| Literature DB >> 34584186 |
Ozkan Cesur1, Tugba Endogan Tanir2, Pinar Celepli3, Fatma Ozarslan4, Sema Hucumenoglu3, Adnan Karaibrahimoglu5, Nesrin Hasirci6,7,8.
Abstract
We aimed to prepare a bioactive and biodegradable bilayer mesh formed by fibroblast growth factor (FGF) loaded gelatin film layer, and poly ε-caprolactone (PCL) film layer, and to investigate its treatment efficacy on esophageal anastomosis. It is envisaged that the bioactive mesh in in vivo model would improve tissue healing in rats. The full thickness semicircular defects of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 were created in anterior walls of abdominal esophagus. The control group had abdominal esophagus isolated with distal esophageal blunt dissection, and sham group had primary anastomosis. In the test groups, the defects were covered with bilayer polymeric meshes containing FGF (5 μg/2 cm2), or not. All rats were sacrificed for histopathology investigation after 7 or 28 days of operation. The groups are coded as FGF(-)-7th day, FGF(+)-7th day, and FGF(+)-28th day, based on their content and operation day. Highest burst pressures were obtained for FGF(+)-7th day, and FGF(+)-28th day groups (p < 0.005) and decreased inflammation grades were observed. Submucosal and muscular collagen deposition scores were markedly increased in these groups compared to sham and FGF(-)-7th day groups having no FGF (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, respectively). It was proved that FGF loaded bioactive bilayer mesh provided effective repair, reinforcement and tissue healing of esophageal defects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34584186 PMCID: PMC8478899 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98840-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Design of study (a) bilayer meshes, (b) preparation of esophagial defect, (c) the mesh was placed as a patch over the esophageal opening, then the edges of the esophageal opening were secured with interrupted sutures, (d) syhngomanometer device.
Contents of bilayer meshes applied to animals.
| Bilayer mesh | Content |
|---|---|
| FGF(−) | Form from gelatin film and PCL film as second layer (has no FGF). Films of 1 × 2 cm2 were applied to rats |
| FGF(+) | Contains 2.5 μg FGF per cm2 of gelatin film and, PCL film as second layer. Films of 1 × 2 cm2 having 5 μg FGF were applied to rats |
Description of the histopathological scores of the semi-quantitative evaluation.
| Histological parameter | Criteria | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Submucosal collagen deposition | None | 0 |
| Mild (submucosal collagen < muscularis mucosa thickness × 2) | + 1 | |
| Marked (submucosal collagen > muscularis mucosa thickness × 2) | + 2 | |
| Muscular layer collagen deposition | None | 0 |
| Mild (collagen deposition around the smooth muscles | + 1 | |
| Marked (collagen deposition around the smooth muscles and replacement of muscles with collagen) | + 2 | |
| Epithelialization | Thickness of cut edges | 0 |
| Migration of epithelial cells | 1 | |
| Moderate | 2 | |
| Bridging of the excision complete regeneration | 3 | |
| PMNL, polymorphonuclear leukocyte | Minimum | 0 |
| Mild | 1 | |
| Moderate | 2 | |
| Marked | 3 |
Results of the semi-quantitative histopathological evaluation and bursting pressure, presented by its mean and standard deviation (mean ± sd).
| Group | Submucosal collagen deposition | Muscular layer collagen deposition | Epithelisation | PMNL | Bursting pressure (mmHG) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 0.85 ± 069 | 1.14 ± 0.37 | 0.42 ± 0.53 | 2.85 ± 0.37 | 20.84 ± 2.98 |
| FGF(−)-7th day | 0.42 ± 053 | 0.71 ± 048 | 1.28 ± 0.75 | 2.57 ± 0.53 | 29.94 ± 4.55 |
| FGF(+)-7th day | 1.6 ± 06 | 1.75 ± 0.46 | 2.12 ± 0.83 | 1.25 ± 0.46 | 53.52 ± 1.85 |
| FGF(+)-28th day | 2 ± 0* | 2 ± 0* | 2.6 ± 0.89* | 0.6 ± 0.54* | 60.15 ± 7.46* |
M, mean, SD, standard-deviation.
*Chi-square test, significant at 0.05 level, (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Mean histopathological pictogrammes of the groups studied. (a, b) Esophageal mucosa belonging to the control group. (a) There is normal archetype preserved esophageal full-thickness mucosa sample containing lamina propria and muscularis propria consisting of compact connective tissue observed under the surface ceratinized squamous epithelium, in the Hematoxylin&Eosin (H&E), × 100). (b) There is no collagen increase in the submucosal and muscular layers, in the Mason Trichrome Stain, × 100. (c, d) Esophageal mucosa belonging to the groups of sham and FGF(−). For the Groups of Sham and FGF(−) not received FGF, there are noteworthy epithelial degeneration, intense inflammation in the submucosa and muscular layer, and mildly increased collagen, in the Mason Trichrome Stain, × 100 and Hematoxylin&Eosin (H&E), × 100. (e, f) Esophageal mucosa belonging to the groups given FGF. (e) In the surface epithelium, there is marked regeneration as well as the presence of significantly increased collagen, which is replaced by the submucosal and muscular layer. There is a moderate decrease in the inflammatory cell density observed between the collagen bundles on the 7th day and a significant decrease on the 28th day, in the Hematoxylin&Eosin (H&E), × 100. (f) There is significantly increased collagen (blue color) between the submucosal and muscular layers observed, in the Mason Trichrome Stain, × 100.
Figure 3Mean histopathological scores according to groups.
Figure 4Differences of mean bursting pressure in the groups.
Figure 5Bilayer mesh used in the study design was created by loading FGF into the Gelatin film which was casted onto PCL film showing preparation of bilayer meshes; PCL films were prepared by dissolving 5% polymer in dichloromethane. Dried PCL films were immersed in 10% hexane diamine-isopropanol solution for 1 h at 37 °C for aminolization. PCL films were washed with deionized water for 24 h. Gelatin solution was prepared by dissolving 5% polymer in distilled water and with addition of glutaraldehyde as crosslinker, and FGF. Gelatin solution was poured onto aminolyzed PCL films and let dry at room temperature. A full thickness semicircular defect of 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 was created via cutting in the anterior wall of the abdominal esophagus. The defect was repaired with primary anastomosis with the prepared bilayer mesh, using interrupted sutures.