| Literature DB >> 34599479 |
Jonas Ort1,2,3, Hussam Aldin Hamou4,5, Julius M Kernbach4,6,5, Karlijn Hakvoort4,6,5, Christian Blume4,5, Philipp Lohmann7,8, Norbert Galldiks7,9,5, Dieter Henrik Heiland10,11, Felix M Mottaghy12,13,5, Hans Clusmann4,5, Georg Neuloh4,5, Karl-Josef Langen7,12,13,5, Daniel Delev4,6,5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: PET using radiolabeled amino acid [18F]-fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine (FET-PET) is a well-established imaging modality for glioma diagnostics. The biological tumor volume (BTV) as depicted by FET-PET often differs in volume and location from tumor volume of contrast enhancement (CE) in MRI. Our aim was to investigate whether a gross total resection of BTVs defined as < 1 cm3 of residual BTV (PET GTR) correlates with better oncological outcome.Entities:
Keywords: Extent of resection; FET-PET; Glioma; Neurosurgery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34599479 PMCID: PMC8545732 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03844-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurooncol ISSN: 0167-594X Impact factor: 4.130
Fig. 1Patient cohort and study work-flow. a Patient identification with FET-PET examination either before initial or recurrent resection, histologically confirmed WHO grade III or IV glioma. b Comparison of FET-PET imaging with gadolinium T1-MRI shows mismatch between biological tumor volume and gadolinium uptake. c Calculated residual tumor volumes after segmentation and correlation with resection cavity. PET GTR is achieved with a residual biological tumor volume of < 1 cm3. Survival analysis between PET GTR and PET residual.
Created with BioRender.com
Cohort characteristics
| Total | PET GTR (< 1 cm3 residual BTV) | PET residual (≥ 1 cm3 residual BTV) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 30 | 20 | 10 | |
| Age at diagnosis (years median) | 59.0 [53.0–63.0] | 59.0 [53.0–63.0] | 60.0 [49.8–66.0] | .758# |
| Male/Female (%) | 19/11 (63.3/36.7) | 13/7 (65.0/35.0) | 6/4 (60.0/40.0) | 1.000§ |
| WHO grade III/IV | 5/25 | 3/17 | 2/8 | 1.000§ |
| MGMT methylated (%) | 17 (58.6), n = 29* | 12 (60.0) | 5 (55.6), n = 9* | 1.000§ |
| IDH mutated (%) | 5 (16.7) | 3 (15.0) | 2 (20.0) | 1.000§ |
| pre-OP BTV (cm3, median) | 10.8 [8.5–25.7] | 9.2 [7.5–11.0] | 26.3 [12.9–38.3] | |
| pre-OP CE volume (cm3, median) | 7.44 [3.1–25.2] | 6.44 [3.4–13.4] | 24.7 [3.7–39.0] | .143# |
| CE rest (cm3, median) | 0.1 [0.0–1.3] | 0.0 [0.0–0.7] | 0.8 [0.1–1.6] | .150# |
| Initial/recurrent resection (%) | 20/10 (66.7/33.3) | 12/8 (60.0/40.0) | 8/2 (80.0/20.0) | .419§ |
| Mid-line crossing (%) | 4 (13.3) | 1 (5.0) | 3 (30.0) | .095§ |
| Hemisphere left/right (%) | 20/10 (66.7/33.3) | 13/7 (65.0/35.0) | 7/3 (70.0/30.0) | 1.000§ |
| Eloquent localization (%) | 22 (73.3) | 13 (65.0) | 9 (90.0) | .210§ |
Both PET-GTR and PET residual groups were tested for significant differences (bold). Continuous data is represented as median with interquartile range in []
*For one patient no MGMT methylation status was available
#Mann–Whitney-U. §Fisher’s exact test
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier curves of the whole cohort. a PET GTR results in longer overall survival (19.3 months) compared to patients with PET residual (13.7 months), p-value = 0.007. b Patients with FET-PET examination before initial resection, showing a significant effect of PET GTR
Fig. 4Hazards regression plot of multivariable survival analysis. PET GTR is the only prognostic factor identified to reduce hazard (p = 0.006, Cox proportional hazards regression model)
Fig. 3Subgroup analysis. a Patients with IDH-wildtype that received PET GTR showed improved OS (17.3 months) compared to patients with PET residual (13.7 months). b The same effect could be observed in the subgroup of patients that received GTR as defined by gadolinium uptake (PET GTR: 17.3 months OS vs. PET residual: 13.6 months OS)