| Literature DB >> 34583728 |
Liyan Wu1,2, Wei Zhang1,2, Yanmeng Li2,3, Donghu Zhou2,3, Bei Zhang2,3, Anjian Xu2,3, Zhen Wu1,2, Lina Wu1,2, Shuxiang Li1,2, Xiaoming Wang1,2, Xinyan Zhao1,2, Qianyi Wang1,2, Min Li4, Yu Wang1,2, Hong You1,2, Jian Huang5,6,7, Xiaojuan Ou8,9, Jidong Jia10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is widely recognized and clinical manifestations of hemochromatosis-related (HFE-related) HH is well studied in European populations. Less is known about the clinical and laboratory characteristics of non-HFE related HH in Asian population. We aimed to explore the relationship between genotype and clinical phenotype in Chinese patients with non-HFE related hereditary hemochromatosis.Entities:
Keywords: Genotype; Genotype–phenotype; Hereditary haemochromatosis (HH); Non-HFE
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34583728 PMCID: PMC8479922 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-02020-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Demographic characteristics of patients in in different groups with HH
| Characteristic | Total (32) | HJV (n = 8) | SLC40A1 (n = 6) | SUGP2 or DENND3 (n = 10) | HH without P or LP variants* (n = 6) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male, n (%) | 23(71.9) | 6 (75) | 4 (66.7) | 8 (80) | 4 (66.7) | 0.897 |
| Age, y | 45.07 ± 15.94 (18–79) | 30.13 ± 12.12 | 56.33 ± 6.83 a | 48.30 ± 16.99 a | 48.33 ± 12.55 a | 0.007 |
| SF, ng/ml | 2631.0 (1115.95, 6371.25) | 6153(3246.5,6922.5) | 5917.6 (2061.8,9333.8) | 972 ab (670.3,2467.1) | 1267 (1033.8,10129.7) | 0.010 |
| TS, % | 92.30 (81.30,96.10) | 94.85 (92.25,97.5) | 92.25 (60.43,95.75) | 85.0(58.5,96.7) | 88.35(70.6,93.5) | 0.210 |
| ALT, U/L | 72.0 (30.0,104.0) | 99.5(67.3,12) | 78.5(39.5,141.3) | 31(22.5,44.5) | 72(18.5,121.5) | 0.161 |
| AST, U/L | 62.8 (34.6,103.0) | 92(64.4,121.0) | 60.4(37.6,111.8) | 33.4(22.9,48.5) | 72(20.7,124.3) | 0.051 |
| GGT, U/L | 42 (27.00,72.0) | 48(34.3,75) | 38(19.8,278.3) | 29.9(26.5,58.5) | 56(22.5,403) | 0.622 |
| TBIL, μmol/L | 37.88 ± 43.86 | 17.56 ± 8.85 | 18.79 ± 10.72 | 64.14 ± 62.59 a | 51.25 ± 48.90 | 0.094 |
| ALB, g/L | 40.30 ± 8.33 | 43.98 ± 10.12 | 38.88 ± 3.87 | 39.14 ± 9.42 | 37.96 ± 7.58 | 0.540 |
| Cirrhosis | 11 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0.011 |
| Skin pigmentation | 13 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0.281 |
| Arthropathy | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.540 |
| Cardiac involvement | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.042 |
| Diabetes | 11 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0.035 |
| Hypogonadism | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.020 |
HH without P or LP variants* = HH without pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, SF = serum ferritin,
TS = transferrin saturation, ALT = alanine transaminase, AST = aspartate aminotransferase,
GGT = γ-glutamyltransferase, TBIL = total bilirubin, ALB = albumin; Statistically significant differences are denoted as (a) compared to HJV. Statistically significant differences are denoted as (b) compared to SLC40A1
Representative predicted pathogenic variants and allele frequency of HH included in this study
| Gene | Location | Nucleotide change | Amino acid alteration | Mutation type | Frequency (this study) | Frequency (Asia/World) | Prediction of Pathogenicity (score) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyphen-2 | SIFT | Mutation Taster | |||||||||
| Exon 4 | c.963C>A | p.C321X | Nonsense | 7/32 | 5.798e−05/4.062e−06 | NA | NA | Disease causing (1) | |||
| Exon 4 | c.842T>C | p. I281T | Missense | 2/32 | 5.798e−05 /8.121e−06 | Probably damaging (1.0) | Damaging (0.000) | Disease causing (0.999) | |||
| Exon 4 | c.934C>T | p. Q312X | Nonsense | 1/32 | NA | NA | NA | Disease causing (1) | |||
| Exon 3 | c.311A>G | p.H104R | Missense | 1/32 | NA | Probably damaging (0.999) | Damaging (0.000) | Disease causing (1) | |||
| Exon 4 | c.820G>A | p. V274M | Missense | 1/32 | 0.0012/8.527e−05 | Probably damaging (0.997) | Tolerated (0.060) | Disease causing (0.986) | |||
| Exon 3 | c.309C>G | p. F103L | Missense | 1/32 | NA | Probably damaging (0.649) | Damaging (0.000) | Disease causing (1) | |||
| Exon 5 | c.430A>G | p. N144D | Missense | 1/32 | NA | Probably damaging (1.0) | Tolerable (0.067) | Disease causing (1) | |||
| Exon 7 | c.997T>C | p. Y333H | Missense | 3/32 | NA | Probably damaging (1.0) | Damaging (0.022) | Disease causing (1) | |||
| Exon 8 | c.1531G>A | p. V511I | Missense | 1/32 | NA | Probably damaging (0.984) | Damaging (0.000) | Disease causing (1) | |||
| Exon 5 | c.485_487delTTG | p. v162del | Deletion | 1/32 | NA | – | – | – | |||
| Intron | IVS3+10delGTT | – | Splicing | 1/32 | NA | – | – | – | |||
| Exon 5 | c.1916G>A | p. R639Q | Missense | 8/32 | 0.0388/0.0029 | Probably damaging (0.992) | Damaging (0.005) | Polymorphism (0.980) | |||
| Exon 14 | c.2122C>G | p. L708V | Missense | 5/32 | 0.0333/0.0029 | Probably damaging (0.982) | Damaging (0.003) | Disease causing (1) | |||
| Exon 4 | c.845G>A | p. C282Y | Missense | 1/32 | 0.0001/0.0332 | Probably damaging (1.0) | Damaging (0.000) | Disease causing (1) | |||
| Exon 2 | c.211C>T | p. R71X | Nonsense | 1/32 | 0.0002/ 1.624e-05 | NA | NA | Disease causing (1) | |||
Fig. 1Representative pedigree analysis of four families. A Pedigree chart of family HH8. The patient (HH8) harbored homozygous variations of HJV p.C321X and HJV p.Q6H, which were inherited from their father and mother. B Pedigree chart of family HH10. The patient (HH10) harbored compound heterozygous variations of SLC40A1 p.Y333H and SUGP2 p.R639Q. C Pedigree chart of family HH13. The patient (HH13) harbored a single heterozygous variation of SLC40A1 p.Y333H, which was inherited from their mother. D Pedigree chart of family HH9. The patient (HH9) harbored compound heterozygous variations of SLC40A1 p.N144D and TFR2 p.R336H
Genetic characteristics of 32 patients in HH cases
| NO | Age | Gender | SF (ng/ml) | TS (%) | Iron deposition on liver biopsy | Iron overload on MRI | Known HH-related genes | Iron homeostasis -related genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | M | 7004 | 92.0 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver | HJV p.Q6H/C321X/I281T | – |
| 2 | 28 | M | 6269 | 95.4 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, pancreas | HJV p.Q6H/C321X/I281T | – |
| 3 | 22 | F | 2995 | 89.1 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, pancreas | HJV p. Q312X (homo) | – |
| 4 | 18 | M | 6678 | 100 | Predominant in hepatocytes | ND | HJV p.Q6H/C321X/H104R | – |
| 5 | 57 | M | 4001 | 93.0 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver | HJV p.Q6H/C321X/V274M | – |
| 6 | 36 | F | 2000 | 96.0 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver | HJV p. F103L (homo) | – |
| 7 | 30 | M | 11,555 | 98.0 | ND | Liver, spleen, pancreas | HJV p. Q6H(homo)/ C321X (homo) | – |
| 8 | 24 | M | 6037 | 94.3 | ND | Liver, pancreas | HJV p. Q6H(homo)/C321X (homo) | – |
| 9 | 57 | F | 5886.1 | 71.1 | Hepatocytes and reticuloendothelial cells | Liver, spleen, pancreas | SLC40A1 p. N144D | – |
| 10 | 66 | F | 1446.2 | 92.7 | ND | Liver, spleen, pancreas | SLC40A1 p. Y333H | SUGP2 p. R639Q |
| 11 | 48 | M | 2267- | 91.8 | ND | Liver, spleen, pancreas | SLC40A1 p. V511I | – |
| 12 | 58 | M | 5949 | 28.4 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, spleen | SLC40A1 p. v162del | – |
| 13 | 49 | M | 7445 | 97.0 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, spleen | SLC40A1 p. Y333H | – |
| 14 | 60 | M | 15,000 | 94.0 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, spleen, pancreas | SLC40A1 p. Y333H | – |
| 15 | 79 | M | 493.8 | 97.1- | ND | Liver, pancreas | – | SUGP2 p. R639Q |
| 16 | 63 | M | 3868 | 97.7 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, spleen | – | SUGP2 p. R639Q |
| 17 | 67 | M | 1102 | 92.3 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, spleen | – | DENND3 p. L708V(homo) SUGP2 p. R639Q |
| 18 | 28 | M | 738 | 46.4 | Predominant in hepatocytes | ND | – | DENND3 p. L708V |
| 19 | 38 | F | 843 | 96.2 | Predominant in hepatocytes | ND | – | DENND3 p. L708V |
| 20 | 53 | F | 1402 | 49.0 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, spleen | – | SUGP2 p. R639Q |
| 21 | 46 | M | 2000 | 85.0 | ND | Liver, spleen | – | SUGP2 p. R639Q |
| 22 | 45 | M | 685 | - | Predominant in hepatocytes | ND | – | DENND3 p. L708V |
| 23 | 33 | M | 626 | 68.0 | Hepatocytes and reticuloendothelial cells | ND | – | SUGP2 p. R639Q |
| 24 | 31 | M | 6000 | 81.0 | ND | Liver | – | DENND3 p. L708V |
| 25 | 66 | F | 12,703- | 91.7 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, spleen, pancreas | – | – |
| 26 | 50 | F | 9272 | 81.6 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, spleen, pancreas | – | – |
| 27 | 53 | M | 1121 | 37.6 | Predominant in reticuloendothelial cells | Liver, spleen | – | – |
| 28 | 53 | M | 773 | 96.8 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver | – | – |
| 29 | 31 | M | 1220 | 92.4 | ND | Liver, spleen, pancreas | – | – |
| 30 | 37 | M | 1316 | 85.0 | ND | Liver, spleen | – | – |
| 31 | 48 | F | 7078 | 99.7 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver, spleen | SLC40A1 IVS3 + 10delGTT | SUGP2 p. R639Q(homo) |
| 32 | 28 | M | 2153 | 91.7 | Predominant in hepatocytes | Liver | HFE p.C282Y/R71X | – |
HH = Hereditary hemochromatosis, ND = not done
Fig. 2Gender and age at diagnosis of patients with non-HFE-related HH. A Gender and B Age at diagnosis are shown for patients with HJV HH, SLC40A1 HH, SUGP2 or DENND3 HH and HH without pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. Graphs A show the ratios of males and females in the four groups. Variables were compared using chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. There are no statistical differences between the groups. Graphs B show percentage of patients at different age stages (< 30Y, 30-50Y, > 50Y). Variables were compared using one-way ANOVA and LSD-t test. Statistically significant differences are denoted as (a) compared to HJV
Fig. 3Clinical characteristics at diagnosis of patients with non-HFE-related HH. The presence or absence of clinical characteristics was determined in all patients with genetic diagnosis of HJV HH, SLC40A1 HH, SUGP2 or DENND3 HH and HH without pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. A Cirrhosis, B Skin pigmentation, C Arthropathy, D Cardiac involvement, E Diabetes and F Hypogonadism at diagnosis are shown for subjects in the four groups. Variables were compared using chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Differences in clinical characteristics with Cirrhosis, Cardiac involvement, Hypogonadism were statistically significant in the four groups. However, due to the limited sample size, the pairwise comparison showed no significant difference