Literature DB >> 34571193

Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: addressing and reporting sources of bias in randomized controlled trials.

Daniel Kotz1, Robert West2.   

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials are widely considered the most robust design for evaluating the effects of clinical interventions. While generalisability is often limited, randomization aims to ensure that effects observed are genuine. However, there are common sources of bias, even in well-conducted trials, that pose a threat to this interpretation. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for trials (RoB 2) distinguishes five domains of bias that can affect the results of trials stemming from (1) the randomization process, (2) deviations from intended interventions, (3) missing outcome data, (4) outcome measurement, and (5) reporting of findings. We use RoB 2 as a framework for recommendations to help researchers mitigate these sources of bias and ensure transparency in reporting so that users of research are aware of them.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; Internal validity; Randomized controlled trial; Reporting; Research transparency

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34571193     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  1 in total

1.  Potential Explanations for Conflicting Findings on Abrupt Versus Gradual Smoking Cessation: A Population Study in England.

Authors:  Claire Garnett; Jamie Brown; Lion Shahab; Tobias Raupach; Nicola Lindson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.244

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.