| Literature DB >> 34579658 |
A Garu1, Eri Nitta2, Yuri Yoshida2, Erika Yata2, Akari Tsunematsu2, Tsuyoshi Araki2, Atsushi Nagai1, Shozo Yano3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The reactive hyperemia index (RHI), which is obtained from the measurement of peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT), is highly associated with the percentage change in the end-diastolic arterial diameter (%flow-mediated dilatation) at reactive hyperemia. Low RHI is reported to be a mortality risk in patients with a high risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. CV events are thought to be induced by physical and mental stress, including long-term fatigue and lack of sleep. However, the relationship between fatigue, lack of sleep, and endothelial function has not yet been established.Entities:
Keywords: Fatigue; Peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT); Reactive hyperemia index (RHI); Sleep; Vascular endothelial function
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34579658 PMCID: PMC8474775 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02277-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Comparison between before duty and after duty
| Variables | Before duty | After duty | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| CFQ scale | 9 ± 4 | 17 ± 4 | < 0.05 |
| Sleep duration (h) | 6.0 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 1.0 | < 0.05 |
| VAS scale (%) | 36 ± 16 | 64 ± 12 | < 0.05 |
| RHI | 2.12 ± 0.53 | 1.97 ± 0.50 | 0.21 |
| HR (bpm) | 69 ± 9 | 64 ± 7 | 0.01 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 110 ± 9 | 112 ± 11 | 0.35 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 64 ± 7 | 64 ± 7 | 0.98 |
| SDNN (ms) | 46.59 ± 17.27 | 53.52 ± 15.28 | 0.08 |
| rMSSD (ms) | 40.27 ± 22.37 | 51.63 ± 23.33 | 0.04 |
| NN50 (ms) | 23.32 ± 22.89 | 35.06 ± 22.83 | 0.03 |
| pNN50 (ms) | 0.96 ± 3.80 | 0.12 ± 0.08 | 0.18 |
| LF (ms2) | 12.49 ± 4.51 | 14.16 ± 4.12 | 0.72 |
| HF (ms2) | 116.09 ± 59.44 | 120.92 ± 52.75 | 0.62 |
| LF/HF | 177.97 ± 68.65 | 186.20 ± 70.11 | 0.47 |
| AI (%) | 0.77 ± 0.54 | 0.90 ± 0.91 | 0.33 |
| AI@75 bpm (%) | − 2.54 ± 11.06 | 0.29 ± 13.18 | 0.97 |
Comparison of PAT data of healthy people before and after duty are shown in Table 1. Data are presented here as mean ± standard deviation
AI, augmentation index; AI@75 bpm, augmentation index adjusted at heart rate 75 bpm; CFQ, Chalder Fatigue Question; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HF, high frequency; HR, heart rate; LF, low frequency; LF/HF, the ratio between low-frequency and high-frequency; N, number; VAS, visual analog scale; NN50, number of N–N differing by more than 50 ms; pNN50, NN50 divided by the total number of N–N intervals; RHI, Reactive hyperemia index; rMSSD, root mean squared standard deviation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation; SDNN, standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals
Statistical analysis was done with paired t test, where p < 0.05 was considered as significant
Comparison of sleep, fatigue HRV and AI among RHI three groups
| Variables | RHI | N | Mean | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep duration (h) | Normal | 34 | 4.4 | 2.2 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 4.2 | 2.4 | 0.84 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 0.61 | |
| VAS scale (%) | Normal | 34 | 46 | 21 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 48 | 21 | 0.65 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 59 | 13 | 0.02 | |
| CFQ scale | Normal | 34 | 13 | 6 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 12 | 7 | 0.35 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 14 | 5 | 0.74 | |
| SBP | Normal | 34 | 108 | 9 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 112 | 10 | 0.19 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 114 | 11 | 0.07 | |
| DBP | Normal | 34 | 64 | 8 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 66 | 7 | 0.23 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 63 | 5 | 0.85 | |
| HR | Normal | 34 | 68 | 9 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 65 | 8 | 0.17 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 64 | 6 | 0.09 | |
| SDNN (ms) | Normal | 34 | 46.05 | 16.14 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 52.39 | 12.41 | 0.18 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 54.22 | 20.41 | 0.09 | |
| rMSSD (ms) | Normal | 34 | 40.84 | 19.82 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 46.49 | 16.74 | 0.39 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 53.77 | 32.91 | 0.06 | |
| NN50 (ms) | Normal | 34 | 24.74 | 23.26 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 33.00 | 23.76 | 0.22 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 32.72 | 23.39 | 0.25 | |
| pNN50 (ms) | Normal | 34 | 55.71 | 280.91 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 10.84 | 8.17 | 0.57 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 103.60 | 395.24 | 0.55 | |
| LF (ms2) | Normal | 34 | 109.69 | 64.08 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 138.01 | 52.48 | 0.07 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 113.23 | 37.31 | 0.83 | |
| HF (ms2) | Normal | 34 | 180.30 | 77.14 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 187.03 | 72.97 | 0.73 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 179.49 | 48.35 | 0.97 | |
| LF/HF | Normal | 34 | 0.76 | 0.62 | – |
| Critical value | 20 | 1.03 | 0.94 | 0.20 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.99 | |
| AI (%) | Mild | 33 | − 3.00 | 11.53 | – |
| moderate | 35 | 0.68 | 11.83 | 0.22 | |
| Severe | 5 | − 1.60 | 18.43 | 0.81 | |
| AI@75 bpm (%) | Normal | 34 | − 5.32 | 10.24 | − |
| Critical value | 20 | − 5.20 | 14.20 | 0.97 | |
| Abnormal | 18 | − 10.83 | 9.19 | 0.10 |
Table shows the correlation between different RHI groups and HRV, sleep, and fatigue. Participants were divided into 3 groups by RHI: normal (< 1.67), critical value (1.67–2.07), and abnormal (≥ 2.07) groups. Data are presented here as mean ± standard deviation
AI, augmentation index; AI@75 bpm, augmentation index adjusted at heart rate 75 bpm; CFQ, Chalder Fatigue Question; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HF, high frequency; HR, heart rate; HRV, heart rate variability; LF, low frequency; LF/HF, the ratio between low-frequency and high-frequency; N, number; VAS, visual analog scale; NN50, number of N–N differing by more than 50 ms; pNN50, NN50 divided by the total number of N–N intervals; RHI, Reactive hyperemia index; rMSSD, root mean squared standard deviation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation; SDNN, standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals
Statistical analysis was done with ANOVA test and Fisher's LSD test, where p < 0.05 was considered as significant
Odds ratios in three models of binary logistic regression analysis for low RHI
| Variables | OR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | ||
| VAS scale (%) | 1.04 (1.00–1.07) | 0.026 |
| Model 2 | ||
| VAS scale (%) | 1.03 (1.00–1.07) | 0.044 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 1.03 (0.97–1.09) | 0.303 |
| Model 3 | ||
| VAS scale (%) | 1.03 (1.00–1.07) | 0.056 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 1.04 (0.97–1.10) | 0.267 |
| rMSSD (ms) | 1.02 (0.97–1.06) | 0.431 |
| SDNN (ms) | 0.99 (0.93–1.06) | 0.785 |
| HR (bpm) | 0.97 (0.89–1.06) | 0.501 |
Table shows the participants were divided into 2 groups by RHI: normal (< 1.67), and abnormal (≥ 1.67) groups
CI, confidence interval; HR, heart rate; OR, odds ratio; RHI, Reactive hyperemia index; rMSSD, root mean squared standard deviation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SDNN, standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals; VAS, visual analog scale
Statistical analysis was done with binary logistic regression analysis where p < 0.05 was considered as significant
Fig. 1Relationship between the degree of fatigue and sleep duration in 72 RH-PAT examinations. There was a significant association between sleep and the CFQ scale (a) or VAS scale (b). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05
Fig. 2Relationship between RHI and sleep duration or the degree of fatigue in 72 RH-PAT examinations. No significant association was observed between the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) and sleep duration (a) or CFQ scale (b) in 13 healthy subjects. However, a significant correlation was observed between the RHI and VAS scale (c). A linear regression line is shown (p < 0.05, considered significant)
A multiple linear regression analysis for RHI
| Variables | Beta | SE | Standard beta | VIF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | |||||
| SBP (mmHg) | − 0.01 | 0.01 | − 0.21 | 0.071 | 1.04 |
| VAS scale (%) | − 0.01 | 0.00 | − 0.25 | 0.034 | 1.04 |
| Model 2 | |||||
| SBP (mmHg) | − 0.01 | 0.01 | − 0.26 | 0.026 | 1.07 |
| SDNN (ms) | − 0.01 | 0.01 | − 0.16 | 0.371 | 2.63 |
| rMSSD (ms) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.703 | 2.80 |
| HR (bpm) | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.017 | 1.19 |
| VAS scale (%) | − 0.01 | 0.00 | − 0.19 | 0.100 | 1.10 |
Table shows the participants were divided into 2 groups by RHI: normal (< 1.67), and abnormal (≥ 1.67) groups
HR, heart rate; RHI, Reactive hyperemia index; rMSSD, root mean squared standard deviation; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SDNN, standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals; SE, standard error; VAS, visual analog scale; VIF, variance inflation factor
Statistical analysis was done with multiple linear regression analysis where p < 0.05 was considered as significant