AIMS: Atrial septal defects (ASD) are associated with atrial arrhythmias, but the arrhythmia substrate in these patients is poorly defined. We hypothesized that bi-atrial fibrosis is present and that right atrial fibrosis is associated with atrial arrhythmias in ASD patients. We aimed to evaluate the extent of bi-atrial fibrosis in ASD patients and to investigate the relationships between bi-atrial fibrosis, atrial arrhythmias, shunt fraction, and age. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with uncorrected secundum ASDs (n = 36; 50.4 ± 13.6 years) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with atrial late gadolinium enhancement. Comparison was made to non-congenital heart disease patients (n = 36; 60.3 ± 10.5 years) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiac magnetic resonance parameters associated with atrial arrhythmias were identified and the relationship between bi-atrial structure, age, and shunt fraction studied. Bi-atrial fibrosis burden was greater in ASD patients than paroxysmal AF patients (20.7 ± 14% vs. 10.1 ± 8.6% and 14.8 ± 8.5% vs. 8.6 ± 6.1% for right and left atria respectively, P = 0.001 for both). In ASD patients, right atrial fibrosis burden was greater in those with than without atrial arrhythmias (33.4 ± 18.7% vs. 16.8 ± 10.3%, P = 0.034). On receiver operating characteristic analysis, a right atrial fibrosis burden of 32% had a 92% specificity and 71% sensitivity for predicting the presence of atrial arrhythmias. Neither age nor shunt fraction was associated with bi-atrial fibrosis burden. CONCLUSION: Bi-atrial fibrosis burden is greater in ASD patients than non-congenital heart disease patients with paroxysmal AF. Right atrial fibrosis is associated with the presence of atrial arrhythmias in ASD patients. These findings highlight the importance of right atrial fibrosis to atrial arrhythmogenesis in ASD patients.
AIMS: Atrial septal defects (ASD) are associated with atrial arrhythmias, but the arrhythmia substrate in these patients is poorly defined. We hypothesized that bi-atrial fibrosis is present and that right atrial fibrosis is associated with atrial arrhythmias in ASD patients. We aimed to evaluate the extent of bi-atrial fibrosis in ASD patients and to investigate the relationships between bi-atrial fibrosis, atrial arrhythmias, shunt fraction, and age. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with uncorrected secundum ASDs (n = 36; 50.4 ± 13.6 years) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with atrial late gadolinium enhancement. Comparison was made to non-congenital heart disease patients (n = 36; 60.3 ± 10.5 years) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Cardiac magnetic resonance parameters associated with atrial arrhythmias were identified and the relationship between bi-atrial structure, age, and shunt fraction studied. Bi-atrial fibrosis burden was greater in ASD patients than paroxysmal AF patients (20.7 ± 14% vs. 10.1 ± 8.6% and 14.8 ± 8.5% vs. 8.6 ± 6.1% for right and left atria respectively, P = 0.001 for both). In ASD patients, right atrial fibrosis burden was greater in those with than without atrial arrhythmias (33.4 ± 18.7% vs. 16.8 ± 10.3%, P = 0.034). On receiver operating characteristic analysis, a right atrial fibrosis burden of 32% had a 92% specificity and 71% sensitivity for predicting the presence of atrial arrhythmias. Neither age nor shunt fraction was associated with bi-atrial fibrosis burden. CONCLUSION: Bi-atrial fibrosis burden is greater in ASD patients than non-congenital heart disease patients with paroxysmal AF. Right atrial fibrosis is associated with the presence of atrial arrhythmias in ASD patients. These findings highlight the importance of right atrial fibrosis to atrial arrhythmogenesis in ASD patients.
Authors: Bobby John; Martin K Stiles; Pawel Kuklik; Sunil T Chandy; Glenn D Young; Lorraine Mackenzie; Lukasz Szumowski; George Joseph; Jacob Jose; Stephen G Worthley; Jonathan M Kalman; Prashanthan Sanders Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Irfan M Khurram; Mohammadali Habibi; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Jonathan Chrispin; Eunice Yang; Kotaro Fukumoto; Jane Dewire; David D Spragg; Joseph E Marine; Ronald D Berger; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Jack Rickard; Yiyi Zhang; Vadim Zipunnikov; Stefan L Zimmerman; Hugh Calkins; Saman Nazarian Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-01-06
Authors: Nassir F Marrouche; David Wilber; Gerhard Hindricks; Pierre Jais; Nazem Akoum; Francis Marchlinski; Eugene Kholmovski; Nathan Burgon; Nan Hu; Lluis Mont; Thomas Deneke; Mattias Duytschaever; Thomas Neumann; Moussa Mansour; Christian Mahnkopf; Bengt Herweg; Emile Daoud; Erik Wissner; Paul Bansmann; Johannes Brachmann Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Louisa O'Neill; Rashed Karim; Rahul K Mukherjee; John Whitaker; Iain Sim; James Harrison; Orod Razeghi; Steven Niederer; Tevfik Ismail; Matthew Wright; Mark D O'Neill; Steven E Williams Journal: Europace Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Louisa O'Neill; Iain Sim; Daniel O'Hare; John Whitaker; Rahul K Mukherjee; Steven Niederer; Matthew Wright; Vivienne Ezzat; Eric Rosenthal; Matthew I Jones; Alessandra Frigiola; Mark D O'Neill; Steven E Williams Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 1.759