Literature DB >> 34570180

Effect of Methylphenidate on Apathy in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: The ADMET 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jacobo Mintzer1, Krista L Lanctôt2, Roberta W Scherer3, Paul B Rosenberg4, Nathan Herrmann2, Christopher H van Dyck5, Prasad R Padala6, Olga Brawman-Mintzer1, Anton P Porsteinsson7, Alan J Lerner8, Suzanne Craft9, Allan I Levey10, William Burke11, Jamie Perin3, David Shade3.   

Abstract

Importance: Apathy, characterized by diminished will or initiative and one of the most prevalent neuropsychiatric symptoms in individuals with Alzheimer disease, is associated with significant caregiver burden, excess disability, increased medical costs, and mortality. Objective: To measure whether methylphenidate compared with placebo decreases the severity of apathy in individuals with Alzheimer disease. Design, Setting, and participants: This multicenter randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted from August 2016 to July 2020 in 9 US clinics and 1 Canadian clinic specializing in dementia care. A total of 307 potential participants were screened. Of those, 52 did not pass screening and 55 were not eligible. Participants with Alzheimer disease, mild to moderate cognitive impairment, and frequent and/or severe apathy as measured by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) were included. Interventions: Ten milligrams of methylphenidate, twice daily, vs matching placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coprimary outcomes included (1) change from baseline to 6 months in the NPI apathy subscale or (2) improved rating on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change. Other outcomes include safety, change in cognition, and quality of life.
Results: Of 200 participants, 99 were assigned to methylphenidate and 101 to placebo. The median (interquartile range) age of study participants was 76 (71-81) years; 68 (34%) were female and 131 (66%) were male. A larger decrease was found from baseline to 6 months in the NPI apathy score in those receiving methylphenidate compared with placebo (mean difference, -1.25; 95% CI, -2.03 to -0.47; P = .002). The largest decrease in the NPI apathy score was observed in the first 100 days, with a significant hazard ratio for the proportion of participants with no apathy symptoms receiving methylphenidate compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.19-3.91; P = .01). At 6 months, the odds ratio of having an improved rating on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change for methylphenidate compared with placebo was 1.90 (95% CI, 0.95-3.84; P = .07). The difference in mean change from baseline to 6 months estimated using a longitudinal model was 1.43 (95% CI, 1.00-2.04; P = .048). Cognitive measures and quality of life were not significantly different between groups. Of the 17 serious adverse events that occurred during the study, none were related to the study drug. No significant differences in the safety profile were noted between treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found methylphenidate to be a safe and efficacious medication to use in the treatment of apathy in Alzheimer disease. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02346201.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34570180      PMCID: PMC8477302          DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Neurol        ISSN: 2168-6149            Impact factor:   29.907


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological Management of Apathy in Dementia.

Authors:  Laiba Azhar; Raphael W Kusumo; Giovanni Marotta; Krista L Lanctôt; Nathan Herrmann
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Disease modification is not all - we need symptomatic therapies for Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cummings
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Efficacy of methylphenidate for the treatment of apathy in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Kuo-Chuan Hung; Chia-Wei Lee; Jui-Yi Chen; Ching-Chung Ko; Min-Hsiang Chuang; Wen-Wen Tsai
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 4.415

Review 4.  Emotion Processing Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: An Overview of Behavioral Findings, Systems Neural Correlates, and Underlying Neural Biology.

Authors:  Shefali Chaudhary; Simon Zhornitsky; Herta H Chao; Christopher H van Dyck; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.632

Review 5.  New approaches for the quantification and targeting of noradrenergic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Michael David; Paresh A Malhotra
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.511

6.  Cognitive and neuropsychiatric effects of noradrenergic treatment in Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael C B David; Martina Del Giovane; Kathy Y Liu; Benjamin Gostick; James Benedict Rowe; Imafidon Oboh; Robert Howard; Paresh A Malhotra
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 13.654

7.  Rosmarinus officinalis and Methylphenidate Exposure Improves Cognition and Depression and Regulates Anxiety-Like Behavior in AlCl3-Induced Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Nishat Malik; Sanila Amber; Saadia Zahid
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 5.988

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.