Literature DB >> 34585164

Isolation of mouse Kupffer cells for phenotypic and functional studies.

Francesco Andreata1, Camille Blériot2, Pietro Di Lucia1, Giorgia De Simone1,3, Valeria Fumagalli1,3, Xenia Ficht1, Cristian Gabriel Beccaria1, Mirela Kuka1,3, Florent Ginhoux2,4,5, Matteo Iannacone1,3,6.   

Abstract

Here, we provide detailed protocols for the isolation of mouse Kupffer cells - the liver-resident macrophages - for phenotypic (e.g., via flow cytometry, mass cytometry, or RNA-sequencing) analyses or for functional experiments involving cell culture. The procedures presented can be adapted for the isolation of other hepatic cell populations. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to De Simone et al. (2021).
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell culture; Cell isolation; Flow Cytometry/Mass Cytometry; Immunology; Single Cell

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34585164      PMCID: PMC8450292          DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  STAR Protoc        ISSN: 2666-1667


Before you begin

In addition to its metabolic functions, the liver is endowed with unique immunological features (Bénéchet et al., 2019; Ficht and Iannacone, 2020; Iannacone and Guidotti, 2021). It is comprised by parenchymal cells (the hepatocytes) as well as non-parenchymal cells (LNPCs). Among the latter, Kupffer cells (KC) reside within liver sinusoids and represent the most abundant resident macrophage population of the organism. KCs have long been known for their scavenger and phagocytic functions but can also present antigens to CD8+ T cells and promote either tolerance or effector differentiation. Efficient, reproducible methods for the isolation of Kupffer cells suitable for phenotypical and functional analyses are hence of paramount importance in order to study the biology of liver-resident macrophages. This STAR protocol provides two distinct methods for KC isolation: a quick, scalable procedure for phenotypic analyses (method #1, steps 1 through 26), or a longer, more laborious preparation best suited for in vitro functional studies (method #2, steps 27 through 48). KCs isolated with either methods are suitable for the desired downstream application, and we provide detailed information and suggestions on how to perform cell culture (steps 49 through 53) as well as flow cytometry analysis and cell sorting (steps 54 through 63). Prepare the reagents for liver digestion, related to method #1

Prepare the ex vivo digestion medium

Timing: 15 min Prepare a solution of plain RPMI supplemented with 0.2 mg/mL of collagenase, 5 units/mL of Deoxyribonuclease I and 10% FBS. Prewarm the solution at 37°C.

Key resources table

Materials and equipment

FACS Buffer [Store at 4°C up to one month] 1% FBS can be substituted with 1% BSA. For cell sorting experiments that involve in vitro culture, FACS buffer should be prepared under sterile conditions, filtered through 0.2 μm filter and should not contain NaN3. ACK Buffer Adjust pH to 7.2 and filter through 0.2 μm filter. Keep it sterile at 20°C–25°C. Avertin Dissolve 2.5 g of tribromoethanol into 5 mL of 2-methyl-2-butanol by warming to 55°C with gentle swirling. Add slowly (dropwise) the 5 mL of dissolved tribromoethanol into 200 mL of sterile ddH2O. Filter through 0.2 μm filter and store at 4°C for up to 4 months. Percoll 36% Mix 7.2 mL of Percoll (100%) with 0.8 mL of PBS (10×) to achieve a Iso-osmolar Percoll solution. Then, mix this solution with 12 mL of plain RPMI to achieve a final Percoll density of 36%.

Step-by-step method details

Harvesting the liver for ex vivo LNPCs isolation (method #1)

Timing: 10 min Euthanize the mouse according to the authorized ethical guidelines. Sanitize the mouse abdomen surface with 70% ethanol (Figure 1A).
Figure 1

Surgical preparation and harvesting of the liver

(A and B) (A) Euthanized mouse is sanitized with 70% ethanol and the peritoneal cavity is exposed (B).

(C) The intestine is pushed sideward in order to expose the portal vein and the vena cava.

(D and E) (D) Liver is perfused through the vena cava. After 2 mL of perfusion the liver vasculature becomes engorged (E); at this moment the portal vein is cut.

(F and G)(F) Liver is perfused with 10 mL of PBS and the organ clears immediately turning into a light brown color (G).

(H–J) (H) The gallbladder is removed, and the hepatic ligaments are cut (I) before the complete harvest of the liver (J).

Surgical preparation and harvesting of the liver (A and B) (A) Euthanized mouse is sanitized with 70% ethanol and the peritoneal cavity is exposed (B). (C) The intestine is pushed sideward in order to expose the portal vein and the vena cava. (D and E) (D) Liver is perfused through the vena cava. After 2 mL of perfusion the liver vasculature becomes engorged (E); at this moment the portal vein is cut. (F and G)(F) Liver is perfused with 10 mL of PBS and the organ clears immediately turning into a light brown color (G). (H–J) (H) The gallbladder is removed, and the hepatic ligaments are cut (I) before the complete harvest of the liver (J). Cut through the peritoneum (Figure 1B), by first performing a vertical cut from the lower end of the abdomen to the ribcage, and then performing horizontal cuts at the mid-section of the abdomen to both sides until the organs of the mouse are exposed. Pay attention not to damage any organs and gently expose the liver. Push the intestine right-hand sideward by using the blunt end of a forceps to get access to the liver (Figure 1C). Load a 10 mL syringe with 10 mL of PBS and a 27G needle. Carefully insert the needle in the inferior vena cava and perfuse 2 mL until the organ starts to swell (Figure 1D). Cut the portal vein with scissors, paying attention not to damage the liver (Figure 1E). Complete the perfusion until 10 mL of PBS have been injected in about 2 min (Figures 1F and 1G). Remove the gallbladder (Figure 1H) and cut the liver ligaments connecting the liver to surrounding tissues (Figures 1I and 1J). Collect the liver in ice-cold plain RPMI until next step. the following protocol has been adapted from (Blériot et al., 2020) and optimized for the digestion of half a liver. However, the volume of the digestion medium can be adjusted according to the amount of liver to be processed. If KC isolation is performed to be followed by a cell culture experiment, both mouse surgery and organ processing should be performed under sterile conditions (e.g., under a cell culture hood).

Processing the liver for ex vivo LNPCs isolation

Timing: 60 min Transfer the liver to a 60 mm Petri dish and use blunt-end scissors to mince it in 1–2 mm3 small pieces. Transfer the liver pieces in a 50 mL Falcon tube containing 10 mL of pre-warmed ex vivo digestion medium (see above). Incubate at 37°C for 30 min. Vortex the sample every 10 min at 2000 rpm. After incubation, gently homogenize the digested liver pieces by forcing them 7–8 times into a 10 mL syringe loaded with a 18G needle. Filter the homogenized liver solution through a 70 μm cell strainer in a new 50 mL Falcon tube and wash the filter with 10 mL of plain RPMI. Centrifuge at 50 rcf for 3 min. Recover the aqueous phase and transfer it in a new 50 mL Falcon tube. Discard the pellet containing dead hepatocytes and debris. Centrifuge at 400 rcf for 5 min. After this centrifugation step the pellet contains target LNPCs. Discard the top aqueous phase. Lyse red blood cells resuspending the cell pellet with 2 mL of ACK and incubate for 30 s at 20°C–25°C. Add 20 mL of plain RPMI to restore osmolarity and centrifuge at 400 rcf for 5 min. Resuspend the cell sediment in 10 mL of ice-cold plain RPMI. From now on all the steps are done at 4°C. Filter cell suspension through a 70 μm cell strainer in a new 50 mL Falcon tube. Mix an aliquot of the cell suspension cell suspension 1:2 in trypan blue and determine cell count of viable cells with a Neubauer chamber. Proceed with the desired downstream application (steps 49 through 53 for cell culture or steps 54 through 63 for flow cytometry and cell sorting). CRITICAL: cell sediment in step 20 is loose, pay attention if a vacuum aspiration system is used to discard the supernatant. at steps 20–21 there might be clogs in the cell pellet, cut the tip of a 1 mL pipette to facilitate the resuspension process.

In situ liver digestion for the isolation of hepatocytes and LNPCs (method #2)

Timing: 90 min The following step-by-step section describe an alternative, longer but more gentle protocol for the isolation of LNPCs. This method also allows the simultaneous recovery of hepatocytes and replaces steps 1 through 28. Prewarm the Liver perfusion medium and liver digestion medium in the water bath at 37°C (see Figure 2 for pump configuration).
Figure 2

Configuration of the equipment for the in situ digestion of the liver

Configuration of the equipment for the in situ digestion of the liver Prime and wash the pump tubes with prewarmed HBSS. Pump flux during the procedure should be set at 5 mL/min. Inject the mouse intravenously with 200 μL of heparin solution (100 Units in PBS) to avoid coagulation issues that can potentially interfere with the perfusion and with the digestion. Anesthetize the mouse with Avertin (600 μL for a mouse of 25 grams) at 37°C intraperitoneally. Spread the mouse with 70% EtOH and cut through the peritoneum, by first performing a vertical cut from the lower end of the abdomen to the ribcage, and then performing horizontal cuts at the mid-section of the abdomen to both sides und the organs of the mouse are exposed. Gently push the intestine right-hand sideward by using the blunt end of a forceps to get access to the liver. Canulate the inferior vena Cava (25G needle). Place an open silk suture around inferior vena Cava to help the canula to be in place. Start the perfusion with Liver Perfusion Medium for 3 min after severing the portal vein. This medium is meant to clean the liver from blood and to start the loosening of cell-to-cell contacts. Perfuse with warm Liver digestion medium for 12 min and pay attention that no air bubbles should be introduced during the entire process. After 8 min, start checking the liver consistency with a wet cotton applicator. Digested liver loses elasticity and assumes a reticulated appearance. Once the liver is completely digested, remove the gallbladder, and cut the liver ligaments connecting the liver to the surrounding tissue. Transfer liver into a 60 mm Petri dish with Hepatocyte Wash Medium and carefully decapsulate the organ using surgical forceps (for more information see the online Methods video S1). Gently shake the liver while holding it with a tweezer. This procedure allows digested cells (Hepatocytes and LNPCs) to be released in the Hepatocyte wash medium (online Methods video S1). Transfer the obtained cell suspension to a 50 mL falcon tube and reach 50 mL of volume with the Hepatocyte Wash Medium. Centrifuge at 20 rcf for 3 min. Note that at the end of each 20 rcf centrifugation the pellet is enriched by Hepatocytes, while soluble fraction by LNPCs. At this step the pellet is composed mainly by Hepatocytes (HC) and the soluble fraction by LNPCs. Repeat steps 40 to 41. Collect separately HC and LNPC and resuspend each fraction in separate 15 mL tubes containing 10 mL of 36% Percoll solution and gently mix. Centrifuge 2000 rpm for 20 min without brake. the purpose of the Percoll separation is to get rid of cellular and tissue debris to obtain a clearer cell preparation. At the end of the centrifugation, discard the Percoll soluble fraction (containing cellular debris) and resuspend each cell pellet in the appropriate medium (LNPC fraction should be suspended in RPMI, hepatocytes in hepatocyte medium). Filter LNPCs fraction through a 40 μm cell strainer. lyse red blood cells with 2 mL of ACK for 30 seconds at 25°C, centrifuge and resuspend the cell pellet in 10 mL of RPMI. Mix an aliquot of each cell suspension 1:2 in trypan blue and determine cell count of viable cells with a Neubauer chamber. Proceed with the desired downstream application (step from 49 to 53 for cell culture or step from 54 to 66 for flow cytometry and cell sorting). CRITICAL: make sure that the tube carrying the digestion medium to the liver is at 37°C when reaches the vena cava. If the solution is at lower temperature, enzymatic activity might be suboptimal. Hepatocytes are extremely fragile cells and should be maintained at 37°C during the entire procedure to maximize cell vitality.

Isolating KCs by cell adhesion

Timing: 3 h Prepare the culture medium supplementing plain RPMI with 10% FBS and 100 U/mL Penicillin/Streptomycin. Resuspend LNPCs to a density of 1–3×107/mL in culture medium. Plate 1×107 LNPCs per well in a 6-well culture plate. Incubate for 2 h at 37°C with 5% CO2. Remove cell debris and non-adherent cells by gently washing adherent cells with cold PBS. more than 95% of adhering cells are Kupffer cells (Li et al., 2014). To maintain Kupffer cell differentiation, add 50 ng/mL of recombinant M-CSF (R&D system cat #416-ML) in the culture medium.

Staining KCs from isolated LNPCs for FACS sorting

Timing: 2 h Transfer LNPCs in FACS tubes at 5×107/mL. Note that in order to sort 106 KCs, a good starting point is 2×107 of total LNPCs. Wash with 1–2 mL of FACS buffer and spin down for 5 min at 400 rcf. Incubate with 200 μL of anti-CD16/CD32 (5 μg/mL in FACS buffer) for 15 min at 4°C. Wash with 1–2 mL of FACS buffer and spin down for 5 min at 400 rcf. Incubate with 300 μL of antibody mix for 40 min at 4°C. Wash with 1–2 mL of FACS buffer and spin down for 5 min at 400 rcf. Incubate with 200 μL of DAPI (5 μg/mL in FACS buffer) for 5 min at 4°C. Wash with 1–2 mL of FACS buffer and spin down for 5 min at 400 rcf. Resuspend in FACS buffer at 5×106 cells per mL. Sort target cells at 4°C using a 100 μm nozzle. CRITICAL: sheath pressure should not exceed 20 psi to preserve cell viability. Recommended: To enhance viability of sorted cells, collection FACS tubes pre-coated with 5% BSA or 5% FBS for 14–16 h at 4°C to neutralize the electrostatic charges of polystyrene tubes should be used. Otherwise, polypropylene tubes can be used since have neutral charge. If cells are sorted for functional downstream applications (e.g., cell culture), do not supplement FACS buffer with NaN3. To further improve cell viability, collection media should contain at least 10% FBS. Antibody mix brilliant stain buffer can be used in place of FACS buffer to minimize Brilliant Violet dyes staining artifacts. fixable Live/Dead (L/D) dyes can be used to gate live cells instead of DAPI. In this case, at the end of LNPC isolation procedure, cells must be washed in plain PBS and Live/Dead staining should be performed at 20°C–25°C for 20 minutes. sessile LNPCs (e.g., KCs and Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial cells - LSECs), once extracted from the liver during the digestion process, are slightly auto fluorescent and have more proteins on their membrane surface. For this reason, since fixable dyes stain amine reactive groups, the use of Live/Dead might be suboptimal in separating dead cells. DAPI – being impermeable to the membrane of live cells – is more appropriate when possible (see Figure 3).
Figure 3

Different strategies to gate live cells

Representative dot plots of LNPC preparation in which live cells have been gated with DAPI staining (A) or with fixable Live/Dead staining (B). In separate samples, LNPCs have been mixed in 1:1 ratio with LNPCs placed at 70°C for 5 min to show actual dead cell population.

Different strategies to gate live cells Representative dot plots of LNPC preparation in which live cells have been gated with DAPI staining (A) or with fixable Live/Dead staining (B). In separate samples, LNPCs have been mixed in 1:1 ratio with LNPCs placed at 70°C for 5 min to show actual dead cell population.

Expected outcomes

Usually, this protocol allows to recover 2–3∗107 of total LNPCs and about 1.5–2∗106 KCs from one healthy liver of a 7–9 week-old mouse. Considering the LNPC fraction, we do not find major differences in terms of absolute numbers when comparing the ex vivo and in situ digestion protocols.

Limitations

The ex vivo digestion combined with the mechanical dissociation of the liver has been designed to obtain reproducible whole LNPC preparations in a reasonable amount of time. This protocol is easily scalable, allowing the isolation of LNPC from several liver samples at the same time. The viability of recovered cells is greater than 94%, which makes the single cell suspensions obtained with this procedure suitable for functional and phenotypical analysis by multicolor flow cytometry, cell sorting and RNAseq (see Figure 4 for a suggested flow cytometry data analysis).
Figure 4

Gating strategy for Kupffer cell and LSEC identification in LNPC samples isolated from C57BL/6 mice

Representative dot plots of LNPC preparation obtained with the quick ex vivo digestion protocol (A) or with the in situ digestion protocol (B). Single, live cells can be divided in LSEC (CD45-, CD31+) and in hepatic leukocytes (which are CD45+). Once discarded the lineage positive cells (CD3+, CD19+, CD49+, Ly6G+), the F4/80+CD11bint macrophage population is pre-gated to further distinguish capsular macrophages (TIM4-, I-A/I-E+) from Kupffer cells (TIM4+, I-A/I-Eint). Kupffer cells (KCs) can be divided in KC1 (CD206-, ESAM-) and in KC2 (CD206+, ESAM+) subpopulations.

Gating strategy for Kupffer cell and LSEC identification in LNPC samples isolated from C57BL/6 mice Representative dot plots of LNPC preparation obtained with the quick ex vivo digestion protocol (A) or with the in situ digestion protocol (B). Single, live cells can be divided in LSEC (CD45-, CD31+) and in hepatic leukocytes (which are CD45+). Once discarded the lineage positive cells (CD3+, CD19+, CD49+, Ly6G+), the F4/80+CD11bint macrophage population is pre-gated to further distinguish capsular macrophages (TIM4-, I-A/I-E+) from Kupffer cells (TIM4+, I-A/I-Eint). Kupffer cells (KCs) can be divided in KC1 (CD206-, ESAM-) and in KC2 (CD206+, ESAM+) subpopulations. Although this protocol gives highly reproducible preparations, it is worth noting that the execution of critical steps (e.g., the homogenization step with the 18G syringe) should be performed consistently to minimize inter-user variability. However, because of the mechanical force being used, the quick LNPC preparation does not permit the isolation of hepatocytes and enables only the partial recovery of other non-parenchymal cells like Hepatic Stellate Cells (HSC). For this purpose, the in situ intravenous injection of the enzymatic medium has the main advantage to completely digest the liver tissue without the need for mechanical disruption (Guidotti et al., 2015). This passage is essential to preserve hepatocytes integrity since those cells are extremely fragile and are lost during the quick ex vivo procedure. In situ digestion might be preferred if hepatocytes or stellate cells must be isolated contextually and/or if a gentler preparation is demanded by the experimental design. Here, the main limitation is represented by the need of dedicated equipment (e.g., the peristaltic pump) and by the laboriousness of the in situ digestion itself, which makes this protocol not suitable for the processing of a large quantity of samples.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

Liver perfusion during the ex vivo protocol at step 6 does not efficiently remove blood from the liver.

Potential solution

Failure in performing an effective liver perfusion leads to an irreversible contamination of LNPC preparation with non-resident, blood-borne cells. Therefore, this step is critical since it can be a potential source of sample-to-sample variability in term of LNPC composition and preparation. To reach 100% success in the liver perfusion, insert the 27G needle of a PBS-charged 10 mL syringe in the inferior vena cava paying particular attention to be inside the vasculature. Start injecting 1–2 mL of PBS into the vena cava without cutting the portal vein at this step. Only once the liver vasculature becomes engorged, cut the portal vein with surgical scissors. This will make the hepatic perfusion more effective and the liver will clear immediately turning into a light brown color. At this point, complete the perfusion with the remaining PBS. For more details, please refer to Figure 1.

Problem 2

Liver in situ digestion is suboptimal (step 36). Enzymes need a controlled, stable temperature of about 37.5°C to perform efficiently. For this reason, it is mandatory that the output pipe carrying the digestion mix reaches the vena cava at the correct temperature (see Figure 2). To avoid unwarranted cooling of the digestion mix during its way from the thermostatic bath to the vena cava, one strategy might be to rise the temperature of the water bath up to 39°C–40°C. However, consider that higher temperatures can damage the enzymatic activity. If necessary, shortening the output pipe tube might also prevent excessive dissipation of the heat. Alternatively, place the output pipe in the water bath again in order to re-warm the buffer (see Figure 2, label #7). Checking the temperature of the digestion mix at the end of the tube with a digital thermometer is also recommended.

Problem 3

After the ex vivo digestion, at step 15, liver pieces are still too big and cannot pass through the 18G needle for the homogenization step. Make sure to cut the liver pieces as small as possible before starting the enzymatic digestion. At the end of the mechanical disruption the liver should have a pulp consistency. Alternatively, if liver pieces are still too big, use a serological 10 mL pipette and flush up and down for about 10 times before homogenizing with the syringe. Please note that the homogenization through the 18G needle is another critical step and should be done consistently (e.g., same number of homogenizations for each sample) in order to minimize sample-to-sample variations.

Problem 4

The recovery of LNPC is low (step 25). If cell recovery is below 2∗107 LNPC per liver, make sure that the enzymatic digestion has been performed for the correct amount of time (e.g., 30 min) at the correct temperature (e.g., 37°C). Alternatively, the homogenization step might not have been performed properly. In the latter case, make sure to move the plunger up and down for at least 7–10 times. At the end of this step no more liver pieces should be evident in the cell suspension. Moreover, after the filtration of the homogenized liver solution, limited debris should be present on the surface of the cell strainer.

Problem 5

The vitality of LNPC is below 90% (step 25). Possible cell-damaging steps are represented by the liver homogenization and by the red blood cell lysis. Avoid excessive (e.g., more than 15) homogenizations through the 18G needle and be gentle in pushing/pulling the plunger in order to avoid incorporating air bubbles. Otherwise, do not exceed 60 s incubation with the ACK solution.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact.

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

InVivoMAb anti-mouse CD16/CD32 antibodyBio X CellBio X CellCat# BE0307; RRID:AB_2736987
Brilliant Violet 605(TM) anti-mouse CD31 antibodyBioLegendBioLegend Cat# 102427;RRID: AB_2563982
Brilliant Violet 650(TM) anti-mouse/human CD11b antibodyBioLegendBioLegend Cat# 101239;RRID: AB_11125575
FITC anti-Mouse CD45BioLegendBioLegend Cat# 103108;RRID:AB_312973
PE anti-mouse ESAM antibodyBioLegendBioLegendCat# 136203, RRID: AB_1953300
PE-CF594 Rat Anti-Mouse Ly-6GBD BiosciencesBD Biosciences Cat# 562700;RRID: AB_2737730
PE-CF594 Rat Anti-Mouse CD49bBD BiosciencesBD Biosciences Cat# 562453;RRID: AB_11153857
PE-CF594 Rat Anti-Mouse CD19BD BiosciencesBD Biosciences Cat# 562291;RRID: AB_11154223
PE-CF594 anti-Mouse CD3eBD BiosciencesBD Biosciences Cat# 562286;RRID: AB_11153307
PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse I-A/I-EBioLegendBioLegend Cat# 107626;RRID: AB_2191071
PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse Tim-4BioLegendBioLegend Cat# 130010;RRID: AB_2565719
APC anti-mouse CD206 (MMR) antibodyBioLegendBioLegend Cat# 141708;RRID: AB_10900231
APC/Cyanine7 anti-mouse F4/80BioLegendBioLegend Cat# 123117;RRID: AB_893489

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

DAPIThermo Fisher ScientificThermo Fisher ScientificCat# D1306; RRID: AB_2629482
ViaKrome 808BeckmanBeckman Cat# C36628
Brilliant stain bufferBD BiosciencesBD Biosciences Cat# 659611; RRID: AB_2870505
Heparin sodium saltSigma AldrichSigma Aldrich Cat# H4784
Liver Perfusion MediumThermo Fisher ScientificThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 17701038
Liver Digest MediumThermo Fisher ScientificThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 17703034
Hepatocyte Wash MediumThermo Fisher ScientificThermo Fisher ScientificCat# 17704024
Deoxyribonuclease I from bovine pancreasSigma AldrichSigma Aldrich Cat# D4263
Collagenase from Clostridium histolyticumMerck LifeMerck Life Cat# C5138
Trypan Blue SolutionSigma AldrichSigma Aldrich Cat# T8154
Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium 1640GibcoGibco Cat# 61870-010
Complement inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)CorningCorning Cat# 35-079-CV
Penicillin-Streptomycin (10,000 U/mL)GibcoGibco Cat# 15140122
Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) 1×, pH 7.4GibcoGibco Cat# 10010023
Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) 10×, pH 7.4GibcoGibco Cat# 70011044
70% Ethanol (v/v)Sigma AldrichSigma Aldrich Cat# 51976-500ML-F
2,2,2-tribromoethanolSigma AldrichSigma Aldrich Cat# T48402
2-methyl-2-butanolSigma AldrichSigma Aldrich Cat# 240486
Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl)MerkMerk Cat# 254134
Potassium bicarbonate (KHCO3)MerkMerk Cat# 237205
Na2EDTAMerkMerk Cat# E5134
NaN3MerkMerk Cat# S2002
PercollSigma AldrichSigma Aldrich Cat# P4937

Experimental models: organisms/strains

Mouse: C57BL/6Charles RiverC57BL/6 colony

Software and algorithms

FlowJo V10FlowJohttps://www.flowjo.com/

Other

FACS CANTO IIBD BioscienceN/A
CytoFLEX LXBeckman CoulterN/A
FACSAria FusionBD BioscienceN/A
Centrifuge 5810/5810REppendorfN/A
Peristaltic pump PLP 380Behr LaborBehr labor Cat# B00454739
Neubauer chamberBlaubrandBlaubrand Cat# 717805
Student Adson Surgical forcepsFine ScienceFinescience Cat# 91106-12
Student fine scissorsFine ScienceFinescience Cat# 91460-11
6-well culture plate flat bottomCorningCorning Cat# 3516
Petri dishes, polystyrene (60 mm × 15 mm)Sigma AldrichSigma Aldrich Cat# P5481
10 mL syringePic SolutionPicsolution Cat# 02076120090300
Hypodermic needle 18GPic SolutionPicsolution Cat# 02070520300800
Falcon Cell Strainers 70 μmFalconFalcon Cat# 352350
5 mL polystyrene round bottom FACS tubesFalconFalcon Cat# 51976
15 mL tubesFalconFalcon Cat# 352096
50 mL tubesFalconFalcon Cat# 352070

FACS Buffer

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
FBS1%5 mL
Na2EDTA (0.5 M)2 mM2 mL
NaN3 (10% wt/v)0.05%2.50 mL
PBSn/a490.5 mL
Totaln/a500 mL

[Store at 4°C up to one month]

ACK Buffer

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
NH4Cl0.15 M8.02 g
KHCO310 mM1 g
Na2 EDTA (0.5M)0.1 mM200 μL
double-distilled H2O (ddH2O)n/a1 L
Totaln/a1 L

Avertin

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
2,2,2-tribromoethanol45 mM2.5 g
2-methyl-2-butanol2.5%5 mL
ddH2On/a195 mL
Totaln/a200 mL

Percoll 36%

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
Percoll (100%)36%7.2 mL
PBS 10×1×800 μL
RPMIn/a12 mL
Totaln/a20 mL

Antibody mix

AntigenFluorophoreCloneFinal concentration (μg/mL)
CD31BV6053905
CD11bBV650M1/701
CD45FITC30F112
I-A/I-E (MHCII)PerCP-Cy5.5M5/114.15.21
ESAMPE1G8/EASAM1
CD3 (lineage)PE-CF594UCHT13
CD19 (lineage)PE-CF5941D31
Ly6G (lineage)PE-CF5941A81
CD49b (Lineage)PE-CF594DX52
TIM-4PE-Cy7RMT4-541
CD206APCC068C22
F4/80APC-Cy7BM83
  6 in total

1.  An efficient method to isolate and culture mouse Kupffer cells.

Authors:  Pei-zhi Li; Jin-zheng Li; Min Li; Jian-ping Gong; Kun He
Journal:  Immunol Lett       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.685

2.  Kupffer Cell Characterization by Mass Cytometry.

Authors:  Camille Blériot; Shamin Li; Muhammad Faris Bin Mohd Kairi; Evan Newell; Florent Ginhoux
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2020

3.  Immunosurveillance of the liver by intravascular effector CD8(+) T cells.

Authors:  Luca G Guidotti; Donato Inverso; Laura Sironi; Pietro Di Lucia; Jessica Fioravanti; Lucia Ganzer; Amleto Fiocchi; Maurizio Vacca; Roberto Aiolfi; Stefano Sammicheli; Marta Mainetti; Tiziana Cataudella; Andrea Raimondi; Gloria Gonzalez-Aseguinolaza; Ulrike Protzer; Zaverio M Ruggeri; Francis V Chisari; Masanori Isogawa; Giovanni Sitia; Matteo Iannacone
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Identification of a Kupffer cell subset capable of reverting the T cell dysfunction induced by hepatocellular priming.

Authors:  Giorgia De Simone; Francesco Andreata; Camille Bleriot; Valeria Fumagalli; Chiara Laura; José M Garcia-Manteiga; Pietro Di Lucia; Stefano Gilotto; Xenia Ficht; Federico F De Ponti; Elisa B Bono; Leonardo Giustini; Gioia Ambrosi; Marta Mainetti; Paola Zordan; Alexandre P Bénéchet; Micol Ravà; Svetoslav Chakarov; Federica Moalli; Marc Bajenoff; Luca G Guidotti; Florent Ginhoux; Matteo Iannacone
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 43.474

Review 5.  Immune surveillance of the liver by T cells.

Authors:  Xenia Ficht; Matteo Iannacone
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2020-09-04

6.  Dynamics and genomic landscape of CD8+ T cells undergoing hepatic priming.

Authors:  Alexandre P Bénéchet; Giorgia De Simone; Pietro Di Lucia; Francesco Cilenti; Giulia Barbiera; Nina Le Bert; Valeria Fumagalli; Eleonora Lusito; Federica Moalli; Valentina Bianchessi; Francesco Andreata; Paola Zordan; Elisa Bono; Leonardo Giustini; Weldy V Bonilla; Camille Bleriot; Kamini Kunasegaran; Gloria Gonzalez-Aseguinolaza; Daniel D Pinschewer; Patrick T F Kennedy; Luigi Naldini; Mirela Kuka; Florent Ginhoux; Alessio Cantore; Antonio Bertoletti; Renato Ostuni; Luca G Guidotti; Matteo Iannacone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 49.962

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.