| Literature DB >> 34572556 |
Eka Metreveli1, Tamar Khardziani1, Vladimir Elisashvili1.
Abstract
In the present study, the polysaccharide-hydrolyzing secretomes of Irpex lacteus (Fr.) Fr. (1828) BCC104, Pycnoporus coccineus (Fr.) Bondartsev and Singer (1941) BCC310, and Schizophyllum commune Fr. (1815) BCC632 were analyzed in submerged fermentation conditions to elucidate the effect of chemically and structurally different carbon sources on the expression of cellulases and xylanase. Among polymeric substrates, crystalline cellulose appeared to be the best carbon source providing the highest endoglucanase, total cellulase, and xylanase activities. Mandarin pomace as a growth substrate for S. commune allowed to achieve comparatively high volumetric activities of all target enzymes while wheat straw induced a significant secretion of cellulase and xylanase activities of I. lacteus and P. coccineus. An additive effect on the secretion of cellulases and xylanases by the tested fungi was observed when crystalline cellulose was combined with mandarin pomace. In I. lacteus the cellulase and xylanase production is inducible in the presence of cellulose-rich substrates but is suppressed in the presence of an excess of easily metabolizable carbon source. These enzymes are expressed in a coordinated manner under all conditions studied. It was shown that the substitution of glucose in the inoculum medium with Avicel provides accelerated enzyme production by I. lacteus and higher cellulase and xylanase activities of the fungus. These results add new knowledge to the physiology of basidiomycetes to improve cellulase production.Entities:
Keywords: carbon source; cellulase; regulation of synthesis; saccharification; wood-rotting basidiomycetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34572556 PMCID: PMC8466102 DOI: 10.3390/biom11091341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Modulation of basidiomycetes hydrolytic enzyme activity by chemically different growth substrates.
| Growth Substrate | Final | CMCase (U/mL) | Xylanase | FPA | β-Glucosidase | β-Xylosidase (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 1.5% Avicel | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 63 ± 6.011 * | 31 ± 3.814 * | 4.6 ± 0.514 * | 3.6 ± 0.311 * | 0.06 ± 0.0111 * |
| 4% mandarin squeeze (MS) | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 19 ± 2.111 | 14 ± 1.18 | 2.2 ± 0.28 | 2.2 ± 0.28 | 0.05 ± 06 |
| 4% wheat straw (WS) | 6.2 ± 0.1 | 22 ± 1.411 | 18 ± 1.211 | 1.9 ± 0.28 | 1.5 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 06 |
| 1.5% Avicel + 4% MS | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 82 ± 8.314 | 65 ± 5.811 | 5.7 ± 0.611 | 3.3 ± 0.38 | 0.12 ± 0.0111 |
| 4% WS +4% MS | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 27 ± 2.411 | 19 ± 1.711 | 2.2 ± 0.311 | 1.6 ± 0.26 | 0.05 ± 0.016 |
|
| ||||||
| 1.5% Avicel | 6.1 ± 0.1 | 39 ± 4.314 | 626 ± 7814 | 2.1 ± 0.311 | 10.7 ± 0.814 | 0.12 ± 0.0114 |
| 4% MS | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 23 ± 3.011 | 531 ± 968 | 3.0 ± 0.311 | 10.1 ± 0.914 | 0.15 ± 0.0214 |
| 4% WS | 6.8 ± 0.1 | 8 ± 1.014 | 120 ± 1014 | 1.3 ± 0.114 | 3.8 ± 0.314 | 0.07 ± 0.0114 |
| 1.5% Avicel + 4% MS | 6.3 ± 0.1 | 39 ± 2.911 | 740 ± 8014 | 4.2 ± 0.414 | 18.6 ± 2.014 | 0.31 ± 0.0314 |
| 4% WS + 4% MS | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 14 ± 1.311 | 528 ± 596 | 2.2 ± 0.214 | 5.9 ± 0.414 | 0.07 ± 0.0111 |
|
| ||||||
| 1.5% Avicel | 5.4 ± 0.1 | 54 ± 6.611 | 67 ± 8.111 | 5.1 ± 0.411 | 1.4 ± 0.1211 | 0.02 ± 06 |
| 4% MS | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 18 ± 1.48 | 20 ± 1.711 | 1.9 ± 0.28 | 1.1 ± 0.128 | 0.02 ± 06 |
| 4% WS | 6.2 ± 0 | 23 ± 2.011 | 29 ± 1.48 | 2.3 ± 0.211 | 1.0 ± 0.118 | 0.05 ± 0.018 |
| 1.5% Avicel + 4% MS | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 76 ± 9.011 | 106 ± 8.614 | 6.8 ± 0.511 | 2.3 ± 0.278 | 0.08 ± 0.018 |
| 4% WS + 4% MS | 6.3 ± 0.2 | 40 ± 4.78 | 34 ± 2.18 | 2.5 ± 0.38 | 1.6 ± 0.198 | 0.05 ± 0.016 |
* The numbers indicate the days of the peak activity.
Figure 1Effect of glycerol (G) as an additional carbon source on the production of endoglucanase (A) and xylanase (B) during submerged fermentation of Avicel by I. lacteus.
Effect of the carbon source in the inoculum medium on the enzyme activity of I. lacteus.
| Growth | Final | CMCase | Xylanase (U/mL) | β-Glucosidase (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The inoculum was grown in the presence of glucose | ||||
| Avicel | 5.4 ± 0.1 | 52.6 ± 6.111 * | 71.0 ± 6.111 * | 1.65 ± 0.208 * |
| Mandarin squeeze | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 11.0 ± 0.98 | 23.8 ± 2.214 | 0.87 ± 0.068 |
| Wheat bran | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 17.4 ± 1.611 | 45.2 ± 5.611 | 1.18 ± 0.168 |
| Wheat straw | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 29.4 ± 3.911 | 39.1 ± 3.411 | 1.34 ± 0.148 |
| Beech sawdust | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.211 | 10.3 ± 1.214 | 0.21 ± 0.0311 |
| The inoculum was grown in the presence of Avicel | ||||
| Avicel | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 72.6 ± 8.06 | 106.5 ± 9.411 | 2.84 ± 0.218 |
| Mandarin squeeze | 7.0 ± 0.1 | 14.2 ± 1.16 | 24.5 ± 1.98 | 0.82 ± 0.0611 |
| Wheat bran | 6.0 ± 0.1 | 24.5 ± 2.011 | 67.2 ± 6.011 | 1.46 ± 0.1611 |
| Wheat straw | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 46.5 ± 3.46 | 63.2 ± 7.18 | 2.08 ± 0.178 |
| Beech sawdust | 6.1 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.46 | 8.2 ± 1.18 | 0.38 ± 0.0311 |
* The numbers indicate the days of the peak activity.
Figure 2Kinetics of CMCase, xylanase, and FPA accumulation in I. lacteus cultivation in fermenter.
Figure 3Accumulation of reducing sugars during hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw (WS) using I. lacteus (1–3) and commercial (4) enzyme preparations. Enzyme load–20 U/g substrate. 1–10 mg WS; 2, 4–20 mg WS; 3–40 mg WS.