Literature DB >> 34571211

Good Engraftment but Quality and Donor Concerns for Cryopreserved Hemopoietic Progenitor Cell Products Collected During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Duncan Purtill1, Cheryl Hutchins2, Glen Kennedy2, Andrea McClean2, Chris Fraser3, Peter J Shaw4, Paul Chiappini5, Helen Tao6, David Df Ma7, Karieshma Kabani8, Lijun Bai9, Matthew Greenwood10, Ashish Bajel11, Elizabeth O'Flaherty12, David J Curtis13, Leanne Purins14, Travis Perera15, Sarah Tan16, Andrew Butler17, Ken Micklethwaite18, Vicki Antonenas19, David Gottlieb20, Nada Hamad7.   

Abstract

Changes to donor availability, collection center capacity, and travel restrictions during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic led to routine cryopreservation of most unrelated donor products for hematopoietic transplantation prior to the recipient commencing the conditioning regimen. We investigated the effect of this change on unrelated donor product quality and clinical outcomes. Product information was requested from transplantation centers in Australia and New Zealand and clinical outcome data from the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR). In total, 191 products were collected between April 1, 2021, and September 30, 2021, and most (74%) were from international collection centers. Median post-thaw CD34 recovery was 78% (range 25% to 176%) and median post-thaw CD34 viability was 87% (range 34% to 112%). Median time to neutrophil recovery was 17 days (interquartile range 10 to 24 days), and graft failure occurred in 6 patients (4%). These clinical outcomes were similar to those of "fresh" unrelated donor transplants reported to the ABMTRR in 2019. However, recipient transplantation centers reported problems with 29% of products in the form of damage during transit, low cell dose, inadequate labeling, missing representative samples, or missing documentation. These problems were critical in 7 cases (4%). At last follow-up, 22 products (12%) had not been infused. Routine cryopreservation of unrelated donor hemopoietic progenitor cell products has enabled safe continuation of allogeneic transplant services during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, practices for product tracing, documentation, and transportation can be optimized, and measures to reduce the incidence of unused unrelated donor product are required. Crown
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Cryopreservation; Donor; Engraftment; Stem cell quality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34571211     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther        ISSN: 2666-6367


  3 in total

1.  Effect of Cryopreservation in Unrelated Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Update from the Japan Marrow Donor Program.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Kanda; Noriko Doki; Minoru Kojima; Shinichi Kako; Masami Inoue; Naoyuki Uchida; Yasushi Onishi; Reiko Kamata; Mika Kotaki; Ryoji Kobayashi; Junji Tanaka; Takahiro Fukuda; Nobuharu Fujii; Koichi Miyamura; Shin-Ichiro Mori; Yasuo Mori; Yasuo Morishima; Hiromasa Yabe; Yoshiko Atsuta; Yoshihisa Kodera
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 2.  Impact of Cryopreservation and Freeze-Thawing on Therapeutic Properties of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells and Other Common Cellular Therapeutics.

Authors:  Chasen Cottle; Amanda Paige Porter; Ariel Lipat; Caitlin Turner-Lyles; Jimmy Nguyen; Guido Moll; Raghavan Chinnadurai
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Rep       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 3.  Secondary Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 19 Pandemic on Patients and the Cellular Therapy Healthcare Ecosystem.

Authors:  Jane Koo; Jeffrey J Auletta; David M Hartley; John Huber; Samantha Jaglowski; Malika Kapadia; Katilyn Kusnier; Leslie Lehmann; Joseph Maakaron; Kasiani C Myers; Ahna Pai; Loretta Parker; Rachel Phelan; Christine Sper; Seth J Rotz; Christopher E Dandoy
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2022-07-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.