Literature DB >> 34587293

Asymmetry in sprinting: An insight into sub-10 and sub-11 s men and women sprinters.

Athanassios Bissas1, Josh Walker1, Giorgos P Paradisis2, Brian Hanley1, Catherine B Tucker1, Nils Jongerius1, Aaron Thomas1, Stéphane Merlino3, Pierre-Jean Vazel4, Olivier Girard5.   

Abstract

We assessed sprint mechanical asymmetry in world-class competitors and evaluated whether inter-limb sex-based differences in sprinting mechanics exist. The eight finalists in the men's and women's 100 m events at the 2017 IAAF World Championships were studied. Five high-speed cameras (150 Hz) were used to capture two consecutive steps of the whole body between 47.0 m and 55.5 m from the start, while four additional cameras (250 Hz) focussed on the lower extremities. A total of 33 spatio-temporal, touchdown and toe-off joint angles, and horizontal and vertical foot velocity parameters were extracted through three-dimensional analysis. Group mean asymmetry scores were assessed using the symmetry angle (SA) where scores of 0% and 100% represent perfect symmetry and perfect asymmetry, respectively. Although considered generally low (SA <3% for 22 out of 33 parameters), the magnitude of mechanical asymmetry varied widely between sprinters of the same sex. However, there was no mean SA scores difference between men and women for any stride mechanical parameters (all p ≥ 0.064). Asymmetry scores were inconsistent between parameters and phases (touchdown vs toe-off instants), and sprinting mechanics were generally not related to asymmetry magnitudes. In summary, low to moderate asymmetry is a natural phenomenon in elite sprinting. Asymmetry was inconsistent between parameters and competitors during near maximum velocity running, yet mean values for a given parameter generally did not differ between sexes. Sprinters' performances were not related to their SA scores.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  running mechanics; sex differences; sprint running; symmetry angle scores; world championships

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34587293     DOI: 10.1111/sms.14068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  3 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical Performance Factors in the Track and Field Sprint Start: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria João Valamatos; João M Abrantes; Filomena Carnide; Maria-José Valamatos; Cristina P Monteiro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Kinematic and Temporal Differences Between World-Class Men's and Women's Hurdling Techniques.

Authors:  Athanassios Bissas; Giorgos P Paradisis; Brian Hanley; Stéphane Merlino; Josh Walker
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-29

3.  Inter-limb asymmetries and kicking limb preference in English premier league soccer players.

Authors:  Gareth Nicholson; Tim Bennett; Aaron Thomas; Lysander Pollitt; Mike Hopkinson; Rubén Crespo; Tom Robinson; Rob J Price
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-08-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.