| Literature DB >> 34595360 |
Kiyoshige Ishibashi1, Kenichi Yoshikawa1, Kazunori Koseki1, Toshiyuki Aoyama2, Daisuke Ishii3,4, Satoshi Yamamoto2, Tomoyuki Matsuda2, Kazuhide Tomita2, Hirotaka Mutsuzaki3, Yutaka Kohno3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional rehabilitation is known to improve walking ability after stoke, but its effectiveness is often limited. Recent studies have shown that gait training combining conventional rehabilitation and robotic devices in stroke patients provides better results than conventional rehabilitation alone, suggesting that gait training with a robotic device may lead to further improvements in the walking ability recovered by conventional rehabilitation. Therefore, the aim of this report was to highlight the changes in kinematic and electromyographic data recorded during walking before and after gait training with the Honda Walking Assist Device® (HWAT) in a male patient whose walking speed had reached a recovery plateau under conventional rehabilitation. CASE: The patient was a 42-year-old man with severe hemiplegia caused by right putaminal hemorrhage. He underwent conventional rehabilitation for 20 weeks following the onset of stroke, after which his walking speed reached a recovery plateau. Subsequently, we added robotic rehabilitation using HWAT to his regular rehabilitation regimen, which resulted in improved step length symmetry and gait endurance. We also noted changes in muscle activity patterns during walking. DISCUSSION: HWAT further improved the walking ability of a patient who had recovered with conventional rehabilitation; this improvement was accompanied by changes in muscle activity patterns during walking. The improvement in gait endurance exceeded the smallest meaningful change in stroke patients, suggesting that this improvement represented a noticeable enhancement in the quality of life in relation to mobility in the community. Further clinical trials are needed to confirm the results of the present case study. 2021 The Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine.Entities:
Keywords: Honda Walking Assist Device®; electromyography; gait endurance; robot assisted gait training
Year: 2021 PMID: 34595360 PMCID: PMC8441009 DOI: 10.2490/prm.20210037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Rehabil Med ISSN: 2432-1354
Fig. 1.(a) Honda Walking Assist Device® (HWA) and (b) gait training with the HWA. HWA assists hip flexion and extension of both limbs in line with the patient’s gait. The angle and torque sensors built into the hip joint actuator monitor the hip angle and generate appropriate torque. The torque exerted by the actuator is calculated and output in real time by an algorithm that adjusts to approximate normal walking.
Fig. 2.Timeline of the maximum walking speed for the current patient. The maximum walking speed in this case had reached a plateau in recovery before the start of HWAT.
Fig. 3.Average angular changes over a gait cycle in the hip, knee, and ankle joints recorded during the 10mWT. (a) Hip joint, (b) knee joint, and (c) ankle joint. Gray lines, average angular change before HWAT; black lines, average angular change after 20 sessions of HWAT.
HWA torque settings for the 20 HWAT sessions
| Session number | Right Hip | Left Hip | ||
| Flexion torque (Nm) | Extension torque (Nm) | Flexion torque (Nm) | Extension torque (Nm) | |
| 1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 2.6 |
| 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3.6 | 2.8 |
| 3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 2.6 |
| 4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 2.6 |
| 5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 2.6 |
| 6 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 2.5 |
| 7 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 2.2 |
| 8 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
| 9 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
| 10 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
| 11 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 1.9 |
| 12 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 2.1 |
| 13 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 2.1 |
| 14 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| 15 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| 16 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| 17 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
| 18 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| 19 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| 20 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
Assessment scores before and after 20 sessions of HWAT
| Before | After | P value | |
| FMA LE (0–34) | 20 | 20 | |
| MAS (0–4) | |||
| Knee flexor muscles | 1 | 1 | |
| Knee extensor muscles | 1 | 1 | |
| Plantar flexor muscles | 2 | 2 | |
| Dorsiflexor muscles | 1 | 1 | |
| 6MWT | |||
| Distance (m) | 342.1 | 400.6 | |
| Change in pulse rate (bpm) | 109 → 124 | 92 → 119 | |
| Change in Borg Scale (6–20) | 11 → 15 | 11 → 13 | |
| 10mWT | |||
| Speed (m/s) | 1.15 ± 0.10 | 1.16 ± 0.07 | |
| Cadence (steps/min) | 110.3 ± 4.1 | 108.9 ± 6.5 | |
| Step length of the affected limb (m) | 0.78 ± 0.04 | 0.77 ± 0.06 | 0.701 |
| Step length of the nonaffected limb (m) | 0.62 ± 0.04 | 0.70 ± 0.05 | 0.005 |
| Symmetry of step length | 0.79 ± 0.08 | 0.92 ± 0.10 | 0.033 |
| Muscle synergy analysis (number of modules) | 1 | 2 |
The step length for both sides and the step length symmetry were analyzed using Student’s t-test.
FMA, Fugl-Meyer Assessment; LE, lower extremity; MAS, Modified Ashworth Scale; 6MWT, 6-minute walking test; 10mWT, 10 m walking test.
Fig. 4.Average EMG changes over a gait cycle in the affected lower limb recorded during the 10mWT. (a) Gluteus maximus (Gmax), (b) proximal portion of the rectus femoris (RF-p), (c) distal portion of the rectus femoris (RF-d), (d) biceps femoris (BF), and (e) tibialis anterior (TA). Gray lines, average EMG changes before HWAT; black lines, average EMG change after 20 sessions of HWAT.
Fig. 5.Results of the muscle synergy analysis of data recorded during the 10mWT. (a) Before HWAT and (b) after 20 sessions of HWAT. Only one module was evident before the HWAT intervention, whereas there were two modules after the intervention.