Literature DB >> 34604564

The association between various indicators of hospital capacity, age category, and the number of screening tests performed with case fatality rate and recovery rate during the COVID-19 disease pandemic.

Morteza Abdullatif Khafaie1, Amal Saki Malehi2, Fakher Rahim3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19-related deaths are growing rapidly around the world, especially in Europe and the United States.
PURPOSE: In this study we attempt to measure the association of these variables with case fatality rate (CFR) and recovery rate (RR) using up-to-date data from around the world.
METHODS: Data were collected from eight global databases. According to the raw data of countries, the CFR and RR and their relationship with different predictors was compared for countries with 1,000 or more cases of COVID-19 confirmed cases.
RESULTS: There were no significant correlation between the CFR and number of hospital beds per 1,000 people, proportion of population aged 65 and older ages, and the number of computed tomography per one million inhabitants. Furthermore, based on the continents-based subgroup univariate regression analysis, the population (R2 = 0.37, P = 0.047), GPD (R2 = 0.80, P < 0.001), number of ICU Beds per 100,000 people (R2 = 0.93, P = 0.04), and number of CT per one million inhabitants (R2 = 0.78, P = 0.04) were significantly correlated with CFR in America. Moreover, the income-based subgroups analysis showed that the gross domestic product (R2 = 0.30, P = 0.001), number of ICU Beds per 100,000 people (R2 = 0.23, P = 0.008), and the number of ventilator (R2 = 0.46, P = 0.01) had significant correlation with CFR in high-income countries.
CONCLUSIONS: The level of country's preparedness, testing capacity, and health care system capacities also are among the important predictors of both COVID-19 associated mortality and recovery. Thus, providing up-to-date information on the main predictors of COVID-19 associated mortality and recovery will hopefully improve various countries hospital resource allocation, testing capacities, and level of preparedness. ©2021 Pacini Editore SRL, Pisa, Italy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Case fatality rate (CFR); Hospital resource allocation; Recovery rate (RR)

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34604564      PMCID: PMC8451361          DOI: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2.1569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg        ISSN: 1121-2233


Introduction

Since the first suspected case of coronavirus-2019 disease (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) on December 1, 2019, in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, a total of 4,012,857 confirmed cases and 276,216 deaths in 212 countries and territories have been reported by May 9, 2020 [1]. The COVID-19-related deaths are growing rapidly around the world, especially in Europe and the United States. Case Fatality Rate (CFR) is a measure of the ability of a pathogen or virus to infect or harm a host in infectious disease and is described as the mortality rate in a given population. Globally, the overall CFR for COVID-19 disease estimated by researchers was 3.6-4.3% [2]. There is a disparity in tactics against COVID-19 disease, which different countries used in various protocols and procedures [3]. The US government does not recommend more than 10 people gathered, but San Francisco has ordered everyone to stay home. Italy, France, and Spain, while police or the army are patrolling in some areas, have almost completely shut down their populations, but at the same time, public places were open in the UK. Like many other countries, Germany has closed its schools, but schools are open to children in Sweden. The capacity of hospitals has long been exhausted, and medical staffs are forced to make annoying choices about who to treat and who will be saved [4]. In today’s world, information guides the health care system, and the realization of this depends on the existence of accurate data and reliable information provided from various sources. Hospital indicators are one of the most important tools for measuring the efficiency and productivity of a health care service, which is collected and analyzed correctly; they play an important role in decision making and quality control of services [5]. The intensive care unit (ICU) is one of the essential and vital pillars of hospitals, which provides care to patients with severe and life-threatening conditions. Patients with severe acute respiratory infections due to COVID-19 disease may need supplemental oxygen and mechanical respiratory support. Thus, the higher the number of beds and care equipment in the intensive care unit, the lower the mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 [6, 7]. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest in patients with COVID-19 are usually considered as a tool that can be very helpful in diagnosing the disease in its early stages [8]. Moreover, people of any age can be severely infected with the COVID-19, although it is more common in middle-aged and older adults, especially people older than 60 years [9]; thus, experts believe that age distribution can also play a key role in increased mortality rates. Considering the importance of CFR and recovery rate (RR), as well as the relationship between these two variables with the number of beds in hospitals and intensive care units, the number of ventilators, the number of CT-scan apparatuses, gross domestic product (GDP), the percentage of people over the age of 60, and the number of screening tests performed during a COVID-19 disease pandemic, in this study, we attempt to measure the association of these variables with CFR and RR using up-to-date data from around the world.

Materials and methods

DATA COLLECTION

Data were collected from global databases such as World meter [10], WHO [11], the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [12], and the Weekly Report on Complications and Deaths (prepared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), based on the user guide, data sources for disease registration [13]. Due to the rapid increase in data, the analysis in this study was conducted on April 10, 2020. According to the raw data of countries, the CFR and RR and their relationship with the number of beds in hospitals and intensive care units, the number of ventilators in hospitals, the number of CT scans, the gross domestic product (GDP), the number of screening tests performed during an epidemic was compared for countries with 1000 or more cases of COVID-19 confirmed cases [2]. The number of beds in hospitals and intensive care units, the number of ventilators in hospitals, the number of CT scans, the gross domestic product (GDP), the number of screening tests performed during an epidemic were collected from American Hospital Association (AHA) fact sheet (), Critical Care Statistics (), Wikipedia (), research data and infographics from Statista () and WHO reports.

CALCULATE THE CASE FATALITY RATE (CFR) AND RECOVERY RATE (RR)

The case fatality rate and recovery rate were calculated from the following formulas: CFR = (Total number of deaths due to COVID-19/Total number of cases of disease) * 100 RR = (Total number of cases recovered from COVID-19/Total number of cases of the disease) * 100

Methods

Based on currently observed parameters we provide insights into the association between various indicators of healthcare systems and COVID-19 results (death or recovery) in global level. So, firstly the univariate regression analysis was performed based on these expletory variables. Furthermore, to assess the simultaneous impact of different risk indicators on the CFR, multiple regression model was fitted using all significant factors in prior step.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the association between recovery rate and case fatality rate as dependent variables and GPD, population, number of ICU beds, proportion of population aged 65 and older ages, number of ventilators, number of total COVID-19 tests, number of total COVID-19 tests per 1 M population and number of hospital beds as explanatory variables. Regard this process, firstly the univariate model was fitted with all the explanatory variables. Furthermore, based on the univariate findings, to assess the simultaneous impact of different explanatory variables on the recovery rate and case fatality rate, multiple linear regression model was fitted using all significant factors in prior step. However, due to the existence of a correlation between the independent variables (multicollinearity) the Ridge regression model was implemented. Since, the multicollinearity lead to definitely serious problems such as makes it hard to interpret the coefficients in multiple regression, and it reduces the power of the model to identify independent variables that are statistically significant. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was conducted based on country’s origin (continent) and class of the country’s economy (based on The World Bank classifies). The graphs were also plotted using the scatter plot. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22 and Stata 12. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

Table I showed all the data about the GDP, number of hospital beds per 1,000 people, number of ICU beds per 100,000 people, number of ventilators, % population of ≥ 65 years age, number of computed tomography apparatus per one million people, with CFR and RR of COVID-19 infection among countries with more than 1,000 infected cases.
Tab. I.

Comparison of population, GDP, number of hospital beds per 1,000 people, number of ICU beds per 100,000 people, number of ventilators, % population of ≥ 65 years age, number of computed tomography apparatus per one million people, with case fatality and recovery rates of COVID-19 infection among countries with more than 1,000 infected cases.

Country [reference]Population (million)GDP (trillion)Number of hospital beds per 1,000 peopleNumber of ICU beds per 100,000 peopleNumber of ventilatorsTotal casesTotal deathsTotal recoveredCase fatality rateRecovery rate% population ages 65 and olderNumber of CT per 1 million inhabitantsNumber of tests
USA [14] 327.219.392.7734.7177,000245,3736,09510,40312.074.2416%44.3901,654,409
Italy [15] 60.481.9353.1812.53,000115,24213,91518,2789.2315.8622.4%34.710657,224
Spain[15] 46.661.3112.979.7NR112,06510,34826,7431.3123.8619.1%18.590355,000
China [16] 1,38612.244.343.6NR84,7941,10722,4404.0726.4611.9%NR320,000
Germany [15] 82.793.6778.0029.225,00081,6203,32276,5719.1193.8121.1%35.130918,460
France [15] 66.992.5835.9811.630,00059,1055,38712,4286.2621.0320.3%17.690224,254
Iran [17] 81.160.43951.54.8NR50,4683,16016,7118.6633.116.1%NR80,000
UK [15] 66.442.6222.546.68,17533,7182,9211352.960.4018.3%NR183,190
Switzerland [15] 8.570.67894.5311.0NR19,1065654,8461.9625.3618.3%39.280153,440
Turkey [15] 80.810.85112.8147.117,00018,1353564156.592.298.8%14.770161,380
Belgium [15] 11.40.49275.7615.9NR15,3481,0112,4959.1116.2618.7%NR18,360
Netherlands [15] 17.180.82623.326.4NR14,6971,3392501.531.7018.9%13.48046,810
Austria [15] 8.8220.41667.3721.82,50011,2831731,9791.4117.5418.8%28.640104,134
S. Korea [16] 51.41.53112.2710.69,79511,2381582,0221.7317.9915.1%38.180461,233
Canada [18] 37.591.6532.5213.5NR10,0621746,0212.3159.8417.2%15.510317,972
Portugal [15] 10.290.21763.394.21,4009,034209684.050.7520.7%NR52,086
Brazil 209.32.0562.3NRNR8,0663271270.511.578.5%NR58,824
Israel 8.7120.35093.02NRNR7,030363385.534.81NR9.69090,394
Australia 24.61.3233.849.11,3145,5683081030.521.8515.8%67.200286,786
Sweden 10.120.5382.225.8NR5,350285850.9610.9319.6%17.28036,900
Norway 5.3680.39883.688005,21850320.820.6117.2%NR101,986
Czech Republic [15] 10.650.21576.6311.63,5294,149342811.196.7719.6%15.67074,170
Russia [19] 144.51.5788.058.340,0003,86946712.551.8414.6%13.640639,606
Ireland 4.830.33372.966.5NR3,8499853.350.13NR20.50030,213
Denmark 5.6030.32492.616.7NR3,6721231,0890.5329.6619%39.78045,270
Malaysia 31.620.31451.9NRNR3,404183353.799.846.4%NR49,570
Chile 18.050.27712.22.11NR3,163120651.872.0611.8%24.27044,130
Ecuador 16.620.10311.50NRNR3,14959561.601.78NRNR10,317
Philippines 104.90.31361.0NRNR3,116507674.5124.615.1%NR5,530
Poland [15] 37.980.52456.626.910,1003,018136524.241.7217.5%16.88072,901
Romania 19.530.21186.321.4NR2,7381162672.419.7518.2%NR36,092
Japan [16] 126.84.87213.057.332,5862,617634722.8018.0426%111.49042,882
Luxembourg 0.6130.6254.6624.8NR2,567721921.217.4814.4%16.450NR
Pakistan 1970.3050.6NR34,0002,48730801.433.224.3%NR32,930
India 1,3392.5970.535.240,0002,450351269.115.146.1%NR79,950
Thailand 69.040.45522.1NRNR1,9861811340.966.7511.5%NR23,669
Indonesia 2641.0161.2NRNR1,978195811.1129.375.6%NR7,896
Saudi Arabia 32.940.68382.7NRNR1,885213281.1817.40NRNRNR
Finland 5.5130.25193.286.1NR1,615193003.4318.5820.3%24.51029,000
Greece 10.740.20034.246.0NR1,54453613.313.9519%34.22015,961
South Africa [20] 56.720.34942.88.9NR1,510506332.5141.926.0%NR50,361
Mexico 129.21.151.381.22,0501,4753790.340.617.2%5.839,481
Peru 32.170.21141.6NRNR1,4625953.896.508.4%NR12,669
Panama 4.0990.61842.3NRNR1,414555374.3537.98NRNR7,333
Dominican Republic 10.770.75931.6NRNR1,38060160.301.163%NRNR
Iceland 0.36420.23912.966.5NR1,31942842.9221.5314.2%20.50023,640
Argentina 44.270.63745.0NRNR1,265372562.6520.2411.4%NR7,385
Colombia 49.070.30921.7NRNR1,17131421.643.5911.4%1.30023,760
Serbia 7.0220.41435.7NRNR1,16119550.454.7420.2%NR5,008
Singapore 5.6120.32392.4NRNR1,11452660.7823.88NRNR39,000
World 7,530 80.68 ---- ----- ----- 1,019,354 53,322 214,358 2.48 21.03 ----- -----
There were no significant correlations between the CFR and the number of hospital beds per 1,000 people, the proportion of population aged 65 and older, and the number of CT per one million inhabitants (Fig. 1). However, CFR was positively correlated to the country’s GPD, population, number of ICU beds per 100 individuals, number of ventilators, and total COVID-19 tests performed (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

Case fatality rate against the population (R2 = 0.09, P = 0.035), the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) (in trillion) (R2 = 0.22, P = 0.001), the number of intensive care unit (ICU) beds per 100 individuals (R2 = 0.17, P = 0.016), and the number of ventilators (R2 = 0.38, P = 0.007), and the number of screening tests performed (R2 = 0.31, P < 0.001). Lines represent linear regression analysis together with 95% confidence intervals around the line.

Furthermore, to assess the simultaneous impact of different risk indicators on the CFR, the ridge regression model was fitted using all significant variables in theunivariate regression model (Fig. 1). Based on ridge regression results, these variables simultaneously were not significant, albeit the R2 was impressive in multiple regression (Tab. II). Furthermore, based on the continents-based subgroup univariate regression analysis, the population (R2 = 0.37, P = 0.047), GPD (R2 = 0.80, P < 0.001), number of ICU Beds per 100,000 people (R2 = 0.93, P = 0.04), and number of CT per one million inhabitants (R2 = 0.78, P = 0.04) were significantly correlated with CFR in America, which means these variables could be main predictors of CFR in America. In Asia and Europe, there was no significant correlation between the CFR and most of the variables; however, the number of CT per one million inhabitants (R2 = 0.37) was an important predictor when compared to other variables in Asia, and the GPD (R2 = 0.30) was the main predictors of CFR in Europe (Tab. III). Moreover, the income-based subgroups analysis showed that the GPD (R2 = 0.30, P = 0.001), number of ICU Beds per 100,000 people (R2 = 0.23, P = 0.008), and the number of ventilators (R2 = 0.46, P = 0.01) had a significant correlation with CFR in high-income countries. The population in low-middle income countries (R2 = 0.74) and the number of CT per one million inhabitants (R2 = 0.52) in upper-middle-income countries are as main predictors of CFR (Tab. III). However, overall analysis for RR showed that there was no significant correlation between the recovery rate and GPD, population, number of ICU beds, percentage of population of aged 65 and older ages, number of ventilators, number of total COVID-19 tests, number of hospital beds, and number of CT (Fig. 2). Only RR was weakly positively related to the number of COVID-19 performed tests (R2 = 0.06, P = 0.086) (Fig. 2). Since none of the explanatory variables was significantly correlated to recovery rate, the multiple linear regression model was not fitted. It means that these expletory variables could not be as good as predictors to the recovery rate.
Tab. II.

The result of multiple ridge regression of the association of variables of interest with CFR.

VariablesStandardized betaSEP-valueR2
GPD 0.360.0020.080.66
Population 0.380.460.51
Number of ICU beds per 100 individuals 0.470.0790.10
Number of ventilators 0.15< 0.00010.83
Number of total COVID-19 tests -0.24< 0.00010.63
Tab. III.

The result of subgroup analysis of the association of variables of interest with CFR.

ContinentsVariablesStandardized betaR2P-value
America (n = 11) Population (million) 0.61 0.37 0.047
GDP (trillion) 0.89 0.80 < 0.001
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people0.260.070.44
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people 0.96 0.93 0.04
Number of ventilators------------
% population ages 65 and older0.580.340.10
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants 0.89 0.78 0.046
Number of COVID-19 tests0.400.160.23
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population0.110.010.74
Asia (n = 14) Population (million)0.390.150.17
GDP (trillion)0.070.0050.81
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people-0.240.0560.42
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people0.110.0120.72
Number of ventilators0.320.110.59
% population ages 65 and older-0.390.150.22
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants-0.610.370.39
Number of COVID-19 tests0.210.0440.47
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population0.090.0080.77
Europe (n=23) Population (million)0.380.140.77
GDP (trillion)0.550.300.27
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people0.240.0570.27
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people0.310.0940.16
Number of ventilators0.270.0730.45
% population ages 65 and older0.400.160.06
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants0.290.0880.25
Number of COVID-19 tests0.210.0450.33
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population-0.050.0030.81
Africa (n = 1) -----
Australia (n = 1) -----
High income (n = 31) Population (million)0.190.0360.31
GDP (trillion) 0.55 0.30 0.001
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people0.050.0030.77
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people 0.48 0.23 0.008
Number of ventilators 0.68 0.46 0.01
% population ages 65 and older0.0340.0010.87
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants0.040.0020.86
Number of COVID-19 tests0.230.0530.21
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population0.01< 0.0010.95
Lower middle income (n = 15) Population (million)0.860.740.14
GDP (trillion)0.790.630.21
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people-0.540.290.46
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people0.870.750.13
Number of ventilators------------
% population ages 65 and older0.670.450.33
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants------------
Number of COVID-19 tests0.120.0150.88
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population-0.430.180.57
Upper middle income (n = 4) Population (million)-0.030.0010.92
GDP (trillion)-0.220.0470.44
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people-0.0980.010.73
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people0.350.120.39
Number of ventilators0.230.0540.85
% population ages 65 and older-0.240.0550.42
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants0.720.520.28
Number of COVID-19 tests0.120.0140.67
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population-0.050.0020.87
Fig. 2.

Recovery rate (RR) against the number of tests. Lines represent linear regression analysis together with 95% confidence intervals around the line (R2 = 0.06, P = 0.086).

Furthermore, subgroup analysis of RR based on origin continents revealed that GPD (R2 = 0.34, P = 0.004), number of ICU Beds per 100,000 people (R2 = 0.33, P = 0.005), and number of CT per one million inhabitants (R2 = 0.26, P = 0.04) are the significant and main predictors of RR in Europe. In America and Asia, there is no significant correlation between the RR and expletory variables. However, the percentage of population of aged 65 and older ages (R2 = 0.38) is the important predictor compared to other variables in America, and the number of CT per one million inhabitants is the main predictor of recovery rate in Asia (R2 = 0.58) (Tab. IV). In addition, the result based on income subgroups showed that the number of ICU Beds per 100,000 people (R2 = 0.14, P = 0.05) is the significant predictor of RR in high-income countries. The number of COVID-19 tests (R2 = 0.50, P = 0.003) and the number of hospital beds per 1000 people (R2 = 0.97, P = 0.02) are positively correlated to RR in upper-middle and lower-middle-income, respectively (Tab. IV).
Tab. IV.

The result of subgroup analysis of the association of variables of interest with RR.

ContinentsVariablesStandardized betaR2P-value
America (n = 11) Population (million)-0.280.0790.40
GDP (trillion)-0.110.0120.75
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people0.330.110.31
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people0.080.0060.93
Number of ventilators------------
% population ages 65 and older0.630.380.07
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants-0.060.0040.92
Number of COVID-19 tests-0.090.0090.79
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population0.150.020.66
Asia (n = 14) Population (million)0.0310.0010.91
GDP (trillion)0.260.0690.37
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people0.100.010.73
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people-0.390.150.19
Number of ventilators-0.310.0980.61
% population ages 65 and older0.060.0040.86
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants0.760.580.24
Number of COVID-19 tests-0.040.0010.90
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population-0.430.190.12
Europe (n = 23) Population (million)0.240.0550.28
GDP (trillion) 0.58 0.34 0.004
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people0.290.080.18
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people 0.58 0.33 0.005
Number of ventilators0.330.110.35
% population ages 65 and older0.290.080.19
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants 0.51 0.26 0.04
Number of COVID-19 tests0.260.070.23
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population-0.200.040.36
Africa (n = 1) --------------------
Australia (n = 1) --------------------
High income (n = 31) Population (million)0.0970.0090.61
GDP (trillion)0.060.0040.75
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people0.160.0270.38
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people 0.37 0.14 0.05
Number of ventilators-.0060.0010.98
% population ages 65 and older0.120.0150.54
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants0.0360.0010.87
Number of COVID-19 tests-0.0150.0010.94
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population-0.190.0340.32
Lower middle income (n = 15) Population (million)-0.510.260.49
GDP (trillion)-0.330.110.67
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people 0.98 0.97 0.02
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people-0.250.060.76
Number of ventilators---------------
% population ages 65 and older0.200.0430.79
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants---------------
Number of COVID-19 tests0.210.0460.79
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population-0.110.0130.89
Upper middle income (n = 4) Population (million)-0.130.020.65
GDP (trillion)-0.320.100.24
Number of hospital beds per 1,000 people-0.0350.0010.90
Number of ICU beds per 100,000 people-0.260.070.53
Number of ventilators0.620.380.58
% population ages 65 and older-0.240.0590.40
Number of CT Per 1 million inhabitants-0.290.0840.71
Number of COVID-19 tests 0.71 0.50 0.003
Number of COVID-19 tests per 1 M population-0.190.0350.51

Discussion

This study was aimed to measure the association of indicators of hospital capacity, age category, and the number of screening tests performed with CFR and RR using up-to-date data from around the world, showed that CFR was positively correlated to the country’s GPD, population, number of ICU beds per 100 individuals, number of ventilators and number of total COVID-19 tests performed; however, RR had a weak and positive correlation to the number of COVID-19 performed tests. In mid-February 2020, in a joint report, CDC and WHO announced that although 80% of all patients with COVID-19 had the mild form of the disease, 13.8% of all confirmed cases had serious symptoms 4.7% were in acute conditions as well [21]. This point prompted healthcare and political authorities in all countries to step up their efforts, asking whether the capacity of the hospitals, especially ICUs, was sufficient for patients with acute and severe conditions. Therefore, if the acceleration of the transmission of the disease continues in its current form, the intensive care unit in hospitals in many countries will collapse due to the high number of such patients. The United States and Germany topped the list with 34.7 and 29.2 beds per 100,000 people, while Philippines and India have 1.0 and 0.56 beds per 100,000 people at the bottom of the list [14-16]. One possible reason is that, despite bearing a good hospital and ICU capacity, the number of beds does not cover the large number of confirmed cases. The COVID-19 disease outbreak has put unprecedented pressure on hospitals, as the number of people infected in the country increases exponentially in a very short time. Thus, doctors have been forced to prioritize patients who were more likely to survive, and the rest are left to their own devices. In line with previous reports, one of the variables that positively correlated with CFR was GDP, which means CFR is associated with countries’ income, so high-income countries usually have lower mortality than low-income countries [22, 23]. The possible reasons are life expectancy, health expenditure per capita, and the frequency of underlying diseases [24-26]. Especially in American countries, CFR was significantly correlated with GDP, population density, number of ICU beds, and number of CT scans. In this context, a study reported an increase in the COVID-19 test rate is associated with a decrease in the death rate [27]. Thus, to control or possibly decrease the COVID-19 associated mortality, there could be a need to increase the demand for hospital and ICU beds [28]. Our analyses also showed that COVID-19 related mortality is significantly associated with older population fraction, especially in European countries. In line with our findings, a recent study showed that COVID-19 mortality is mainly observed among older people in European countries, such as Italy [29].

Conclusions

In countries of which the average age of infected individuals is lower (Iran, Brazil, Malaysia, Pakistan, India, and Indonesia), and many of the patients are relatively young and healthy, COVID-19 related mortality is accordingly low. The level of country’s preparedness and health care system capacities also are among the important predictors of both COVID-19 associated mortality and recovery. Another factor that may lead to the lower CFR and higher RR is testing far more people, which means detecting more infected people at very early stages could increase the confirmed cases, but not the mortalities. Thus, providing up-to-date information on the main predictors of COVID-19 associated mortality and recovery will hopefully improve various countries hospital resource allocation, testing capacities, and level of preparedness. Case fatality rate against the population (R2 = 0.09, P = 0.035), the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) (in trillion) (R2 = 0.22, P = 0.001), the number of intensive care unit (ICU) beds per 100 individuals (R2 = 0.17, P = 0.016), and the number of ventilators (R2 = 0.38, P = 0.007), and the number of screening tests performed (R2 = 0.31, P < 0.001). Lines represent linear regression analysis together with 95% confidence intervals around the line. Recovery rate (RR) against the number of tests. Lines represent linear regression analysis together with 95% confidence intervals around the line (R2 = 0.06, P = 0.086). Comparison of population, GDP, number of hospital beds per 1,000 people, number of ICU beds per 100,000 people, number of ventilators, % population of ≥ 65 years age, number of computed tomography apparatus per one million people, with case fatality and recovery rates of COVID-19 infection among countries with more than 1,000 infected cases. The result of multiple ridge regression of the association of variables of interest with CFR. The result of subgroup analysis of the association of variables of interest with CFR. The result of subgroup analysis of the association of variables of interest with RR.
  21 in total

1.  Critical Care Utilization for the COVID-19 Outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: Early Experience and Forecast During an Emergency Response.

Authors:  Giacomo Grasselli; Antonio Pesenti; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Case-Fatality Rate and Characteristics of Patients Dying in Relation to COVID-19 in Italy.

Authors:  Graziano Onder; Giovanni Rezza; Silvio Brusaferro
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Patterns in the relationship between life expectancy and gross domestic product in Russia in 2005-15: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Vladimir M Shkolnikov; Evgeny M Andreev; Rustam Tursun-Zade; David A Leon
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2019-04

4.  CT Imaging and Differential Diagnosis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Wei-Cai Dai; Han-Wen Zhang; Juan Yu; Hua-Jian Xu; Huan Chen; Si-Ping Luo; Hong Zhang; Li-Hong Liang; Xiao-Liu Wu; Yi Lei; Fan Lin
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.248

5.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis.

Authors:  Robert Verity; Lucy C Okell; Ilaria Dorigatti; Peter Winskill; Charles Whittaker; Natsuko Imai; Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg; Hayley Thompson; Patrick G T Walker; Han Fu; Amy Dighe; Jamie T Griffin; Marc Baguelin; Sangeeta Bhatia; Adhiratha Boonyasiri; Anne Cori; Zulma Cucunubá; Rich FitzJohn; Katy Gaythorpe; Will Green; Arran Hamlet; Wes Hinsley; Daniel Laydon; Gemma Nedjati-Gilani; Steven Riley; Sabine van Elsland; Erik Volz; Haowei Wang; Yuanrong Wang; Xiaoyue Xi; Christl A Donnelly; Azra C Ghani; Neil M Ferguson
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Cross-Country Comparison of Case Fatality Rates of COVID-19/SARS-COV-2.

Authors:  Morteza Abdullatif Khafaie; Fakher Rahim
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2020-04

Review 7.  Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults.

Authors:  Neill K J Adhikari; Robert A Fowler; Satish Bhagwanjee; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The assessment of inequality on geographical distribution of non-cardiac intensive care beds in iran.

Authors:  A Ameryoun; M Meskarpour-Amiri; M Lorgard Dezfuli-Nejad; Hr Khoddami-Vishteh; Sh Tofighi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.429

9.  Impact of disaster-related mortality on gross domestic product in the WHO African Region.

Authors:  Joses M Kirigia; Luis G Sambo; William Aldis; Germano M Mwabu
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2004-03-15

10.  Comparative Quality Indicators for Hospital Choice: Do General Practitioners Care?

Authors:  Marie Ferrua; Claude Sicotte; Benoît Lalloué; Etienne Minvielle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.