| Literature DB >> 34576964 |
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the bioactive compounds in artichoke (Cynara scolymus) powder, having antioxidant and antimicrobial activity, and to determine the effectiveness of artichoke (C. scolymus) powder extract within the minced meat. C. scolymus was extracted using two different methods. The method incorporating high phenolic and flavonoid content levels was used in other analyses and the phenolic and flavonoid contents in C. scolymus extract was determined using LC-QTOF-MS. Antioxidant, antimicrobial, and metmyoglobin (metMb) reducing activities and pH values of the extract-added minced meat samples were measured for 10 days during storage. DPPH, FRAP, and ABTS were used in the antioxidant analyses. The antimicrobial activity of C. scolymus extract was evaluated on five different food pathogens by using the disc diffusion method. The most resistant bacterium was found to be Listeria monocytogenes (18.05 mm ± 0.24). The amount of metMb was measured in the minced meat sample that was added to the extract during storage (p < 0.05). MetMb formation and pH value on the sixth day of storage were found to be at lower levels than in the control group. In conclusion, C. scolymus exhibited a good antimicrobial and antioxidant effect and can be used in storing and packaging the food products, especially the meat and meat products.Entities:
Keywords: C. scolymus; antimicrobial activity; antioxidant activity; food quality; functional food; meat quality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34576964 PMCID: PMC8470805 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26185494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Total phenolic and total flavonoid compounds.
| Method of Extract. | Total Phenolic Compounds | Total Flavonoid Compounds |
|---|---|---|
| Method 1 | 17.37 ± 0.07 aB | 6.45 ± 0.03 bB |
| Method 2 | 98.26 ± 0.05 aA | 19.74 ± 0.04 bA |
a,b: Means followed by different letters within the same line represent significant differences (p < 0.05). A,B: Means followed by different letters within the same column represent significant differences. Data are the average of triplicates.
Figure 1LC-QTOF-MS (a) photodiode array detector analysis spectra (b) MS spectra analysis of C. scolymus powder extracts.
Method calibration and validation parameters for analysis of the phenolic standards.
| Peak No | Phenolic Compounds | Rt (min) | Observed m/z | Recovery (%) | Rec.RSD (%) | R2 | LOD (µg/mL) | LOQ (µg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3,4,5-Trihydroxybenzoic acid | 0.475 | 400.1022 | 90.28 ± 2.24 | 1.76 | 0.9967 | 0.07 | 0.18 |
|
| 0.850 | 455.1171 | 88.27 ± 4.37 | 3.42 | 0.9996 | 0.11 | 0.35 | |
|
| 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzoic acid | 1.18 | 388.2636 | 90.51 ± 2.10 | 1.63 | 0.9985 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
|
| 3,5-Dimethoxy-4-hydroxybenzoic acid | 1.75 | 392.2331 | 90.38 ± 2.16 | 1.69 | 0.9967 | 0.06 | 0.16 |
|
| 1.9 | 371.1338 | 90.53 ± 2.03 | 1.58 | 0.9988 | 0.06 | 0.13 | |
|
| p-Coumaroyl- | 2.02 | 266.2013 | 90.99 ± 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.9978 | 0.005 | 0.01 |
|
| 1,4,5-Trihydroxycyclohexanecarboxylic acid 3-(3,4-dihydroxycinnamate) | 2.75 | 481.1711 | 85.18 ± 6.27 | 4.92 | 0.9994 | 0.15 | 0.51 |
|
| (+)-Catechin | 2.83 | 461.1035 | 87.32 ± 4.90 | 3.85 | 0.9991 | 0.12 | 0.42 |
|
| (−)-Epigallocatechin | 2.93 | 423.1521 | 89.39 ± 3.33 | 2.61 | 0.9967 | 0.08 | 0.27 |
|
| p-Coumaroyl- | 3.04 | 362.2082 | 90.70 ± 1.49 | 1.17 | 0.9980 | 0.05 | 0.11 |
|
| 3.62 | 298.1291 | 90.83 ± 1.30 | 1.00 | 0.9985 | 0.03 | 0.07 | |
|
| 4.33 | 466.1588 | 85.96 ± 5.88 | 4.61 | 0.9964 | 0.13 | 0.48 | |
|
| p-Coumaroyl- | 4.52 | 403.1022 | 90.04 ± 2.67 | 2.09 | 0.9985 | 0.07 | 0.20 |
|
| 4′,5,7-Trihydroxyflavone | 5.36 | 321.3371 | 90.77 ± 1.41 | 1.09 | 0.9980 | 0.04 | 0.09 |
|
| p-Coumaroyl- | 5.92 | 286.3122 | 90.90 ± 0.88 | 0.68 | 0.9966 | 0.01 | 0.06 |
|
| 7-neohesperidoside | 6.65 | 448.1822 | 88.53 ± 3.94 | 3.11 | 0.9973 | 0.10 | 0.35 |
|
| 2-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one | 7.97 | 488.1088 | 84.95 ± 6.52 | 5.11 | 0.9973 | 0.15 | 0.52 |
|
| 3,4′,5-Trihydroxy- | 8.5 | 411.2633 | 89.74 ± 3.20 | 2.49 | 0.9988 | 0.08 | 0.22 |
|
| p-Coumaroyl- | 8.84 | 273.1023 | 90.95 ± 0.63 | 0.49 | 0.9985 | 0.01 | 0.04 |
LOD: limit of detection; LOQ: limit of quantification; Rec.: recovery; RSD: relative standard deviation.
Figure 2Correlation matrix of the obtained phenolic compound compositions.
Antimicrobial activity of the added C. scolymus powder on meat extract solution.
| Treatments | Inhibition Zone (mm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Added | 19.74 ± 0.08 cB | 19.75 ± 1.09 cC | 17.32 ± 0.83 dB | 29.33 ± 1.13 aB | 25.20 ± 0.95 bB |
| Added + | 20.07 ± 0.66 cB | 21.10 ± 0.92 cB | 18.05 ± 0.45 dB | 30.95 ± 0.88 aB | 25.37 ± 0.53 bB |
| Control(+) | 29.00 ± 1.41 bA | 30.00 ± 0.46 bA | 27.00 ± 0.95 cA | 32.00 ± 0.62 aA | 31.50 ± 1.15 aA |
| Control(−) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Values are expressed as means ± SD. Standard disk; 6mm, control(+); ampicillin, control(−); distilled water, a,b,c,d: Means followed by different letters within the same line represent significant differences (p < 0.05). A,B,C: Means followed by different letters within the same column represent significant differences. Data are the average of triplicates.
Figure 3The antioxidant activity of control and marinated meat samples (DPPH assay).
Figure 4The antioxidant activity of control and marinated meat samples (ABTS assay).
Figure 5The antioxidant activity of control and marinated meat samples (FRAP assay).
Figure 6MetMb (%) and pH changes in meat samples marinated with C. scolymus powder.
Effect from different references of artichoke (C. scolymus) powder on the quality performances on meat products.
| Added-Extract | Foodstuffs | Storage Period | Quality Measurements | Results | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artichoke ( | Minced Meat on the During Frozen Storage | 10 days |
Antioxidant Activity (DPPH, FRAP, ABTS) Antimicrobial Activity metMb Reducing Activity | A potential to improve the meat quality | In this study |
| Artichoke ( | Meat Quality of Japanese Quail | 21 days |
TBARS WHC | A potential to improve the oxidative stability and meat quality | [ |
| Artichoke ( | Frozen Meat Quality of Japanese Quail | 21 days |
TBARS WHC | A potential to improve the oxidative stability and meat quality | [ |
| Artichoke ( | Chicken thigh meat | 35 days |
Antioxidant activity (DPPH) | Decreases GPx and CAT activities in | [ |
| Artichoke ( | Raw beef patties during refrigerated storage | 7 days |
Antioxidant activity (DPPH) TBARS | As natural antioxidant in meat products | [ |
TBARS: 2-thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance, WHC: Water holding capacity, GPx: glutathione peroxidase, CAT: catalase.
Color parameters (L*, a*, b*) of minced meat samples during storage.
| Storage Period | Storage Period | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Day 0 | 35.62 ± 0.32 aB | 14.67 ± 0.48 bA | 15.03 ± 0.57 bA |
| Added | 36.84 ± 0.51 aA | 15.12 ± 0.37 bA | 15.92 ± 0.63 bA | |
| Control | Day 3 | 35.74 ± 0.43 aB | 12.28 ± 0.51 bA | 14.22 ± 0.39 bA |
| Added | 36.21 ± 0.31 aA | 12.88 ± 0.31 bA | 14.20 ± 0.46 bA | |
| Control | Day 6 | 37.13 ± 0.46 aA | 10.67 ± 0.54 bB | 13.44 ± 0.63 bB |
| Added | 35.24 ± 0.36 aB | 10.75 ± 0.49 bB | 12.88 ± 0.38 bB | |
| Control | Day 10 | 38.56 ± 0.34 aA | 9.93 ± 0.48 bB | 12.82 ± 0.51 bB |
| Added | 34.88 ± 0.38 aB | 10.13 ± 0.56 bB | 12.11 ± 0.34 bB |
a,b: Means followed by different letters within the same line represent significant differences (p < 0.05). A,B: Means followed by different letters within the same column represent significant differences. Data are the average of triplicates.