Literature DB >> 34583621

Improving porcine SCNT efficiency by selecting donor cells size.

Deling Jiao1,2,3, Wenmin Cheng1,2,3, Xiaolin Zhang1,2,3, Yifan Zhang1,2,3, Jianxiong Guo1,2,3, Zhuo Li1,2,3, Dejia Shi1,2,3, Zhe Xiong1,2,3, Yubo Qing1,2,3,4, Muhammad Ameen Jamal1,2,3, Kaixiang Xu1,2,3, Hong-Ye Zhao1,2,5, Hong-Jiang Wei1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

Considerable advancements have recently been achieved in porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), but the efficiency remains low. Donor cell size might play an important role in SCNT, but its effects in pigs remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of porcine SCNT by selecting donor cells of suitable size. Porcine fetal fibroblasts (PFFs) were divided into three groups, group S (small, d ≤ 13 μm), group M (medium, 13 μm<d ≤ 18 μm), and group L (large, d > 18 μm), and their biological characteristics were analyzed. Next, SCNT was performed using PFFs of different sizes to evaluate the developmental potential of reconstructed embryos. The data showed that PFFs in groups S, M and L accounted for 17.5%, 47.7% and 34.8% of cells, respectively. Morphologically, cells in group S exhibited clear and regular cell membranes and nuclei, whereas cells in groups M and L displayed varying degrees of cell membrane protuberance, karyo-pyknosis, autophagy and mitochondrial abnormalities. In addition, the growth status and proliferation capabilities of cells in group S were significantly better than those of group M and group L. The percentage of cells at G0/G1 in group S and M were significantly greater than group L. The senescence rate of group S was lower than group M and group L. The apoptosis rate of group S was significantly lower than that of group L but comparable to that of group M . The cleavage rate of group S was also significantly greater than that of group M but comparable to that of group L . The blastocyst rate of group S was significantly greater than that of group M and group L. The blastocyst cell numbers of group S were also significantly greater than those of group M and group L. These findings suggested that small PFFs with a diameter of less than 13 μm are more suitable donor cells for SCNT in pigs.Abbreviations: DMEM: Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FBS: Fetal bovine serum; PBS: Phosphate buffer saline; PFFs: Porcine fetal fibroblast cells; SCNT: Somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pig; SCNT; cell size; reconstructed embryo development

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34583621      PMCID: PMC8794526          DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2021.1980983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   5.173


  47 in total

1.  Flow cytometric cell cycle analysis of cultured porcine fetal fibroblast cells.

Authors:  A C Boquest; B N Day; R S Prather
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Epigenetic states of donor cells significantly affect the development of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos in pigs.

Authors:  Yanhui Zhai; Wei Li; Zhiren Zhang; Yunqing Cao; Zhengzhu Wang; Sheng Zhang; Ziyi Li
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.609

3.  Oct4 overexpression facilitates proliferation of porcine fibroblasts and development of cloned embryos.

Authors:  Su Jin Kim; Ok Jae Koo; Hee Jung Park; Joon Ho Moon; Bego Roibas da Torre; Palaksha Kanive Javaregowda; Jung Taek Kang; Sol Ji Park; Islam M Saadeldin; Ji Yei Choi; Byeong-Chun Lee; Goo Jang
Journal:  Zygote       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 1.442

Review 4.  Cell cycle co-ordination in embryo cloning by nuclear transfer.

Authors:  K H Campbell; P Loi; P J Otaegui; I Wilmut
Journal:  Rev Reprod       Date:  1996-01

5.  Embryonic development following somatic cell nuclear transfer impeded by persisting histone methylation.

Authors:  Shogo Matoba; Yuting Liu; Falong Lu; Kumiko A Iwabuchi; Li Shen; Azusa Inoue; Yi Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Development potential of transgenic somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos according to various factors of donor cell.

Authors:  Jongki Cho; M M U Bhuiyan; Sangtae Shin; Eulsoon Park; Goo Jang; Sungkeun Kang; Byeongchun Lee; Woosuk Hwang
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Effects of donor fibroblast cell type and transferred cloned embryo number on the efficiency of pig cloning.

Authors:  Zicong Li; Junsong Shi; Dewu Liu; Rong Zhou; Haiyu Zeng; Xiu Zhou; Ranbiao Mai; Shaofen Zeng; Lvhua Luo; Wanxian Yu; Shouquan Zhang; Zhenfang Wu
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  The expression of β-galactosidase during long-term cultured goat skin fibroblasts and the effect of donor cell passage on in vitro development of nuclear transfer embryos.

Authors:  Haijun Liu; Hui Peng; Fang Liu; Qun Ma; Wenchang Zhang
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.416

9.  Donor cell lines considerably affect the outcome of somatic nuclear transfer in the case of bovines.

Authors:  Ralf Poehland; Fatima Al-Rostum; Frank Becker; Torsten Viergutz; Ronald Marco Brunner; Wilhelm Kanitz; Sanjay Bhojwani
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Identification of key factors conquering developmental arrest of somatic cell cloned embryos by combining embryo biopsy and single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Wenqiang Liu; Xiaoyu Liu; Chenfei Wang; Yawei Gao; Rui Gao; Xiaochen Kou; Yanhong Zhao; Jingyi Li; You Wu; Wenchao Xiu; Su Wang; Jiqing Yin; Wei Liu; Tao Cai; Hong Wang; Yong Zhang; Shaorong Gao
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 10.849

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inhibition of FOXO1‑mediated autophagy promotes paclitaxel‑induced apoptosis of MDA‑MB‑231 cells.

Authors:  Kaixiang Xu; Wanyun Zhu; Anyong Xu; Zhe Xiong; Di Zou; Heng Zhao; Deling Jiao; Yubo Qing; Muhammad Ameen Jamal; Hong-Jiang Wei; Hong-Ye Zhao
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.952

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.