Literature DB >> 34582859

Socio-demographic and health vulnerability in prescribed-burn exposed versus unexposed counties near the National Forest System.

Michelle C Kondo1, Colleen E Reid2, Miranda H Mockrin3, Warren E Heilman4, David Long5.   

Abstract

Prescribed fire is an increasingly important tool in restoring ecological conditions and reducing uncontrolled wildfire. Prescribed burn techniques could reduce public health impacts associated with wildfire smoke exposure. However, there have been few assessments of the health impacts of prescribed burning, and potential vulnerabilities among populations exposed to smoke from prescribed fires. Our study area focused on counties in and near U.S. National Forests - a set of lands distributed across the U.S. In county-level analyses, we compared the sociodemographic and health characteristics of areas that were exposed with those that were not exposed to prescribe burns during the years 2010-2019 on a national level and within three regions. In addition, using spatial error regression models, we looked for associations between prescribed fire exposure and health behaviors and outcomes while controlling for spatial autocorrelation. On a national level, we found disproportionate prescribed fire exposure in rural counties with higher percentage mobile home and vacant housing units, and higher percentage African-American and white populations. Regionally, we found evidence of disproportionate exposure to prescribed burns among counties with lower percentage white population, higher percentage Hispanic population and mobile homes in the southern region, and to high poverty counties with high vacancy in the western region. These findings could indicate that vulnerable populations face potential health risks from prescribed burning smoke exposure, but also that they are not missing out on the benefits of prescribed burning, which could involve considerably lower smoke exposure compared to uncontrolled wildfire. In addition, in regression analyses, we found no evidence of disproportionate health burden in exposed compared to unexposed counties. Awareness of these patterns could influence both large-scale or institutional polices about prescribed burning practice, and could be used to build decision-making factors into modeling tools and smoke management plans, as well as community-engagement around wildfire risk reduction. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prescribed burning; Smoke exposure; Social and health burden

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34582859      PMCID: PMC9063456          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   10.753


  23 in total

1.  Impact of smoke from prescribed burning: Is it a public health concern?

Authors:  Anjali Haikerwal; Fabienne Reisen; Malcolm R Sim; Michael J Abramson; Carl P Meyer; Fay H Johnston; Martine Dennekamp
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Potential impacts of prescribed fire smoke on public health and socially vulnerable populations in a Southeastern U.S. state.

Authors:  Sadia Afrin; Fernando Garcia-Menendez
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Rapid growth of the US wildland-urban interface raises wildfire risk.

Authors:  Volker C Radeloff; David P Helmers; H Anu Kramer; Miranda H Mockrin; Patricia M Alexandre; Avi Bar-Massada; Van Butsic; Todd J Hawbaker; Sebastián Martinuzzi; Alexandra D Syphard; Susan I Stewart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Human exposure and sensitivity to globally extreme wildfire events.

Authors:  David M J S Bowman; Grant J Williamson; John T Abatzoglou; Crystal A Kolden; Mark A Cochrane; Alistair M S Smith
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 5.  A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke.

Authors:  Jia C Liu; Gavin Pereira; Sarah A Uhl; Mercedes A Bravo; Michelle L Bell
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 6.  Wildfire and prescribed burning impacts on air quality in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel A Jaffe; Susan M O'Neill; Narasimhan K Larkin; Amara L Holder; David L Peterson; Jessica E Halofsky; Ana G Rappold
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests.

Authors:  John T Abatzoglou; A Park Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Impact of Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Exposure During Wildfires on Cardiovascular Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Anjali Haikerwal; Muhammad Akram; Anthony Del Monaco; Karen Smith; Malcolm R Sim; Mick Meyer; Andrew M Tonkin; Michael J Abramson; Martine Dennekamp
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Emergency Department Visits Associated With Wildfire Smoke Exposure in California in 2015.

Authors:  Zachary S Wettstein; Sumi Hoshiko; Jahan Fahimi; Robert J Harrison; Wayne E Cascio; Ana G Rappold
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  The unequal vulnerability of communities of color to wildfire.

Authors:  Ian P Davies; Ryan D Haugo; James C Robertson; Phillip S Levin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.