| Literature DB >> 34582648 |
Wedad Saeed Al-Qahtani1, Tahani Mohamed Al-Hazani2, Fatmah Ahmed Safhi3, Mashael Alhumaidi Alotaibi4, Dalia Mostafa Domiaty5, Salha M S Al-Shamrani5, Eman Alshehri6, Amani Mohammed Alotaibi7, Saad Alkahtani6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In forensic science, there are cases when the only available provider of biological data is samples of malignant tissues. It can be useful in identification and/or paternity tests. Still, such samples have ambiguities because of microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) effects, being often related to neoplasia.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer tissues; Forensic pathology; Neoplastic tissues; Short tandem repeat PCR; adjoining non-cancerous tissue marginals
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34582648 PMCID: PMC8850881 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.9.2797
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Study Participants (Patients and Control Groups)
| Clinical-pathological Information | Patient Group | Control Group |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 22 (51.16) | 14 (46.66) |
| Female | 21 (48.84) | 16 (53.33) |
| Age (years) | ||
| <35 | 3 (6.97) | 12 (40.0) |
| 35-45 | 11 (25.58) | 10 (33.33) |
| 46-55 | 9 (20.93) | 8 (26.66) |
| 56-65 | 14 (32.56) | 0 |
| >65 | 6 (13.95) | 0 |
| Site | ||
| Ascending colon | 5 (11.63) | 0 |
| Descending colon | 3 (6.98) | 0 |
| Cecum | 8 (18.60) | 0 |
| Rectum | 10 (23.26) | 0 |
| Sigmoid colon | 17 (39.53) | 0 |
| Total | 43 (100) | 0 |
| Tumor thickness (mm) | ||
| 0-10 | 8 (18.60) | 0 |
| 10-20 | 28 (65.12) | 0 |
| >20 | 7 (16.28) | 0 |
| Total | 43 (100) | 0 |
| Metastasis | ||
| M0 | 8 (18.60) | 0 |
| M1 | 21 (48.83) | 0 |
| Undefined | 14 (32.56) | 0 |
| Total | 43 (100) | 0 |
| Nodal status | ||
| N0 | 0 | 0 |
| N1 | 25 (58.14) | 0 |
| N2 | 18 (41.86) | 0 |
| Total | 43 (100) | 0 |
| UICC stage | ||
| Stage 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stage I | 0 | 0 |
| Stage II | 8 (18.60) | 0 |
| Stage III | 24 (55.81) | 0 |
| Stage IV | 11 (25.85) | 0 |
| Total | 43 (100) | 0 |
DNA Concentration (ng/μl) for Study Participants’ Specimens
| Participants | DNA concentration | P |
|---|---|---|
| Controls (30) | 28.44 ± 18.63 | 0 |
| Patients (43): colorectal cancer specimens (CRC) | 362.53 ± 38.51 | |
| Patients (43): the adjoining | 208.34 ± 29.47 | 0 |
Student’s T-test for constant variables, Pearson’s X2 test for definitive variables.
Figure 1Photomicroscopic Images of: a) H&E-stained CRC histological specimens; and b) stained histological specimens (zoomed at magnitude ×50) of adjoining cancer-free CRC tissues demonstrating the crypts, lamina propria, muscularis mucosae, submucosa as well as lymphoid aggregates within adequate conditions. Moreover, c) and d) stained histopathological specimens (zoomed at magnitude ×100) of MCRA covering the mucous environment and demonstrating an excessive well-identifiable adenocarcinoma; the critical signs are polymorphic epithelium, huge and unstable lumen glands incorporating signs of blood and tumor-related inflammation; moreover, several cells from patients were degraded and incorporated MCRA as well as T5N2M1, showing early signs of developing metastases in liver and abdominal sites
Figure 2The Relationship between Metastasis Development Phases and DNA Concentrations (ng/μl) Focusing on CR Tissues of CRC Patients. Values derived are presented as (mean ± SEM) passing through a triad of tests for every specimen. P value (***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05) has been evaluated for the values of DNA concentrations regarding metastasis-affected participants with CRC (M1 and undetermined metastasis phases) compared to the mean value of the same concentrations participants with CRC (M0) without metastasis signs and in contrast to values from the control group
The Correlation between Mutation Types (LOH and MSI) Identified in Autosomal 16 STR loci and Tissues Obtained from CRC Patients (n=43): CRC Specimens and the Adjoining N-CRC Tissues
| Mutation type | No. of mutations in CRC samples | Mutation frequency | No. of mutations in N-CRC samples | Mutation frequency (total no. of loci = 1168) | OR (95% CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOH | 19 | 0.0162 | 7 | 0.0059 | 2.74 (0.0129 - 0.0217) | 0.617 |
| MSI | 5 | 0.0042 | 0 | 0 | Undefined | 0.667 |
| Total | 24 | 0.0205 | 4 | 0.0034 | 6.02 (0.0097 – 0.0183) | 0.465 |
Allocation LOH and MSI Mutations Identified in 16 STR Loci in CRC Samples
| STR Locus | Chromosome | Total mutation rate (%) | Number of mutations in CRC | Total mutation rate (%) | Number of mutations in N-CRC | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOH | MSI | LOH | MSI | |||||
| Amelogenin | Sex | 2 (0.171) | 2 | 0 | 1 (0.085) | 1 | 0 | 0.234 (NS) |
| D3S1358 | 3 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| D13S317 | 13 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| Penta E | 15 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| D16S539 | 16 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| D18S51 | 18 | 9 (0.770) | 7 | 2 | 2 (0.171) | 2 | 0 | 0.00 |
| CSF1PO | 5 | 6 (0.513) | 5 | 1 | 1 (0.085) | 1 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Penta D | 21 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| TH01 | 11 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| vWA | 12 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| D21S11 | 21 | 5 (0.428) | 4 | 1 | 2 (0.171) | 2 | 0 | 0.009 |
| D7S820 | 7 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| D5S818 | 5 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| TPOX | 2 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
| D8S1179 | 8 | 2 (0.171) | 1 | 1 | 1 (0.085) | 1 | 0 | 0.234 (NS) |
| FGA | 4 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.00) | 0 | 0 | NA |
NS, not significant; NA, not applicable
Figure 3An Electrophoregram of Special Images Demonstrating Genetic Deviations in STR Configurations. LOH was identified in loci such as D8S1179 (a), D21S11 (b), and CSF1PO (c). MSI was detected in the locus D18S51 (d) in CRC samples contrasted to the adjoining N-CRC specimens. Moreover, (e) and (f) revealed the locus D5S818 from two separate specimens taken from the control cohort
Figure 4Correlation between Mutation Types (LOH and MSI) in STR Loci and Factors of Gender (a) and Age (b) among CRC Participants (n = 43). Values are presented as (mean ± SEM, n = 43) passing through a triad of tests for every specimen