Antibody responses to SARS-CoV2 vaccination in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

To the Editor:

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for a wide range of hematological diseases but is still associated with significant infection-related morbidity and mortality related to post-transplant immune-deficiency. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies have shown that allogeneic HSCT recipients have a higher risk of developing severe forms of COVID-19 and have a higher mortality rate compared to the general population [1, 2]. Induction of protective immunity through prophylactic vaccination is therefore critically important in this high-risk patient population. Although mRNA-based SARS-Cov-2 vaccines are highly effective in inducing protective responses in healthy individuals [3-5], whether they are able to induce protective immunity in allogeneic HSCT recipients is still unknown. In this study, we analyzed humoral responses to mRNA-based SARS-Cov-2 vaccines in 63 allogeneic HSCT recipients transplanted at Geneva University Hospitals (Supplementary Table 1). All patients signed an informed consent and the study was approved by the Geneva Ethical Committee (CCER-2021-01237). Patients were vaccinated between January and April 2021 with two doses of either the BNT162b2 (Pfizer) or the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines as part of our institutional priority vaccination program whose inclusion criteria included: patients who were at minimum 3 months and maximum 3 year since allogeneic HSCT; patients transplanted at more than 3 years post-transplant with GvHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive drugs; absence of Rituximab treatment in the previous 3 months; absence of ongoing steroid treatment at Prednisone ≥10 mg/day. Blood samples were collected at a median of 67 (range 41–131) days from the first dose of vaccine and 38 (13–98) days after the administration of the second dose. In 32 patients, pre-vaccination blood samples collected at a median of 12 (0–84) days before the administration of the first dose of vaccine were also available. Patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccination or after vaccination but before serological analysis were excluded from the analysis. Vaccine-induced antibody responses against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-S) were assessed in serum using the semi-quantitative Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay (Roche). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the lower limit of detection of anti-S IgG was 0.4 U/ml, the upper limit was 2500 U/ml, and values above the cutoff of 0.8 U/ml were considered positive. One value at the limit of positivity (0.88 U/ml) was considered negative after immunofluorescence did not confirmed the positivity. IgG against the SARS-CoV2 N-protein were measured in parallel to exclude immunization due to infection rather than vaccination.

We detected low levels anti-S IgG before vaccination in 4/32 available pre-vaccination samples, a result that was not confirmed by immunofluorescence validation nor by the detection of anti-N IgG, pointing to a false positive result rather than an exposure to the virus before vaccination. Forty-eight out of 63 (76%) allogeneic HSCT recipients showed some degree of humoral response to vaccination based on anti-S IgG (Fig. 1a). Median levels of anti-S IgG were 815 U/ml. Median age in our cohort was 54 (18–78) years. Given the previously reported impact of age in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses in the general population [3, 4], we assessed the impact of age on vaccine responses. We observed a trend not reaching statistical significance toward reduced anti-S IgG responses in patients older than 60 years (16/25, 64%; median 183 U/ml) compared to younger patients (32/38, 84%; median 2347 U/ml; p = 0.055; Fig. 1b). Fourty-six out of 63 (73%) patients received mRNA-1273 and 17/63 (27%) received BNT162b2 vaccines. No significant differences in the levels of anti-S IgG were detected between patients receiving BNT162b2 compared with patients receiving mRNA-1273 (data not shown). No grade 3–4 adverse events were reported after vaccination.

Fig. 1

Quantification of IgG against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in response to vaccination in allogeneic HSCT recipients.

a IgG against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein before and after mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (time 0). Dashed gray lines connect paired samples before and after mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients for which both samples were available. Dotted black line indicates the 0.8 U/ml positivity cutoff. b Levels of IgG against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in allogeneic HSCT recipient stratified by age, time post-HSCT, ATG use during conditioning and lymphocyte count. Groups were compared using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test.

According to current EBMT and ASTCT recommendations, vaccination could be initiated as early as three months after HSCT if the transmission rate in the surrounding society is high (ASH-ASTCT General Principles of COVID-19 Vaccines for Immunocompromised Patients, Version 3.0; April 5, 2021; EBMT recommendations COVID-19 vaccines, Version 6.0, May 27, 2021). To improve the chances of response, the EBMT recommendations defined it as logical to wait until six months after transplantation if transmission in the surrounding society is well controlled. We assessed the potential impact of time since HSCT on antibodies responses in our patient’s cohort. The first vaccine dose was administered at a median of 14 (3–150) months after transplantation. We observed significantly lower anti-S IgG responses in patients receiving the first vaccine dose within 6 months since transplantation (6/13, 46%; median 0.88 U/ml) compared with patients vaccinated after 6 months post-HSCT (42/50, 84%; median 2500 U/ml; p = 0.0016; Fig. 1b). Moreover, EBMT recommendations define reasonable criteria to postpone COVID-19 vaccination the presence of uncontrolled acute GVHD grades III–IV, the administration of anti-CD20 antibodies during the past six months and recent therapy with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab. No patients in our cohort had uncontrolled acute GvHD grades III–IV at time of vaccination. Two patients received rituximab within 6 months before the first dose of vaccination and failed to produce detectable anti-S IgG antibodies after vaccination. Regarding ATG use, we observed significantly lower anti-S IgG responses in patients having received ATG as part of their conditioning (27/41, 66%; median 183 U/ml) compared with patients who did not receive ATG (21/22, 95%; median 2500 U/ml; p = 0.004; Fig. 1b). Recently, Redjoul and colleagues reported an association between lymphocyte count and anti-S IgG responses in HSCT recipients [6]. Accordingly, we observed significantly higher anti-S IgG levels in patients with lymphocyte counts >1 G/L (37/46, 80%; median 2396 U/ml) compared with lymphopenic patients (12/17, 71%; median 14 U/ml; p = 0.02; Fig. 1b). Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed the impact of patients’ age, time since transplantation and ATG use while failed to confirm the impact of lymphocyte count on anti-S seroconversion (Supplementary Table 2).

Collectively, our data indicate that mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination induced humoral responses in the majority of allogeneic HSCT recipients (76%). Such a response rate, despite being lower than the one reported for the general population [3-5], is higher than the one reported in solid organ transplant recipients [7-10] and similar to the one described in patients with hematological cancers [11].

Focusing on clinical factors that are taken into account in clinical decision to vaccinate allogeneic HSCT patients according to the EBMT guidelines, we identified a short time (less than 6 months) after allogeneic HSCT and ATG use during conditioning as two factors negatively influencing anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses to vaccination. These results suggest that delaying vaccination at later time-points whenever possible might improve immune responses by allowing for improved immune-reconstitution and by potentially reducing the impact of lymphodepleting antigen employed during conditioning. Alternatively, providing a third dose of vaccine at later time points in patients not developing sufficient humoral responses to standard vaccination schedule might be an option as recently described in a small series of solid organ transplant recipients [12].

Our study has limitations including the limited number of subjects included and the absence of pre-vaccination samples in a significant proportion of patients. Moreover, induction of cellular responses was not assessed. More importantly, no correlate of protection for SARS-CoV-2 exist so far and only vaccine efficacy and effectiveness studies in this specific patients population will reveal if allogeneic HSCT recipients are protected against infection or severe disease by mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

In conclusion, we observed a 76% rate of antibody responses to mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccination after allogeneic HSCT and we identified age, time since transplantation, and ATG use as three factors potentially affecting the response. After validation in larger patient cohorts, these results will help orient clinical management of SARS-CoV-2 prevention strategies in allogeneic HSCT recipients.

Supplemental Materials