| Literature DB >> 34590022 |
Pieter J M Joosten1,2, Toon A Winkelman3, David J Heineman1,3, Sayed M S Hashemi4, Idris Bahce4, Suresh Senan5, Marinus A Paul3, Koen J Hartemink2, Max Dahele5, Chris Dickhoff1,3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The role of salvage surgery for patients with locoregional (LR) recurrence or persistent SCLC after radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for limited-stage disease is not well established. We evaluated our experience.Entities:
Keywords: Locoregional recurrence; Outcome; Salvage surgery; Small cell lung cancer
Year: 2021 PMID: 34590022 PMCID: PMC8474289 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2021.100172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JTO Clin Res Rep ISSN: 2666-3643
Tumor and Treatment Characteristics for Patients Who Underwent Salvage Pulmonary Resection for Recurrent or Persistent SCLC
| Pt | Year of Resection | Sex | Age at Initial Diagnosis (y) | cTNM | Histological features | Radiation Dose (Gy) | Second-Line Chemo | Reason for Salvage Surgery | Time Between RT and Surgery (mo) | Mediastinal Evaluation (Presalvage) | r-cTNM | ypTNM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | F | 71 | cT4N2 | SCLC | 66 | + | R | 23 | EBUS | r-cT1aN0 | ypT2N1 |
| 2 | 2020 | F | 58 | cT2aN1 | SCLC | 66 | − | R | 10 | EBUS | r-cT1bN0 | ypT1cN0 |
| 3 | 2020 | F | 59 | cT3N1 | SCLC | 56 | − | R | 23 | EBUS | r-cT2aN0 | ypT1cN0 |
| 4 | 2020 | F | 53 | cT4N0 | SCLC | N/A | − | R | 22 | EBUS | r-cT4N0 | ypT2N0 |
| 5 | 2018 | F | 64 | cT4N2 | SCLC | 50 | − | R | 7 | − | r-cT1aN0 | ypT1aN0 |
| 6 | 2018 | F | 66 | cT3N2 | SCLC/NSCLC | N/A | + | R | 80 | EBUS + CT biopsy | r-cT3N1 | ypT0N0 |
| 7 | 2015 | M | 58 | cT3N0 | SCLC | 66 | − | P | 3 | CT biopsy | r-cT3N0 | ypT0N0 |
| 8 | 2012 | F | 58 | cT2aN1 | SCLC | 46 | + | R | 47 | EBUS | r-cT1cN0 | ypT2aN1 |
| 9 | 2011 | F | 48 | cT4N0 | SCLC | 45 | + | R | 22 | EUS | r-cT2bN1 | ypT2bN0 |
| 10 | 2008 | M | 64 | cT1bN0 | SCLC | 45 | + | R | 22 | EBUS | r-cT1cN0 | ypT2N0 |
c-TNM, clinical TNM; CT, computed tomography; EBUS, endobronchial ultrasound; EUS, esophageal ultrasound; F, female; M, male; N/A, not available; P, persistent; Pt, patient; R, recurrence; r-cTNM, recurrence-clinical TNM; RT, radiotherapy; ypTNM, pathologic TNM.
Surgical Details, Morbidity, Resection Margin, Progression of Disease, and Overall Survival
| Pt | Type of Resection | Operating Time (min) | IP Resection | Bronchial Stump Cover | Separate Dissected LN | In | Reintervention | Hospital Stay (d) | LP or DP | Time to Progression | Survival (mo) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L LUL | 180 | + | IMF | 5/6, 8, 9, 10, 11 | AF, pneumonia | − | 13 | − | − | ≥2 |
| 2 | L LUL | 154 | − | IMF | 5/6, 7, 10 | − | − | 5 | LP | 6 | ≥11 |
| 3 | L RUL | 244 | − | IMF | 4, 7 | AF | − | 13 | − | − | ≥8 |
| 4 | P L | N/A | + | IMF | 4, 10 | − | − | 7 | − | − | ≥8 |
| 5 | L RUL | 161 | − | IMF | 4, 7 | − | − | 9 | − | − | ≥34 |
| 6 | B RUL/RML | 220 | + | IMF | 4, 7 | AF | − | 9 | − | − | ≥35 |
| 7 | L RUL | 295 | − | ASM | 4, 7, 10, 11 | Air leakage | − | 12 | − | − | ≥71 |
| 8 | S (1,2,6) | 135 | + | Pericardium | 4, 7, 8, 11, 10, 12 | − | − | 6 | DP | 61 | 86 |
| 9 | B RUL/RML | 244 | + | Omentum | 7, 10 | Respiratory distress | Rethoracotomy | 30 | DP | 6 | 12 |
| 10 | L RUL | 144 | − | IMF | 4, 7, 9, 11 | − | − | 9 | DP | 32 | 33 |
AF, atrium fibrillation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ASM, anterior serratus muscle; B, bilobectomy; DP, distant progression; EBUS, endobronchial ultrasound; EUS, esophageal ultrasound; IMF, pedicled intercostal muscle flap; IP, intrapericardial; L, lobectomy; LN, lymph node; LP, locoregional progression; LUL, left upper lobe; N/A, not available; P L, pneumonectomy left sided; RML, right middle lobe; RUL, right upper lobe, S, segment resection.
Died of disease progression.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS. OS, overall survival.