| Literature DB >> 34584183 |
Guangzhao Qi1, Jingmin Zhang2, Chao Han2, Yubing Zhou2, Duolu Li2, Pengfei Ma3.
Abstract
Inter-individual differences of drug responses could be attributed to genetic variants of pharmacogenes such as cytochrome P450 (CYP), phase 2 enzymes, and transporters. In contrast to extensive studies on the genetic polymorphisms of CYP gene, genetic mutation spectrum of other pharmacogenes was under-representative in the pharmacogenetics investigations. Here we studied the genetic variations of 125 pharmacogenes including drug transporters, non-CYP phase 1 enzymes, phase 2 enzymes, nuclear receptors and others in Chinese from the Chinese Millionome Database (CMDB), of which 38,188 variants were identified. Computational analyses of the 2554 exonic variants found 617 deleterious missense variants, 91.1% of which were rare, and of the 54 loss-of-function (splice acceptor, splice donor, start lost, and stop gained) variants, 53 (98.1%) were rare. These results suggested an enrichment of rare variants in functional ones for pharmacogenes. Certain common functional variants including NUDT15 13:48611934 G/A (rs186364861), UGT1A1 2:234676872 C/T (rs34946978), and ALDH2 12:112241766 G/A (rs671) were population-specific for CMDB Chinese because they were absent (with a zero of variant allele frequency) or very rare in other gnomAD populations. These findings might be useful for the further pharmacogenomics research and clinical application in Chinese.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34584183 PMCID: PMC8478937 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98877-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The genetic landscape of 125 pharmacogenes. (a) Flowchart of screen of the studied pharmacogenes. (b) Pie chart showing the distribution of the identified 38,188 variants among ABC transporters, SLC transporters, non-CYP phase 1 enzymes, phase 2 enzymes, nuclear receptors, and others. (c) 1038 (2.7%) of these 38,188 variants we identified were novel as compared to dbSNP release 135. (d) Number of variants with different variant allele frequencies. (e) Number of variants with different nucleotide mutation type.
Figure 2Gene region pattern of 125 pharmacogenes. (a) Of these 38,188 variants, 35,634 variants were non-coding ones (intronic, upstream and downstream regions) while 2554 (6.7%) were exonic variants. Pie chart showing the distribution of the identified 2554 exonic variants. (b) Number of variants with different gene region distributions in each of ABC transporters, SLC transporters, non-CYP phase 1 enzymes, phase 2 enzymes, nuclear receptors, and others pharmacogenes.
Figure 3Rare variants were the majority of putatively functional pharmacogenes variants. (a) Number of neutral missense variants were 446 while deleterious missense and loss-of-function variants were 671 for the studied 125 pharmacogenes. (b) Number and fraction of deleterious missense variants with different variant allele frequencies in diverse pharmacogenes families. (c) Number of loss-of-function variants in different pharmacogenes families. (d) Number of functional variants (deleterious missense plus loss-of-function variants) in different pharmacogenes families.
Figure 4Frequency distribution of functional variants in individual pharmacogene. The aggregated putatively functional variants frequency of each of ABC transporters, SLC transporters, non-CYP phase 1 enzymes, phase 2 enzymes, nuclear receptors, and others pharmacogenes is plotted in log scale and indicated as dots connected by the black line (right y-axis). The fraction of the functional variation that is allotted to common (blue) or rare (red) variants is indicated on the left y-axis.
Figure 5Correlation of variants number with the gene length. The relationship between the number of total variants, missense variants and deleterious variants and the corresponding gene length among the 6 pharmacogenes groups were different.
VAF with clinical relevance in CMDB Chinese and diverse gnomAD populations.
| Gene | Variant | Consequence | Drugs involved | African | Ashkenazi Jewish | Amish | Middle Eastern | gnomAD_VAF | CMDB_VAF | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latino | European (non-Finnish) | European (Finnish) | East Asian | South Asian | Chinese | ||||||||
| ABCC4 | 13:95,859,035 C/A (rs2274407) | p.Lys304Asn | Methotrexate, Mercaptopurine, Zidovudine, Dipyridamole | 0.167 | 0.1325 | 0.01429* | 0.121 | 0.08122* | 0.06825* | 0.06309* | 0.1759 | 0.1456 | 0.126 |
| 13:95,863,008 C/A (rs11568658) | p.Gly187Trp | 0.004779* | 0.0415* | 0.1404 | 0.05063* | 0.08711* | 0.02346* | 0.04566* | 0.1146 | 0.05763* | 0.1155 | ||
| SLCO1B1 | 12:21,331,549 T/C (rs4149056) | p.Val174Ala | Pravastatin, Rifampicin, Gemfibrozil | 0.03168* | 0.1771 | 0.06798* | 0.2057 | 0.13 | 0.1587 | 0.2178 | 0.1279 | 0.04888* | 0.1085 |
| ALDH2 | 12:112,241,766 G/A (rs671) | p.Glu504Lys | Disulfiram, Ethanol | 0.0001931* | 0* | 0* | 0* | 0.0009178* | 0.0000294* | 0.00009436* | 0.2247 | 0.0008292* | 0.2021 |
| TPMT | 6:18,130,918 T C (rs1142345) | p.Tyr240Cys | Azathioprine, Mercaptopurine , Cefazolin, Olsalazine | 0.05485 | 0.01902 | 0.0165 | 0.02532 | 0.05058 | 0.04227 | 0.0293 | 0.01366 | 0.01863 | 0.01291 |
| UGT1A1 | 2:234,676,872 C/T (rs34946978) | p.Pro364Leu | Irinotecan, Nilotinib, Atazanavir, Carvedilol | 0.0002171* | 0* | 0* | 0 | 0.001767* | 0.0000294* | 0* | 0.01196* | 0.001242* | 0.01986 |
| VDR | 12:48,272,895 A/G (rs2228570) | p.Met51Thr | Calcipotriol, Calcitriol,Ergocalciferol | 0.7799 | 0.5716 | 0.7368 | 0.7025 | 0.5778 | 0.6162 | 0.644 | 0.5698 | 0.7387 | 0.5141 |
| NUDT15 | 13:48,611,934 G/A (rs186364861) | p.Val18Ile | Azathioprine, Mercaptopurine , Thioguanine, Magnesium | 0* | 0.000288* | 0* | 0 | 0* | 0.0000147* | 0* | 0.01121 | 0.0008271* | 0.01607 |
VAF variant allele frequency, CMDB Chinese Millionome Database, gnomAD Genome Aggregation Database, ABCC4 ATP-Binding Cassette Subfamily C Member 4, SLCO1B1 Solute Carrier Organic Anion Transporter Family Member 1B1, ALDH2 Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 Family Member, TPMT Thiopurine S-Methyltransferase, UGT1A1 UDP Glucuronosyltransferase Family 1 Member A1, VDR Vitamin D Receptor, NUDT15 Nudix Hydrolase 15.
*P < 0.0006 compared with CMDB Chinese by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test when needed.