Literature DB >> 34590913

Measurement error of self-paced exercise performance in athletic women is not affected by ovulatory status or ambient environment.

Huixin Zheng1, Claire E Badenhorst2, Tze-Huan Lei3, Ahmad Munir Che Muhamed4, Yi-Hung Liao5, Tatsuro Amano6, Naoto Fujii7, Takeshi Nishiyasu7, Narihiko Kondo8, Toby Mündel1.   

Abstract

Measurement error(s) of exercise tests for women are severely lacking in the literature. The purpose of this investigation was to 1) determine whether ovulatory status or ambient environment were moderating variables when completing a 30-min self-paced work trial and 2) provide test-retest norms specific to athletic women. A retrospective analysis of three heat stress studies was completed using 33 female participants (31 ± 9 yr, 54 ± 10 mL·min-1·kg-1) that yielded 130 separate trials. Participants were classified as ovulatory (n = 19), anovulatory (n = 4), and oral contraceptive pill users (n = 10). Participants completed trials ∼2 wk apart in their (quasi-) early follicular and midluteal phases in two of moderate (1.3 ± 0.1 kPa, 20.5 ± 0.5°C, 18 trials), warm-dry (2.2 ± 0.2 kPa, 34.1 ± 0.2°C, 46 trials), or warm-humid (3.4 ± 0.1 kPa, 30.2 ± 1.1°C, 66 trials) environments. We quantified reliability using limits of agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and coefficient of variation (CV). Test-retest reliability was high, clinically valid (ICC = 0.90, P < 0.01), and acceptable with a mean CV of 4.7%, SEM of 3.8 kJ (2.1 W), and reliable bias of -2.1 kJ (-1.2 W). The various ovulatory status and contrasting ambient conditions had no appreciable effect on reliability. These results indicate that athletic women can perform 30-min self-paced work trials ∼2 wk apart with an acceptable and low variability irrespective of their hormonal status or heat-stressful environments.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study highlights that aerobically trained women perform 30-min self-paced work trials ∼2 wk apart with acceptably low variability and their hormonal/ovulatory status and the introduction of greater ambient heat and humidity do not moderate this measurement error.

Entities:  

Keywords:  females; heat stress; hormones; performance; reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34590913     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00342.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  2 in total

1.  Seasonal Heat Acclimatisation in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Harry A Brown; Thomas H Topham; Brad Clark; James W Smallcombe; Andreas D Flouris; Leonidas G Ioannou; Richard D Telford; Ollie Jay; Julien D Périard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Do E2 and P4 contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high?

Authors:  Huixin Zheng; Claire E Badenhorst; Tze-Huan Lei; Ahmad Munir Che Muhamed; Yi-Hung Liao; Naoto Fujii; Narihiko Kondo; Toby Mündel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.346

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.