Ahsen Buyukaslan1,2, Kadir Abul3, Haluk Berk4, Hurriyet Yilmaz5. 1. Formed Healthcare Scoliosis Treatment and Brace Center, Istanbul, Turkey. ahsen.buyukaslan@gmail.com. 2. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. ahsen.buyukaslan@gmail.com. 3. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 4. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey. 5. Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Halic University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to present the clinical and radiological features of functional scoliosis due to LLD and LLD concurrent with AIS; it also aimed to define their relationships for differentiating functional scoliosis due to LLD and LLD concurrent with AIS. METHODS: This study was conducted as a single-center retrospective comparative study on 47 scoliosis patients with diagnosed LLD, aged 10-18 years. Cases with a diagnosis of structural LLD were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of concurrent AIS. Data on demographics and the angle of trunk rotation on a sacral basis (ATRsacrum) were recorded. Limb length was clinically measured with a tape measure and clinical LLD (C-LLD) scoliometer test. Cobb angle, axial rotation, pelvic obliquity, and radiological LLD (R-LLD) were obtained from standing spine radiographs and measured by two blinded orthopedic spine surgeons. RESULTS: The prevalence of LLD was 6.7% in scoliosis patients in our study population. Cobb angle and apical rotation were higher in the LLD concurrent with AIS group than in the LLD group (p ≤ 0.05). The C-LLDscoliometer test results were strongly correlated with both C-LLDtape measure (r = 0.651; p = 0.000) and ATRsacrum (r = 0.688; p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: LLD may develop as a result of adaptive changes due to scoliosis, or a concurrent condition to scoliosis. Cobb angle and apical rotation are the features that differentiate AIS from functional scoliosis in patients with LLD. The C-LLD scoliometer test can be an effective, practical, and useful method for measuring C-LLD, but its validity and reliability should be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT04713397, date of registration: 01/14/2021). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to present the clinical and radiological features of functional scoliosis due to LLD and LLD concurrent with AIS; it also aimed to define their relationships for differentiating functional scoliosis due to LLD and LLD concurrent with AIS. METHODS: This study was conducted as a single-center retrospective comparative study on 47 scoliosis patients with diagnosed LLD, aged 10-18 years. Cases with a diagnosis of structural LLD were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of concurrent AIS. Data on demographics and the angle of trunk rotation on a sacral basis (ATRsacrum) were recorded. Limb length was clinically measured with a tape measure and clinical LLD (C-LLD) scoliometer test. Cobb angle, axial rotation, pelvic obliquity, and radiological LLD (R-LLD) were obtained from standing spine radiographs and measured by two blinded orthopedic spine surgeons. RESULTS: The prevalence of LLD was 6.7% in scoliosis patients in our study population. Cobb angle and apical rotation were higher in the LLD concurrent with AIS group than in the LLD group (p ≤ 0.05). The C-LLDscoliometer test results were strongly correlated with both C-LLDtape measure (r = 0.651; p = 0.000) and ATRsacrum (r = 0.688; p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: LLD may develop as a result of adaptive changes due to scoliosis, or a concurrent condition to scoliosis. Cobb angle and apical rotation are the features that differentiate AIS from functional scoliosis in patients with LLD. The C-LLD scoliometer test can be an effective, practical, and useful method for measuring C-LLD, but its validity and reliability should be determined. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT04713397, date of registration: 01/14/2021). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Yvonne M Golightly; Kelli D Allen; Charles G Helmick; Todd A Schwartz; Jordan B Renner; Joanne M Jordan Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 4.666