V Tcherbbis Testa1, S Jaimovich2, R Argañaraz2, B Mantese2. 1. Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Hospital de Pediatría SAMIC "Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan", Buenos Aires, Argentina. victoriatt89@gmail.com. 2. Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Hospital de Pediatría SAMIC "Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Management of ventriculomegaly in pediatric patients with syndromic craniosynostosis (SC) requires understanding the underlying mechanisms that cause increased intracranial pressure (ICP) and the role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in cranial vault expansion in order to select the best treatment option for each individual patient. METHODS: A total of 33 pediatric patients with SC requiring craniofacial surgery were retrospectively evaluated. Cases of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and shunt-induced craniosynostosis were excluded. Six syndrome-based categories were distinguished: Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Apert syndrome, cloverleaf skull syndrome, and others (Muenke syndrome, Sensenbrenner syndrome, unclassified). All of the patients were treated surgically for their cranial deformity between 2010 and 2016. The presence of ventriculomegaly and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt requirement with its impact in cranial vault expansion were analyzed. Clinical and neuroimaging studies covering the time from presentation through the follow-up period were revised. The mean postoperative follow-up was 6 years and 3 months. A systematic review of the literature was conducted through a PubMed search. RESULTS: Of the total of 33 patients with SC, 18 (54.5%) developed ventriculomegaly and 13 (39.4%) required ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement. Six patients (18.2%) required shunt placement previous to craniofacial surgery. Seven patients (21.2%) required a shunt after craniofacial surgery. Seven fixed pressure ventriculoperitoneal shunts and six programmable valves were placed as first choice. All patients improved their clinical symptoms after shunt placement. Aesthetic results seemed to be better in patients with programmable shunts. CONCLUSIONS: Unless clear criteria for overt hydrocephalus are present, it is recommended to perform craniofacial surgery as a first step in the management of patients with SC in order to preserve the expansive effect of CSF for cranial vault expansion. In our experience, the use of externally programmable valves allows for the treatment of hydrocephalus while maintaining the expansive effect of CSF for the remodeling of the cranial vault. Prospective evaluations are needed to determine causality.
INTRODUCTION: Management of ventriculomegaly in pediatric patients with syndromic craniosynostosis (SC) requires understanding the underlying mechanisms that cause increased intracranial pressure (ICP) and the role of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in cranial vault expansion in order to select the best treatment option for each individual patient. METHODS: A total of 33 pediatric patients with SC requiring craniofacial surgery were retrospectively evaluated. Cases of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and shunt-induced craniosynostosis were excluded. Six syndrome-based categories were distinguished: Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Apert syndrome, cloverleaf skull syndrome, and others (Muenke syndrome, Sensenbrenner syndrome, unclassified). All of the patients were treated surgically for their cranial deformity between 2010 and 2016. The presence of ventriculomegaly and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt requirement with its impact in cranial vault expansion were analyzed. Clinical and neuroimaging studies covering the time from presentation through the follow-up period were revised. The mean postoperative follow-up was 6 years and 3 months. A systematic review of the literature was conducted through a PubMed search. RESULTS: Of the total of 33 patients with SC, 18 (54.5%) developed ventriculomegaly and 13 (39.4%) required ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement. Six patients (18.2%) required shunt placement previous to craniofacial surgery. Seven patients (21.2%) required a shunt after craniofacial surgery. Seven fixed pressure ventriculoperitoneal shunts and six programmable valves were placed as first choice. All patients improved their clinical symptoms after shunt placement. Aesthetic results seemed to be better in patients with programmable shunts. CONCLUSIONS: Unless clear criteria for overt hydrocephalus are present, it is recommended to perform craniofacial surgery as a first step in the management of patients with SC in order to preserve the expansive effect of CSF for cranial vault expansion. In our experience, the use of externally programmable valves allows for the treatment of hydrocephalus while maintaining the expansive effect of CSF for the remodeling of the cranial vault. Prospective evaluations are needed to determine causality.