| Literature DB >> 34604396 |
Amir Faghihi1, Sied Saeed Najafi2, Mohammad Hashem Hashempur3, Majid Najafi Kalyani2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Constipation is one of the most prevalent problems during old age. Abdominal massage is a complementary method in controlling constipation. This study is conducted with the aim of determining the effect of abdominal massage with extra-virgin olive oil on constipation among the elderly.Entities:
Keywords: Complementary and alternative medicine; Constipation; Massage; Olive oil; The elderly
Year: 2021 PMID: 34604396 PMCID: PMC8479287 DOI: 10.30476/ijcbnm.2021.88206.1495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery ISSN: 2322-2476
Figure 1Figure 1: CONSORT flow chart of the participants
Distribution of the elderly people in the three groups in terms of demographic variables
| Massage with olive oil | Massage with water | Control | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |||
| Gender | Male | 7 (43.8) | 10 (55.6) | 11 (61.1) | 0.69 |
| Female | 9 (56.3) | 8 (44.4) | 7 (38.9) | ||
| Education level | Illiterate | 2 (12.5) | 8 (44.4) | 4 (22.2) | 0.74 |
| Primary school | 7 (43.8) | 3 (16.7) | 4 (22.2) | ||
| Middle school | 2 (12.5) | 2 (11.1) | 4 (22.2) | ||
| High school | 3 (18.8) | 3 (16.7) | 3 (16.7) | ||
| Associate Degree | 1 (6.3) | 1 (5.6) | 2 (11.2) | ||
| Bachelor’s or above | 1 (6.3) | 1 (5.6) | 1 (5.6) | ||
| History of smoking | Yes | 3 (18.8) | 5 (27.8) | 4 (22.2) | 0.91 |
| No | 13 (81.3) | 13 (72.2) | 14 (77.8) | ||
| History of medication use | Yes | 5 (31.3) | 9 (50) | 7 (38.9) | 0.52 |
| No | 11 (68.8) | 9 (50) | 11 (61.1) | ||
| Doing daily sports | Yes | 4 (25) | 0 (0) | 2 (11.1) | 0.06 |
| No | 12 (75) | 18 (100) | 16 (88.9) | ||
Chi-square test
Comparison of the elderly participants’ mean scores of constipation before and after the intervention in three groups
| Group | Constipation | d score | Effect size | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before the intervention Mean±SD | After the intervention Mean±SD | ||||
| Control | 4.44±1.38 | 5.22±1.35 | 0.77±1.06 | 0.57 | 0.006 |
| Massage with water | 5.05±1.25 | 3.11±0.99 | -1.94±0.93 | 1.72 | 0.02 |
| Massage with olive oil | 5.62±1.89 | 2.06±0.99 | -3.56±1.26 | 2.35 | ≤0.001 |
| P value | 0.87 | ≤0.001 | |||
Paired t-test;
One-way ANOVA
Comparison of the eight items of CAS before and after the intervention among three groups
| Groups | Control | Massage with water | Massage with olive oil | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | Mean±SD | Mean±SD | Mean±SD | ||
| Abdominal distension or bloating | Before | 0.62±0.61 | 0.79±0.63 | 1.17±0.62 | 0.04 |
| After | 0.94±0.44 | 0.47±0.51 | 0.44±0.51 | 0.01 | |
| Changing in amount of gas passed rectally | Before | 0.56±0.51 | 0.42±0.51 | 0.39±0.5 | 0.56 |
| After | 0.5±0.51 | 0.16±0.37 | 0 | 0.001 | |
| Less frequent bowel movement | Before | 0.75±0.68 | 0.89±0.58 | 1.05±0.54 | 0.007 |
| After | 0.44±0.51 | 0.39±0.5 | 0.22±0.43 | 0.40 | |
| Oozing liquid stool | Before | 0.62±0.25 | 0 | 0.11±0.32 | 0.34 |
| After | 0.62±0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0.31 | |
| Rectal fullness or pressure | Before | 0.75±0.44 | 1±0.57 | 0.72±0.57 | 0.25 |
| After | 0.81±0.4 | 0.58±0.61 | 0.28±0.46 | 0.01 | |
| Rectal pain with bowel movement | Before | 0.44±0.51 | 0.68±0.48 | 0.72±0.57 | 0.24 |
| After | 0.69±0.6 | 0.47±0.51 | 0.28±0.46 | 0.10 | |
| Small volume of stool | Before | 0.62±0.5 | 0.31±0.48 | 0.55±0.51 | 0.15 |
| After | 0.87±0.72 | 0.74±0.45 | 0.33±0.48 | 0.02 | |
| Unable to pass stool | Before | 0.62±0.5 | 0.68±0.48 | 0.83±0.51 | 0.48 |
| After | 0.94±0.44 | 0.58±0.61 | 0.28±0.46 | 0.003 | |
Kruskal-Wallis Test