Zaza Katsarava1,2,3,4, Tamar Akhvlediani5, Tamar Janelidze1, Tamar Gudadze1, Marina Todua1, Kakhaber Akhvlediani6, Mirza Khinikadze1,7,6,8, Giorgi Egutidze9, Temur Margania10, Alexander Tsiskaridze7,6,11,12. 1. Evex Medical Corporation, Tbilisi, Georgia. 2. Evangelical Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 4. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation. 5. American MD Program, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia. 6. Tbilisi Institute of Medicine, Tbilisi, Georgia. 7. Pineo Medical Ecosystem, Tbilisi, Georgia. 8. New Vision University, Tbilisi, Georgia. 9. K. Eristavi National Center of Surgery, Tbilisi, Georgia. 10. New Hospital, Tbilisi, Georgia. 11. Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia. 12. Georgian Stroke Association, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This article summarizes the medical experience in establishing stroke units and systemic thrombolysis in Georgia, which, like many other post-Soviet countries, still faces problems in organizing stroke care even after 30 years of independence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We created an example of treating acute stroke with systemic thrombolysis and introduced stroke units in several hospitals in the country, including standardization of the diagnostic and treatment process, consistent evaluation, and monthly feedback to the stroke unit staff. RESULTS: Systemic thrombolysis has become a clinical routine in some large hospitals and is meanwhile reimbursed by the state insurance. The data of consecutive 1,707 stroke patients in 4 major cities demonstrated significant time lost at the prehospital level, due to failure in identifying stroke symptoms, delay in notification, or transportation. The consequent quality reports resulted in a dramatic increase in adherence to the European and national guidelines. A mandatory dysphagia screening and subsequent treatment led to a decrease in pneumonia rates. DISCUSSION: We discuss our experience and suggestions on how to overcome clinical, financial, and ethical problems in establishing a stroke services in a developing country. CONCLUSION: The Georgian example might be useful for doctors in other post-Soviet countries or other parts of the world.
INTRODUCTION: This article summarizes the medical experience in establishing stroke units and systemic thrombolysis in Georgia, which, like many other post-Soviet countries, still faces problems in organizing stroke care even after 30 years of independence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We created an example of treating acute stroke with systemic thrombolysis and introduced stroke units in several hospitals in the country, including standardization of the diagnostic and treatment process, consistent evaluation, and monthly feedback to the stroke unit staff. RESULTS: Systemic thrombolysis has become a clinical routine in some large hospitals and is meanwhile reimbursed by the state insurance. The data of consecutive 1,707 stroke patients in 4 major cities demonstrated significant time lost at the prehospital level, due to failure in identifying stroke symptoms, delay in notification, or transportation. The consequent quality reports resulted in a dramatic increase in adherence to the European and national guidelines. A mandatory dysphagia screening and subsequent treatment led to a decrease in pneumonia rates. DISCUSSION: We discuss our experience and suggestions on how to overcome clinical, financial, and ethical problems in establishing a stroke services in a developing country. CONCLUSION: The Georgian example might be useful for doctors in other post-Soviet countries or other parts of the world.