Noelle Ozimek1, Karen Velez1, Hannah Anvari1, Lauren Butler1, Kara N Goldman1,2, Nicole C Woitowich3. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 2. Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 3. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has introduced acute and persistent psychosocial stressors for many individuals, with emerging gender differences that suggest women may be at greater risk for poorer mental health outcomes. This may have unintended consequences for women's overall health and well-being, including disruptions to reproductive function as elevated stress is often associated with menstrual cycle irregularities. The objective of this study was to determine if and how the COVID-19 pandemic and its related stressors have impacted women's menstrual cyclicity. Materials and Methods: An online survey instrument designed to capture self-reported information on menstrual cycle changes and perceived stress levels was distributed between July and August 2020. A total of 210 women between the ages of 18-45 years met stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria and completed the survey. Results: Of the 210 respondents, more than half (54%) reported changes in their menstrual cycles. These included changes in menstrual cycle length (50%), the duration of menses (34%), and changes in premenstrual symptoms (50%). Respondents with high perceived stress scale (PSS) scores during Covid were more likely to experience a longer duration of menses (p < 0.001) and heavier bleeding during menses (p = 0.028) compared with those with moderate Covid PSS scores. Conclusions: By uncovering a trend in increased menstrual cycle irregularities during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study contributes to our understanding of the implications that the pandemic may have on women's reproductive health.
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has introduced acute and persistent psychosocial stressors for many individuals, with emerging gender differences that suggest women may be at greater risk for poorer mental health outcomes. This may have unintended consequences for women's overall health and well-being, including disruptions to reproductive function as elevated stress is often associated with menstrual cycle irregularities. The objective of this study was to determine if and how the COVID-19 pandemic and its related stressors have impacted women's menstrual cyclicity. Materials and Methods: An online survey instrument designed to capture self-reported information on menstrual cycle changes and perceived stress levels was distributed between July and August 2020. A total of 210 women between the ages of 18-45 years met stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria and completed the survey. Results: Of the 210 respondents, more than half (54%) reported changes in their menstrual cycles. These included changes in menstrual cycle length (50%), the duration of menses (34%), and changes in premenstrual symptoms (50%). Respondents with high perceived stress scale (PSS) scores during Covid were more likely to experience a longer duration of menses (p < 0.001) and heavier bleeding during menses (p = 0.028) compared with those with moderate Covid PSS scores. Conclusions: By uncovering a trend in increased menstrual cycle irregularities during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, this study contributes to our understanding of the implications that the pandemic may have on women's reproductive health.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; menstrual cycle; perceived stress scale; reproductive health
Authors: Nadia Muhaidat; Mohammad A Alshrouf; Muayad I Azzam; Abdulrahman M Karam; Majed W Al-Nazer; Abdallah Al-Ani Journal: Int J Womens Health Date: 2022-03-28
Authors: Mohammad A A Al-Najjar; Ruaa R Al-Alwany; Firas M Al-Rshoud; Rana K Abu-Farha; Mohammed Zawiah Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Syeda Tayyaba Rehan; Laiba Imran; Hussain Mansoor; Qudsia Sayyeda; Hassan Ul Hussain; Mustafa Sajjad Cheema; Muhammad Junaid Tahir; Muhammad Sohaib Asghar; Mohammed Mahmmoud Fadelallah Eljack; Md Saiful Islam Journal: Health Sci Rep Date: 2022-10-08