| Literature DB >> 34584410 |
Hui Huang1,2, Qinhui Liu1, Ting Zhang2, Jinhang Zhang1,2, Jian Zhou1,2, Xiandan Jing2, Qin Tang1, Cuiyuan Huang1,2, Zijing Zhang1, Yingnan Zhao1,2, Guorong Zhang1,2, Jiamin Yan1,2, Yan Xia1,2, Ying Xu1,2, Jiahui Li1,2, Yanping Li1, Jinhan He1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal fibrosis is the common pathway in chronic kidney diseases progression to end-stage renal disease, but to date, no clinical drug for its treatment is approved. It has been demonstrated that the inhibitor of proto-oncogene Ras, farnesylthiosalicylic acid (FTS), shows therapeutic potential for renal fibrosis, but its application was hindered by the water-insolubility and low bioavailability. Hence, in this study, we improved these properties of FTS by encapsulating it into bovine serum albumin nanoparticles (AN-FTS) and tested its therapeutic effect in renal fibrosis.Entities:
Keywords: Ras; albumin nanoparticle; epithelial–mesenchymal transition; farnesylthiosalicylic acid; renal fibrosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34584410 PMCID: PMC8464329 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S318124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Figure 1Characterization of FTS-loaded albumin nanoparticles (AN-FTS) in vitro. (A) Dynamic light scattering data and transmission electron microscope images for blank AN and AN-FTS. The scale bar is 100 nm. (B) The variations in particle size and PDI of blank AN and AN-FTS at 4 °C for 14 days. All values are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (C) Cumulative release of free FTS and AN-FTS at 37 °C in PBS (pH 7.4) containing tween-80 (0.2%, w/w). Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Characteristics of Blank AN and AN-FTS (n = 3, Mean ± SEM)
| Size (nm) | PDI | Zeta Potential (mV) | EE (%) | DLC (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AN | 99.12 ± 0.87 | 0.17 ± 0.07 | 17.17 ± 0.39 | – | – |
| AN-FTS | 100.60 ± 1.12 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 18.99 ± 0.41 | 98.60 ± 1.21 | 2.31 ± 0.15 |
Figure 2AN-FTS inhibited TGF-β1-induced activation of NRK-49F cells. NRK-49F cells were treated with free FTS and AN-FTS (20 μM of FTS) in the presence of 2 ng/mL TGF-β1 for 48 h. (A) Relative mRNA expression of α-SMA, collagen, Pai-1 and Fn in NRK-49F cells treated with free FTS and AN-FTS. (B) Protein expression of α-SMA, Col1a1 and Fn in NRK-49F cells treated with free FTS and AN-FTS. (C) Relative mRNA expression of H-Ras, K-Ras and N-Ras. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 3). ##P < 0.01 compared with control (ctrl) group, *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with AN-FTS group.
Figure 3Pharmacokinetic profiles and in vivo distribution of AN-DiD. (A) Plasma concentration-time curve of free DiD and AN-DiD after i.v. administration in rats. (B) Pharmacokinetic parameters of free DiD and AN-DiD. AUC, area under the concentration-time curve; t1/2, half-life. Values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6), **P < 0.01. (C) Ex vivo images of kidneys tripped from UUO mice at 4 h after injection of free DiD and AN-DiD. (D) Semi-quantitative fluorescence intensity of kidneys. Data are mean ± SEM (n =4), **P < 0.01.
Figure 4AN-FTS reduced renal injury and inflammation in UUO mice. (A) Weight ratio of kidney (weight of obstructed kidney/body weight). (B) Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. (C) Serum creatinine (SCR) levels. (D) H&E and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining of kidney sections. Scale bar is 100 μm. The arrows indicated the damaged areas. (E) The relative mRNA levels of MCP1, TNF-α, F4/80, IL-1β, CD3 and CD68 in kidney of sham and UUO mice. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6–7). ##P < 0.01 compared with sham group, *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with AN-FTS group.
Figure 5AN-FTS attenuated renal fibrosis in UUO mice. (A) Masson staining of kidney sections. Scale bar is 100 μm. (B) Hydroxyproline content in kidney of mice. (C and D) Renal mRNA expression of α-SMA and Col1a1 (C), and Fn, Timp-1 and Pai-1 (D). (E) Protein expression of α-SMA, Col1a1 and Fn in kidney tissues of mice. (F) Immunohistochemistry staining of α-SMA in kidney sections. Scale bar is 100 μm. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6–7). ##P < 0.01 compared with Sham group, *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with AN-FTS group.
Figure 6AN-FTS inhibited UUO-induced Ras expression in kidney of mice. (A) The relative expression of H-Ras, K-Ras and N-Ras in kidney tissues of mice. (B) Immunohistochemistry staining of Ras in kidney sections. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6–7). ##P < 0.01 compared with Sham group, *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with AN-FTS group.
Figure 7AN-FTS suppressed EMT process by inhibiting Raf/P38 signaling pathway in kidney of UUO mice. (A) Renal mRNA expression of snail, vimentin and E-cadherin in indicated groups. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 6–7). (B) Protein expression of E-cadherin, vimentin and snail in kidney tissues of sham and UUO mice. (C) Protein expression of phospho-Raf1 and phospho-P38 in kidney tissues of sham and UUO mice. (D) Quantification of Western blot analysis in (C). (E) Immunohistochemistry staining of p-Raf1 and p-P38 in kidney sections. Data are mean ± SEM (n = 3). ##P < 0.01 compared with sham group, *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with AN-FTS group.