Literature DB >> 34580820

Epidemiology of common and uncommon adult pituitary tumors in the U.S. according to the 2017 World Health Organization classification.

Luz E Castellanos1,2, Catherine Gutierrez2, Timothy Smith2,3,4, Edward R Laws2,3, J Bryan Iorgulescu5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the contemporary epidemiology of adult pituitary tumors with a particular focus on uncommon tumor types, using the 2017 WHO Classification of pituitary tumors.
METHODS: Adult patients presenting with a pituitary or sellar tumor between 2004 and 2017 were identified from the U.S. National Cancer Database, with tumor type categorized according to the 2017 WHO classification. Descriptive epidemiological statistics were evaluated and reported for all pituitary tumor types and subtypes.
RESULTS: 113,349 adults with pituitary tumors were identified, 53.0% of whom were female. The majority of pituitary tumors were pituitary adenomas (94.0%), followed by craniopharyngiomas (3.8%). Among pituitary adenomas, whereas 71.6% of microadenomas presented in females, only 46.7% of macroadenomas and 41.3% of giant adenomas did (p < 0.001). For craniopharyngiomas, 71.2% were adamantinomatous and 28.8% were papillary, with adamantinomatous tumors associated with Black non-Hispanic race/ethnicity (ORadj = 2.44 vs. White non-Hispanic, 99.9 %CI = 1.25-4.75, p < 0.001) in multivariable analysis. The remaining 0.7% (n = 676) of pathology-confirmed pituitary tumor types were composed of: 21% tumors of the posterior pituitary, 16% chordomas, 11% pituitary carcinomas (i.e. adenohypophyseal histology with metastasis; herein most frequently to bone), 10% meningiomas, 8% germ cell tumors, 7% hematolymphoid (largely DLBCLs), and 4% neuronal/paraneuronal (largely gangliogliomas). Pituitary carcinomas and posterior pituitary tumors demonstrated a male predilection (62.2% and 56.0%, respectively), whereas sellar meningiomas predominated in females (84.1%). Age, race/ethnicity, tumor size, and overall survival further varied across uncommon pituitary tumor types.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a detailed contemporary dissection of the epidemiology of common and uncommon adult pituitary tumors in the context of WHO2017.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Craniopharyngioma; Epidemiology; Pituitary adenoma; Pituitary carcinoma; Pituitary tumor; Tumor of the posterior pituitary

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34580820     DOI: 10.1007/s11102-021-01189-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  29 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis of pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 2.  Pituitary-Tumor Endocrinopathies.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Using the National Cancer Database for Outcomes Research: A Review.

Authors:  Daniel J Boffa; Joshua E Rosen; Katherine Mallin; Ashley Loomis; Greer Gay; Bryan Palis; Kathleen Thoburn; Donna Gress; Daniel P McKellar; Lawrence N Shulman; Matthew A Facktor; David P Winchester
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Descriptive epidemiology of pituitary tumors in the United States, 2004-2009.

Authors:  Haley Gittleman; Quinn T Ostrom; Paul D Farah; Annie Ondracek; Yanwen Chen; Yingli Wolinsky; Carol Kruchko; Justin Singer; Varun R Kshettry; Edward R Laws; Andrew E Sloan; Warren R Selman; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Demographic differences in incidence for pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  Bradley D McDowell; Robert B Wallace; Ryan M Carnahan; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Charles F Lynch; Janet A Schlechte
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for sellar and parasellar masses: ten-year experience in 2598 patients.

Authors:  Pouyan Famini; Marcel M Maya; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Pathohistological classification of pituitary tumors: 10 years of experience with the German Pituitary Tumor Registry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Saeger; Dieter K Lüdecke; Michael Buchfelder; Rudolf Fahlbusch; Hans-Jürgen Quabbe; Stephan Petersenn
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.664

8.  The epidemiology and management patterns of pediatric pituitary tumors in the United States.

Authors:  Luz E Castellanos; Madhusmita Misra; Timothy R Smith; Edward R Laws; J Bryan Iorgulescu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Presenting Features in 269 Patients With Clinically Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas Enrolled in a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Jeffrey N Bruce; Alexander G Khandji; Zhezhen Jin; Richard A Hickman; Emily Frey; Carlos Reyes-Vidal; Marc Otten; Sharon L Wardlaw; Kalmon D Post
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2020-02-18

10.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2013-2017.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Nirav Patil; Gino Cioffi; Kristin Waite; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 12.300

View more
  2 in total

1.  Duct-like diverticulum at the base of third ventricle tumors: a morphological signature diagnostic of papillary craniopharyngioma.

Authors:  José María Pascual; Ruth Prieto; Rodrigo Carrasco; Laura Barrios
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Surgical Outcomes of Clival Chordoma Through Endoscopic Endonasal Approach: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Ge Chen; Mingchu Li; Wenlong Xu; Xu Wang; Ming Feng; Renzhi Wang; Xiaohai Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 6.055

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.