Manish Sharma1, Anand Gupta2, Anil Kumar3, Rajnish Talwar4, Rakesh Kumar5. 1. Senior Advisor (Surgery) & Neurosurgeon, Army Hospital (R&R), Delhi Cantt, India. 2. Classified Specialist (Surgery) & Neurosurgeon, Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt, India. 3. Senior Advisor (Surgery) & Neurosurgeon, Command Hospital (Northern Command) Udhampur, India. 4. Professor & Head of Department (Oncosurgery), Fortis Hospital, Mohali, India. 5. Ex-Senior Consultant (Surgery), Delhi, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-velocity missile injuries are commonly encountered in war or war-like situations. Aggressive resuscitation, early evacuation to neurosurgical center, and application of neurosurgical principles remain tenets of success. METHODS: The spectrum of injuries and clinical profile of 14 such cases with craniocerebral missile injuries managed at our center in the northern sector were included. Site of injury, GCS at presentation, associated injuries, surgical intervention, duration of hospitalization, and recovery of the patient were analyzed. RESULTS: Five patients had sustained gunshot wounds, and nine patients had sustained shrapnel injuries. Thirteen patients were deeply comatose, and one patient was conscious. The entry wound was in frontal lobe in eight patients, and in four patients, it was in the faciocranial area. Ten patients had Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 8 at presentation. Surgical intervention was required in 13 patients, including 11 decompressive craniectomies and anterior skull base repair in four patients with faciocranial entry wound. One patient expired during initial resuscitation, and one patient died in the postoperative period. Location of injury was the single most important determinant of outcome. CONCLUSION: An early decompressive craniectomy provides a reasonable chance of recovery. Aggressive debridement involving track explorations, lobectomies, or removal of retained shrapnels is not beneficial. Injuries to the skull base and violation of sinus spaces predispose these patients to cerebrospinal fluid leaks and infective sequelae. All these patients require aggressive postoperative intensive care and rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND: High-velocity missile injuries are commonly encountered in war or war-like situations. Aggressive resuscitation, early evacuation to neurosurgical center, and application of neurosurgical principles remain tenets of success. METHODS: The spectrum of injuries and clinical profile of 14 such cases with craniocerebral missile injuries managed at our center in the northern sector were included. Site of injury, GCS at presentation, associated injuries, surgical intervention, duration of hospitalization, and recovery of the patient were analyzed. RESULTS: Five patients had sustained gunshot wounds, and nine patients had sustained shrapnel injuries. Thirteen patients were deeply comatose, and one patient was conscious. The entry wound was in frontal lobe in eight patients, and in four patients, it was in the faciocranial area. Ten patients had Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 8 at presentation. Surgical intervention was required in 13 patients, including 11 decompressive craniectomies and anterior skull base repair in four patients with faciocranial entry wound. One patient expired during initial resuscitation, and one patient died in the postoperative period. Location of injury was the single most important determinant of outcome. CONCLUSION: An early decompressive craniectomy provides a reasonable chance of recovery. Aggressive debridement involving track explorations, lobectomies, or removal of retained shrapnels is not beneficial. Injuries to the skull base and violation of sinus spaces predispose these patients to cerebrospinal fluid leaks and infective sequelae. All these patients require aggressive postoperative intensive care and rehabilitation.
Authors: Brian J Ivins; Karen A Schwab; John S Crowley; B Joseph McEntire; Christopher C Trumble; Fred H Brown; Deborah L Warden Journal: Mil Med Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Randy S Bell; Corey M Mossop; Michael S Dirks; Frederick L Stephens; Lisa Mulligan; Robert Ecker; Christopher J Neal; Anand Kumar; Teodoro Tigno; Rocco A Armonda Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Les Folio; Jeffrey Solomon; Nadia Biassou; Tatjana Fischer; Jenny Dworzak; Vanessa Raymont; Ninet Sinaii; Eric M Wassermann; Jordan Grafman Journal: Mil Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 1.437