| Literature DB >> 34602470 |
Kate J Russin1, K Sreekumaran Nair2, Thomas J Montine3, Laura D Baker1, Suzanne Craft1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exploration of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amino acids and the impact of dietary intake on central levels may provide a comprehensive understanding of the metabolic component of Alzheimer's disease.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; amino acids; cerebrospinal fluid; diet intervention; mild cognitive impairment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34602470 PMCID: PMC8673538 DOI: 10.3233/JAD-210471
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Alzheimers Dis ISSN: 1387-2877 Impact factor: 4.472
Baseline characteristics (mean and standard error) for participants who provided at least one CSF sample (n = 43)1
| LOW Diet | HIGH Diet | |||
| Variable | NC ( | MCI ( | NC ( | MCI ( |
| Age, y | 68.90 (2.24) | 68.82 (2.14) | 68.25 (2.51) | 67.64 (1.89) |
| BMI2 | 26.81 (1.13) | 26.48 (1.08) | 30.06 (1.26) | 27.85 (0.94) |
| Education, y 3 | 13.40 (0.66) | 15.55 (0.63) | 15.88 (0.74) | 15.07 (0.56) |
| 3MS4 | 96.56 (1.44) | 95.27 (1.31) | 97.88 (1.53) | 93.07 (1.16) |
| Gender | ||||
| female | 6 (28.6) | 5 (23.8) | 5 (23.8) | 5 (23.8) |
| male | 4 (18.2) | 6 (27.3) | 3 (13.6) | 9 (40.9) |
| E4- | 7 (23.3) | 6 (20) | 6 (20) | 11 (36.7) |
| E4+ | 3 (25) | 4 (33.3) | 2 (16.7) | 3 (25) |
| AD Biomarkers (pg/ml) | ||||
| Aβ42 | 1265.2 (155.7) | 1135.6 (155.7) | 1223.3 (174.1) | 1248.9 (127.1) |
| Tau | 81.4 (16.2) | 116.7 (15.5) | 72.0 (18.2) | 78.5 (14.2) |
| PTau181 | 59.7 (12.4) | 93.8 (11.8) | 64.0 (13.9) | 66.2 (10.5) |
1Continuous data are expressed as least squares mean (standard error of the mean) and categorical data are expressed as frequency (percent). A mixed model was used to assess the differences in means for each continuous baseline variable by diet, diagnosis, and diet-by-diagnosis. Pairwise comparisons were assessed using the Tukey–Kramer method. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were used to assess categorical baseline variables. 2Participants on the LOW diet had a lower BMI then participants on the HIGH diet (26.64±0.78 versus 28.96±0.79 kg/m2; p = 0.04). 3There was a diet by diagnosis interaction for years of education (p = 0.03). NC on the LOW diet tended to have less years of education at baseline compared to MCI on the LOW diet (p = 0.11) and NC on the HIGH diet (p = 0.08). 4Data was missing for one participant (n = 42). Participants with NC had higher cognitive testing scores compared to MCI (95.91±0.97 versus 95.47±0.96; p = 0.03). 5Data was missing for one participant with MCI on the LOW diet (n = 10). APOE4, apolipoprotein E4 (presence of E4 allele referred to as E4+, absence of E4 allele referred to as E4-); BMI, body mass index (calculated as kg/m2); HIGH, high saturated fat/high glycemic index; LOW, low saturated fat/low glycemic index; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; 3MS, modified Mini-Mental State test (100 point range with lower scores indicating more severe cognitive deficit); NC, normal cognition.
Average daily change in diet composition (week 4 – week 0) for the LOW and HIGH diets, according to three-day food records1
| Variable | LOW Diet | HIGH Diet |
| Calories (kcal) | 230.07 (141.61) | 302.73 (139.57) |
| Protein (g) | 21.08 (6.74) | 12.82 (6.65) |
| Fat (g)2 | –18.71 (7.08) | 41.67 (6.97) |
| Saturated Fat (g)2 | –7.69 (3.03) | 34.73 (2.98) |
| Monounsaturated Fat (g)2 | –5.27 (2.61) | 11.03 (2.557) |
| Polyunsaturated Fat (g)2 | –2.48 (1.49) | –4.03 (1.47) |
| Trans Fat (g)2 | –0.13 (0.20) | 0.75 (0.19) |
| Cholesterol (mg)2 | –183.29 (38.42) | 105.55 (37.87) |
| Carbohydrate (g)3 | 104.00 (15.90) | –31.95 (15.67) |
| Fiber (g)3 | 17.84 (2.11) | –13.32 (2.08) |
| Sugar (g)3 | 20.26 (8.27) | –35.53 (8.15) |
| Fructose (g)3 | 4.01 (1.95) | –4.98 (1.92) |
1Dietary intake data from participants who provided CSF samples at baseline and endpoint (n = 31). Data are expressed as least squares mean (standard error of the mean). A mixed model was used to assess the differences in means in nutrient composition change (week 4 – week 0) by diet, diagnosis, and diet-by-diagnosis. Pairwise comparisons were assessed using the Tukey–Kramer method. 2Total fat (p < 0.0001), saturated fat (p < 0.0001), monounsaturated fat (p = 0.0001), trans fat (p = 0.004), and cholesterol (p < 0.0001) increased after consumption of the HIGH diet compared to the LOW diet. 3Total carbohydrate (p < 0.0001), fiber (p < 0.0001), sugar (p < 0.0001), and fructose (p = 0.003) increased after consumption of the LOW diet compared to the HIGH diet.
Fig. 1Mean change from baseline (LSM±SEM; value at week 4 – value at week 0) for serine (a) according to diet, and arginine (b), valine (c), isoleucine (d), and leucine (e) according to diet and cognitive status.+p≤0.16, *p≤0.05. MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NC, normal cognition.
Fig. 2Heat map of Pearson product moment correlations between the change (value at week 4 – value at week 0) in CSF amino acids and CSF AD biomarkers, stratified by diet and cognitive diagnosis. Correlations with a p-value > 0.15 are indicated in black. Correlations with a p-value≤0.15 are categorized according to degree of significance and direction of the association, indicated in red (inverse correlation) or green (direct correlation). MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NC, normal cognition.
Fig. 3Heat map of Pearson product moment correlations between the change (value at week 4 – value at week 0) in CSF amino acids and CSF insulin, stratified by diet and cognitive diagnosis. Correlations with a p-value > 0.15 are indicated in black. Correlations with a p-value≤0.15 are categorized according to degree of significance and direction of the association, indicated in red (inverse correlation) or green (direct correlation). MCI, mild cognitive impairment; NC, normal cognition.