Literature DB >> 34580785

Phenotypic characterization of cell-to-cell interactions between two yeast species during alcoholic fermentation.

Natasha Alethea Luyt1, Sandra Beaufort2, Benoit Divol1, Mathabatha Evodia Setati1, Patricia Taillandier2, Florian Franz Bauer3.   

Abstract

Microbial multispecies ecosystems are responsible for many biotechnological processes and are particularly important in food production. In wine fermentations, in addition to the natural microbiota, several commercially relevant yeast species may be co-inoculated to achieve specific outcomes. However, such multispecies fermentations remain largely unpredictable because of multilevel interactions between naturally present and/or co-inoculated species. Understanding the nature of such interactions has therefore become essential for successful implementation of such strategies. Here we investigate interactions between strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea thermotolerans. Co-fermentations with both species sharing the same bioreactor (physical contact) were compared to co-fermentations with physical separation between the species in a membrane bioreactor ensuring free exchange of metabolites. Yeast culturability, viability and the production of core metabolites were monitored. The previously reported negative interaction between these two yeast species was confirmed. Physical contact greatly reduced the culturability and viability of L. thermotolerans and led to earlier cell death, compared to when these yeasts were co-fermenting without cell-cell contact. In turn, in the absence of cell-cell contact, L. thermotolerans metabolic activity led to an earlier decline in culturability in S. cerevisiae. Cell-cell contact did not result in significant differences in the major fermentation metabolites ethanol, acetic acid and lactic acid, but impacted on the production of some volatile compounds.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell–cell contact; Co-culture fermentations; L. thermotolerans; S. cerevisiae; Yeast interactions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34580785     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-021-03154-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  41 in total

1.  Aeration strategy: a need for very high ethanol performance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae fed-batch process.

Authors:  S Alfenore; X Cameleyre; L Benbadis; C Bideaux; J-L Uribelarrea; G Goma; C Molina-Jouve; S E Guillouet
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae accumulates GAPDH-derived peptides on its cell surface that induce death of non-Saccharomyces yeasts by cell-to-cell contact.

Authors:  Patrícia Branco; Varongsiri Kemsawasd; Lara Santos; Mário Diniz; Jorge Caldeira; Maria Gabriela Almeida; Nils Arneborg; Helena Albergaria
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.194

3.  Selected non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts in controlled multistarter fermentations with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Francesca Comitini; Mirko Gobbi; Paola Domizio; Cristina Romani; Livio Lencioni; Ilaria Mannazzu; Maurizio Ciani
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.516

4.  Feedback control of morphogenesis in fungi by aromatic alcohols.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Gerald R Fink
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Identification of novel GAPDH-derived antimicrobial peptides secreted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and involved in wine microbial interactions.

Authors:  Patrícia Branco; Diana Francisco; Christophe Chambon; Michel Hébraud; Nils Arneborg; Maria Gabriela Almeida; Jorge Caldeira; Helena Albergaria
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Quorum-sensing in yeast and its potential in wine making.

Authors:  Martina Avbelj; Jure Zupan; Peter Raspor
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Influence of Lachancea thermotolerans on cv. Emir wine fermentation.

Authors:  Eren Kemal Balikci; Hasan Tanguler; Neil P Jolly; Huseyin Erten
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 8.  Peer pressure: evolutionary responses to biotic pressures in wine yeasts.

Authors:  C G Conacher; D Rossouw; F F B Bauer
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Novel wine yeast with ARO4 and TYR1 mutations that overproduce 'floral' aroma compounds 2-phenylethanol and 2-phenylethyl acetate.

Authors:  Antonio G Cordente; Mark Solomon; Alex Schulkin; I Leigh Francis; Alice Barker; Anthony R Borneman; Christopher D Curtin
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Yeast Interactions in Inoculated Wine Fermentation.

Authors:  Maurizio Ciani; Angela Capece; Francesca Comitini; Laura Canonico; Gabriella Siesto; Patrizia Romano
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.