Literature DB >> 34598946

Response to Rucaparib in BRCA-Mutant Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Identified by Genomic Testing in the TRITON2 Study.

Andrea Loehr1, Akash Patnaik2, David Campbell3, Jeremy Shapiro4, Alan H Bryce5, Ray McDermott6, Brieuc Sautois7, Nicholas J Vogelzang8, Richard M Bambury9, Eric Voog10, Jingsong Zhang11, Josep M Piulats12, Arif Hussain13, Charles J Ryan14, Axel S Merseburger15, Gedske Daugaard16, Axel Heidenreich17, Karim Fizazi18, Celestia S Higano19, Laurence E Krieger20, Cora N Sternberg21, Simon P Watkins22, Darrin Despain23, Andrew D Simmons1, Melanie Dowson24, Tony Golsorkhi25, Simon Chowdhury26, Wassim Abida27.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The PARP inhibitor rucaparib is approved in the United States for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and a deleterious germline and/or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alteration. While sequencing of tumor tissue is considered the standard for identifying patients with BRCA alterations (BRCA+), plasma profiling may provide a minimally invasive option to select patients for rucaparib treatment. Here, we report clinical efficacy in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC identified through central plasma, central tissue, or local genomic testing and enrolled in TRITON2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had progressed after next-generation androgen receptor-directed and taxane-based therapies for mCRPC and had BRCA alterations identified by central sequencing of plasma and/or tissue samples or local genomic testing. Concordance of plasma/tissue BRCA status and objective response rate and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates were summarized.
RESULTS: TRITON2 enrolled 115 patients with BRCA+ identified by central plasma (n = 34), central tissue (n = 37), or local (n = 44) testing. Plasma/tissue concordance was determined in 38 patients with paired samples and was 47% in 19 patients with a somatic BRCA alteration. No statistically significant differences were observed between objective and PSA response rates to rucaparib across the 3 assay groups. Patients unable to provide tissue samples and tested solely by plasma assay responded at rates no different from patients identified as BRCA+ by tissue testing.
CONCLUSIONS: Plasma, tissue, and local testing of mCRPC patients can be used to identify men with BRCA+ mCRPC who can benefit from treatment with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34598946      PMCID: PMC8678310          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  33 in total

Review 1.  Current Perspectives on Circulating Tumor DNA, Precision Medicine, and Personalized Clinical Management of Cancer.

Authors:  Kelly C S Oliveira; Iago Barroso Ramos; Jessica M C Silva; Williams Fernandes Barra; Gregory J Riggins; Vikrant Palande; Catarina Torres Pinho; Milana Frenkel-Morgenstern; Sidney E B Santos; Paulo P Assumpcao; Rommel R Burbano; Danielle Queiroz Calcagno
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.852

2.  Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT): A Hybridization Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Solid Tumor Molecular Oncology.

Authors:  Donavan T Cheng; Talia N Mitchell; Ahmet Zehir; Ronak H Shah; Ryma Benayed; Aijazuddin Syed; Raghu Chandramohan; Zhen Yu Liu; Helen H Won; Sasinya N Scott; A Rose Brannon; Catherine O'Reilly; Justyna Sadowska; Jacklyn Casanova; Angela Yannes; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Jinjuan Yao; Wei Song; Dara S Ross; Alifya Oultache; Snjezana Dogan; Laetitia Borsu; Meera Hameed; Khedoudja Nafa; Maria E Arcila; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 3.  Profile of the Roche cobas® EGFR mutation test v2 for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Malapelle; Rafael Sirera; Eloísa Jantus-Lewintre; Pablo Reclusa; Silvia Calabuig-Fariñas; Ana Blasco; Pasquale Pisapia; Christian Rolfo; Carlos Camps
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 5.225

4.  Distribution of metastatic sites in patients with prostate cancer: A population-based analysis.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Firas Abdollah; Jonas Schiffmann; Vincent Trudeau; Shahrokh F Shariat; Simon P Kim; Paul Perrotte; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Genomics of lethal prostate cancer at diagnosis and castration resistance.

Authors:  Joaquin Mateo; George Seed; Claudia Bertan; Pasquale Rescigno; David Dolling; Ines Figueiredo; Susana Miranda; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Bora Gurel; Matthew Clarke; Mark Atkin; Rob Chandler; Carlo Messina; Semini Sumanasuriya; Diletta Bianchini; Maialen Barrero; Antonella Petermolo; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Mariane Fontes; Raquel Perez-Lopez; Nina Tunariu; Ben Fulton; Robert Jones; Ursula McGovern; Christy Ralph; Mohini Varughese; Omi Parikh; Suneil Jain; Tony Elliott; Shahneen Sandhu; Nuria Porta; Emma Hall; Wei Yuan; Suzanne Carreira; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Concordance of Circulating Tumor DNA and Matched Metastatic Tissue Biopsy in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander W Wyatt; Matti Annala; Rahul Aggarwal; Kevin Beja; Felix Feng; Jack Youngren; Adam Foye; Paul Lloyd; Matti Nykter; Tomasz M Beer; Joshi J Alumkal; George V Thomas; Robert E Reiter; Matthew B Rettig; Christopher P Evans; Allen C Gao; Kim N Chi; Eric J Small; Martin E Gleave
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Genomic Alterations in Cell-Free DNA and Enzalutamide Resistance in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander W Wyatt; Arun A Azad; Stanislav V Volik; Matti Annala; Kevin Beja; Brian McConeghy; Anne Haegert; Evan W Warner; Fan Mo; Sonal Brahmbhatt; Robert Shukin; Stephane Le Bihan; Martin E Gleave; Matti Nykter; Colin C Collins; Kim N Chi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer predisposition in unsolved high-risk breast and ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Beth Crawford; Sophie B Adams; Taylor Sittler; Jeroen van den Akker; Salina Chan; Ofri Leitner; Lauren Ryan; Elad Gil; Laura van 't Veer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Association of Clonal Hematopoiesis in DNA Repair Genes With Prostate Cancer Plasma Cell-free DNA Testing Interference.

Authors:  Kendal Jensen; Eric Q Konnick; Michael T Schweizer; Alexandra O Sokolova; Petros Grivas; Heather H Cheng; Nola M Klemfuss; Mallory Beightol; Evan Y Yu; Peter S Nelson; Bruce Montgomery; Colin C Pritchard
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Diagnosing hereditary cancer predisposition in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mary Pritzlaff; Yuan Tian; Patrick Reineke; A J Stuenkel; Kyle Allen; Stephanie Gutierrez; Michelle Jackson; Jill S Dolinsky; Holly LaDuca; Jianfeng Xu; Mary Helen Black; Brian T Helfand
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  PARP Inhibition, a New Therapeutic Avenue in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ronan Flippot; Anna Patrikidou; Mihaela Aldea; Emeline Colomba; Pernelle Lavaud; Laurence Albigès; Natacha Naoun; Pierre Blanchard; Mario Terlizzi; Camilo Garcia; Alice Bernard-Tessier; Alina Fuerea; Mario Di Palma; Bernard Escudier; Yohann Loriot; Giulia Baciarello; Karim Fizazi
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.