Tijn van Diemen1, Daan P J Verberne2, Patrick S J Koomen3, Helma M H Bongers-Janssen3, Ilse J W van Nes3. 1. Department of Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. t.vandiemen@maartenskliniek.nl. 2. Department of Neurorehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Explorative retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Secondary health conditions (SHCs) are common in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). To date, little is known about the effectiveness of long-term follow-up care in preventing SHCs. The objective of this study was to explore the therapeutic content of an interdisciplinary follow-up clinic by retrospective analyses of provided recommendations and collected data concerning SHCs. SETTING: Rehabilitation center Sint Maartenskliniek, The Netherlands. METHODS: All people with SCI, who visited one or more outpatient interdisciplinary follow-up clinics between January 2012 and October 2020 were included in this study. Treatment information was retrieved from their medical records. RESULTS: The 264 participants of the follow-up clinic received, after their first visit, an average of 3.9 recommendations regarding SHCs. Most recommendations were preventive in nature (43%), and were related to physical SHCs (61%). Most recommendations were followed by the participants (34% out of 40% that could be determined) and half of the underlying problems were solved (31% out of 62%). The bodyweight and respiratory function remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: Participants of the interdisciplinary follow-up clinics received extensive recommendations on a variety of subjects, which most likely, reflects the interdisciplinary approach. Recommendations were followed-up to a large extent, resulting in solving half of the underlying SHCs. This way, worse SHCs were prevented by the recommendations. This findings, together with the stability of respiratory function and bodyweight, suggests the added value of the interdisciplinary follow-up clinic to usual care. More prospective research is necessary to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness.
STUDY DESIGN: Explorative retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Secondary health conditions (SHCs) are common in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). To date, little is known about the effectiveness of long-term follow-up care in preventing SHCs. The objective of this study was to explore the therapeutic content of an interdisciplinary follow-up clinic by retrospective analyses of provided recommendations and collected data concerning SHCs. SETTING: Rehabilitation center Sint Maartenskliniek, The Netherlands. METHODS: All people with SCI, who visited one or more outpatient interdisciplinary follow-up clinics between January 2012 and October 2020 were included in this study. Treatment information was retrieved from their medical records. RESULTS: The 264 participants of the follow-up clinic received, after their first visit, an average of 3.9 recommendations regarding SHCs. Most recommendations were preventive in nature (43%), and were related to physical SHCs (61%). Most recommendations were followed by the participants (34% out of 40% that could be determined) and half of the underlying problems were solved (31% out of 62%). The bodyweight and respiratory function remained stable over time. CONCLUSION: Participants of the interdisciplinary follow-up clinics received extensive recommendations on a variety of subjects, which most likely, reflects the interdisciplinary approach. Recommendations were followed-up to a large extent, resulting in solving half of the underlying SHCs. This way, worse SHCs were prevented by the recommendations. This findings, together with the stability of respiratory function and bodyweight, suggests the added value of the interdisciplinary follow-up clinic to usual care. More prospective research is necessary to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness.
Authors: Sonja de Groot; Marcel W M Post; Karin Postma; Tebbe A Sluis; Lucas H V van der Woude Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Rhoda Allison; Laura Shelling; Rachel Dennett; Tim Ayers; Philip H Evans; John L Campbell Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 1.458
Authors: Kelly L Stolzmann; David R Gagnon; Robert Brown; Carlos G Tun; Eric Garshick Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2008-01-17 Impact factor: 21.405