| Literature DB >> 34591184 |
Lena Lutz1, Richard Zehner2, Marcel A Verhoff2, Hansjürgen Bratzke2, Jens Amendt2.
Abstract
This study highlights the importance of insect evidence by evaluating 949 insect-associated cases, including 139 entomological reports, from 2001 to 2019 at the Institute of Legal Medicine Frankfurt/Germany. With a high number of cases in the summer months and a low number in the colder season, 78.5% of the bodies were found indoors, regardless of year or month. In more than 80% of the cases, where PMI information was available (n = 704), the presumed PMI ranged from 1 to 21 days, a period during which entomological evidence can provide a day-specific estimate of PMImin. In cases where insects have been identified to species level (n = 279), most bodies were infested by one or two species with a maximum of 10 different species. Overall, a total of 55 insect species were found. Information on biology, activity and distribution of the most abundant taxa is given and applied for 5 case histories estimating different PMImins of up to over 6 months. Despite proved importance and scientific development of forensic entomology, insects are still rarely considered as a tool in forensic case work. The main reasons are a lack of awareness and (too) late involvement of a forensic entomologist. Our work shows that forensic entomology is an independent discipline that requires specialist expertise.Entities:
Keywords: Blow flies; Legal medicine; Myiasis; Negligence; Postmortem interval
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34591184 PMCID: PMC8523412 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02628-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Legal Med ISSN: 0937-9827 Impact factor: 2.686
Fig. 1Number of publications with “forensic entomology” in the title, abstract or keywords published in peer-reviewed journals from 2001 to 2019
Insect-associated cases from 2001 and 2019 with information of the place of discovery, the age and sex of the deceased; “information of insect species” indicates whether the insects were determined or whether only the insect infestation was documented
| Bodies infested with insects | 949 |
|---|---|
| Information of insect species | 29.5% |
| Entomological report | 14.5% |
| Indoor | 78.5% |
| Outdoor | 21.5% |
| Male | 69.9% |
| Female | 30.1% |
| Age (mean) | 55.6 |
| Age (median) | 56 |
Fig. 2Number of bodies infested with insects (bars; n = 854) found indoor (black) and outdoor (white) in the period from 2001 to 2019
Fig. 3Number of bodies infested with insects (bars; n = 949) in the period of 2001 to 2019 found indoor (black) and outdoor (white) month-by-month
Percentage distribution of the presumed PMI and the manner of death for insect-associated cases from the years 2001 to 2019
| PMI | 704 (n) |
|---|---|
| 1–7 d | 31.73% |
| > 1–3 w | 51.48% |
| > 3 w–3 m | 7.76% |
| > 3–6 m | 4.23% |
| > 6 m | 4.09% |
| Manner of death | 949 (n) |
| Natural | 35.19% |
| Unnatural | 26.10% |
| Unclear | 38.71% |
Insect species (Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera) sampled from human bodies (n = 279) from 2001 to 2019. Information on the number of cases the species were found as well as the percentage distribution are given
| Order | Family | Species | n | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coleoptera | Cleridae | 3 | 1.08 | |
| 3 | 1.08 | |||
| Dermestidae | 10 | 3.58 | ||
| 7 | 2.51 | |||
| Geotrupidae | 2 | < 1 | ||
| Geotrupes sp. | 1 | < 1 | ||
| Histeridae | 4 | 1.43 | ||
| Silphidae | 8 | 2.86 | ||
| 3 | 1.08 | |||
| 3 | 1.08 | |||
| 4 | 1.43 | |||
| 2 | < 1 | |||
| 1 | < 1 | |||
| 3 | 1.08 | |||
| Staphylinidae | 5 | 1.79 | ||
| 1 | < 1 | |||
| 1 | < 1 | |||
| 1 | < 1 | |||
| Diptera | Calliphoridae | 150 | 53.76 | |
| 111 | 39.78 | |||
| 68 | 24.37 | |||
| 55 | 19.71 | |||
| 45 | 16.13 | |||
| 45 | 16.13 | |||
| 27 | 9.68 | |||
| 19 | 6.81 | |||
| 4 | 1.43 | |||
| 1 | < 1 | |||
| Calliphoridae sp. | 6 | 2.15 | ||
| Drosophilidae | Drosophilidae sp. | 2 | < 1 | |
| Fanniidae | 4 | 1.43 | ||
| 4 | 1.43 | |||
| 2 | < 1 | |||
| 4 | 1.43 | |||
| Muscidae | 10 | 3.58 | ||
| 8 | 2.87 | |||
| 6 | 2.15 | |||
| 3 | 1.08 | |||
| 3 | 1.08 | |||
| 2 | < 1 | |||
| 2 | < 1 | |||
| 1 | < 1 | |||
| 8 | 2.87 | |||
| 8 | 2.87 | |||
| Muscidae sp. | 3 | 1.08 | ||
| Phoridae | 13 | 4.66 | ||
| 2 | < 1 | |||
| 1 | < 1 | |||
| 1 | < 1 | |||
| 1 | < 1 | |||
| 1 | < 1 | |||
| Phoridae sp. | 21 | 7.53 | ||
| Piophilidae | 7 | 2.51 | ||
| Piophilidae sp. | 4 | 1.43 | ||
| Sarcophagidae | 33 | 11.83 | ||
| Sarcophagidae sp. | 12 | 4.3 | ||
| Scatopsidae | Scatopsidae sp. | 1 | < 1 | |
| Sepsidae | 2 | < 1 | ||
| Sphaeroceridae | Sphaeroeridae sp. | 1 | < 1 | |
| Stratiomyidae | Stratiomyidae sp. | 1 | < 1 | |
| Syrphidae | 2 | < 1 | ||
| 2 | < 1 | |||
| Trichoceridae | 1 | < 1 | ||
| Hymenoptera | Braconidae | Braconidae sp. | 1 | < 1 |
| Pteromalidae | 9 | 3.23 |
Fig. 4Pictures of the most relevant species in forensic entomological case work. 1 Lucilia sericata: adult fly; b 3rd instar larvae; c adult specimens colonizing natural orifices (eyes, mouth) of a fresh human body. 2 Calliphora vicina: a adult fly; b 3rd instar larvae; c mono-colonization on a human body of C. vicina. 3 Chrysomya albiceps: a adult fly; b 3rd instar larvae; c mono-colonization on a human body of Ch. albiceps with zoom on the characteristic of the larvae. 4 Muscina prolapsa: a adult fly, b 3rd instar larvae; c wrapped human body with colonization of Muscina species. 5 Megaselia scalaris: a adult fly and pupa; b 3rd instar larvae; c colonization of M. scalaris on a human body with pupae stick on the face. 6 Dermestidae: a adult beetle and exuviae; b body of a 93-year-old woman colonized by Dermestes lardarius; c excrements of larvae and adult larder beetles; fibrous horsehair-like, dark-brown material
Fig. 5Seasonal oviposition activity on human bodies of A the most important blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae): Aa C. vicina, Ab C. vomitoria, Ac Ch. albiceps, Ad L. ampullacea, Ae L. caesar, Af L. sericata, Ag P. regina, Ah P. terraenovae and B the most important forensically relevant flies and beetles: Ba S. argyrostoma, Bb Fannia sp., Bc Hydrotaea sp., Bd Muscina sp., Be Phoridae sp., Bf Piophilidae sp., Bg Dermestidae sp., Bh Silphidae sp
Fig. 6Percentage distribution of indoor (black) and outdoor (white) cases for the most important and abundant species