Literature DB >> 34591156

Risk factors for mortality following one-stage septic hip arthroplasty - a case-control study.

Sophia-Marlene Busch1, Mustafa Citak2, Mustafa Akkaya1, Felix Prange1, Thorsten Gehrke1, Philip Linke1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite good clinical outcomes and a high success rate, there is a comparatively high mortality after one stage septic exchange of total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for mortality in the hospitalization period after one-stage septic exchange of THA.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed in our database all patients who had a one-stage septic exchange for periprosthetic infection of THA and died during hospitalization (n = 33). The control group was matched semi-randomly by surgical procedure (n = 121) who did not die during hospitalization. The two groups were analyzed for risk factors such as age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and high-/low-virulence bacteria.
RESULTS: In the deceased group, 16 patients were female and 17 were male with a mean age at surgery of 73.2 years. In the control group, there were 55 females and 66 males with an average age at surgery of 68.2 years. Comparing the two groups, the deceased group had a significantly higher proportion of liver disease as well as higher rate of pulmonary embolism, apoplexy, and/or myocardial infarction, an increased CCI with an average of 6.5 and advanced age. Further demographic and surgery-related parameters especially high- or low-virulent germs were not identified as risk factors for mortality during the hospitalization period. The binominal logistic regression analysis showed that the probability of an inpatient death following one-stage septic exchange of THA increases by a factor of 3.079, with each additional point of the CCI.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, advanced age and high CCI are the main risk factors for mortality after single-stage septic change of THA. However, high-virulence bacteria have no influence on the mortality during the hospitalization period after one-stage septic exchange of THA.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aseptic; Mortality; One-stage septic exchange; Periprosthetic joint infection; Risk factors; Septic; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34591156     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05230-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  Infected total hip arthroplasty revision: one- or two-stage procedure?

Authors:  S Klouche; P Leonard; V Zeller; L Lhotellier; W Graff; P Leclerc; P Mamoudy; E Sariali
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 2.  Prosthetic-joint infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli; Andrej Trampuz; Peter E Ochsner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  One-stage revision arthroplasty using cementless stem for infected hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Guillem Bori; Ernesto Muñoz-Mahamud; Jordi Cuñé; Xavier Gallart; David Fuster; Alejandro Soriano
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Infection as a cause of primary total hip arthroplasty revision and its predictive factors.

Authors:  N Reina; C Delaunay; P Chiron; N Ramdane; M Hamadouche
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.256

5.  Comparison of one-stage revision with antibiotic cement versus two-stage revision results for infected total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ho-Rim Choi; Young-Min Kwon; Andrew A Freiberg; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Trends in Periprosthetic Hip Infection and Associated Costs: A Population-Based Study Assessing the Impact of Hospital Factors Using National Data.

Authors:  Robert L Brochin; Kevin Phan; Jashvant Poeran; Nicole Zubizarreta; Leesa M Galatz; Calin S Moucha
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 7.  Risk factors, diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Syed S Ahmed; Fahima Begum; Babar Kayani; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Atul F Kamath; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Steve Kurtz; Vanessa Chan; Thomas P Vail; Harry Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Single-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Infection-An Underutilized Treatment Strategy.

Authors:  Jonathan J Negus; Peter B Gifford; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Managing uncertainty - a qualitative study of surgeons' decision-making for one-stage and two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection.

Authors:  Andrew J Moore; Ashley W Blom; Michael R Whitehouse; Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.