including anti-CCP2, anti-CCP3, and anti-CCP3.1), 22 cytokines/chemokines, 36 individual anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, and IgG-cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibodies. Random forest classification, mixed modeling, and joint mixed modeling were used to determine differences in anti-EBV antibody levels between RA subjects and controls. RESULTS: Random forest analysis identified the presence of preclinical EBV antibodies in the serum that differentiated RA subjects from controls without RA. Specifically, IgG-EA antibody levels were higher in RA subjects (mean ± SD 0.82 ± 0.72 international standardized ratio [ISR]) compared to controls (mean ± SD 0.49 ± 0.28 ISR). In subjects with RA, elevated serum IgG-EA levels in the preclinical period before seroconversion were significantly correlated with increased serum IgM-RF levels (P = 0.007), whereas this correlation was not seen in control subjects without RA (P = 0.15). IgG-CMV antibody levels did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Subjects whose serum IgG-EA antibody levels are elevated in the preclinical period will eventually develop RA, which suggests that EBV reactivation cycles are increased during the preclinical period of RA. A combination of RF and EBV reactivation may play an important role in the development of RA.
Authors: Kevin D Deane; Colin I O'Donnell; Wolfgang Hueber; Darcy S Majka; Ann A Lazar; Lezlie A Derber; William R Gilliland; Jess D Edison; Jill M Norris; William H Robinson; V Michael Holers Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-11
Authors: F Pratesi; C Tommasi; C Anzilotti; I Puxeddu; E Sardano; G Di Colo; P Migliorini Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist; Ben A W de Jong; Ewa Berglin; Göran Hallmans; Göran Wadell; Hans Stenlund; Ulf Sundin; Walther J van Venrooij Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2003-10
Authors: Markus M J Nielen; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg; Henk W Reesink; Rob J van de Stadt; Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma; Margret H M T de Koning; Moud R Habibuw; Jan P Vandenbroucke; Ben A C Dijkmans Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-02
Authors: D S Majka; K D Deane; L A Parrish; A A Lazar; A E Barón; C W Walker; M V Rubertone; W R Gilliland; J M Norris; V M Holers Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Danielle M Gerlag; Karim Raza; Lisa G M van Baarsen; Elisabeth Brouwer; Christopher D Buckley; Gerd R Burmester; Cem Gabay; Anca I Catrina; Andrew P Cope; François Cornelis; Solbritt Rantapää Dahlqvist; Paul Emery; Stephen Eyre; Axel Finckh; Steffen Gay; Johanna M Hazes; Annette van der Helm-van Mil; Tom W J Huizinga; Lars Klareskog; Tore K Kvien; Cathryn Lewis; Klaus P Machold; Johan Rönnelid; Dirkjan van Schaardenburg; Georg Schett; Josef S Smolen; Sue Thomas; Jane Worthington; Paul P Tak Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Jeremy Sokolove; Reuven Bromberg; Kevin D Deane; Lauren J Lahey; Lezlie A Derber; Piyanka E Chandra; Jess D Edison; William R Gilliland; Robert J Tibshirani; Jill M Norris; V Michael Holers; William H Robinson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael J Peluso; Tyler-Marie Deveau; Sadie E Munter; Dylan Ryder; Amanda Buck; Gabriele Beck-Engeser; Fay Chan; Scott Lu; Sarah A Goldberg; Rebecca Hoh; Viva Tai; Leonel Torres; Nikita S Iyer; Monika Deswal; Lynn H Ngo; Melissa Buitrago; Antonio Rodriguez; Jessica Y Chen; Brandon C Yee; Ahmed Chenna; John W Winslow; Christos J Petropoulos; Amelia N Deitchman; Joanna Hellmuth; Matthew A Spinelli; Matthew S Durstenfeld; Priscilla Y Hsue; J Daniel Kelly; Jeffrey N Martin; Steven G Deeks; Peter W Hunt; Timothy J Henrich Journal: medRxiv Date: 2022-07-22
Authors: Dylan T Bergstedt; Wyatt J Tarter; Ryan A Peterson; Marie L Feser; Mark C Parish; Christopher C Striebich; M Kristen Demoruelle; LauraKay Moss; Elizabeth A Bemis; Jill M Norris; V Michael Holers; Jess D Edison; Geoffrey M Thiele; Ted R Mikuls; Kevin D Deane Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 8.786