David H Yoo1, Rolf Bodmer2, Karen Ocorr2, Christopher J Larson2, Alexandre R Colas2, Evan D Muse3,4. 1. Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. 2. Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. 3. Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. emuse@scripps.edu. 4. Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. emuse@scripps.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our understanding of the fundamental cellular and molecular factors leading to atrial fibrillation (AF) remains stagnant despite significant advancement in ablation and device technologies. Diagnosis and prevention strategies fall behind that of treatment, but expanding knowledge in AF genetics holds the potential to drive progress. We aim to review how an understanding of the genetic contributions to AF can guide an approach to individualized risk stratification and novel avenues in drug discovery. RECENT FINDINGS: Rare familial forms of AF identified monogenic contributions to the development of AF. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) further identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) suggesting polygenic and multiplex nature of this common disease. Polygenic risk scores accounting for the multitude of associated SNPs that each confer mildly elevated risk have been developed to translate genetic information into clinical practice, though shortcomings remain. Additionally, novel laboratory methods have been empowered by recent genetic findings to enhance drug discovery efforts. AF is increasingly recognized as a disease with a significant genetic component. With expanding sequencing technologies and accessibility, polygenic risk scores can help identify high risk individuals. Advancement in digital health tools, artificial intelligence and machine learning based on standard electrocardiograms, and genomic driven drug discovery may be integrated to deliver a sophisticated level of precision medicine in this modern era of emphasis on prevention. Randomized, prospective studies to demonstrate clinical benefits of these available tools are needed to validate this approach.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our understanding of the fundamental cellular and molecular factors leading to atrial fibrillation (AF) remains stagnant despite significant advancement in ablation and device technologies. Diagnosis and prevention strategies fall behind that of treatment, but expanding knowledge in AF genetics holds the potential to drive progress. We aim to review how an understanding of the genetic contributions to AF can guide an approach to individualized risk stratification and novel avenues in drug discovery. RECENT FINDINGS: Rare familial forms of AF identified monogenic contributions to the development of AF. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) further identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) suggesting polygenic and multiplex nature of this common disease. Polygenic risk scores accounting for the multitude of associated SNPs that each confer mildly elevated risk have been developed to translate genetic information into clinical practice, though shortcomings remain. Additionally, novel laboratory methods have been empowered by recent genetic findings to enhance drug discovery efforts. AF is increasingly recognized as a disease with a significant genetic component. With expanding sequencing technologies and accessibility, polygenic risk scores can help identify high risk individuals. Advancement in digital health tools, artificial intelligence and machine learning based on standard electrocardiograms, and genomic driven drug discovery may be integrated to deliver a sophisticated level of precision medicine in this modern era of emphasis on prevention. Randomized, prospective studies to demonstrate clinical benefits of these available tools are needed to validate this approach.
Authors: M M Kaarisalo; P Immonen-Räihä; R J Marttila; V Salomaa; E Kaarsalo; K Salmi; C Sarti; J Sivenius; J Torppa; J Tuomilehto Journal: Stroke Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Susan Colilla; Ann Crow; William Petkun; Daniel E Singer; Teresa Simon; Xianchen Liu Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Melissa E Middeldorp; Rajeev K Pathak; Megan Meredith; Abhinav B Mehta; Adrian D Elliott; Rajiv Mahajan; Darragh Twomey; Celine Gallagher; Jeroen M L Hendriks; Dominik Linz; R Doug McEvoy; Walter P Abhayaratna; Jonathan M Kalman; Dennis H Lau; Prashanthan Sanders Journal: Europace Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; A Takahashi; M Hocini; G Quiniou; S Garrigue; A Le Mouroux; P Le Métayer; J Clémenty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ravi Kanagala; Narayana S Murali; Paul A Friedman; Naser M Ammash; Bernard J Gersh; Karla V Ballman; Abu S M Shamsuzzaman; Virend K Somers Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-05-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Mina K Chung; Lee L Eckhardt; Lin Y Chen; Haitham M Ahmed; Rakesh Gopinathannair; José A Joglar; Peter A Noseworthy; Quinn R Pack; Prashanthan Sanders; Kevin M Trulock Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 29.690