Literature DB >> 34586622

Remember that patient you saw last week: characteristics and frequency of patients experiencing anticipated and unanticipated death following ED discharge.

Richard Hoang1,2, Kari Sampsel3,4, Andrew Willmore3,4, Katerina Yelle Labre4, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy3,4,5, Lisa A Calder5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) is an at-risk area for medical error. We determined the characteristics of patients with unanticipated and anticipated death within 7 days of ED discharge and whether medical error contributed.
METHODS: We performed a single-centre health records review of 200 consecutive cases during a 3-year period from 2014 to 2017 in two urban, academic, tertiary care EDs. We included patients evaluated by an emergency physician who were discharged and died within 7 days. Three trained and blinded reviewers determined if deaths were related to the index visit, anticipated or unanticipated, and/or due to potential medical error. Reviewers performed content analysis to identify themes.
RESULTS: Of 200 cases, 129 had sufficient information for analysis, translating to 44 deaths per 100,000 ED discharges (200/458,634). 13 cases per 100,000 ED discharges (58/458,634) were related and unanticipated deaths. 4 cases per 100,000 were due to potential medical errors (18/458,634). Over half (52.7%) of 129 patients displayed abnormal vital signs at discharge. Pneumonia (27.1%) was the most common cause of death. Patient themes were: difficult historian, multiple complaints, multiple comorbidities, acute progression of chronic disease, and recurrent falls. Provider themes were: failure to consider infectious etiology, failure to admit high-risk elderly patient, and missed diagnosis. System themes were: multiple ED visits or recent admission, and no repeat vital signs recorded.
CONCLUSION: Though the frequency of related and unanticipated deaths and those due to medical error was low, clinicians should carefully consider the highlighted common patient, provider, and system themes to facilitate safe discharge from the ED.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP)/ Association Canadienne de Médecine d'Urgence (ACMU).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discharge; Emergency department; Medical error; Patient safety

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34586622     DOI: 10.1007/s43678-021-00190-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJEM        ISSN: 1481-8035            Impact factor:   2.410


  4 in total

1.  Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits.

Authors:  Lisa Calder; Anita Pozgay; Shena Riff; David Rothwell; Erik Youngson; Naghmeh Mojaverian; Adam Cwinn; Alan Forster
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  Adverse events following an emergency department visit.

Authors:  Alan J Forster; Nicholas G W Rose; Carl van Walraven; Ian Stiell
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-02

3.  Adverse Events Among Emergency Department Patients With Cardiovascular Conditions: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Calder; Jeffrey Perry; Justin W Yan; Ria De Gorter; Marco L A Sivilotti; Debra Eagles; Frank Myslik; Bjug Borgundvaag; Marcel Émond; Andrew D McRae; Monica Taljaard; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Wei Cheng; Alan J Forster; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 5.721

  4 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  How do we identify acute medical admissions that are suitable for same day emergency care?

Authors:  Catherine Atkin; Bridget Riley; Elizabeth Sapey
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.410

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.