Literature DB >> 34580929

Extreme hyponatremia as a risk factor for early mortality after liver transplantation in the MELD-sodium era.

Tommy Ivanics1, Shravan Leonard-Murali1, Hassan Mouzaihem1, Dilip Moonka2, Toshihiro Kitajima1, Sirisha Yeddula1, Mhd Tayseer Shamaa1, Michael Rizzari1, Kelly Collins1, Atsushi Yoshida1, Marwan Abouljoud1, Shunji Nagai1.   

Abstract

The impact of hyponatremia on waitlist and post-transplant outcomes following the implementation of MELD-Na-based liver allocation remains unclear. We investigated waitlist and postliver transplant (LT) outcomes in patients with hyponatremia before and after implementing MELD-Na-based allocation. Adult patients registered for a primary LT between 2009 and 2021 were identified in the OPTN/UNOS database. Two eras were defined; pre-MELD-Na and post-MELD-Na. Extreme hyponatremia was defined as a serum sodium concentration ≤120 mEq/l. Ninety-day waitlist outcomes and post-LT survival were compared using Fine-Gray proportional hazard and mixed-effects Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 118 487 patients were eligible (n = 64 940: pre-MELD-Na; n = 53 547: post-MELD-Na). In the pre-MELD-Na era, extreme hyponatremia at listing was associated with an increased risk of 90-day waitlist mortality ([ref: 135-145] HR: 3.80; 95% CI: 2.97-4.87; P < 0.001) and higher transplant probability (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.38-2.01; P < 0.001). In the post-MELD-Na era, patients with extreme hyponatremia had a proportionally lower relative risk of waitlist mortality (HR: 2.27; 95% CI 1.60-3.23; P < 0.001) and proportionally higher transplant probability (HR: 2.12; 95% CI 1.76-2.55; P < 0.001) as patients with normal serum sodium levels (135-145). Extreme hyponatremia was associated with a higher risk of 90, 180, and 365-day post-LT survival compared to patients with normal serum sodium levels. With the introduction of MELD-Na-based allocation, waitlist outcomes have improved in patients with extreme hyponatremia but they continue to have worse short-term post-LT survival.
© 2021 Steunstichting ESOT. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MELD-Na; United Network of Organ Sharing; hyponatremia; post-transplant survival; waitlist

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34580929      PMCID: PMC8720071          DOI: 10.1111/tri.14123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  24 in total

1.  Persistent ascites and low serum sodium identify patients with cirrhosis and low MELD scores who are at high risk for early death.

Authors:  Douglas M Heuman; Souheil G Abou-Assi; Adil Habib; Leslie M Williams; R Todd Stravitz; Arun J Sanyal; Robert A Fisher; Anastasios A Mihas
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Evaluating health outcomes in the presence of competing risks: a review of statistical methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  Ravi Varadhan; Carlos O Weiss; Jodi B Segal; Albert W Wu; Daniel Scharfstein; Cynthia Boyd
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Addition of serum sodium into the MELD score predicts waiting list mortality better than MELD alone.

Authors:  Andres E Ruf; Walter K Kremers; Lila L Chavez; Valeria I Descalzi; Luis G Podesta; Federico G Villamil
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 4.  Central pontine and extrapontine myelinolysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  T D Singh; J E Fugate; A A Rabinstein
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 6.089

5.  Effects of Allocating Livers for Transplantation Based on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium Scores on Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Shunji Nagai; Lucy C Chau; Randolph E Schilke; Mohamed Safwan; Michael Rizzari; Kelly Collins; Atsushi Yoshida; Marwan S Abouljoud; Dilip Moonka
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia: expert panel recommendations.

Authors:  Joseph G Verbalis; Steven R Goldsmith; Arthur Greenberg; Cynthia Korzelius; Robert W Schrier; Richard H Sterns; Christopher J Thompson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  A proportional hazards regression model for the subdistribution with right-censored and left-truncated competing risks data.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Mei-Jie Zhang; Jason Fine
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Hyponatremia in cirrhosis: Results of a patient population survey.

Authors:  Paolo Angeli; Florence Wong; Hugh Watson; Pere Ginès
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 9.  Hyponatremia in cirrhosis: pathogenesis, clinical significance, and management.

Authors:  Pere Ginès; Mónica Guevara
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Hyponatremia and mortality among patients on the liver-transplant waiting list.

Authors:  W Ray Kim; Scott W Biggins; Walter K Kremers; Russell H Wiesner; Patrick S Kamath; Joanne T Benson; Erick Edwards; Terry M Therneau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  2 in total

1.  The vexing triad of obesity, alcohol, and coagulopathy predicts the need for multiple operations in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Hunter B Moore; Yanik J Bababekov; James J Pomposelli; Megan A Adams; Cara Crouch; Dor Yoeli; Rashikh A Choudhury; Tanner Ferrell; James R Burton; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Trevor L Nydam
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.125

2.  Liver Transplant Recipient Characteristics Associated With Worse Post-Transplant Outcomes in Using Elderly Donors.

Authors:  Shingo Shimada; Tayseer Shamaa; Tommy Ivanics; Toshihiro Kitajima; Kelly Collins; Michael Rizzari; Atsushi Yoshida; Marwan Abouljoud; Dilip Moonka; Mei Lu; Shunji Nagai
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.842

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.