| Literature DB >> 34602537 |
Shan-Hua Yang1, Chi Chen2,3, Yunli Eric Hsieh1, Sung-Yin Yang4,5, Hau-Wen Li6, Tzu-Yun Ching7, Chia-Hui Wang7, Ching-Fong Chang6,8, Sen-Lin Tang9, Guan-Chung Wu6,8.
Abstract
The accessory nidamental gland (ANG) is part of the reproduction organ in the majority of female cephalopods, including the bigfin reef squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana, an economically important fishery product. Microbes in Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia have been suggested to play a role in the maturation of the S. lessoniana ANG and are responsible for its color. However, the bacterial composition and dynamics of the different maturation stages of the ANG remain unclear. In the present study, we surveyed ANG-associated bacterial dynamics in wild-caught S. lessoniana at various developmental stages in different populations over 3 years. The results obtained showed that the ANG bacterial community shifted gradually and decreased in diversity throughout maturation. Verrucomicrobia occupied the ANG during the early stages in large numbers, and was replaced by Bacteroidia, Alphaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria in the later stages. Flavobacteriales and Alphaproteobacteria both appeared to contribute to pigmentation, while Bacteroidia, Alphaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria may be involved in enriching the heme biosynthesis pathway in the ANG with the maturation of S. lessoniana. The present results provide an open question of whether S. lessoniana actively selects the bacterial community in the ANG to adjust to its surrounding environment.Entities:
Keywords: Sepioteuthis lessoniana; accessory nidamental gland; maturity; microbial dynamics
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34602537 PMCID: PMC8674444 DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME21030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbes Environ ISSN: 1342-6311 Impact factor: 2.912
Characteristics of sampled squids
| Batch | Stage | Sampling date | ML (cm) | BW (g) | GW (g) | GSI (%) | Gonadal stage | Reproductive phase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | Nov, 2015 | 15.5 | 216.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | PO | Immature female |
| 1 | 2 | Nov, 2015 | 17.0 | 195.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | PO | Immature female |
| 1 | 2 | Dec, 2015 | 23.5 | 774.5 | 0.7 | 0.1 | PO | Immature female |
| 1 | 3 | Nov, 2015 | 26.0 | 938.3 | 1.3 | 0.1 | PVO | Maturing female |
| 1 | 3 | Feb, 2016 | 22.0 | 611.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | PVO | Maturing female |
| 1 | 3 | Dec, 2015 | 25.0 | 818.3 | 2.7 | 0.3 | PVO | Maturing female |
| 1 | 4 | Dec, 2015 | 26.0 | 986.8 | >10 | — | MO | Mature female |
| 1 | 4 | Feb, 2016 | 26.0 | 883.6 | >10 | — | MO | Mature female |
| 1 | 4 | Oct, 2015 | 21.5 | 522.2 | >10 | — | MO | Mature female |
| 2 | 1 | Sep, 2016 | 15.5 | 196.0 | <0.1 | — | PO | Juvenile female |
| 2 | 1 | Sep, 2016 | 14.5 | 211.4 | <0.1 | — | PO | Juvenile female |
| 2 | 2 | Oct, 2016 | 18.0 | 308.3 | 0.3 | — | PO | Immature female |
| 2 | 2 | Oct, 2016 | 17.5 | 310.7 | <0.1 | — | PO | Immature female |
| 2 | 2 | Nov, 2016 | 26.0 | 912.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | PO | Immature female |
| 2 | 3 | Nov, 2016 | 23.0 | 717.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 | PVO | Maturing female |
| 2 | 3 | Dec, 2016 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | — | PVO | Maturing female |
| 2 | 3 | Dec, 2016 | 21.0 | 542.0 | n.d. | — | PVO | Maturing female |
| 2 | 3 | Dec, 2016 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | — | PVO | Maturing female |
| 2 | 3 | Feb, 2017 | 24.0 | 735.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | PVO | Maturing female |
| 2 | 3 | Feb, 2017 | 27.0 | 1120.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | PVO | Maturing female |
| 2 | 4 | Feb, 2017 | 25.5 | 991.0 | >10 | — | MO | Mature female |
| 2 | 4 | Mar, 2017 | 25.0 | 744.0 | 9.0 | 1.2 | VO | Mature female |
| 2 | 4 | Mar, 2017 | 33.0 | 1787.0 | >10 | — | MO | Mature female |
| 2 | 4 | Mar, 2017 | 32.0 | 1650.0 | >10 | — | MO | Mature female |
| 3 | 2 | Nov, 2017 | 22.0 | 683.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | PO | Immature female |
| 3 | 2 | Dec, 2017 | 29.0 | 1321.8 | 1.9 | 0.1 | PO | Immature female |
| 3 | 2 | Jan, 2018 | 23.5 | 680.8 | 1.4 | 0.2 | PO | Immature female |
| 3 | 2 | Jan, 2018 | 27.5 | 977.7 | 1.7 | 0.2 | PO | Immature female |
| 3 | 3 | Jan, 2018 | 28.7 | 1098.2 | 1.7 | 0.2 | PVO | Maturing female |
| 3 | 3 | Jan, 2018 | 26.4 | 859.3 | 1.5 | 0.2 | PVO | Maturing female |
| 3 | 3 | Jan, 2018 | 28.7 | 1252.9 | 1.7 | 0.1 | PVO | Maturing female |
| 3 | 3 | Mar, 2018 | 24.7 | 695.1 | 1.3 | 0.2 | PVO | Maturing female |
| 3 | 4 | Nov, 2017 | 29.0 | 1214.3 | >10 | — | MO | Mature female |
| 3 | 4 | Dec, 2017 | 31.0 | 1265.7 | 4.9 | 0.4 | VO | Mature female |
| 3 | 4 | Jan, 2018 | 23.5 | 891.5 | >10 | — | MO | Mature female |
| 3 | 4 | Mar, 2018 | 26.5 | 1039.6 | >10 | — | MO | Mature female |
Fig. 1.Histological analysis to indicate different stages of the accessory nidamental gland of Sepioteuthis lessoniana. (a) to (d) indicate stages 1 to 4, respectively. ANG, accessory nidamental gland; CT, connective tissue. The dashed line denotes the barrier between the ANG and CT.
Fig. 2.Beta diversity of bacterial OTUs from different stages. (a) A principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of bacterial OTUs from different stages. (b) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) of bacterial genera from different stages in present/absent transformation.
Fig. 3.Sepioteuthis lessoniana ANG-associated bacterial composition. (a) Bacterial composition at the phylum level. (b) Bacterial composition at the phylum level for each sample. (c) Sepioteuthis lessoniana ANG-associated bacterial composition at the class level.
Fig. 4.Relative abundance of bacterial orders in (a) Alphaproteobacteria and (b) Gammaproteobacteria and (c) the bacterial class Bacteroidia. There were more orders of Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria each year in earlier stages (stages 1 and 2). In Bacteroidia, Flavobacteriales was the dominant order.
Fig. 5.Heatmap of top 30 OTUs of shared 191 OTUs at different stages according to phylogenic relationships among 30 top OTUs. The first group (I) is Mycoplasma and Gram-positive bacteria. The second group (II) is Bacteroidia. The third group (III) is composed of Alphaproteobacteria (IIIa) and Gammaproteobacteria (IIIb).
Fig. 6.Enrichment analysis of predictive KEGG metabolic modules of total bacterial OTUs in different stages of Sepioteuthis lessoniana ANG. Thirty-eight modules were enriched in the microbiota of one or more of the ANG stages. The dashed line indicates that the FDR q-value=0.05.