Ketrin Lengu1,2, Shannon Ryan2, Scott J Peltier3,4, Troy Tyszkowski2, Anson Kairys2, Bruno Giordani2, Benjamin M Hampstead1,2. 1. Neuropsychology Section, Mental Health Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. Research Program on Cognition and Neuromodulation-Based Interventions (RP-CNBI), Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Functional MRI Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior research, primarily with young adults, suggests transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects are driven by the primary excitatory and/or inhibitory neurotransmitters, glutamate, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), respectively. OBJECTIVE: We examined the neurometabolic mechanisms of tDCS in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: We used data from a double-blind, cross-over, randomized controlled trial (NCT01958437) in 32 older adults to evaluate high definition (HD)-tDCS-induced changes in glutamate and GABA via magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Participants underwent MRS following two counterbalanced HD-tDCS sessions (one active, one sham) that targeted the right superior parietal cortex (center anode at P2) and delivered 2mA for 20 minutes. RESULTS: Relative to sham, and when co-varying for MRS voxel overlap and right superior parietal volume, active HD-tDCS significantly increased GABA and decreased the ratio of glutamate to GABA. No changes were observed in a left prefrontal control MRS voxel. Although we did not find a significant correlation between strength of delivered current (measured via MRI-based computational modeling) and neurometabolite change, there was a robust positive relationship between the volume of right superior parietal cortex and neurometabolite change. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary findings of increased GABA and reduced glutamate/GABA ratio raise the possibility that (HD-)tDCS effects differ by age. Moreover, age- and disease-related regional brain volume loss may be especially important to consider when planning future studies. Replication would emphasize the importance of developing population-specific tDCS parameters that consider structural and physiologic changes associated with "normal" and pathological aging.
BACKGROUND: Prior research, primarily with young adults, suggests transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects are driven by the primary excitatory and/or inhibitory neurotransmitters, glutamate, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), respectively. OBJECTIVE: We examined the neurometabolic mechanisms of tDCS in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: We used data from a double-blind, cross-over, randomized controlled trial (NCT01958437) in 32 older adults to evaluate high definition (HD)-tDCS-induced changes in glutamate and GABA via magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Participants underwent MRS following two counterbalanced HD-tDCS sessions (one active, one sham) that targeted the right superior parietal cortex (center anode at P2) and delivered 2mA for 20 minutes. RESULTS: Relative to sham, and when co-varying for MRS voxel overlap and right superior parietal volume, active HD-tDCS significantly increased GABA and decreased the ratio of glutamate to GABA. No changes were observed in a left prefrontal control MRS voxel. Although we did not find a significant correlation between strength of delivered current (measured via MRI-based computational modeling) and neurometabolite change, there was a robust positive relationship between the volume of right superior parietal cortex and neurometabolite change. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary findings of increased GABA and reduced glutamate/GABA ratio raise the possibility that (HD-)tDCS effects differ by age. Moreover, age- and disease-related regional brain volume loss may be especially important to consider when planning future studies. Replication would emphasize the importance of developing population-specific tDCS parameters that consider structural and physiologic changes associated with "normal" and pathological aging.
Authors: Todd D Greenberg; Michael N Hoff; Tobias B Gilk; Edward F Jackson; Emanuel Kanal; Alexander M McKinney; Joseph G Och; Ivan Pedrosa; Tina L Rampulla; Scott B Reeder; Jeffrey M Rogg; Frank G Shellock; Robert E Watson; Jeffrey C Weinreb; Dina Hernandez Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: W Bogner; S Gruber; M Doelken; A Stadlbauer; O Ganslandt; U Boettcher; S Trattnig; A Doerfler; H Stefan; T Hammen Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2009-02-07 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Mauricio O Nava-Mesa; Lydia Jiménez-Díaz; Javier Yajeya; Juan D Navarro-Lopez Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 5.505
Authors: Khaled Abdel-Aziz; Bhavana S Solanky; Marios C Yiannakas; Daniel R Altmann; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 3.240