| Literature DB >> 34580342 |
Arvin Haj-Mirzaian1,2,3, Kiana Ramezanzadeh1,2,3, Siavash Shariatzadeh2,3, Michael Tajik1,2,3, Farima Khalafi1,2,3, Armin Tafazolimoghadam1,2, Mahla Radmard1,2, Alireza Rahbar1,2,4, Fardad Pirri1,2, Kiarash Kazemi1,2, Ayda Khosravi1,2, Niloufar Shababi1,2, Ahmad Reza Dehpour5,6.
Abstract
It has been well documented that chronic stress can induce atherosclerotic changes, however, the underlying mechanisms is yet to be established. In this regard, this study aimed to elucidate the relation between hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal-axis (HPA-axis), toll-like receptors (TLRs), as well as M1/M2 macrophage ratio and pre-atherosclerotic changes in social isolation stress (SIS) in mice. We used small interfering RNA against the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to evaluate the relation between HPA-axis and TLRs. C57BL/6J mice were subjected to SIS and RT-PCR, ELISA, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry were used to assess the relations between pre-atherosclerotic changes and TLRs, macrophage polarization, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and cell adhesion molecules in aortic tissue. We used TAK-242 (0.3 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), a selective antagonist of TLR4, as a possible prophylactic treatment for atherosclerotic changes induced by SIS. We observed that isolated animals had higher serum concentration of corticosterone and higher body weight in comparison to normal animals. In isolated animals, results of in vitro study showed that knocking-down of the GR in bone marrow-derived monocytes significantly decreased the expression of TLR4. In vivo study suggested higher expression of TLR4 on circulating monocytes and higher M1/M2 ratio in aortic samples. Pathological study showed a mild pre-atherosclerotic change in isolated animals. Finally, we observed that treating animals with TAK-242 could significantly inhibit the pre-atherosclerotic changes. SIS can possibly increase the risk of atherosclerosis through inducing abnormal HPA-axis activity and subsequently lead to TLR4 up-regulation, vascular inflammation, high M1/M2 ratio in intima. Thus, TLR4 inhibitors might be a novel treatment to decrease the risk of atherosclerosis induced by chronic stress.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34580342 PMCID: PMC8476494 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98276-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Sequences of primers used for quantitative RT-PCR in mice.
| Gene name | Primers (forward and reverse 5′ to 3′) |
|---|---|
| ICAM-1 | F: 5′-TTCACACTGAATGCCAGCTC-3′ R: 5′-GTCTGCTGAGACCCCTCTTG-3′ |
| VCAM-1 | F: 5′-CCCAGGTGGAGGTCTACTCA-3′ R: 5′-CAGGATTTTGGGAGCTGGTA-3′ |
| P-selectin | F: 5′-GTCCACGGAGAGTTTGGTGT-3′ R: 5′-AAGTGGTGTTCGGACCAAAG-3′ |
| E-selectin | F: 5′-AGCTACCCATGGAACACGAC-3′ R: 5′-ACGCAAGTTCTCCAGCTGTT-3′ |
| TLR2 | F: 5′-CAGCTGGAGAACTCTGACCC-3′ R: 5′-CAAAGAGCCTGAAGTGGGAG-3′ |
| TLR4 | F: 5′-CAACATCATCCAGGAAGGC-3′ R: 5′-GAAGGCGATACAATTCCACC-3′ |
| NF-κB | F: 5′-ATGGCAGACGATGATCCCTAC-3′ R: 5′-TGTTGACAGTGGTATTTCTGGTG-3′ |
Absolute body weight (g) and organ weights (mg) in both isolated and social conditioned mice.
| Groups | ||
|---|---|---|
| Social conditioned | Isolation conditioned | |
| Concentration of corticosterone (ng/ml | 33.3 ± 5.0 | 42.3 ± 7.7** |
| Body weight before (g, | 20.58 ± 0.51 | 20.32 ± 0.71 |
| Body weight after (g, | 25.56 ± 1.1 | 27.08 ± 1.6* |
| Adrenals (mg, | 3.49 ± 0.12 | 3.51 ± 0.14 |
| Thymus (mg, | 58.31 ± 2.6 | 57.12 ± 2.8 |
*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared to social conditioned animals.
Figure 1Fold change in gene expression of TLR2, TLR4, and NF-κB in GR- and NF-κB- (p50 subunit) knock-down cultured monocytes derived from bone marrow of socially isolated animals. Values are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10 in each group) results were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ***P < 0.001 compared to social condition group treated with vector. ###P < 0.001 compared to isolated condition group treated with GR-siRNA, ∧P < 0.05 and ∧∧∧P < 0.001 compared to social isolation group treated with vector.
Figure 2Results of plasma concentrations of lipid profile components in socially isolated and normal animals. Values are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10 in each group) results were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ***P < 0.001 compared to social conditioned animals.
Figure 3Gating strategy (A) and the expression of TLR-2 and 4 on circulating monocytes in both normal and isolated animals (B and C). Values are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10 in each group) results were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ***P < 0.001 compared to social conditioned animals.
Figure 4Fold change in gene expression of VCAM-1, ICAM-1, E-selectin, P-selectin receptors among SC, IC, and isolation conditioned animals treated with TAK-242 in aorta samples. Values are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10 in each group) results were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 compared to social conditioned animals. #P < 0.05 and ###P < 0.001 compared to isolation conditioned animals.
Figure 5The expression of M1 and M2 biomarkers in aorta samples in social and isolation conditioned animals. Values are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 12 in each group) results were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ***P < 0.001 compared to social conditioned animals. ###P < 0.001 compared to isolation conditioned animals. Bar = 100 μm.
Figure 6Effects of SIS on concentration of TNF-α (A), IL-1β (B), and IL-6 (C) in aorta samples. Values are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10 in each group) results were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. ***P < 0.001 compared to social conditioned animals and ###P < 0.001 compared to isolation conditioned animals.
Figure 7Pre-atherosclerotic changes and intimal/media ratio assessment in social and isolation conditioned animals treated with TAK-242 in comparison to social conditioned animals (40× magnification, A); correlation analysis between the level of lipid profile components and intimal/media ratio (B). Values are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10 in each group) results were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. **P < 0.01 compared to social conditioned animals. #P < 0.01 compared to isolation conditioned animals.
ECG results of normal and socially isolated animals.
| Items | Social condition ( | Social condition + TAK-242 ( | Isolation condition ( | Isolation condition + TAK-242 ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (bpm) | 383 ± 37 | 377 ± 33 | 451 ± 47* | 443 ± 68* |
| PQ (msec) | 45.9 ± 10.3 | 48.6 ± 9.9 | 51.3 ± 12.6 | 47.8 ± 8.1 |
| QRS (msec) | 10.9 ± 0.7 | 11.1 ± 0.7 | 11.1 ± 1.8 | 10.8 ± 1.3 |
| QTc (msec) | 42.7 ± 3.5 | 42.3 ± 2.2 | 41.8 ± 1.8 | 40.8 ± 2.7 |
HR heart rate, bpm beats per minute, msec millisecond. *P < 0.05 compared to social conditioned animals.
Figure 8Signaling pathway involved in pre-atherosclerotic changes triggered by social isolation stress.