Literature DB >> 34602839

An annotated checklist of millipede fauna from Slovakia, with ecological and biogeographic characteristics.

Beáta Haľková1, Martina Drabová1, Andrej Mock1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two decades have passed since the publishing of the last checklist of the millipedes of Slovakia. During this time, several new faunistic records have been added and taxonomic revisions have occurred. The present updated checklist summarises data on all millipede species recorded in Slovakia, including altogether 93 species. NEW INFORMATION: For each species, general habitat characteristics, ecological classification and distributional pattern are provided. Ecological classification is presented for the first time for the millipede species occurring in Slovakia and is proposed as a tool for ecological studies and for the nature protection purposes. Special remarks are given to the species newly found for Slovakia, Geoglomerissubterranea Verhoeff, 1908, Brachyiuluslusitanus Verhoeff, 1898, Cylindroiulusbritannicus (Verhoeff, 1891), C.parisiorum (Brölemann & Verhoeff, 1896) and Polydesmusburzenlandicus Verhoeff, 1925, as well as to C.arborum Verhoeff, 1928, the species newly confirmed for Slovakia after more than 70 years. Beáta Haľková, Martina Drabová, Andrej Mock.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diplopoda ; distributional pattern; ecological classification; faunal list; new records

Year:  2021        PMID: 34602839      PMCID: PMC8445909          DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.9.e71495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodivers Data J        ISSN: 1314-2828


Introduction

Until 1993, Slovakia was part of several political units (Hungarian, Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, Czechoslovakia, Slovak Republic, Hungary); therefore, historical data on Slovak millipede fauna are not easy to find and there has been a lot of geographical confusion in trying to locate old published records. The studies on the millipedes in Slovakia have a long history, with the first papers published at the end of the 19th century (Nowicki 1867, Nowicki 1869, Nowicki 1870, Nowicki 1871, Karliński 1883a, Karliński 1883b, Latzel 1882, Latzel 1884, Chyzer 1886, Daday 1889, Daday 1896, Petricskó 1891, Petricskó 1892, Malesevics 1892, Attems 1895, Attems 1899, Verhoeff 1899a, Verhoeff 1899b). One of the most important authors working at that time in Slovakia was Ödön Tömösváry. He wanted to prepare a monograph on the myriapods of the Kingdom of Hungary, but died young and his findings were at least excerpted in the papers of Chyzer (1886), Daday (1889) and Daday (1896). In the pre-war and interwar periods, K. W. Verhoeff, the phenomenal German zoologist, expanded the knowledge of the millipedes of our country. In addition, important information about the millipede fauna of Slovakia is included in historical monographs published by Attems (1926), Verhoeff (1928), Verhoeff (1932), Verhoeff (1937), Ortvay (1902) and Schubart (1934). A significant contribution to the knowledge of Slovak millipedes during the first half of the 20th century was done by other authors, including Jawlowski (Jawlowski 1930, Jawlowski 1938), Jermy (1942) and Loksa (Loksa 1954, Loksa 1957, Loksa 1962, Loksa 1968). In the second half of the 20th century, the most extensive research on millipedes in Slovakia was performed by Ján Gulička (1925–2009) (Gulička 1952, Gulička 1954, Gulička 1955, Gulička 1956a, Gulička 1956b, Gulička 1957, Gulička 1960b, Gulička 1965, Gulička 1985, Gulička 1986). Gulička's unpublished compendia (Gulička 1951, Gulička 1960a), which we have today and can work with, were not taken into account in the last published checklist (Mock 2001a). This last checklist included all the available information at that time and involved information for about 70 species reported for the whole territory of Slovakia. A new chapter of millipede research began at the end of the 20th century, conducted by several researchers, for example, Tajovský (1997), Mock (Mock 1998, Mock 1999a, Mock 1999b) and Stašiov (Stašiov 1997, Stašiov 1998). Several studies on Slovak millipede fauna were published after Gulička’s death (Gulička 2016, ), based on material and manuscripts from his estate. Besides this, Gulička's unpublished compendia (Gulička 1951, Gulička 1960a), which we have today available and data listed there can be actually re-evaluated and taken into consideration, represent other sources for more complex overview of the millipede fauna of Slovakia. Since 2001, the number of species has changed significantly, thus warranting a new update. The aim of this report is to update the list of millipede species and their distribution in Slovakia, to summarise published, as well as unpublished data and records, respecting recent taxonomic changes and to provide a useful tool in the form of ecological and geographical classification of species for other studies.

Materials and methods

The classification for used for this checklist follows the systematic arrangement by Shear (2011), while the nomenclature follows Kime and Enghoff (2011), Kime and Enghoff (2013), Kime and Enghoff (2017). We verified the system and nomenclature using MilliBase (Sierwald and Spelda 2021); however, we are reticent towards some proposals, for example, dividing the genera and into other genera. We do not include the subspecific categories as subspecies, nor all the relevant literature since that information has been included by the author of the last published checklist (Mock 2001a). References are listed at the species where the first records for Slovakia were documented for the first time after the year 2000. In addition, habitat evaluation for each species is included, applied specifically to the area of Slovakia, following adapted categorisation proposed by Tuf and Tufová (2008) and marked by a letter in caps: Relic species (R) - stenotopic species inhabiting exclusively undisturbed habitats with low impact of human activities, for example, the nature-closest forests, remnants of steppes, caves, stony debris, mountain habitats. Adaptable species (A) - species inhabiting nature-close habitats (various types of forests or meadows), able to penetrate artificial and man-made habitats (parks, abandoned gardens, graveyards, greenhouses etc.). Eurytopic species (E) - species with the widest ecological valence, frequently found in forested and non-forested biotopes and in man-made plots (fields, brownfields etc.). Synanthropic species (S) - species inhabiting a wide spectrum of man-made habitats, missing in natural biotopes, species significantly synanthropic, although occasionally found in natural, mainly altered, sites. Exotic species (X) – this category includes mostly tropical species, non-native or introduced species, found exclusively in hothouses. Ecological classification of each species (Kime and Enghoff 2011, Kime and Enghoff 2017) is provided in Notes, marked by lowercase letters: (c) - corticolous (e) - epigeic (ed) - edaphic (h) - hygrophilous (m) - mountainous (n) - nidicolous (tb) - troglobitic (tp) - troglophilous (x) - xerophilous We would like to note that we did not adopt this habitat evaluation scheme mechanically, but we evaluate each species, based on the knowledge about its ecology in Slovakia. Question mark (?) next to the classification refers to problematic data on the occurrence of the species. In addition, a general geographical category that outlines the distribution of each species is included in the list (Kime and Enghoff 2011, Kime and Enghoff 2017).

Data resources

Records from Slovakia compiled from the published literature and additional collected material are summarised. The actually sampled material is in the collection at the workplace of the authors' team. Part of the data was obtained by preliminary revision of the collection by J. Gulička, including his unpublished compendia. A large portion of Gulička's complete written legacy is lost. However, his views on the taxonomy, biogeography and ecology of individual species can be found in Gulička's additionally handwritten notes in the monographs of other authors (e.g. Verhoeff 1928, Schubart 1934 etc.).

Checklists

Updated list of the millipede fauna of Slovakia

51B5879F-5FC7-5A53-8809-BE8BA4E6EFD4 1474AEEA-6B12-5591-ACB8-91EDF280965C (Linnaeus, 1758) 828426A7-1F69-533A-8D81-0CB37BEC7213

Distribution

West Palearctic and Nearctic

Notes

A, c, n BFC7F491-9FAA-5D78-ADF4-E7B530A4DD4E The order , according to published data, is represented by three genera in Slovakia – and (Lang 1954, Kime and Enghoff 2011, Kime and Enghoff 2013, Kocourek et al. 2017). Genus is rather problematic, as it represents a complex of species, characterised by inconsistency and unreliable determination information in the old literature. , and represent well-confirmed species, occurring in the territory of Slovakia. Only one old record of from Slovakia exists. In the area of Slovakia, some populations of the species of the genus are characterised by a remarkable variety of colouration, which could indicate the ongoing speciation processes. EBD87C29-C98C-5A2D-8A64-999815A34F72 Brandt, 1833 A2511E1B-A91D-5850-ABB7-F2C07503C54C South, Central and East European A, e, x Brandt, 1833 61A6C9BA-E61A-533A-8F6C-4DA9CA387815 West and South European A, e, ? The species (known under synonyms and in older literature) is characterised by a south-western occurrence in Europe (Kime and Enghoff 2011). It has been confirmed in most of the neighbouring countries (Poland, Czech Republic, Austria and Hungary). For Slovakia, only one record of this species has been recently discovered, in the millipede collection of Czech arachnologist František Miller (1902–1983), housed in the National Museum, Prague (Dolejš and Kocourek 2020). One female specimen of is included in the collection, labelled with April 1930, Turčianske Teplice District, Žilina Region. Based on this information, a series of sampling from this area has been conducted, but unsuccessfully. Therefore, a mistake in localisation made by collector is highly possible. Reference: Dolejš and Kocourek (2020) Nowicki, 1870 694103EA-A3AF-533E-A057-1E6D5868BA6A West Carpathian R, e is considered the only endemic species of the order north of the Alps. According to Kime and Enghoff (2011), the species inhabits mountainous biotopes of Slovakia (Belianske Tatras Mts., Pieniny Mts.) and Poland. However, literature contains many controversial data about diagnostic characteristics, as well as ecological demands (Mock 2001a, Kravcová and Mock 2014). Nowicki originally offered two descriptions of (Nowicki 1870, Nowicki 1871), without any illustration. In addition, the author used different transcription for the species names in both cases, (Nowicki 1870) and (Nowicki 1871). After this confusion, the species was described several times in the old literature, under various synonyms (Latzel 1884, Gulička 1951, Gulička 1960a, Dziadosz 1966). Other authors considered the species to be subspecies of , due to the striking similarity of both species (e.g. Jawlowski 1938). Although the taxonomic status of the species remains unresolved, recent molecular analyses of several representatives of from the type locality of suggest the presence of several separate species; therefore, the existence of and its occurrence in Slovakia cannot be ruled out. (Fabricius, 1781) 8EAAF47F-F7BE-5D57-AD24-C8CA0B7A8FC5 South and Central European A, e, c Brandt, 1833 D64F6E1F-0B9A-5880-9006-DBADB01E7E7C Central and East European A, e Some authors mentioned the occurrence of C. L. Koch, 1847 in Slovakia. This species is characteristic for its south-western European distribution (Kime and Enghoff 2011). In the literature from the last century, there is a lot of data on the findings and its occurrence. However, it should be noted that, in most cases, under this name, there were referred other species, especially (Kime and Enghoff 2011, Kocourek et al. 2017). From Slovakia, no recent reliable records of its occurrence are available; therefore, the older data on this species name are preliminarily all included under . However, due to the findings from the Czech Republic, very close to the border with Slovakia, the occurrence of this species cannot be ruled out. Verhoeff, 1908 485B724B-7148-51A6-9F8A-F595371C7499 West and Central European R, ed, tp, h This species was described by Verhoeff (1908) from the neighbourhood of Dresden, Germany, where two females were found on limestone near a brook. In his monograph on the millipede fauna of Czechoslovakia, Lang (1954) presented the finding of in the only Slovak locality from the vicinity of the Bratislava City (Malé Karpaty Mts.). However, he did not comment on the finding and attached only a picture taken from other literature (Schubart 1934). Since the cited monograph contains many ambiguities and unreliable data, this information is considered doubtful (Gulička 1986, Mock 2001a). In the area of Slovakia, it was found only recently (Haľková et al., unpublished), repeatedly, in karst springs and wetlands on karst bedrock. Detailed morphological study (including SEM), supported by molecular analysis, confirmed the identity of , without any apparent morphological adaptations to aquatic and semi-aquatic habitat. The possibility that this species is not strictly limited to the terrestrial environment has already been suggested by Noll (1939), although his findings were completely forgotten in recent literature. Noll mentioned the presence of (a younger synonym of ) in the water of three wells in Northern Bavaria, Germany. The author explained its occurrence as random, presuming the animals entered the well through crevices in the wall. (Latzel, 1884) E2F129A8-8841-5B7A-8884-F673C64DA7E8 Carpathian R, ed, tp, h (Waga, 1857) B05A6FD8-BBE1-5C39-87F4-27EE0DDCB1E5 East and Central European R, ed, m (Latzel, 1884) C8D3F0D0-4F6A-570C-A64D-2544106EAECD Alpine and West Carpathian R, ed 0D81710B-775D-5A5F-B443-9D6023099906 621915C8-EAFC-5396-9714-FE20D7462F70 Verhoeff, 1907 F24C4010-6F24-56CD-9527-A5CFB0D89E06 East Alpine and West Carpathian R, e Brandt, 1837 0FF2874E-FB0B-579D-AE75-912804D3A386 European A, e, h Verhoeff, 1898 6E9952B6-3AB8-57ED-927F-53563C7C8C6C East Carpathian R, h 85AF59DC-241D-5259-BB9E-A2B5FD794658 EFAA8300-886A-5590-B1A3-EAECD325EF46 (Brade-Birks, 1920) 3481208A-BB4B-5F5A-8FB5-5089E9D8B446 West, North, Central and East European R, ed, tp Reference: Mock et al. (2015) (Fabricius, 1798) B89DF54C-253C-5767-887F-BF4C2CF3B1A6 European S, ed Antić, Mock & Enghoff, 2015 6BD50117-1D65-52DF-B16F-788C6FE3D833 West Carpathian R, ed, tp (Němec, 1895) 58F43795-2A1E-5F3A-917B-9BBF992DCF83 European S, ed Reference: Mock (2001b) (Gervais, 1847) 82D904AB-2C93-5895-9895-696840D9AD3B Euro-Caucasian S, ed (Am Stein, 1857) 90CD54F7-E609-5EEA-A47D-CA7C9BFB183F European E, c, n 17D6B204-1121-5909-8A04-30BB23FCB962 C. L. Koch, 1847 E2AE1783-D0ED-5389-99E3-EA3FDCEA4048 European R, c, n A0FD6BA1-3FBD-5217-908B-7229ADD0FA3B (Brolemann, 1924) 8A120E9F-8E37-5E28-A5AE-266719F586D5 South and Central European E, e, n, x Verhoeff, 1898 DA264670-66AC-5322-B965-09E7A9B62558 Type status:Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 1; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; Taxon: scientificName: ; class: ; family: ; genus: ; specificEpithet: ; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Slovakia; locality: Košice Basin, Košice – a city park (Mestský park) at the railway station; verbatimElevation: 210 m a.s.l.; locationRemarks: leaf litter (; verbatimCoordinates: ; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Mock; Event: eventDate: 18-12-2018; fieldNotes: co-existing with ; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen Type status:Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 2; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; Taxon: scientificName: ; class: ; family: ; genus: ; specificEpithet: ; taxonRank: species; Location: county: Slovakia; locality: Košice Basin, Košice – a city park (Mestský park) at the railway station; verbatimElevation: 210 m a.s.l.; locationRemarks: leaf litter (; verbatimCoordinates: ; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Mock; Event: eventDate: 18-12-2018; fieldNotes: co-existing with ; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen European A, e According to Kime and Enghoff (2017), the species is distributed in Western and Central Europe and Balkans, but also Algeria, Egypt and Iran. It was introduced into Australia and North America. The species can be found in forests, in addition to open land, meadows, cornfields and vineyards. It has been recorded under stone debris, as well as city parks and heated greenhouses. (C. L.Koch, 1847) 4B2E539A-C953-5C56-A2A3-B021375BA5F8 South and Central European R, e Verhoeff 1928 B89DFBDB-1AE3-5FF3-9F8F-FC29FCCBABC9 Type status:Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 1; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; Taxon: scientificName: ; class: ; family: ; genus: ; specificEpithet: ; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Slovakia; locality: Burda Mts.; verbatimElevation: 190 m a.s.l.; locationRemarks: forest (; verbatimCoordinates: ; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Mock; Event: eventDate: 2017-06-16; fieldNotes: co-existing with ; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen Type status:Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 1; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; Taxon: scientificName: ; class: ; family: ; genus: ; specificEpithet: ; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Slovakia; locality: Burda Mts.; verbatimElevation: 190 m a.s.l.; locationRemarks: forest (; verbatimCoordinates: ; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Mock; Event: eventDate: 2017-06-16; fieldNotes: co-existing with ; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen Type status:Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 16; lifeStage: juveniles; Taxon: scientificName: ; class: ; family: ; genus: ; specificEpithet: ; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Slovakia; locality: Burda Mts.; verbatimElevation: 190 m a.s.l.; locationRemarks: forest (; verbatimCoordinates: ; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Mock; Event: eventDate: 2017-06-16; fieldNotes: co-existing with ; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen Central and East European R, e Mainly lowland species with Central and East European distribution (Kime and Enghoff 2017). The species usually prefers forest habitats, found mostly in deadwood and leaf litter, although several records are from hothouses and other artificial habitats. New record after more than 70 years in Slovakia (see Dudich 1958, Mock 2001a). (Verhoeff, 1891) 00B4D62F-CAB4-5AC1-A501-206AD0322D4C Type status:Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 5; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; Taxon: scientificName: ; class: ; family: ; genus: ; specificEpithet: ; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Slovakia; locality: Košice Basin, Košice, Public cemetery; verbatimElevation: 225 m a.s.l.; locationRemarks: leaf litter (; verbatimCoordinates: ; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Mock; Event: eventDate: 2020-05-26; fieldNotes: co-existing with ; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen Cosmopolitan S, c, e Species with European distribution, in Britain and Ireland found beneath the bark of dead deciduous tree trunks and stumps (Blower 1985). It appears to be predominantly or entirely synanthropic in most other countries, occurring primarily in cities and cultivated areas (Kime and Enghoff 2017). The same applies to the first findings of the species in Slovakia, where it was found in city parks. Verhoeff, 1907 87350C1D-256A-5255-80AB-B78FB5330452 Carpathian R, e, m (Wood, 1864) 59F9CDA8-596B-5293-B1F4-B134097D301F Cosmopolitan S, e Reference: Mock (2006) (Curtis, 1845) 015DCC44-B303-577D-8F68-8D8FD23D8EBD Atlantic, North-western and Central European S, e Reference: Mock (2001b) (Brölemann & Verhoeff, 1896) 2169FE95-512D-5B5C-9687-EE993EA34BAF Type status:Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 21; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; Taxon: scientificName: ; class: ; family: ; genus: ; specificEpithet: ; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Slovakia; locality: Košice Basin, Košice – a city park (Mestský park) at the railway station; verbatimElevation: 210 m a.s.l.; locationRemarks: leaf litter (; verbatimCoordinates: ; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Mock; Event: eventDate: 2018-12-18; fieldNotes: co-existing with ; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen Type status:Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 28; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; Taxon: scientificName: ; class: ; family: ; genus: ; specificEpithet: ; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Slovakia; locality: Košice Basin, Košice – a city park (Mestský park) at the railway station; verbatimElevation: 210 m a.s.l.; locationRemarks: leaf litter (; verbatimCoordinates: ; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Mock; Event: eventDate: 2018-12-18; fieldNotes: co-existing with ; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen Type status:Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 28; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; Taxon: scientificName: ; class: ; family: ; genus: ; specificEpithet: ; taxonRank: species; Location: country: Slovakia; locality: Košice Basin, Košice – a city park (Mestský park) at the railway station; verbatimElevation: 210 m a.s.l.; locationRemarks: leaf litter (; verbatimCoordinates: ; Identification: identifiedBy: A. Mock; Event: eventDate: 2018-12-18; fieldNotes: co-existing with ; Record Level: basisOfRecord: PreservedSpecimen European S, e, c The species has European distribution; however, the captures apart from England are scattered and isolated. Its occurrence is associated with human activity. According to Kime and Enghoff (2017), it is relatively rare, some records are likely to be incorrect due to possible confusion with other species. Findings in synanthropic habitat represent the first records for Slovakia. (Berlese, 1888) 3F2C90F6-E45B-5522-BEE0-7729C555013F West and Central European X, e, h Reference: Mock (2001b) (Latzel, 1884) 6A9BDF51-A050-5A30-8414-E0B0559A7BD7 European A, e, h (Verhoeff, 1907) A4829F1E-DA65-527C-B7B1-D37F201BA8C6 West Carpathian R, e, m (Verhoeff, 1899) FC523E99-BEB5-5322-BB58-4FFED80B2107 East Carpathian R, e Reference: Gulička et al. (2014) Verhoeff, 1899 C4854698-B0A2-5FEA-88FC-10B1D892E657 Carpathian R, e Latzel, 1884 838E1EA4-4893-559E-AC0B-12AF67C88986 Central European and Scandinavian A, e, n Lohmander, 1925 ACE7AF66-74D7-5242-A32D-D26CEF6D988E Central European A, e, h Linnaeus, 1758 991BA89E-2910-5CC7-A987-3ADC15B2DB20 North, Central, South and East European R, e, h (C. L. Koch, 1847) F1365525-3B19-500B-BE44-03B9C771BE26 East European A, e, x (Verhoeff, 1899) 15D295F6-7BF1-5386-A52E-66E7A0C596D2 East and Central European R, e (Chamberlin, 1921) 08E79850-A0D8-5202-90FB-1DCFEE256CFF North and Central European, Baltic R, e, h, n (Verhoeff, 1899) 37631AAA-BF6F-5888-9930-B3D690E6A46D West Carpathian R, e, m Verhoeff, 1913 8C2CE56F-DB40-5F25-A980-976BB5F8386E Sudetico-Carpathian R, e, m Gulička, 1952 528708CF-BDA4-5421-8648-F5613BD4F96A West Carpathian R, e, tp (Němec, 1896) 5D4CD2CC-5E74-584E-B453-8BD294C5FA8D North, Central and East European A, e Gulička, 1956 5CFD59DC-D3C9-51A1-A7EC-982F005C6A4B West Carpathian R, e, m (Verhoeff, 1894) E70CBA85-A434-5CCF-8054-9F30CB9DE647 Central and East European A, e (Verhoeff, 1907) 10EE350B-3B20-5539-A3F8-F06E5320DA26 West Carpathian R, e, m Verhoeff, 1894 2F4ADCC2-0CAE-5197-96DE-987A6C1EE653 Central and East European A, e (Verhoeff, 1898) 18575707-9CD0-58B8-AC98-F6C577D56B10 East and Central European R, e, m (C. L. Koch, 1838) 82675623-7D8A-587F-9DA2-ECC464C45BD1 South and Central European, Balkan E, e, x (Linnaeus, 1758) F3581CAB-3DDD-5006-9F26-42C2AB926E38 European E, e, x (Newport, 1842) 002768BF-03DC-5C20-AF68-E1D1D6813B89 European E, e (C. L. Koch, 1838) 968A4371-833F-5CF1-8DEB-6403DC30EB83 European E, e, h (Verhoeff, 1899) 590A2C07-04D4-5B08-82B9-6E7AB7E2C297 Central European A, e (Verhoeff, 1907) 2AC4FCC1-001A-5F77-88D6-0BF22F3560D6 North Carpathian R, e, m (Porat, 1889) 9DECA411-8B99-5EBF-BFCC-9236A24D3D0B East and Central European R, e, h, n Reference: Tajovský et al. (2001) 0E3D0A19-D96F-53D6-B9B2-04BDD47C8879 F11EB5B5-46CA-5729-AA43-7CDCC80AFBAA (Verhoeff, 1897) 8779CE31-7CCF-5ED2-844B-F748C93AF4F1 Central European, Balkan S, e Reference: Mock and Tajovský (2002) (Verhoeff, 1897) 160BA32D-8C74-58FD-A7F6-B98739996D13 East Carpathian A, e Reference: Mock and Tajovský (2002) (Verhoeff, 1899) A36ACD63-2589-50F5-BCEE-180E889D5584 North and Central European S, e Reference: Mock and Tajovský (2002) 331205F4-1713-5FBA-8F29-22CB684628EA (Brolemann & Brade-Birks, 1917) CD723F79-E5EA-5909-A6A2-ABF03F0F0BAC West European R, tp Reference: Kováč et al. (2005) BCF46DAF-6878-5C36-8C31-E0AFFA337A96 Loksa, 1960 FF9DAFFD-2F98-5440-B74F-938C13BBFF45 West Carpathian R, ed Reference: Mock et al. (2019) E6E1CFB1-CB6A-50D7-BF31-8C5C8BFE1358 Verhoeff, 1928 10E8DB47-2C13-54BF-97D3-62954C7C3AB6 West Carpathian R, e, h The first description of the species was published by Verhoeff (1928), based on a single female specimen from the Abaliget Cave in Hungary. Detailed analysis of diagnostic characteristics, based on the fresh material from the type locality, as well as all available museum material, was presented only recently by Mock et al. (2016). However, the authors overlooked the apparent similarity of the diagnostic features with that of (Verhoeff, 1899), recently pointed out by Antić et al. (2018). Gonopods of both species appear to be identical, nevertheless, a synonymy was not formally established. Minute differences between Verhoeff’s description of and our knowledge of must be reviewed. In addition, in order to justify the name of the family and its position in the system, the decision as to which genus the species belongs: , , or , has to be resolved (Haľková and Mock 2018, Korsós and Lazányi 2020). Reference: Papáč et al. (2014) 0A4EF9DD-BE59-578D-AE90-9AF360667BBF (Jawlowski, 1938) 5465705D-4E49-593D-8E26-4B084410442C East Carpathian R, e, m Reference: Gulička et al. (2014) Leach, 1814 18001744-0F61-565E-9304-C5DC381DEE11 West, Central and South European A, e Verhoeff, 1897 C034B994-8521-5B2A-BF62-86B943A61F9C South and Eastern European R, e (Latzel, 1882) 9791AA65-998E-5E80-8ACA-379C1C6853A6 West Carpathian R, e, m (Rothenbuhler, 1900) F85EE3C3-6D8D-598A-800C-A0E921089325 Central European R, e Reference: Gulička et al. (2014) 8465A86A-22AF-58EA-A29D-62CCEF45F63C (Latzel, 1884) C84E98DF-B346-5CFA-997A-1DBA43A3F8F5 South and Central European A, e (Tajovský, Mock & Papáč, 2014) A999896F-BD64-58F6-A12B-B3C7541A1B9F West Carpathian R, tb Verhoeff, 1899 140D933F-8B82-55A7-98C8-2C3B87E733AD North Carpathian R, e, m E7D5C923-C05B-5F7F-9308-8679655690C8 (Verhoeff, 1897) A238419E-E84D-5864-94E8-30FCFEB8B7DA East Carpathian R, e Reference: Gulička et al. (2014) 65C7370E-1D2E-5072-9B36-54FF3C108D9C (Verhoeff, 1907) 2A92FCE4-9022-5340-833A-B55860611281 West Carpathian R, tp Mock & Tajovský, 2008 8E374C6F-3304-51BB-B71F-3023B348134D West Carpathian R, tp F3341C42-CE6E-5A79-97D3-5A0080CB7F45 (Verhoeff, 1909) 9CADC961-AE1B-5FD5-9F57-4B13B5EA3CCF Central European R, e (Verhoeff, 1897) 10F158A8-343B-5272-98A4-A5C356723B03 Central and East European E, e Verhoeff, 1899 304B8977-AF62-58F9-BDF5-7CCD99B24798 West Carpathian R, e, m 725C200A-8CB2-5B3F-899B-73FEFDE65557 (Verhoeff, 1893) 3B6E25C9-4384-59EA-8A19-7E147787968D Alpine S, e Reference: Haľková and Mock (2018) 04B3F154-EEB0-589A-AAB6-EA53CFF83B6F CE25DD76-98C6-5791-BFB1-E37E5C39CA55 Verhoeff, 1895 533BBE4D-9FCB-563B-B251-E8258224F4C2 South, Central and East European A, e, h Latzel, 1884 694DE3E8-C9E8-52CC-A576-03D8521719E2 European S, e, h Verhoeff, 1925 3F6D92C3-5485-51AF-A747-5E482E314050 South-eastern Carpathian R, e, c is a small hygrophilous representative of the order , widespread mainly in the south-eastern Carpathians (Kime and Enghoff 2011) The species inhabits forest habitats of the mountainous landscape. It was recently documented from the area of the Latorica PLA (Mock et al. 2021). These findings represent the first record for Slovakia. Reference: Mock et al. (2021) (Linnaeus, 1761) 2F776C36-2364-557E-9339-FA5E7F1A6C08 North, Central, South and East European E, e, h C. L. Koch, 1847 DFBCDACE-498E-578F-9B2B-6666B24578C4 European E, e Latzel, 1884 41C36D84-A0C7-5A99-A3F6-40C3FF568B9B European S, e, h Reference: Mock (2004) Ložek & Gulička, 1962 7A252CA8-152E-5F89-9304-7D099E79DD1B East Carpathian R, e, m Daday, 1889 AED868E6-77C3-5328-A02B-3A599AD52E30 East Carpathian R, e, c, m Latzel, 1884 7602842C-F4AB-568C-A312-4A9572FEE2B7 East Carpathian R, e, m Latzel, 1884 8387BDA8-3A08-5193-B8A5-708A271BC0AB South Carpathian R, e, tp, ? South Carpathian endemic species with affinity to wet forested habitats. From Slovakia, only one questionable historical record is documented from the vicinity of the Veľaty Village (Daday 1889), significantly isolated from the rest of the area of its known distribution in the Southern Carpathians (Kime and Enghoff 2011, Kime and Enghoff 2013). Its occurrence in Slovakia, however, can be supported by the recent findings of Daday, 1889 in nearby locations within the Eastern Slovak Plain (Haľková and Mock 2018), the species with similar biogeography and ecology as . Latzel, 1884 6135C067-D8A4-5AEF-B37B-BDACE0170229 Carpathian R, e, h, m Daday, 1889 F19BF5DF-6F23-5EBD-BC58-0DDB68335FC0 Carpathian R, e, h Reference: Haľková and Mock (2018) CA7A8050-3949-55B0-8481-75FBA30951DF (C. L. Koch, 1847) 00AF0722-FD46-50DD-A656-DB0CEE6CB79E Cosmopolitan X, e (Eichwald, 1830) 58E29EC2-4A4D-5FF3-8A8E-6095FD2EB639 East and Central European, Baltic A, e, tp, h 39B0E373-F2B2-5294-A509-D0FC38803166 (Porat, 1889) 8C690F2D-6B47-56FC-B104-FF46490EB680 North, West and Central European X, e, c, h Reference: Mock (2001b) 5A793D16-C55A-5C43-9D9B-5CC8B6D5FECA (Schubart, 1934) FC24AFCE-C982-58AC-A70A-8C2F9A09C482 East and Central European X, e, c, h Reference: Mock (2001b)

Discussion

The increase in faunistic research over the past two decades has resulted in significant expansion of knowledge of the Slovak millipede fauna. Since the last published review of millipede species from the territory of Slovakia (Mock 2001a), 23 species have been added, resulting at present in 93 species. Within the whole Carpathian Region, Romania still represents the country with the richest fauna, with 170 recorded millipede species (Giurginca 2021). Nevertheless, compared to the total species number of millipedes from neighbouring countries, 94 from Poland (Stojałowska and Staręga 1974, Wytwer 1997), 77 from the Czech Republic (Tajovský and Tuf 2016, Kocourek et al. 2017), 107 species from Hungary (Korsós and Lazányi 2020), 190 from Austria (extrapolation, Geiser 2018) and 75 from Germany (Hauser and Voigtländer 2019), 93 species recorded for Slovakia constitute a strikingly high number, considering the rather small area of the country. In addition, new findings are still expected for the whole territory of Slovakia since numerous locations remain less investigated, as well as records of non-native species are likely to emerge. Most of the unclear and questionable data that were preliminarily excluded from the list are from the older literature. One of the most recent studies, creating confusion due to imprecision in accurate and reliable determination, was published by Topp et al. (2006). The authors investigated the biodiversity of woodlice and millipede faunas of the primeval forest of Central Slovakia. The authors' team, however, lacked a taxonomist and, as a result, species not occurring in our country or species with strictly synanthropic occurrence were listed, such as such as , or and (as ). From the faunistic point of view, the article is very inaccurate and should be approached with great caution. The millipede fauna of Slovakia can be characterised as a combination of European, Alpine-Atlantic and Carpathian elements, with the occasional influence of Caucasian and Balkan fauna (Kime and Enghoff 2011, Kime and Enghoff 2017). From the biogeographical aspect, a relatively high number of endemic species are represented in the country. This is presumably linked to the Carpathians. Compared to the Alps, the geographical repartition of the Carpathian fauna was less affected by glaciations, allowing the isolation of the Carpathian Regions surrounded by the Paratethys (Holdhaus 1954). The presence of a significant proportion of endemic fauna characterises the millipede fauna of Slovakia as exceptional in Central Europe. Gulička and Košel (2016) have mentioned the presence of 28 Carpathian endemic species of millipedes in Slovakia. A large part of these species is defined as Western-Carpathian. However, the border between the Eastern and Western Carpathians crosses the eastern part of the country, resulting in the representation of the eastern Carpathian fauna. Nevertheless, it should be noted that this border is not strict and is not consistent for all the species. For some species, the term Northern-Carpathian endemic is more appropriate. Some species even can be characterised by microendemism (e.g. , and ). The presence of the Western Carpathians has an undeniable influence on the composition of Slovak millipedes. Almost 20% of the species are represented by rare mountainous fauna and more than 10% are characteristic for their preference of cave habitat. According to ecological classification, 50% of Slovak millipede fauna are represented by stenotopic species inhabiting exclusively undisturbed habitats with a low impact of human activities. A total of 20% can be classified as adaptable and only 7% can be classified as eurytopic. While the original classification, proposed by Tuf and Tufová (2008), is applicable to most of the species, the categorisation does not sufficiently segregate non-native, introduced species occurring exclusively in a specific environment (e.g. tropical species in greenhouses). Therefore, we added and used two categories to this classification, in order to distinguish synanthropic and exotic species. These categories include the remaining 13% of millipede species of Slovakia. Despite the increased interest in faunistic research, the millipede fauna of Slovakia has not yet been completely investigated. Several findings are still to be determined at the species level. Such findings include subadult and female individuals of sp. from the Domica Cave (Papáč et al. 2014) and a representative of the family (Akkari and Enghoff 2011). Both taxa are connected to the cave environment.
  5 in total

1.  [Carpatian endemic strain of Allorhiscosoma (Verhoeff) Guli6cka em. (Diplopoda: Ascospermophora)].

Authors:  J GULICKA
Journal:  Biologia (Bratisl)       Date:  1954       Impact factor: 1.350

2.  Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness (Addenda 2013).

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.091

3.  Hungarosoma bokori Verhoeff, 1928 (Diplopoda: Chordeumatida): new insights into its taxonomy, systematics, molecular genetics, biogeography and ecology.

Authors:  Andrej Mock; Karel Tajovský; Martina Žurovcová; Andrea Jarošová; Pavel Kocourek; Jürgen Gruber; Dorottya Angyal; Jörg Spelda
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 1.091

4.  Dalmatosomatidae, a new monotypic family, and Dalmatosoma agaricum gen. et sp. nov. (Diplopoda: Chordeumatida: Craspedosomatidea) from Croatia, Balkan Peninsula.

Authors:  Dragan Ž AntiĆ; TonĆi RaĐa; Slobodan E Makarov
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 1.091

5.  On some surface structures of potential taxonomic importance in families of the suborders Polydesmidea and Dalodesmidea (Polydesmida, Diplopoda).

Authors:  Nesrine Akkari; Henrik Enghoff
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 1.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.